References
- Benedict, R. (1942). Race and Racism. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
- Bohr, N. (1949). Discussion with Einstein on epistemological problems in atomic physics. In P. A. Schilpp (Ed.), Albert Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist. New York: Tudor Publishing Company, pp. 199–241.
- Bohr, N. (1955). Science and the unity of knowledge. In L. Leary (ed.). Unity of Knowledge. New York: Doubleday, pp. 47–62.
- Bohr, N. (1999). Collected Works. Complementarity Beyond Physics (1928–1962). Vol. 10. Ed. D. Favrholdt. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
- Crivellato, E. and Ribatti, D. (2008). Body symmetry and asymmetry in early Greek anatomical reasoning. Clinical Anatomy, 21, 279–282.
- Elkana, Y. (1982). The myth of simplicity. In G. Holton and Y. Elkana (eds.). Albert Einstein: Historical and Cultural Perspectives. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 205–251.
- Faucheux, C. and Moscovici, S. (1962). Remarques critiques sur la « question microsociale». Arguments, 6, 19–27.
- Galam, S. and Moscovici, S. (1991). Towards a theory of collective phenomena: consensus and attitude changes in group. European Journal of Social Psychology, 21, 49–74.
- Galam, S. and Moscovici, S. (1994). Towards a theory of collective phenomena. II: Conformity and power. European Journal of Social Psychology, 24, 481–495.
- Galam, S. and Moscovici, S. (1995). Towards a theory of collective phenomena: III: Conflicts and forms of power. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 217–229.
- Gilligan, C. (1982). In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
- Holton, G. (1973). Introduction to Concepts and Theories in Physical Science. Second Edition. Reading Mass.: Addison-Wesley.
- Holton, G. (1974). Thematic Origins of Scientific Thought. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
- Holton, G. (1975). On the Role of Themata in Scientific Thought. Science, 188, (4186), 328–334.
- Holton, G. (1978). The Scientific Imagination. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Husserl, E. (1913/1962). Ideas : General Introduction to Pure Phenomenology, Trsl. W. R. Boyce Gibson. London and New York: Collier, Macmillan.
- Ichheiser, G. (1940). The image of the other man: A study in social psychology. Sociometry, 111, 277–291.
- Ichheiser, G. (1949). Misunderstandings in human relations: A study in false social perceptions. Supplement to the September issue of the American Journal of Sociology, Chicago: University Press.
- Ichheiser, G. (1951). Misunderstandings in international relations. American Sociological Review, 16, 311–316.
- Jesuino, J.C. (2008). Linking science to common sense. Journal for the Theory of Social Representations, 38, 393–409.
- Joffe, H. (2011). Public apprehension of emerging infectious diseases: are changes afoot? Public Understanding of Science, 20, 446–460.
- Joffe, H. and Haarhoff, G. (2002). Representations of far-flung illnesses: the case of Ebola in Britain. Social Science & Medicine, 54, 955–696.
- Joffe, H., Rossetto, T., Solberg, C., and O’Connor, C. (2013). Social Representations of Earthquakes: A Study of People Living in Three Highly Seismic Areas. Earthquake Spectra, 29, 367–397.
- Joffe, H., Washer, P., and Solberg, C. (2011). Public engagement with emerging infectious disease: The case of MRSA in Britain. Psychology & Health, 26 (667–683).
- Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
- Lindenberg, S. (1987). Common sense and social structure: a sociological view, in F. van Holthoon and D. R. Olson (eds). Common Sense: Foundation for Social Science. Lanham and New York: University Press of America, pp. 199–215.
- Lloyd, G.E.R. (1966). Polarity and Analogy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Marková, I. (2003). Dialogicality and Social Representations: The Dynamics of Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Marková, I. (2012). Epistemologia delle rappresentazioni sociall. Implicazioni per la ricerca empirica. In I. Galli (ed.). Cinquant’Anni di Rappresentazioni Sociali. Milano: Edizioni Unicopli, pp. 45–57.
