Have a personal or library account? Click to login
From dynamic assessment of cognitive abilities to educational interventions: Trends in cognitive education Cover

From dynamic assessment of cognitive abilities to educational interventions: Trends in cognitive education

Open Access
|Jul 2015

References

  1. Adey, P. (2003). Changing minds. Educational and Child Psychology, 20(2), 19-30.10.53841/bpsecp.2003.20.2.19
  2. Adey, P., Shayer, M., & Yates, C. (1992). Thinking science. Philadelphia, PA: Research for Better Schools.
  3. Arbitman-Smith, R., & Haywood, H. C. (1980). Cognitive education for learning-disabled adolescents. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 8(1), 51-64.10.1007/BF00918161
  4. Ashman, A. F., & Conway, R. N. F. (1989). Teaching planning skills in the classroom: the development of an integrated model. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 36(3), 225-240.10.1080/0156655893603005
  5. Ashman, A. F., & Conway, R. N. F. (1997). Cognition and cognitive concepts. In An introduction to cognitive education: Theory and applications (pp. 41-61). London, UK: Routledge.
  6. Binet, A., & Simon, T. (1916). The development of intelligence in the child. The development of intelligence in children. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins.
  7. Blair, C., & Razza, R. P. (2007). Relating effortful control, executive function, and false belief understanding to emerging math and literacy ability in kindergarten. Child Development, 78(2), 647-663.10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01019.x
  8. Budoff, M. (1987a). The validity of learning potential assessment. In C. S. Lidz (Ed.), Dynamic assessment: An interactional approach to evaluating learning potential (pp. 52-81). New York: Guilford Press.
  9. Budoff, M. (1987b). Measures for assessing learning potential. In C. S. Lidz (Ed.), Dynamic assessment: An interactional approach to evaluating learning potential (pp. 173-195). New York: Guilford Press.
  10. Buchel, F. P., & Scharnhorst, U. (1993). The learning potential assessment device (LPAD): discussion of theoretical and methodological problems. In J. H. M. Hamers, K. Sijtsma, & A. J. J. M. Ruijssenaars (Eds.), Learning Potential assessment: Theoretical, methodological and practical issues (pp. 13-18). Amsterdam: Swets, Zeitlinger.
  11. Campione, J. C., & Brown, A. L. (1987). Linking dynamic assessment with school achievement. In C. S. Lidz (Ed.), Dynamic assessment: An interactional approach to evaluating learning potential (pp. 82-109). New York: Guilford Press.
  12. Das, J. P. (1999). PASS Reading Enhancement Program (PREP). Edmonton, AB: J. P.
  13. Das Centre on Learning and Developmental Disabilities.
  14. De Bono, E. (1991). I am right, you are wrong. From this to the new renaissance: From rock logic to water logic. UK: Penguin Books.
  15. Dehn, M. J. (2008). Working memory and academic learning: Assessment and intervention. Hoboken, NJ: Jon Wiley & Sons.
  16. Doidge, N. (2007). The brain that changes itself: Stories of personal triumph from the frontiers of brain science. US: Viking Press.
  17. Drubach, D. (2000). The brain explained. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall Health.
  18. Duckworth, A. L., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2005). Self-discipline outdoes IQ in predicting academic performance of adolescents. Psychological Science, 16(12), 939-944.10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01641.x
  19. Dzuka, J., & Kovalcikova, I. (2008a). Dynamické testovanie latentných učebných schopností. Československá psychologie, 52(4), 366-377.
  20. Dzuka, J., & Kovalcikova, I. (2008b). Sociálne znevýhodňujúce prostredie a dieťa zo sociálne znevýhodňujúceho prostredia, pojem a definícia. Československá psychologie, 52(6), 633-637.
  21. Engelmann, S., & Carnine, D. (1991). Theory of instruction: Principles and applications. Eugene, OR: ADI Press.
  22. Ferrara, R. A., Brown, A. L., & Campione, J. C. (1986). Children’s learning and transfer of inductive reasoning rules: Studies of proximal development. Child development, 57(5), 1087-1099.10.2307/1130433
  23. Ferrer, E., McArdle, J. J., Shawitz, B. A., Holahan, J. N., Marchione, K., & Shawitz, S. E. (2007). Longitudinal models of developmental dynamics between reading and cognition from childhood to adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 43, 1460-1473.10.1037/0012-1649.43.6.1460
  24. Feuerstein, R. (1970). A dynamic approach to causation, prevention, and alleviation of retarded performance. In C. Haywood (Ed.), Social-cultural aspects of mental retardation. New York: Appleton Century Crofts.
