Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Empirical Study Regarding the Influence of Communication Upon the Purchasing Decision Cover

Empirical Study Regarding the Influence of Communication Upon the Purchasing Decision

Open Access
|Jul 2017

References

  1. [1] Khaled, I., A-R., A-J. (2008) Consumer Behavior. An analytical Study of The Saudi Family’s Purchase Decisions. Available at: https://d1.islamhouse.com/data/en/ih_books/single/en_Consumer_Behavior.pdf, (accessed on March, 17th, 2017)
  2. [2] Schiffman, L., Kanuk, L. (2007) Consumer Behavior, 9th Edition. New Jeresy: Pearson.
  3. [3] Payne, W., J., Bettman, J. R., Johnson, E. J. (1993). The adaptive decision maker. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139173933
  4. [4] Tanner, J.-F., Jr., Raymond, M.-A. (2010). Principles of Marketing, New York, Flat World Knowledge, Inc.
  5. [5] Shuyuan, M. H., Paul B. L., Merrill W., Yanyun Y., Jonathan M. H. (2017). “Gender deception in asynchronous online communication: A path analysis”, Information Processing & Management, 53/(1), January, 2017, pp. 21-41.
  6. [6] Robert, E. T. (1984). The definition and function of deceptive communication in a labormanagement session, Doctoral Thesis, Arizona: The University of Arizona.
  7. [7] Roman, M. S., Timothy, W. S. (2017). “Deception and reception: The behavior of information providers and users”, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Vol.137, May 2017, pp.445-45. Available at: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167268117300823, (accessed on April, 25th, 2017)
  8. [8] Paul, E., Wallace, V. F., Klaus, R. S. (1976). “Body movement and voice pitch in deceptive interaction”, Semiotica 16/(1), pp.23-27. Available at: https://www.paulekman.com/wpcontent/uploads/2013/07/Body-Movement-And-Violence-Pitch-In-Deceptive-Interaction.pdf (accessed on April, 20th, 2017).
  9. [9] Shuyuan, M. H., Paul B. L., Merrill W., Yanyun Y., Jonathan M. H. (2017). “Gender deception in asynchronous online communication: A path analysis”, Information Processing & Management, 53/(1), January, 2017, pp. 21-41.
  10. [10] Jeffrey, G., Randall, B., Ryan, M. S. (2016). “Man vs. machine: Investigating the effect of adversarial system use on end-user behavior in automated deception interviews”, Decision Support Systems, Vol. 85, May 2016, pp.23-33. Available at: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167923616300197, (accessed on April, 13th, 2017).
  11. [11] Lina, Z., Jiang, W., Dongsong, Z. (2014). “Discourse cues to deception in the case of multiple receivers”, Information & Management, 51/(6), pp.726-737. Available at: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378720614000640, (accessed on February, 27th, 2017).
  12. [12] Dean, A., Robert, J. W., David, C. S. , Grant, T. L. , Cynthia, C., John, W. R. (2017). Verbal response time and duration indices of deception in humans interviewed by a computer-generated agent”, Int. J. Human-Computer Studies, Vol. 27, pp. 23-33.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/kbo-2017-0071 | Journal eISSN: 2451-3113 | Journal ISSN: 1843-6722
Language: English
Page range: 430 - 437
Published on: Jul 20, 2017
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 3 issues per year

© 2017 Dan Popescu, Alina Dinu, Cristina State, Cătălina Picu, published by Nicolae Balcescu Land Forces Academy
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.