- Marková, I. (2014). Complementarity as an epistemology of life, in B. Wagoner, N. Chaudhary and P. Hviid (eds.). Cultural Psychology and Its Future: Complementarity in a New Key. Charlotte: Information Age Publishing, pp. 33–50.
- Marková, I. (2016). The Dialogical Mind: Common Sense and Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Marková, I., Wilkie, P.A., Naji, S., and Forbes, C. (1990). Self- and other-awareness of the risk of HIV/AIDS in people with haemophilia and implications for behavioural change, Social Science and Medicine, 31, 73–79.
- Marková, I., McKee, K., Power, K. and Moodie, E. (1995). The self, the other and perceived risk: Lay representations of HIV/AIDS in Scottish prisons. In Marková, I. and Farr, R.M. (eds.). Representations of Health, Illness and Handicap. New York: Harwood, pp 111–129.
- Moloney, G., Hall, R., and Walker, I. (2005). Social representations and themata: The construction and functioning of social knowledge about donation and transplantation. British Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 415–441.
- Moloney, G., Williams, J. and Blair, D. (2012). Cognitive Polyphasia, Themata and Blood Donation: Between or Within Representation. Papers on Social Representations, 21, 4.1–4.12
- Moloney G., Walker, I., and Charlton, T. (2013). Social Understandings of Organ donation: Implications for practice. In M. A. Lauri (ed.) Organ Donation and Transplantation: An Interdisciplinary Approach. Hauppauge NY: Nova Science Publishers, pp. 141–150.
- Moloney, G., Gamble, M., Hayman, K. and Smith, G. (2015). Without anchor: Themata and blood donation, Papers on Social Representations, 24, 2, 2.1–2.21.
- Moscovici, S. (1961). La Psychanalyse: son image et son public. [Psychoanalysis: its image and its public]. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
- Moscovici, S. (1984). The phenomenon of social representations. In R.M. Farr and S. Moscovici (eds.). Social Representations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3–69.
- Moscovici, S. (1993). Introductory Address. Papers on Social Representations, 2, 160–170.
- Moscovici, S. (2011). An essay on social representations and ethnic minorities. Social Science Information, 50, 442–461.
- Moscovici, S. and Hewstone, M. (1983). Social representations and social explanations: From the ‘naïve’ to the ‘amateur’ scientist’, in M. Hewstone (ed.). Attribution Theory. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, pp. 98–125.
- Moscovici, S. and Vignaux, G. (1994/2000). ‘Le Concept de Thêmata’, in C. Guimelli, Structures et transformations des représentations sociales [Structures and transformations of social representations]. Neuchatel: Delachaux et Niestlé, pp. 25–72. Reprinted in Moscovici, S. Social Representations. Ed. G. Duveen. London: Polity Press, pp. 156–183.
- Moodie, E., Marková, I. and Plichtová, J. (1995). Lay representations of democracy: A study in two cultures, Culture & Psychology, 1: 423–454.
- Nambu, Y. (2008) Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking in Particle Physics: a Case of Cross-Fertilization. Nobel Prize lecture (http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates/2008/nambu-slides.pdf.).
- Ricoeur, P. (1990/1992). Oneself as Another. Trsl. K. Blamey. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
- Rosenfeld, L. (1963/1979). Niels Bohr’s contribution to epistemology. In Selected Papers of Leon Rosenfeld. Ed. R. S. Cohen and J. J. Stachel. Dordrecht and London: D. Reidel (1979), pp. 522–535.
- Smith, N. and Joffe, H. (2013). How the public engages with global warming: a social representations approach. Public Understanding of Science, 22, 16–32.
- Smith, N., O’Connor, C. and Joffe, H. (2015). Social representations of threatening phenomena: the self-other thema and identity protection. Papers on Social Representations, 24, 2, 1.1–1.23.
- Vico, G. (1744/1948). The New Science of Giambattista Vico. Trsl. T. G. Bergin and M. H. Fisch. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
- Weyl, H. (1952). Symmetry. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
- Whitehead, A. N. (1929/1979). Process and Reality. Ed. D. R. Griffin and D. W. Sherburne. New York and London: Free Press.