  25. Feuerstein, R., Feuerstein, R. S., Falik, L. H., & Rand, Y. (2002). The dynamic assessment of cognitive modifiability: The learning propensity assessment device, theory, instruments, and techniques. Jerusalem, Israel: ICELP Press.
  26. Feuerstein, R., Rand, Y., Hoffman, M. B., & Miller, R. (1980). Instrumental enrichment. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.
  27. Filickova, M., Kovalcikova, I., & Ropovik, I. (2015). The role of simultaneous and successive processing in EFL reading. International Journal of Psychology. Advance Online Publication.
  28. Glaser, R. (1988). Cognitive science and education. In J. Crowley (Ed.), International Social Science Journal, 40(1), 21-44.
  29. Greenberg, K. H. (2000). Attending to hidden needs: The cognitive enrichment advantage perspective. Educational and Child Psychology: Psychological Influences upon Educational Intervention, 17(3), 51-69.10.53841/bpsecp.2000.17.3.51
  30. Greenfield, P. M. (1997). You can’t take it with you: Why ability assessments don’t cross cultures. American psychologist, 52(10), 1115-1124.10.1037/0003-066X.52.10.1115
  31. Guilford, J. P. (1977). Way beyond the IQ. Boston, MA: Creative Education Foundation.
  32. Guthke J. (1993). Developments in learning potential assessment. In J. H. M. Hamers & K. Sijtsma (Eds.), Learning potential assessment: Theoretical, methodological and practical issues (pp. 43-67). Amsterdam: Swets & Zeitlinger.
  33. Hansen, A. (2009). Basic conceptual systems (BCSs) - tools for analytic coding, thinking and learning: A concept teaching curriculum in Norway. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 4(3), 160-169.10.1016/j.tsc.2009.09.001
  34. Haywood, H. C. (1977). A cognitive approach to the education of retarded children. Peabody Journal of Education, 54(2), 110-116.10.1080/01619567709538116
  35. Haywood, H. C. (2004). From the editor: Current concepts in cognitive development and education: A topical issue. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 4(2), 181-182.10.1891/194589504787382802
  36. Haywood, H. C., Brooks, P. H., & Burns, M. S. (1992). Bright Start: Cognitive curriculum for young children. Watertown, MA: Charlesbridge.
  37. Haywood, H. C., & Lidz, C. (2007). Dynamic Assessment in Practice. London: Cambridge University Press.
  38. Haywood, H. C., & Tzuriel, D. (2002). Applications and challenges in dynamic assessment. Peabody Journal of Education, 77(2), 38-61.10.1207/S15327930PJE7702_5
  39. Howard-Jones, P. (2010). The teacher’s handbook of twig: Minds, brains and teaching with immersive gaming. Available at: www.lulu.com:NEnet.
  40. Ihnot, C., Kilkelly, C., & Nichols, M. (2000). Read naturally: Master’s edition, reading level 5.8/6.0 (Blackline Masters). Saint Paul, MI: Read Naturally.
  41. Jitendra, A. K., & Kameenui, E. J. (1994). A review of concept learning models: Implications for special education practitioners. Intervention in School and Clinic, 30(2), 91-98.10.1177/105345129403000205
  42. Karpov, Y. (2008). Do all dynamic assessment techniques assess learning potential? Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 7(3), 411-418.10.1891/194589508787724132
  43. Kirby, J. R., & Robinson, G. W. (1987). Simultaneous and successive processing in reading disabled children. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 20(4), 243-252.10.1177/002221948702000409
  44. Klauer, K. (1987). Criterion-referenced testing: The inference to the item pool. Zeitschrift für differentielle und diagnostische Psychologie, 8, 141-147.
