Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Effect of Gum Arabic on Stallion Sperm Survival During Cold Storage and Post Freezing Cover

Effect of Gum Arabic on Stallion Sperm Survival During Cold Storage and Post Freezing

Open Access
|Mar 2018

References

  1. 1. Wall, R.J., Foote, R.H. (1999). Fertility of bull sperm frozen and stored in clarified egg yolk-Tris-glycerol extender. J Dairy Sci. 82, 817-21. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(99)75301-410.3168/jds.S0022-0302(99)75301-4
  2. 2. Diégo, M., Djemil B., Lamia A., Alberto N., Sandrine D., Daniel T. (2013). Preliminary results: the advantages of low-density lipoproteins for the cryopreservation of equine semen. J Equine Vet Sci. 33, 1068-1075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jevs.2013.04.00410.1016/j.jevs.2013.04.004
  3. 3. Kampshmidt, R.F., Mayer, D.T., Herman, H.A. (1953). Lipid and lipoprotein constituents of egg yolk in the resistance and storage of bull spermatozoa. J Dairy Sci. 36, 733-742. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(53)91553-710.3168/jds.S0022-0302(53)91553-7
  4. 4. Van Wagtendonk-de Leeuw, A.M., Haring, R.M., Kaal-Lansbergen, L.M.T.E., Den Daas, J.H.G. (2000). Fertility results using bovine semen cryopreserved with extenders based on egg yolk and soybean extract. Theriogenology 54, 57-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(00)00324-110.1016/S0093-691X(00)00324-1
  5. 5. Hirai, M., Cerbito, W.A., Wijayagunawardane, M.P.B., Braun, J., Leidl, W., Ohosak, Q.K., Matsuzawa, T., Miyazawa, K., Sato, K. (1997). The effect of viscosity of semen diluents on motility of bull spermatozoa. Theriogenology 47, 1463-1478. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(97)00136-210.1016/S0093-691X(97)00136-2
  6. 6. Vasan, S.S. (2011). Semen analysis and sperm function tests: how much to test? Indian J Urol. 27, 41-48. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-1591.78424 PMid:21716889 PMCid:PMC311458710.4103/0970-1591.78424PMid:21716889PMCid:PMC3114587
  7. 7. Mortimer, S.T., van der Horst, G., Mortimer, D. (2015). The future of computeraided sperm analysis. Asian J Androl. 17, 545–553. https://doi.org/10.4103/1008-682X.154312 PMid:25926614 PMCid:PMC449204310.4103/1008-682X.154312PMid:25926614PMCid:PMC4492043
  8. 8. Turner, T.T., Reich, G.W. (1985). Cauda epididymidal sperm motility: A comparison among five species. Biol Reprod. 32, 120-128. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod32.1.120 PMid:397100610.1095/biolreprod32.1.120
  9. 9. Mortimer, D., Christopher, L.R., Barratt L., Bjorndahl, C., de Jager, A., Jequier, M., Charles, H.M. (2013). What should it take to describe a substance or product as ‘sperm-safe’. Hum Reprod Update. 19 (Suppl 1): i1-45. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmt008 PMid:2355227110.1093/humupd/dmt008PMid:23552271
  10. 10. Nishikawa, Y. (1975). Studies on the preservation of raw and frozen semen. J Reprod Fertil. 23, 99-104.
  11. 11. Neild, D.M., Chaves, M.G., Flores, M., Mora, N., Beconi, M., Agüero, A. (1999). Hypoosmotic test in equine spermatozoa. Theriogenology 51(4): 721-727. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(99)00021-710.1016/S0093-691X(99)00021-7
  12. 12. Hafez, E.S.E. (1993). Reproduction in Farm Animals. In: E.S.E.Hafez, Lea and Febiger (Eds.), (pp. 330-343). Philadelphia
  13. 13. Evans, G., Maxwell, W.M.C. (1987). Handling and examination semen. In: Maxwell, W.M.C. (Ed.), Salamon’s Artificial Insemination of Sheep and Goat. (pp. 93-106). Butterworths, Sydney.
  14. 14. Petrie, A., Watson, P. (2002). Statistics for veterinary and animal science. Chapter 8 and 11. (pp. 90-138). Blackwell science
  15. 15. Hunter, R.H.F., Coy, P., Gadea, J., Rath, D. (2011). Considerations of viscosity in the preliminaries to mammalian fertilization. J Assist Reprod Genet. 28, 191–197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-010-9531-3 PMid:21234667 PMCid:PMC308265110.1007/s10815-010-9531-3PMid:21234667PMCid:PMC3082651
