Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Assessment of stallion semen morphology using two different staining methods, microscopic techniques, and sample sizes Cover

Assessment of stallion semen morphology using two different staining methods, microscopic techniques, and sample sizes

Journal of Veterinary Research
Volume 60 (2016): Issue 1 (March 2016)
By: ,  ,   and    
Open Access
|Apr 2016
References

References

  1. 1. Alm K., Peltoniemi O., Koskinen E., Andersson M.: Porcine field fertility with two different insemination doses and the effect of sperm morphology. Reprod Domes Anim 2006, 41, 210-213.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  2. 2. Almadaly E., Farrag F., Shukry M., Murase T.: Plasma membrane integrity and morphology of frozen-thawed bull spermatozoa supplemented with desalted and lyophilized seminal plasma. Global Vet 2014, 13, 753-766.
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. 3. Banaszewska D., Kondracki S., Wysokińska A.: Effect of age on the dimensions and shape of spermatozoa of Large White Polish boars. Arch Tierz 2011, 54, 504-514.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  4. 4. Blom E.: The ultrastructure of some characteristic sperm defect and a proposal for a new classification of the bull spermiogram. Natl Med J India 1973, 25, 383-391.
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. 5. Blom E.: Studies on seminal vesiculitis in the bull: II. Proposal for a new classification of the spermiogram. Med Weter 1981, 37, 239-242.
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. 6. Brito L.F., Greene L.M., Kelleman A., Knobbe M., Turner R.: Effect of method and clinical on stallion sperm morphology evaluation. Theriogenology 2011, 76, 745-750.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  7. 7. Brodzki P., Wrona Z., Klimont M., Krakowski L.: Morphological characteristics of boar spermatozoa in the annual production cycle. Med Weter 2015, 71, 109-113.
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. 8. Coetzee K., Kruger T.F., Lombard C.J.: Predictive value of normal sperm morphology: a structured literature review. Hum. Reprod Update 1998, 4, 73-82.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  9. 9. Foster M.L., Love C.C., Varner D.D., Brinsko S.P., Hinrisch K., Teague S., LaCaze K., Blanchard T.L.: Comparison of methods for assessing integrity of equine sperm membrane. Theriogenology 2011, 76, 334-341.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  10. 10. Freneau G.E., Chenoweth P.J., Ellis R., Rupp G.: Sperm morphology of beef bulls evaluated by two different methods. Anim Reprod Sci 2010, 118, 176-181.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  11. 11. García-Herreros M., Aparicio I.M., Barón F.J., García- Marín L.J., Gil M.C.: Standardization of sample preparation, staining and sampling methods for automated sperm head morphometry analysis of boar spermatozoa. Int J Andro 2006, 29, 553-563.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  12. 12. Garrett C., Liu D.Y., Baker H.W.: Selectivity of the human sperm-zona pellucida binding process to sperm head morphometry. Fertil Steril 1997, 67, 362-371.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  13. 13. Hidalgo M., Rodríguez I., Dorado Sanz J., Soler C.: Effect of sample size and staining methods on stallion sperm morphometry by the Sperm Class Analyzer. Vet Med 2005, 50, 24-32.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  14. 14. Hidalgo M., Rodríguez I., Dorado J.: Influence of staining and sampling procedures on goat sperm morphometry using the Sperm Class Analyzer. Theriogenology 2006, 66, 996-1003.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  15. 15. Holroyd R.G., Doogan V.J., De Faveri J.D., Fordyce G., McGowan M.R., Bertram J.D., Vankan D.M., Fitzpatrick L.A., Jayawardhana G.A., Miller R.G.: Bull selection and use in northern Australia 4: calf output and predictors of fertility of bulls in multiple-sire herds. Anim Reprod Sci 2002, 71, 67-79.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  16. 16. Jasko D.J., Lein D.H., Foote R.H.: Determination of the relationship between sperm morphologic classifications and fertility in stallions: 66 cases (1987-1988). J Am Vet Med Assoc 1990, 197, 389-394.
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. 17. Jasko D.J.: Evaluation of stallion semen. Vet Clin N Am Equine Pract 1992, 8, 129-148.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  18. 18. Katila T.: In vitro evaluation of frozen-thawed stallion semen: a review. Acta Vet Scand 2001, 42, 199-217.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  19. 19. Knecht D., Środoń S., Dudziński K.: The influence of boar breed and season on semen parameters. S Afr J Anim Sci 2014, 44, 1-9.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  20. 20. Kondracki S., Iwanina M., Wysokińska A., Huszno M.: Comparative analysis of Duroc and Pietrain boar sperm morphology. Acta Vet Brno 2012, 81, 195-199.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  21. 21. Kondracki S., Banaszewska D., Bajena M., Komorowska K., Kowalewski D.: Correlation of frequency of spermatozoa morphological alterations with sperm concentration in ejaculates of Polish Landrace boars. Acta Vet Beograd 2013, 63, 513-524.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  22. 22. Krakowski L., Piech T., Sławińska-Brych A., Tatara M.R., Bartoszek J.: Quality of Cooley semen of cold-blooded stallions evaluated with the use of apoptosis and DNA defragmentation markers. Med Weter 2014, 70, 573-578.
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. 23. Maree L., Du Plessis S.S., Menkveld R., Van der Horst G.: Morphometric dimensions of the human sperm head depend on the staining method used. Hum Reprod 2010, 25, 1369-1382.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  24. 24. Menkveld R., El-Garem Y., Schill W.B., Henkel R.: Relationship between human sperm morphology and acrosomal function. J Assist Reprod Gen 2003, 20, 432-438.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  25. 25. Menkveld R.: Clinical significance of the low normal sperm morphology value as proposed in the 5th WHO laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen. Asian J Androl 2010, 12, 47-58.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  26. 26. Menkveld R.: Sperm morphology assessment using strict (tygerberg) criteria. Methods Mol Biol 2013, 927, 39-50.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  27. 27. Nowakowska I., Pozór M.A.: Sperm morphology of stallions using four different methods. Med Weter 2003, 59, 351-354.
    Search in Google Scholar
  28. 28. O’Connel M., McClure N., Lewis S.E.: The effect of cryopreservation on sperm morphology, motility and mitochondrial function. Hum Reprod 2002, 17, 704-709.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  29. 29. Smital J.: Effects influencing boar semen. Anim Reprod Sci 2009, 110, 335-346.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  30. 30. Wysokińska A., Kondracki S., Banaszewska D.: Morphometrical characteristics of spermatozoa in Polish Landrace boars with regard to the number of spermatozoa in an ejaculate. Reprod Biol 2009, 9, 271-282.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  31. 31. Wysokińska A., Kondracki S.: Assessment of sexual activity levels and their association with ejaculate parameters in two- breed hybrids and purebred Duroc and Pietrain boars. Ann Anim Sci 2014, 14, 559-571.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jvetres-2016-0014 | Journal eISSN: 2450-8608 (formerly 2300-3235)
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 99 - 104
Submitted on: Sep 18, 2015
Accepted on: Feb 3, 2016
Published on: Apr 29, 2016
Published by: National Veterinary Research Institute in Pulawy
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
stallion,
semen,
staining methods,
spermatozoa morphology
Related subjects:
Life sciences,
Molecular biology,
Microbiology and virology,
Life sciences, other,
Medicine,
Veterinary medicine

© 2016 Katarzyna Łącka, Stanisław Kondracki, Maria Iwanina, Anna Wysokińska, published by National Veterinary Research Institute in Pulawy
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Volume 60 (2016): Issue 1 (March 2016)
Previous article
Next article