  45. Klauer, K. J., & Phye, G. D. (1995). Fallbuch der klinischen Psychologie: Modelle psychischer Storungen. Einzelfallstudien zum Lehrbuch der klinischen Psychologie. Germany: Hogrefe, Verlag fur Psychologie.
  46. Kolb, D. A., Boyatzis, R., & Mainemelis, C. (2000). Experiential learning theory: Previous research and new directions. In R. J. Sternberg, & L. F. Zhang (Eds.), Perspectives on cognitive learning and thinking styles. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  47. Kozulin, A. (1999). Profiles of immigrant students` cognitive performance on Raven`s progressive matrices. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 87(3), 1311-1314.
  48. Kulistak, P. (2003). Neuropsychologie. Praha: Portál.
  49. Lebeer, J., Candeias, A., & Gracio, M. L. (2011). With a different glance. Dynamic assessment and functioning of children oriented at development & inclusive learning. Belgium: Garant Publishers.
  50. Lidz, C. S. (1992). Dynamic assessment: Some thoughts on the model, the medium, and the message. Learning and individual differences, 4(2), 125--36.10.1016/1041-6080(92)90009-4
  51. Lovett, M. W., Lacerenza, L., & Borden, S. B. (2000). Putting struggling readers on the PHAST track: A program to integrate phonological and strategy-based remedial reading instruction and maximize outcomes. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33(5), 458-476.10.1177/002221940003300507
  52. Luther, M., & Wyatt, F. (1996). A comparison of Feuerstein’s method of (LPAD) assessment with conventional IQ testing on disadvantaged North York high school students. In M. Luther, E. Cole, & P. Gamlin (Eds.), Dynamic assessment for instruction: From theory to application (pp. 168-181). Ontario: Captus Press.
  53. Malda, M., Van de Vijver, F. R., Srinivasan, K., Transler, C., Sukumar, P., & Rao, K. (2008). Adapting a cognitive test for a different culture: An illustration of qualitative procedures. Psychology Science Quarterly, 50(4), 451-468.
  54. Marzano, R. J. (1998). A theory-based meta-analysis of research on instruction. Aurora, CO: Mid-continent Regional Educational Laboratory.
  55. Meeker, M. (1965). A procedure for relating Stanford Binet behavior samplings to Guilford’s structure of the intellect. Journal of School Psychology, 3(3), 26-36.10.1016/0022-4405(65)90037-3
  56. Miles, D., & Forcht, J. P. (1995). Mathematics strategies for secondary students with learning disabilities or mathematics deficiencies: A cognitive approach. Intervention in School and Clinic, 31, 91-96.10.1177/105345129503100205
  57. Minnaert, A. (2002). Alternative assessment of students’ domain-specific learning competencies in the transition of secondary to higher education. In G. M. Van der Aalsvoort, W. C. M. Resing, & A. J. J. M. Ruijssenaars (Eds.), Learning potential assessment and cognitive training: Actual research and perspectives in theory building and methodology (Volume 7, pp. 335-351). Amsterdam: JAI.
  58. Murphy, R. (2007). Exploring a meta-theoretical framework for dynamic assessment and intelligence. Dissertation thesis. University of Pretoria.
  59. Nyborg, M. (1993). Pedagogy: The study of how to provide optimum conditions of learning for persons who may differ widely in pre-requisites for learning. Norway: Nordisk undervisningsforlag.
  60. OECD. (2007). OECD Factbook 2007 - Economic, Environmental and Social Statistics. OECD.10.1787/journal_dev-v8-2-en
  61. Paour, J. L., & Soavi, G. (1992). A case study in the induction of logic structures. In H. C. Haywood, & D. Tzuriel (Eds.), Interactive Assessment (pp. 419-442). New York: Springer.
  62. Primi, R., Ferrão, M. E., & Almeida, L. S. (2010). Fluid intelligence as a predictor of learning: A longitudinal multilevel approach applied to math. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(5), 446-451. 10.1016/j.lindif.2010.05.001
  63. Rand, Y., & Kaniel, S. (1987). Group administration of the LPAD. In C. S. Lidz (Ed.), Dynamic assessment: an interactional approach to evaluating learning potential (pp. 196-214). NewYork: The Guilford Press.
