Have a personal or library account? Click to login

The Influence of Interspecies Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer on Epigenetic Enzymes Transcription in Early Embryos

Open Access
|Oct 2016

References

  1. 1. Bird, A. (2002). DNA methylation patterns and epigenetic memory. Genes and Development 16, 6-21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.947102 PMid:1178244010.1101/gad.947102
  2. 2. Li, E. (2002). Chromatin modification and epigenetic reprogramming in mammalian development. Nature Reviews Genetics 3, 662–673. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrg887 PMid:1220914110.1038/nrg887
  3. 3. Fulka, H., St John, J.C., Fulka, J., Hozak, P. (2008). Chromatin in early mammalian embryos: achieving the pluripotent state. Differentiation 76, 3-14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1432-0436.2007.00247.x PMid:1809322610.1111/j.1432-0436.2007.00247.x
  4. 4. Dean, W., Santos, F., Stojkovic, M., Zakhartchenko, V., Walter, J., Wolf, E., Reik, W. (2001). Conservation of methylatio reprogramming in mammalian development: aberrant reprogramming in cloned embryos. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 98, 13734-13738. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.241522698 PMid:11717434 PMCid:PMC6111010.1073/pnas.241522698
  5. 5. Deshmukh, R.S., Østrup, O., Østrup, E., Vejlsted, M., Niemann, H., Lucas-Hahn, A., Petersen, B., Li, J., Callesen, H., Hyttel, P. (2011). DNA methylation in porcine preimplantation embryos developed in vivo and produced by in vitro fertilization, parthenogenetic activation and somatic cell nuclear transfer. Epigenetics 6 (2): 177-187. http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/epi.6.2.13519 PMid:2093545410.4161/epi.6.2.13519
  6. 6. Seisenberger, S., Peat, J.R., Hore, T.A., Santos, F., Dean, W., Reik, W. (2013). Reprogramming DNA methylation in the mammalian life cycle: building and breaking epigenetic barriers. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 368(1609): 20110330. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2011.0330 PMid:23166394 PMCid:PMC353935910.1098/rstb.2011.0330
  7. 7. Bestor, T. H. (2000). The DNA methyltransferases of mammals. Human Molecular Genetics 9, 2395-2402. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/hmg/9.16.2395 PMid:1100579410.1093/hmg/9.16.2395
  8. 8. Chen, T., Li, E. (2004). Structure and function of eukaryotic DNA methyltransferases. Current Topics in Developmental Biology 60, 55-89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0070-2153(04)60003-210.1016/S0070-2153(04)60003-2
  9. 9. Howell, C. Y., Bestor, T. H., Ding, F. (2001). Genomic imprinting disrupted by a maternal effect mutation in the Dnmt1 gene. Cell 104, 829–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00280-X10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00280-X
  10. 10. Smallwood, S. A., Kelsey, G. (2012). De novo DNA methylation: a germ cell perspective. Trends in Genetics 28 (1): 33-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tig.2011.09.004 PMid:2201933710.1016/j.tig.2011.09.00422019337
  11. 11. Holker, M., Petersen, B., Hassel, P. (2005). Duration of in vitro maturation of recipient oocytes affects blastocyst development of cloned porcine embryos. Cloning and Stem Cells 7, 35–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/clo.2005.7.35 PMid:1599611610.1089/clo.2005.7.35
  12. 12. Kang, Y.K., Koo, D.B., Park, J.S., Choi, Y.H., Chung, A.S., Lee, K.K., Han, Y.M. (2001). Aberrant methylation of donor genome in cloned bovine embryos. Nature Genetics 28, 173–177. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/88903 PMid:1138126710.1038/88903
  13. 13. Zhao, J., Whyte, J., Prather, R.S. (2010). Effect of epigenetic regulation during swine embryogenesis and on cloning by nuclear transfer. Cell and Tissue Research 341, 13-21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00441-010-1000-x PMid:2056360210.1007/s00441-010-1000-x
