Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
European territorial cohesion policies: Parallels to socialist central planning? Cover

European territorial cohesion policies: Parallels to socialist central planning?

Moravian Geographical Reports
Volume 24 (2016): Issue 1 (March 2016)
By:  and    
Open Access
|Apr 2016
References

References

  1. BÖHME, K., DOUCET, P., KOMORNICKI, T., ZAUCHA, J., ŚWIĄTEK, D. (2011): How to strengthen the territorial dimension of Europe 2020 and the EU Cohesion Policy. Warsaw.
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. BURNHAM, J. (1999): Contrasts and contradictions in French regional policy: from de Gaulle to Chirac, from the Treaty of Rome to the Treaty of Amsterdam, from central direction to local cooperation. In: Allison, M., Heathcote, O. [eds.]: Forty Years of the Fifth French Republic: Actions, Dialogues and Discourses (pp. 77–94). Bern, Peter Lang.
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. ČSÚ (2014): Regional Office Brno [online]. Czech Statistical Office website [cit. 17.07.2015] Available at: <>
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. DAVOUDI, S. (2005): Understanding Territorial Cohesion. Planning, Practice & Research, 20(4): 433–441.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  5. DINGSDALE, A. (1999): New Geographies of Post-Socialist Europe. The Geographical Journal, 165(2): 145–153.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  6. DOUCET, P. (2006): Territorial Cohesion of Tomorrow: A Path to Cooperation or Competition? European Planning Studies, 14(10): 1473–1485.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  7. EC (2004): Third report on economic and social cohesion. Luxembourg, Publications Office of the European Union.
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. EC (2007a): Fourth report on economic and social cohesion. Luxembourg, Publications Office of the European Union.
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. EC (2007b): Treaty of Lisbon: amending the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty establishing the European Community [online]. Official Journal of the European Union, C 306/1 [cit. 15.07.2015] Available at: <>
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. EC (2008): Green Paper on Territorial Cohesion: Turning territorial diversity into strength [online]. COM(2008) 616 final [cit. 16.07.2015] Available at: <>
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. ENYEDI, G. (1990): New Basis for Regional and Urban Policies in East-Central Europe. Pecs: Centre for Regional Studies of Hungarian Academy of Sciences Discussion Paper No. 9.
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. ENYEDI, G. (1996): Urbanization under socialism. In: Andrusz, G., Harloe, M., Szelenyi, I. [eds.]: Cities after socialism. Urban and regional change and conflict in post-socialist societies (pp. 100–118). Oxford, Willey-Blackwell.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  13. EU Ministers responsible for Spatial Development (2011): Territorial Agenda of the European Union 2020 [online]. Agreed on 19 May 2011, Gödöllö [cit. 17.07.2015] Available at: <>
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. EVERS, D. (2008): Reflections on Territorial Cohesion and European Spatial Planning. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 99(3): 303–315.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  15. FALUDI, A. (2004): Territorial Cohesion: Old (French) Wine in New Bottles? Urban Studies, 41(7): 1349–1365.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  16. FALUDI, A. (2009): Territorial Cohesion under the Looking Glass [online]. Synthesis paper about the history of the concept and policy background to territorial cohesion [cit. 17.07.2015] Available at: <>
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. FALUDI, A. (2013): Territorial cohesion, territorialism, territoriality, and soft planning: a critical review. Environment and Planning A, 45: 1302–1317.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  18. FINKA, M., KLUVÁNKOVÁ, T. (2015): Managing complexity of urban systems: A polycentric approach. Land Use Policy, 42: 602–608.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  19. GEORGE, S. (1996): Politics and Policy in the European Union. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. HAMILTON, I. (1976): Spatial structure in east European cities. In: French, R.A., Hamilton, I. [eds.]: The socialist city (pp. 195–262). Chichester, John Wiley & Sons.
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. HAMPL, M. (2005): Geografická organizace společnosti v České republice: Transformační procesy a jejich obecný kontext. Praha, Univerzita Karlova.
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. HOFFMAN, L. (1994): After the fall: crisis and renewal in urban planning in the Czech Republic. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 18(4): 691–702.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  23. ILLNER, M., ANDRLE, A. (1994): The Regional Aspect of Post-Communist Transformation in the Czech Republic. Czech Sociological Review, 2(1): 107–127.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  24. KRAFT, S., HALÁS, M., VANČURA, M. (2014): The delimitation of urban hinterlands based on transport flows: A case study of regional capitals in the Czech Republic. Moravian Geographical Reports, 22(1): 24–32.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  25. KUNC, J., TONEV, P., FRANTÁL, B., SZCZYRBA, Z. (2012): Retail gravity models, shopping habits and shopping centres: The case of the Brno agglomeration (a contribution to the study of daily urban systems), Sociologický časopis (Czech Sociological Review), 48(5): 879–910.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  26. MALÍK, Z., ČADA, R., LUKAŠÍK, M., MUSIL, J., ULIČNÝ, F., ZBOŘIL, M. (1968): Kritéria racionálního rozvoje osídlení. Brno, Výzkumný ústav výstavby a architektury.
    Search in Google Scholar
  27. MALÍK, Z. (1976): Urbanizace a rozvoj systému osídlení. Praha, Výzkumný ústav výstavby a architektury.