  16. 16. Chian, R., Quinn, P. (2010). Cryoprotectant; In: Fertility cryopreservation. (pp. 24-38). Cambridge University Press.
  17. 17. Hyun, N., Chandsawangbhuwana, C., Zhu, Q., Shi, L.Z., Yang-Wong, C., Berns, M.W. (2012). Effects of viscosity on sperm motility studied with optical tweezers. J Biomed Opt. 17, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.17.2.025005 PMid:2246303110.1117/1.JBO.17.2.025005PMid:22463031
  18. 18. Suárez, S.S., Dai, X. (1992). Hyperactivation enhances mouse sperm capacity for penetrating viscoelastic media. Biol Reprod. 46, 686-691. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod46.4.686 PMid:157626710.1095/biolreprod46.4.686PMid:1576267
  19. 19. Amann, R.P., Graham, J.K. (1993). Spermatozoa functional. In: Mckinnon, A.O.; Voss, J.L. (Eds.) Equine reproduction. 1.ed. (pp. 715-745). Philadelphia: Lea and Febiger
  20. 20. Januskauskas, A., Rodriguez-Martinez, H. (1995). Assessment of sperm viability by measurement of ATP, membrane integrity and motility in frozen/thawed bull semen. Acta Vet Scandnavica. 36, 571-574.10.1186/BF03547671
  21. 21. Kirkman-Brown, J.C., Smith, D.J. (2011). Sperm motility: Is viscosity fundamental to progress? Mol Hum Reprod. 17, 539–544. https://doi.org/10.1093/molehr/gar043 PMid:2165375110.1093/molehr/gar043PMid:21653751
  22. 22. Woolley, D.M. (2003). Motility of spermatozoa at surfaces. Reproduction 126, 259–270. https://doi.org/10.1530/rep.0.1260259 PMid:1288728210.1530/rep.0.1260259PMid:12887282
  23. 23. Ford, W.C.L. (2006). Glycolysis and sperm motility does a spoonful of sugar help the flagellum go round. Hum Reprod Update. 112, 269 – 274. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmi053 PMid:1640745310.1093/humupd/dmi053PMid:16407453
  24. 24. Storey, B.T. (2008). Mammalian spermmetabolism oxygen and sugar, friend and foe. Int J Dev Biol. 52, 427–437. https://doi.org/10.1387/ijdb.072522bs PMid:1864925510.1387/ijdb.072522bsPMid:18649255
  25. 25. Gadelha, H., Gaffney, E.A., Smith, D.J., Kirkman-Brown J.C. (2010). Non-linear instability in flagellar dynamics:A novel modulation mechanism in sperm migration? J R Soc Interface. 7, 1689. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2010.0136 PMid:20462879 PMCid:PMC298826510.1098/rsif.2010.0136PMid:20462879PMCid:PMC2988265
  26. 26. Province, C.A., Amann, R.P., Pickett, B.W., Squires, EL. (1984). Extenders for preservation of canine and equine spermatozoa at 5 °C. Theriogenology 22, 409-415. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(84)90461-810.1016/0093-691X(84)90461-8
  27. 27. Bruemmer, J.E., Coy, R.C., Squires, E.L., Graham, J.K. (2002). Effect of pyruvate on the function of stallion spermatozoa stored for up to 48 hours. J Anim Sci. 80, 12-18. https://doi.org/10.2527/2002.80112x10.2527/2002.80112x11831508
  28. 28. Rota, A., Furzi, C., Panzani, D., Camillo, F. (2004). Studies on motility and fertility of cooled stallion spermatozoa. Reprod Domest Anim. 39, 103-109. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.2004.00488.x PMid:1506599210.1111/j.1439-0531.2004.00488.xPMid:15065992
  29. 29. Rota, A., Magelli, C., Panzani, D., Camillo, F. (2008). Effect of extender, centrifugation and removal of seminal plasma on cooled-preserved Amiata donkey spermatozoa. Theriogenology 69, 176-185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2007.09.003 PMid:1794534010.1016/j.theriogenology.2007.09.003PMid:17945340
  30. 30. Jeyendran, R.S., Van der Ven, H.H., Perez-Pelaez, M., Crabo, B.G., Zaneveld, L.J. (1984). Development of an assay to assess the functional integrity of human sperm membrane and its relationship to other characteristics. J Reprod Fertil. 70, 219-228. https://doi.org/10.1530/jrf.0.0700219 PMid:669414010.1530/jrf.0.0700219PMid:6694140
Language: English
Page range: 21 - 31
Submitted on: Apr 8, 2016
Accepted on: Sep 29, 2017
Published on: Mar 15, 2018
Published by: Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2018 Mohamed Ali, Musa M. Musa, Sulaiman Alfadul, K. Al-Sobayel, published by Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.