Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Computational psycholinguistic analysis and its application in psychological assessment of college students Cover

Computational psycholinguistic analysis and its application in psychological assessment of college students

Open Access
|Jul 2015

References

  1. Aaronson, D., & Rieber, R. W. (2013). Psycholinguistic research: Implications and applications. Hove: Psychology Press. pp. IX-X.
  2. Austin, J.L. (1975). How to do things with words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198245537.001.0001
  3. Campbell, R.S., & Pennebaker, J.W. (2003). The secret life of pronouns: Flexibility in writing style and physical health. Psychological Science, 14(1), 60-65.10.1111/1467-9280.01419
  4. Cegala, D. (1989). A study of selected linguistic components of involvement in interaction. West. J. Speech Communication, 53(3), 311-326.10.1080/10570318909374309
  5. Cloninger, C.R. (2008). The Psychobiological theory of temperament and character: Comment on Farmer and Goldberg. Psychological Assessment, 20(3), 292-299.10.1037/a0012933
  6. Figurová, L.T. (2007). Sociální desirabilita (Master’s Thesis). Masarykova univerzita, Filozofická fakulta. Available from http://is.muni.cz/th/75552/ff_m Freud, S. (1901). Psychopathology of everyday life. New York: Basic Books.
  7. Furnham, A. (1990). Language and personality. In H. Giles, & W.H. Robinson (Eds.), Handbook of Language and Social Psychology (pp 73-95), New York: Wiley.
  8. Garside, R., & Smith, N. (1997). A hybrid grammatical tagger: CLAWS4. In R. Garside, G. Leech, & A. McEnery (Eds.), Corpus Annotation: Linguistic Information from Computer Text Corpora (pp.102-121). Longman, London.
  9. Hajič, J. (2004). Disambiguation of rich inflection (Comput. Morphology of Czech). Prague: Karolinum.
  10. Hamilton, R.V. (1957). A Psycholinguistic analysis of some interpretive processes of three basic personality types. The Journal of Social Psychology, 46(2), 153-177.10.1080/00224545.1957.9714317
  11. Hornová, L. (2003). Referenční slovník gramatických termínů. Olomouc: Univerzita Palackého v Olomouci.
  12. Cheng, K.H.C. (2011). Further linguistic markers of personality: The way we say things matters. International Journal of Psychological Studies, 3(1), 2-16. 10.5539/ijps.v3n1p2
  13. Krippendorff, K. (1980). Content analysis: An Introduction to its methodology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  14. Mehl, M.R. (2006). Quantitative text analysis. In M. Eid, & E. Diener (Eds.), Handbook of multimethod measurement in psychology (pp. 141-156). Washington: American Psychological Association.
  15. Müllner, J., Ruisel, I., & Farkaš, G. (1980). Príručka pre administráciu, interpretáciu a vyhodnocovanie dotazníka na meranie úzkosti a úzkostlivosti. Bratislava: Psychodiagnostické a didaktické testy.
  16. Nebeská, I. (1992). Úvod do psycholingvistiky. Praha: H&H.
  17. Oxman, T. E., Rosenberg, S. D., Schnurr, P. P., & Tucker, G. J. (1988). Diagnostic classification through content analysis of patients‘ speech. American Journal of Psychiatry, 145(4), 464-468.10.1176/ajp.145.4.464
  18. Paulhus, D.L. (1988). Assessing self-deception and impression management in self- -reports: The Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding. Unpublished manual, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
  19. Pennebaker, J.W., & Graybeal, A. (2001). Patterns of natural language use: Disclosure, personality, and social integration. Current Directions, 10 (3), 90-93.10.1111/1467-8721.00123
  20. Pennebaker, J.W., & Davis, M. (2006). Pronoun use and dominance. Unpublished data. Department of Psychology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX.
  21. Pennebaker, J.W., & King, L.A. (1999). Linguistic styles: Language use as an individual difference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1296-1312.10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1296
  22. Pennebaker, J.W., Mehl, M.R., & Niederhoffer, K. (2003). Psychological aspects of natural language use: Our words, our selves. Annual Review of Psychology, 54(1), 547-577.10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145041
  23. Petkevič, V. (2006). Reliable morphological disambiguation of Czech: Rule-Based approach is necessary. In M. Šimková (Ed.), Insight into the Slovak and Czech Corpus Linguistics (pp. 26-44), Bratislava: Veda.
  24. Preiss, M., Novák, T., Klose, J., Šamánková, D., Březinová, K., & Štěpánková, H. (2006). Ovlivňování výsledku vyšetření osobnosti: Výsledky dotazníku temperamentu a charakteru. Československá psychologie, 50(3), 251-261.
  25. Rude, S.S., Gortner, E.M., & Pennebaker, J.W. (2004). Language use of depressed and depression - vulnerable college students. Cognition and Emotion, 18(8), 1121-1133.10.1080/02699930441000030
  26. Sanford, F.H. (1942). Speech and personality. Psychological Bulletin, 39(10), 811-845.10.1037/h0060838
  27. Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139173438
  28. Shapiro, G., & Markoff, J. (1997). A Matter of definition. In C. W. Roberts (Ed.), Text analysis for the social sciences: Methods for drawing statistical inferences from texts and transcripts. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc.
  29. Scherer, K. R., & Giles, H. (1979). Social markers in speech. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  30. Schnurr, P.P., Rosenberg, S.D., Oxman, T.E., & Tucker, G.J. (1986). A methodological note on content analysis: Estimates of reliability. Journal of Personality Assessment, 5(4), 601-609.10.1207/s15327752jpa5004_7
  31. Spielberger, C.D., Gorsuch, R.L., & Lushene, R.E. (1970). Manual for the state-trait anxiety inventory. Palo Alto (CA): Consulting Psychologist Press.
  32. Spoustová, D. (2008). Combining statistical and rule-based approaches to morphological tagging of Czech texts. In: Prague Bulletin of Mathematical Linguistics, 89, 23-40. 10.2478/v10108-009-0002-x
  33. Taylor, M.A., Reed, R., & Berenbaum, S. (1994). Patterns of speech disorders in schizophrenia and mania. Journal of Nerv. and Mental Disease, 182(6), 319-326.10.1097/00005053-199406000-00002
  34. Thomas, C.B., & Duszynski, K.R. (1985). Are words of the ROR predictors of disease and death? The case of “whirling.” Psychosomatic Medicine, 47, 201-211.10.1097/00006842-198503000-00012
  35. Votrubec, J. (2006). Morphological tagging based on averaged perceptron. Praha: WDS’06 Proceedings of Contributed Papers, pp. 191-195.
  36. Weintraub, W. (1989). Verbal behavior in everyday life. New York: Springer
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jped-2015-0004 | Journal eISSN: 1338-2144 | Journal ISSN: 1338-1563
Language: English
Page range: 61 - 72
Published on: Jul 24, 2015
Published by: University of Trnava, Faculty of Education
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2015 Dalibor Kučera, Jana M. Havigerová, published by University of Trnava, Faculty of Education
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.