    Search in Google Scholar
  28. MALÝ, J. (2016): Impact of Polycentric Urban Systems on Intra-regional Disparities: A Micro-regional Approach, European Planning Studies, 24(1): 116–138.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  29. MAREŠ, J. (1988): Industrializace Československa – její klady a zápory. Sborník Československé geografické společnosti, 93(3): 183–198.
    Search in Google Scholar
  30. MMR (2015a): Politika územního rozvoje České republiky, ve znění Aktualizace č. 1. Brno, Institute for Spatial Development.
    Search in Google Scholar
  31. MMR (2015b): Vymezení ITI/IPRU metropolitních regionů v ČR. Internal document. Praha.
    Search in Google Scholar
  32. MOLLE, W. (2007): European Cohesion Policy. Oxon, Routledge.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  33. MULÍČEK, O., TOUŠEK, V. (2004): Changes of Brno Industry and their Urban Consequences. Bulletin of Geography, 3: 61–70.
    Search in Google Scholar
  34. MUSIL, J. (2001): Vývoj a plánování měst ve střední Evropě v období komunistických režimů – pohled historické sociologie. Sociologický časopis, 37(3): 275–296.
    Search in Google Scholar
  35. MUSIL, J. (2002): Urbanizace českých zemí a socialismus. In: Horská, P., Maur, E., Musil, J. [eds.]: Zrod velkoměsta: Urbanizace českých zemí a Evropa (pp. 237–331). Praha-Litomyšl, Paseka.
    Search in Google Scholar
  36. MUSIL, J., LINK, J. (1976): Urbanizace v socialistických zemích ve světle mezinárodních srovnání. In: Musil, J. [eds.]: Otázky urbanizace. Sborník výzkumných prací kabinetu sociologie (pp. 9–30). Praha, Výzkumný ústav výstavby a architektury.
    Search in Google Scholar
  37. NEDOVIC-BUDIC, Z. (2001): Adjustment of planning practice to the new eastern and central European context. Journal of the American Planning Association, 67(1): 38–52.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  38. PALLA, V., MÁČEL, O., MALÍK, Z., LUKAŠÍK, M., ULIČNÝ, F., ČADA, R. (1962): Základní otázky osídlení v ČSSR. Brno, Výzkumný ústav výstavby a architektury.
    Search in Google Scholar
  39. RYŠAVÝ, Z., DVOŘÁK, B., ŠIPLER, V. (1992): Posouzení dřívějších koncepcí územního rozvoje České republiky. Praha, Výzkumný ústav výstavby a architektury.
    Search in Google Scholar
  40. SAUTER, W. (2008): Services of General Economic Interest and Universal Service in EU Law [online]. TILEC Discussion Paper No. 2008-017. European Law Review [cit. 13.07.2015] Available at: <>
    Search in Google Scholar
  41. SCHÖN, P. (2005): Territorial Cohesion in Europe? Planning Theory & Practice, 6(3): 389–400.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  42. SERVILLO, L. (2010): Territorial Cohesion Discourses: Hegemonic Strategic Concepts in European Spatial Planning. Planning Theory & Practice, 11(3): 397–416.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  43. SOJA, E. (1980): The socio-spatial dialectic. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 70(2): 207–225.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  44. SOJA, E. (2009): The city and spatial justice [online]. Justice Spatiale/Spatial Justice 1 [cit. 13.07.2015] Available at:
    Search in Google Scholar
  45. SOKOL, M. (2001): Central and Eastern Europe a Decade After the Fall of State-socialism: Regional Dimensions of Transition Processes. Regional Studies, 35(7): 645–655.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  46. SULKIEWICZ, M., ANDRLE, A., ŠTĚPÁNEK, M. (1981): Koncepce urbanizace a vývoje osídlení krajů ČSR: Koncepce sídelního systému. Praha, Terplan.
    Search in Google Scholar
  47. SZCZEPAŃSKI, J., FURDYNA, A. (1977): Early Stages of Socialist Industrialization and Changes in Social Class Structure. International Journal of Sociology, 7(3/4): 11–36.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  48. SZELENYI, I. (1996): Cities under socialism – and after. In: Andrusz, G., Harloe, M., Szelenyi, I. [eds.]: Cities after socialism. Urban and regional change and conflict in post-socialist societies (pp. 286–336). Oxford, Willey-Blackwell.
    Search in Google Scholar
  49. TERPLAN (1981): Koncepce sídelního skeletu: Výchozí podklady. Praha.
    Search in Google Scholar
  50. TERPLAN (1985): Brněnská sídelní regionální aglomerace. Územní plán VÚC. Praha.
    Search in Google Scholar
  51. UAD STUDIO (2014): Územní studie sídelní struktury Jihomoravského kraje. Brno.
    Search in Google Scholar
  52. USB (2015): Zásady územního rozvoje Jihomoravského kraje. In preparation. Brno.
    Search in Google Scholar
  53. VENERI, P., BURGALASSI, D. (2012): Questioning polycentric development and its effects: Issues of definition and measurement for the Italian NUTS 2 Regions. European Planning Studies, 20(6): 1017–1037.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  54. VÚVA (1979): Zásady a pravidla územního plánování. Výzkumný ústav výstavby a architektury, Urbanistické pracoviště Brno.
    Search in Google Scholar
  55. WATERHOUT, B. (2007): Territorial Cohesion: The Underlying Discourses. In: Faludi, A. [ed.]: Territorial Cohesion and the European Model of Society (pp. 37–59). Cambridge (MA), Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
    Search in Google Scholar
  56. WU, F. (2003): Transitional Cities. Commentary. Environment and Planning A, 35: 1331–1338.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/mgr-2016-0002 | Journal eISSN: 2199-6202 (formerly 1210-8812) | Journal ISSN: 1210-8812
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 14 - 26
Submitted on: Oct 6, 2015
Accepted on: Jan 28, 2016
Published on: Apr 9, 2016
Published by: Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Geonics
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
territorial cohesion,
socialist central planning,
settlement systems,
European Union,
Czech Republic
Related subjects:
Geosciences,
Geography

© 2016 Jiří Malý, Ondřej Mulíček, published by Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Geonics
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Volume 24 (2016): Issue 1 (March 2016)
Previous article
Next article