  14. 14. Denomme, M.M., Mann, M.R.W. (2013). Maternal control of genomic imprint maintenance. Reproductive Biomedicine Online 27 (6): 629-636. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.06.004 PMid:2412594610.1016/j.rbmo.2013.06.004
  15. 15. Sawai, K., Takahashi, M., Moriyasu, S., Hirayama, H., Minamihashi, A., Hashizume, T., Onoe, S. (2010). Changes in the DNA methylation status of bovine embryos from the blastocyst to elongated stage derived from somatic cell nuclear transfer. Cellular Reprogramming 12 (1): 15-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/clo.2009.0039 PMid:1978069910.1089/clo.2009.0039
  16. 16. Okano, M., Bell, D., Haber, D., Li, E. (1999). DNA methyltransferases Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b are essential for de novo methylation and mammalian development. Cell 99, 247-257. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81656-610.1016/S0092-8674(00)81656-6
  17. 17. Vassena, R., Dee Schramm, R., Latham, K. E. (2005). Species-dependent expression patterns of DNA methyltransferase genes in mammalian oocytes and preomplantation embryos. Molecular Reproduction and Development 72, 430-436. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrd.20375 PMid:1615595910.1002/mrd.20375
  18. 18. Bortvin, A., Eggan, K., Skaletsky, H., Akutsu, H., Berry, D. L., Yanagimachi, R., Page, D. C., Jaenisch, R. (2003). Incomplete reactivation of Oct4 related genes in mouse embryos cloned from somatic nuclei. Development 130, 1673–1680. http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/dev.00366 PMid:1262099010.1242/dev.00366
  19. 19. Golding, M. C., Westhusin, M. E. (2003). Analysis of DNA (cytosine 5) methyltransferase mRNA sequence and expression in bovine preimplantation embryos, fetal and adult tissues. Gene Expression Patterns 3, 551–558. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1567-133X(03)00121-210.1016/S1567-133X(03)00121-2
  20. 20. Wrenzycki, C., Herrmann, D., Keskintepe, L., Martins, A. Jr., Sirisathien, S., Brackett, B., Niemann, H. (2001). Effects of culture system and protein supplementation on mRNA expression in preimplantation bovine embryos. Human Reproduction 16, 893-901. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/16.5.893 PMid:1133163510.1093/humrep/16.5.89311331635
  21. 21. Zhu, H., Craig, J. A., Dyce, P. W., Sunnen, N., Li, J. (2004). Embryos derived from porcine skin-derived stem cells exhibit enhanced preimplantation development. Biology of Reproduction 71, 1890–1897. http://dx.doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.104.032227 PMid:1530655510.1095/biolreprod.104.03222715306555
  22. 22. Kumar, B. M., Jin, H. F., Kim, J. G., Ock, S. A., Hong, Y., Balasubramanian, S., Choe, S. Y., Rho, G. J. (2007). Differential gene expression patterns in porcine nuclear transfer embryos reconstructed with fetal fibroblasts and mesenchymal stem cells. Developmental Dynamics 236 (2): 435-446. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/dvdy.21042 PMid:1719123410.1002/dvdy.2104217191234
  23. 23. Østrup, O., Strejcek, F., Petrovicova, I., Hahn, A. L., Morovic, M., Lemme, E., Petersen, B., Laurincikova, N., Niemann, H., Laurincik, J., Hyttel, P. (2011). Role of ooplasm in nuclear and nucleolar remodeling of intergeneric somatic cell nuclear transfer embryos during the first cell cycle. Cellular Reprogramming 13 (2): 145-155. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/cell.2010.0061 PMid:2147369110.1089/cell.2010.006121473691
  24. 24. Do, V.H., Taylor-Robinson, A.W. (2014). Somatic cell nuclear transfer in mammals: Reprogramming mechanism and factors affecting success. Cloning and Transgenesis 3 (3): 1-5.
Language: English
Page range: 209 - 217
Submitted on: Mar 21, 2016
Accepted on: Jun 8, 2016
Published on: Oct 15, 2016
Published by: Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 times per year

© 2016 Martin Morovic, Matej Murin, Frantisek Strejcek, Michal Benc, Dusan Paál, Olga Østrup, Heiner Niemann, Lazo Pendovski, Jozef Laurincik, published by Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.