Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Tax Policy and Income Inequality in the Visegrad Countries Cover

Tax Policy and Income Inequality in the Visegrad Countries

By: Anna Moździerz  
Open Access
|Dec 2015

References

  1. 1. Blaug, M. (1994), Teoria ekonomii. Ujęcie retrospektywne. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
  2. 2. CBO. (2011). Trends in the distribution of household income between 1979 and 2007. Washington: The Congress of the United States, Congressional Budget Office.
  3. 3. CSO. (2011). Central Statistical Office (Główny Urząd Statystyczny), Europejskie badanie dochodów i warunków życia (EU-SILC) w 2010 r., Materiał na konferencję prasową w dniu 22 grudnia 2011 r., Główny Urząd Statystyczny, Departament Badań Społecznych i Warunków Życia.
  4. 4. Eurostat. (2014). Taxation trends in the European Union, Data for the EU member states, Iceland and Norway. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
  5. 5. Eurostat. (2015). Eurostat database. Retrieved from http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu
  6. 6. Galbraith, J. K. (1999). Godne społeczeństwo. Program troski o ludzkość. Warsaw: PTE, Dom Wydawniczy Bellona.
  7. 7. Hein, E. (2010). Distribution, ‘financialisation’ and the financial and economic crisis – implications for post-crisis economic policies. Berlin: Berlin School of Economics and Law and Institute for International Political Economy (IPE).
  8. 8. Kitamura, Y., & Miyazaki, T. (2014). Redistributive effects of income tax rates (Discussion Paper Series A No.610). Institute of Economic Research Hitotsubashi University.
  9. 9. Moździerz, A. (2015). Fiscal consolidation in Hungary in the years 2010–2013. Krakow: Argumenta Oeconomica Cracoviensia.
  10. 10. OECD. (2008). OECD economic surveys, Japan: Author.
  11. 11. OECD. (2011). Divided we stand: Why inequality keeps rising. Paris: OECD Publishing.10.1787/9789264119536-en
  12. 12. OECD. (2012). Income inequality and growth: The role of taxes and transfers (No. 9). Paris: OECD Publishing.
  13. 13. OECD. (2015). OECD tax database. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org
  14. 14. Owsiak, S. (2005). Finanse publiczne. Teoria i praktyka (Wydanie III zmienione). Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
  15. 15. Riihelä, M., Sullström, R., & Suoniemi, I (2008). Tax progressivity and recent evolution of the Finnish income inequality. Helsinki: Government Institute for Economic Research.
  16. 16. Smith A. (1776). An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, London: W. Strahan and T. Cadell. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oseo/instance.00043218
  17. 17. Thoresen, T. O. (2004). Reduced tax progressivity in Norway in the nineties. The effect from tax changes. International Tax and Public Finance, 11, 487–506. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:ITAX.0000033989.32569.5e
  18. 18. Verbist, G., & Figari, F. (2014). The redistributive effect and progressivity of taxes revisited: An international comparison across the European Union. (EUROMOD Working Paper No. EM 6).10.1628/001522114X684529
  19. 19. Voinea, L., & Mihaescu, F. (2009). The impact of the flat tax reform on inequality — the case of Romania. Romanian Journal of Economic Forecasting, 4, 19–41.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ngoe-2015-0022 | Journal eISSN: 2385-8052 | Journal ISSN: 0547-3101
Language: English
Page range: 12 - 18
Submitted on: Jul 1, 2015
Accepted on: Nov 1, 2015
Published on: Dec 30, 2015
Published by: University of Maribor
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2015 Anna Moździerz, published by University of Maribor
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.