  64. Resing, W. C. M. (2013). Dynamic testing and individualized instruction: Helpful in cognitive education? Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 12(1), 81-95.10.1891/1945-8959.12.1.81
  65. Resing, W. C. M., Roth, J. M., & Van der Werf, T. J. M. (2002). Learning potential assessment and cognitive training in inductive reasoning: emergent relationship? In G. M. Van der Aalsvoort, W. C. M. Resing, & A. J. J. M. Ruijssenaars (Eds.), Learning potential assessment and cognitive training: actual research and perspectives in theory building and methodology (Volume 7, pp. 175-208). Amsterdam: JAI.
  66. Ropovik, I. (2014). Do executive functions predict the ability to learn problem-solving principles? Intelligence, 44, 64-74.10.1016/j.intell.2014.03.002
  67. Sawyer, R. K. (2006). Educating for innovation. In A. Craft, & R. Wegerif (Eds.), The International Journal of Thinking Skills and Creativity, 1(1), 41-48.10.1016/j.tsc.2005.08.001
  68. Sousa, D. (2001). How the brain learns. Thousand Oaks, California: Corwin Press.
  69. Stanovich, K. E., Cunningham, A. E., & Freeman, D. (1984). Intelligence, cognitive skills and early reading progress. Reading Research Quarterly, 14, 278-303.10.2307/747822
  70. Sternberg, R. J. (2013). Introduction to the special issue. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 12, (1), 4-5.10.1891/1945-8959.12.1.4
  71. Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2002). Dynamic Testing: The nature and measurement of learning potential. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  72. Stevenson C. E. (2012). Puzzling with potential. Dynamic testing of analogical reasoning in children (Doctoral dissertation, Leiden University). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Ipskamp Drukkerij.
  73. Swanson, H. L., & Lussier, C. M. (2001). A selective synthesis of the experimental literature on dynamic assessment. Review of Educational Research, 71(2), 321-363.10.3102/00346543071002321
  74. Taub, G., Floyd, R. G., Keith, T. Z., & McGrew, K. S. (2008). Effects of general and broad cognitive abilities on mathematics. School Psychology Quarterly, 23(2), 187-198.10.1037/1045-3830.23.2.187
  75. Tokuhama-Espinosa, T. (2010). Mind, brain and education science. New York: W.W. Norton Company.
  76. Tzuriel, D. (2001). Dynamic assessment of young children. New York, NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Press.10.1007/978-1-4615-1255-4
  77. Tzuriel, D. (2002). Cognitive education: The menace and the hope. In G. M. Van der Aalsvoort, W. C. M. Resing, & A. J. J. M. Ruijssenaars (Eds ), Learning potential assessment and cognitive training: actual research and perspectives in theory building and methodology (Volume 7, pp. 355-363). Amsterdam: JAI.
  78. Tzuriel, D., & Klein, P. S. (1987). Assessing the young child: Children’s analogical thinking modifiability. In C. S. Lidz (Ed.). Dynamic assessment: an interactional approach to evaluating learning potential (pp. 268-287). New York: Guilford Press.
  79. Tzuriel, D., & Shamir, A. (2007). The effects of peer mediation with young children (PMYC) on children’s cognitive modifiability. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 143-165.10.1348/000709905X84279
  80. Ukrainetz, T. W., Harpell, S., Walsh, C., & Coyle, C. (2000). A preliminary investigation of dynamic assessment with Native American kindergartners. Language, speech and hearing services in schools, 31(2), 142-154.10.1044/0161-1461.3102.142
  81. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
  82. Walsh. K. (1978). Neuropsychology: A clinical approach. New York: Churchill Livingston.
  83. Wolf, O. T., Schommer, N. C., Hellhammer, D. H., Reischies, F. M., & Kirschbaum, C. (2002). Moderate psychosocial stress appears not to impair recall of words learned four weeks prior to stress exposure. Stress: The International Journal on the Biology of Stress, 5(1), 59-6410.1080/102538902900012332
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jped-2015-0001 | Journal eISSN: 1338-2144 | Journal ISSN: 1338-1563
Language: English
Page range: 5 - 21
Published on: Jul 24, 2015
Published by: University of Trnava, Faculty of Education
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2015 Iveta Kovalčíková, published by University of Trnava, Faculty of Education
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.