Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Hypothetical, not Fictional Worlds Cover
By: Friedel Weinert  
Open Access
|Jan 2017

References

  1. Bailer-Jones, D., 2003, When Models Represent. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 17, 59–74.10.1080/02698590305238
  2. Bailer-Jones, D., 2009, Scientific Models in Philosophy of Science. Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh Press.10.2307/j.ctt5vkdnq
  3. Born, M., 1949, Natural Philosophy of Cause and Chance. Oxford, Clarendon.
  4. Fine, A., 1993, Fictionalism Midwest Studies in Philosophy, XVIII, 1–18.10.1111/j.1475-4975.1993.tb00254.x
  5. Giere, R., 2004, How Models are used to represent Reality. Philosophy of Science, 71, 742–752.10.1086/425063
  6. Giere, R., 2008, Why Models should not be regarded as Works of Fiction. In M. Suárez (ed.): Fiction in Science, London, Routledge, 2009, 248–258.
  7. Godfrey-Smith, P., 2006, The strategy of model-based science. Biology and Philosophy, 21, 725–740.10.1007/s10539-006-9054-6
  8. Godfrey-Smith, P., 2009, Models and Fictions in Science. Philosophical Studies, 143, 101–116.10.1007/s11098-008-9313-2
  9. Frigg, R., 2010, Fiction and Scientific Representation. In Roman Frigg and Matthew Hunter (eds.): Beyond Mimesis and Nominalism: Representation in Art and Science, Berlin/New York, Springer 2010, 97–138.10.1007/978-90-481-3851-7_6
  10. Frigg. R., S. Bradley, H. Du and Leonard A. Smith, 2014, Laplace’s Demon and the Adventures of His Apprentices. Philosophy of Science, 81(1), 31–59.10.1086/674416
  11. Heilbron, J. L., 1981, Historical Studies in the Theory of Atomic Structure. New York, Arno Press.
  12. Norton, J., 1996, Are Thought Experiments Just What You Thought? Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 26, 333–366.10.1080/00455091.1996.10717457
  13. Pais, A., 1986, Inward Bound. Oxford, Clarendon Press.
  14. Rutherford, E., 1911, The Scattering of a and b Particles by Matter and the Structure of the Atom. Philosophical Magazine, XXI, 669–88.10.1080/14786440508637080
  15. Suárez, M., 2003, Scientific Representation: Against similarity and isomorphism. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 17(3), 225–244.10.1080/0269859032000169442
  16. Suárez, M., 2004, An inferential conception of scientific representation. Philosophy of Science, 71, 767–779.10.1086/421415
  17. Suárez, M., 2010, Scientific Representation. Philosophy Compass, 5(1), 91–101.10.1111/j.1747-9991.2009.00261.x
  18. Weinert, F., 1999, Theories, Models and Constraints. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 30/2, 303–33310.1016/S0039-3681(98)00051-X
  19. Weinert, F., 2000, The Construction of Atom Models: Eliminative Inductivism and its Relation to Falsificationism. Foundations of Science, 5, 491–53110.1023/A:1011315710119
  20. Weinert, F., 2006, Einstein and the Representation of Reality. Facta Philosophica, 8, 229–5210.3726/93522_229
  21. Weinert, F., 2016, The Demons of Science. What they tell us and do not tells us about our world. Springer International Publishing Switzerland.10.1007/978-3-319-31708-3
Language: English
Page range: 110 - 136
Published on: Jan 25, 2017
Published by: Sciendo
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 3 issues per year

© 2017 Friedel Weinert, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.