Have a personal or library account? Click to login
A Brief Analysis On Preventive Measures Involving Deprivation Of Liberty Cover

A Brief Analysis On Preventive Measures Involving Deprivation Of Liberty

By: Denisa Barbu  
Open Access
|Nov 2015

References

  1. [1] Article 9 of the Criminal Procedure Code; article 202 paragraph 1 of the Criminal Procedure Code.
  2. [2] Nicolae Volonciu, Andreea Simona Uzlău şi alţii, Noul Cod de procedurăpenalăcomentat,Ed. Hamangiu, p.421, 2014; See also the article 11paragraph 2, article 147 paragraph 1 letter b, article 148 paragraph 1 let. b, article 150 paragraph 1 let. bof the Criminal Procedure Code.
  3. [3] I.Neagu, M. Damaschin, Tratat de procedurăpenală. Parteagenerală.Înluminanoului Cod de procedurăpenală, Ed. UniversulJuridic, București, pp.628-629,2014.
  4. [4] According to article. 202paragraphs 1-3 and article 223 of the Criminal Procedure Code „the measure of preventive arrest is necessary in order to ensure the proper course of the criminal process, in order to prevent the accused from avoiding prosecution or judgment, in order to prevent committing another offence ... the deprivation of liberty is necessary for the elimination of a threat to public order...”
  5. [5] ECHR, judgment Fox, Campbell and Hartley vs. the United Kingdom, the decision of 30 august 1990.
  6. [6] According to the article 324 paragraph 4 of the Criminal Procedure Code, the criminal investigation could not have withholding even by delegation of the Prosecutor: “Putting in motion the criminal action, taking or proposing restrictive measures of rights and freedoms, permitting evidence enforceability or layout of other procedural measures or acts may not form the delegation subject ...”
  7. [7] There are exceptions, when the Prosecutor has the obligation and the right to establish closing of the preventive measures by Ordinance which has, in the course of criminal, classingtowards a defendant under such actions, regardless the provisions of the judicial body, pursuant to article 315 paragraph 4 of the Criminal procedure Code.
  8. [8] See the provisions of article 399of the Criminal Procedure Code (the sentence which settled the criminal action).
  9. [9] In accordance with the article 352 paragraph 1 of the Criminal Procedure Code “the meeting is public judgment, except as required by law. The meeting held in the Council Chamber is not public”…
  10. [10] See article 352 paragraph 1 of the Criminal Procedure Code, and by way of exception to article 352 paragraphs 3 and 4 of the Criminal Procedure Code, or when the provisions of special laws expressly provide for this.
  11. [11] In the calculation of the terms relating to the preventive measures or any other measures restrictive of rights, the time or the day which begins and ends go into its duration.
  12. [12] Stelian Scăunaş, Răspunderea internaţională pentru violarea dreptului internaţional, Ed. All Beck, Bucureşti, p.83, 2002.
  13. [13] Emilian Ciongaru, Custodial Sanctions Versus Community Sanctions, Monduzzi Editore, International Proceedings Division, Bologna, Italy, p.341, 2012.
  14. [14] Costică Voicu, Florian Coman, Ştefania-Georgeta Ungureanu, Drept internaţional penal, Editura Pro Universitaria, 2007, p. 144.
  15. [15] George T. Abed, Sanjeev Gupta, Governance, Corruption and Economic Performance, International Monetary Fund, WashingtonD.C., p.58-59,2003.
Language: English
Page range: 398 - 402
Published on: Nov 24, 2015
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 3 issues per year

© 2015 Denisa Barbu, published by Nicolae Balcescu Land Forces Academy
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.