Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Computational psycholinguistic analysis and its application in psychological assessment of college students Cover

Computational psycholinguistic analysis and its application in psychological assessment of college students

Journal of Pedagogy
Volume 6 (2015): Issue 1 (June 2015)
By:  and    
Open Access
|Jul 2015
References

References

  1. Aaronson, D., & Rieber, R. W. (2013). Psycholinguistic research: Implications and applications. Hove: Psychology Press. pp. IX-X.
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. Austin, J.L. (1975). How to do things with words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  3. Campbell, R.S., & Pennebaker, J.W. (2003). The secret life of pronouns: Flexibility in writing style and physical health. Psychological Science, 14(1), 60-65.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  4. Cegala, D. (1989). A study of selected linguistic components of involvement in interaction. West. J. Speech Communication, 53(3), 311-326.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  5. Cloninger, C.R. (2008). The Psychobiological theory of temperament and character: Comment on Farmer and Goldberg. Psychological Assessment, 20(3), 292-299.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  6. Figurová, L.T. (2007). Sociální desirabilita (Master’s Thesis). Masarykova univerzita, Filozofická fakulta. Available from http://is.muni.cz/th/75552/ff_m Freud, S. (1901). Psychopathology of everyday life. New York: Basic Books.
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. Furnham, A. (1990). Language and personality. In H. Giles, & W.H. Robinson (Eds.), Handbook of Language and Social Psychology (pp 73-95), New York: Wiley.
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. Garside, R., & Smith, N. (1997). A hybrid grammatical tagger: CLAWS4. In R. Garside, G. Leech, & A. McEnery (Eds.), Corpus Annotation: Linguistic Information from Computer Text Corpora (pp.102-121). Longman, London.
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. Hajič, J. (2004). Disambiguation of rich inflection (Comput. Morphology of Czech). Prague: Karolinum.
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. Hamilton, R.V. (1957). A Psycholinguistic analysis of some interpretive processes of three basic personality types. The Journal of Social Psychology, 46(2), 153-177.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  11. Hornová, L. (2003). Referenční slovník gramatických termínů. Olomouc: Univerzita Palackého v Olomouci.
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. Cheng, K.H.C. (2011). Further linguistic markers of personality: The way we say things matters. International Journal of Psychological Studies, 3(1), 2-16.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  13. Krippendorff, K. (1980). Content analysis: An Introduction to its methodology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. Mehl, M.R. (2006). Quantitative text analysis. In M. Eid, & E. Diener (Eds.), Handbook of multimethod measurement in psychology (pp. 141-156). Washington: American Psychological Association.
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. Müllner, J., Ruisel, I., & Farkaš, G. (1980). Príručka pre administráciu, interpretáciu a vyhodnocovanie dotazníka na meranie úzkosti a úzkostlivosti. Bratislava: Psychodiagnostické a didaktické testy.
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. Nebeská, I. (1992). Úvod do psycholingvistiky. Praha: H&H.
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. Oxman, T. E., Rosenberg, S. D., Schnurr, P. P., & Tucker, G. J. (1988). Diagnostic classification through content analysis of patients‘ speech. American Journal of Psychiatry, 145(4), 464-468.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  18. Paulhus, D.L. (1988). Assessing self-deception and impression management in self- -reports: The Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding. Unpublished manual, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. Pennebaker, J.W., & Graybeal, A. (2001). Patterns of natural language use: Disclosure, personality, and social integration. Current Directions, 10 (3), 90-93.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  20. Pennebaker, J.W., & Davis, M. (2006). Pronoun use and dominance. Unpublished data. Department of Psychology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX.
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. Pennebaker, J.W., & King, L.A. (1999). Linguistic styles: Language use as an individual difference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1296-1312.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  22. Pennebaker, J.W., Mehl, M.R., & Niederhoffer, K. (2003). Psychological aspects of natural language use: Our words, our selves. Annual Review of Psychology, 54(1), 547-577.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  23. Petkevič, V. (2006). Reliable morphological disambiguation of Czech: Rule-Based approach is necessary. In M. Šimková (Ed.), Insight into the Slovak and Czech Corpus Linguistics (pp. 26-44), Bratislava: Veda.
    Search in Google Scholar
  24. Preiss, M., Novák, T., Klose, J., Šamánková, D., Březinová, K., & Štěpánková, H. (2006). Ovlivňování výsledku vyšetření osobnosti: Výsledky dotazníku temperamentu a charakteru. Československá psychologie, 50(3), 251-261.
    Search in Google Scholar
  25. Rude, S.S., Gortner, E.M., & Pennebaker, J.W. (2004). Language use of depressed and depression - vulnerable college students. Cognition and Emotion, 18(8), 1121-1133.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  26. Sanford, F.H. (1942). Speech and personality. Psychological Bulletin, 39(10), 811-845.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  27. Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  28. Shapiro, G., & Markoff, J. (1997). A Matter of definition. In C. W. Roberts (Ed.), Text analysis for the social sciences: Methods for drawing statistical inferences from texts and transcripts. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc.
    Search in Google Scholar
  29. Scherer, K. R., & Giles, H. (1979). Social markers in speech. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  30. Schnurr, P.P., Rosenberg, S.D., Oxman, T.E., & Tucker, G.J. (1986). A methodological note on content analysis: Estimates of reliability. Journal of Personality Assessment, 5(4), 601-609.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  31. Spielberger, C.D., Gorsuch, R.L., & Lushene, R.E. (1970). Manual for the state-trait anxiety inventory. Palo Alto (CA): Consulting Psychologist Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  32. Spoustová, D. (2008). Combining statistical and rule-based approaches to morphological tagging of Czech texts. In: Prague Bulletin of Mathematical Linguistics, 89, 23-40.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  33. Taylor, M.A., Reed, R., & Berenbaum, S. (1994). Patterns of speech disorders in schizophrenia and mania. Journal of Nerv. and Mental Disease, 182(6), 319-326.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  34. Thomas, C.B., & Duszynski, K.R. (1985). Are words of the ROR predictors of disease and death? The case of “whirling.” Psychosomatic Medicine, 47, 201-211.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  35. Votrubec, J. (2006). Morphological tagging based on averaged perceptron. Praha: WDS’06 Proceedings of Contributed Papers, pp. 191-195.
    Search in Google Scholar
  36. Weintraub, W. (1989). Verbal behavior in everyday life. New York: Springer
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jped-2015-0004 | Journal eISSN: 1338-2144 (formerly 1338-1563) | Journal ISSN: 1338-1563
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 61 - 72
Published on: Jul 24, 2015
Published by: University of Trnava, Faculty of Education
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
psycholinguistics,
computational,
analysis,
assessment,
psychodiagnostics,
Czech
Related subjects:
Social sciences,
Education,
Education, other

© 2015 Dalibor Kučera, Jana M. Havigerová, published by University of Trnava, Faculty of Education
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Volume 6 (2015): Issue 1 (June 2015)
Previous article
Next article