Modern Instruments for Evidence-Gathering in Criminal Matters Across EU
References
- [1] Stanin, M. The Contemporary Countries in the Conditions of Migratory Multiculturalism. In: „Economic, Social and Administrative Approaches to the Knowledge - based Organization. Conference Proceedings 2“, ISBN 978-973-153-274-5, Land Forces Academy ”Nicolae Balchesku", Sibiu, Romania, 2017, pp. 201- 205.
- [2] Кръстева, Н., В. Кръстев. Интеграция на лицата с бежански или хуманитарен статут в България чрез образование. Сб. „Влияние на миграционните процеси върху геополитиката, икономиката и публичната сфера“, УИ „Н. Рилски“, Благоевград, ISBN 978-954-00-0083-1, 2016, с. 67- 79.
- [3] Marin, N. Disproportionate Migration Pressure as a Challenge for the National Security of the Republic of Bulgaria. In: “Economic, Social and Administrative Approaches to the Knowledge - based Organization. Conference Proceedings 2”, Land Forces Academy ”Nicolae Balchesku", Sibiu, Romania, 2016, p. 134.
- [4] Signed in Strasbourg, 20.04.1959.
- [5] Girginov, A., Voynova, R. Bulgarian-English Handbook on International Judicial Cooperation in Criminal Matters, Sofia, Нова звезда, София, ISBN 978-619-198-068-0, 2017.
- [6] OJ L 239, 22.9.2000, pp. 19- 62.
- [7] Funaut, C. The Schengen Treaties and European Police Co-operation. In: European Journal of Crime Criminal Law and Criminal Justice, Vol. 1, № 1 (1993), p. 37.
- [8] OJ C 197, 12.7.2000, pp. 3- 23.
- [9] The mutual recognition principle was developed in several EU working programmes - the Programme of measures to implement the principle of mutual recognition of decisions in criminal matters of 2000, the Hague Programme of 2004 and the Stockholm Programme of 2009. It is stipulated in Article 82 (1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU, OJ C 83/47 of 30.3.2010.
- [10] Klimek, L. Free Movement of Evidence in Criminal Matters in the EU. In: The Lawyer Quarterly 4 (2012), pp. 250- 290.
- [11] OJ L 190, 18.7.2002, p.1.
- [12] OJ L 196, 2.8.2003, pp. 45- 55.
- [13] OJ L 350, 30.12.2008, pp.72 - 92. No longer in force. Date of end of validity: 21.02.2016.
- [14] Murphy, Cian C. The European Evidence Warrant: Mutual Recognition and Mutual (Dis)Trust?, Social Science Research Network, Issue 3 (2010), pp.1- 25.
- [15] OJ L 130, 1.5.2014, pp. 1- 36.
- [16] By April 2018, 20 Member States, including the United Kingdom, have transposed the Directive 2014/41/EU and the other 5 Member States are in the process of transposition.
- [17] Winter, B. L. European investigation order for obtaining evidence in the criminal proceedings, In: ZIS 9/2010, pp. 580- 589.
- [18] Farries, A. The European Investigation Order: stepping forward with care. In: New Journal of European Criminal Law, Issue 1 (2010), pp. 425- 432.
- [19] Raimundas, J., Zajančkauskienė J. Movement of Evidence in the European Union: Challenges for the European Investigation Order, In: Baltic Journal of Law & Politics, Volume 9, Issue 2 (2016), pp. 56- 84.
- [20] Belfiore, R. The European Investigation Order in Criminal Matters: Developments in Evidence-gathering across the EU. In: European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice, Issue 17 (2009), pp. 1- 22.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/kbo-2018-0098 | Journal eISSN: 2451-3113
Language: English
Page range: 248 - 254
Published on: Jul 26, 2018
Published by: Nicolae Balcescu Land Forces Academy
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 3 times per year
Keywords:
Related subjects:
© 2018 Ralitsa Voynova, published by Nicolae Balcescu Land Forces Academy
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.