Have a personal or library account? Click to login
From dynamic assessment of cognitive abilities to educational interventions: Trends in cognitive education Cover

From dynamic assessment of cognitive abilities to educational interventions: Trends in cognitive education

Journal of Pedagogy
Volume 6 (2015): Issue 1 (June 2015)
By:
Open Access
|Jul 2015

References

  1. Adey, P. (2003). Changing minds. Educational and Child Psychology, 20(2), 19-30.<a href="https://doi.org/10.53841/bpsecp.2003.20.2.19" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.53841/bpsecp.2003.20.2.19</a>
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. Adey, P., Shayer, M., & Yates, C. (1992). Thinking science. Philadelphia, PA: Research for Better Schools.
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. Arbitman-Smith, R., & Haywood, H. C. (1980). Cognitive education for learning-disabled adolescents. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 8(1), 51-64.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00918161" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1007/BF00918161</a>
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. Ashman, A. F., & Conway, R. N. F. (1989). Teaching planning skills in the classroom: the development of an integrated model. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 36(3), 225-240.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/0156655893603005" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1080/0156655893603005</a>
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. Ashman, A. F., & Conway, R. N. F. (1997). Cognition and cognitive concepts. In An introduction to cognitive education: Theory and applications (pp. 41-61). London, UK: Routledge.
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. Binet, A., & Simon, T. (1916). The development of intelligence in the child. The development of intelligence in children. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins.
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. Blair, C., & Razza, R. P. (2007). Relating effortful control, executive function, and false belief understanding to emerging math and literacy ability in kindergarten. Child Development, 78(2), 647-663.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01019.x" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01019.x</a>
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. Budoff, M. (1987a). The validity of learning potential assessment. In C. S. Lidz (Ed.), Dynamic assessment: An interactional approach to evaluating learning potential (pp. 52-81). New York: Guilford Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. Budoff, M. (1987b). Measures for assessing learning potential. In C. S. Lidz (Ed.), Dynamic assessment: An interactional approach to evaluating learning potential (pp. 173-195). New York: Guilford Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. Buchel, F. P., & Scharnhorst, U. (1993). The learning potential assessment device (LPAD): discussion of theoretical and methodological problems. In J. H. M. Hamers, K. Sijtsma, & A. J. J. M. Ruijssenaars (Eds.), Learning Potential assessment: Theoretical, methodological and practical issues (pp. 13-18). Amsterdam: Swets, Zeitlinger.
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. Campione, J. C., & Brown, A. L. (1987). Linking dynamic assessment with school achievement. In C. S. Lidz (Ed.), Dynamic assessment: An interactional approach to evaluating learning potential (pp. 82-109). New York: Guilford Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. Das, J. P. (1999). PASS Reading Enhancement Program (PREP). Edmonton, AB: J. P.
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. Das Centre on Learning and Developmental Disabilities.
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. De Bono, E. (1991). I am right, you are wrong. From this to the new renaissance: From rock logic to water logic. UK: Penguin Books.
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. Dehn, M. J. (2008). Working memory and academic learning: Assessment and intervention. Hoboken, NJ: Jon Wiley & Sons.
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. Doidge, N. (2007). The brain that changes itself: Stories of personal triumph from the frontiers of brain science. US: Viking Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. Drubach, D. (2000). The brain explained. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall Health.
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. Duckworth, A. L., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2005). Self-discipline outdoes IQ in predicting academic performance of adolescents. Psychological Science, 16(12), 939-944.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01641.x" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01641.x</a>
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. Dzuka, J., & Kovalcikova, I. (2008a). Dynamické testovanie latentných učebných schopností. Československá psychologie, 52(4), 366-377.
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. Dzuka, J., & Kovalcikova, I. (2008b). Sociálne znevýhodňujúce prostredie a dieťa zo sociálne znevýhodňujúceho prostredia, pojem a definícia. Československá psychologie, 52(6), 633-637.
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. Engelmann, S., & Carnine, D. (1991). Theory of instruction: Principles and applications. Eugene, OR: ADI Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. Ferrara, R. A., Brown, A. L., & Campione, J. C. (1986). Children’s learning and transfer of inductive reasoning rules: Studies of proximal development. Child development, 57(5), 1087-1099.<a href="https://doi.org/10.2307/1130433" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.2307/1130433</a>
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. Ferrer, E., McArdle, J. J., Shawitz, B. A., Holahan, J. N., Marchione, K., & Shawitz, S. E. (2007). Longitudinal models of developmental dynamics between reading and cognition from childhood to adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 43, 1460-1473.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.43.6.1460" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1037/0012-1649.43.6.1460</a>
    Search in Google Scholar
  24. Feuerstein, R. (1970). A dynamic approach to causation, prevention, and alleviation of retarded performance. In C. Haywood (Ed.), Social-cultural aspects of mental retardation. New York: Appleton Century Crofts.
    Search in Google Scholar
  25. Feuerstein, R., Feuerstein, R. S., Falik, L. H., & Rand, Y. (2002). The dynamic assessment of cognitive modifiability: The learning propensity assessment device, theory, instruments, and techniques. Jerusalem, Israel: ICELP Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  26. Feuerstein, R., Rand, Y., Hoffman, M. B., & Miller, R. (1980). Instrumental enrichment. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  27. Filickova, M., Kovalcikova, I., & Ropovik, I. (2015). The role of simultaneous and successive processing in EFL reading. International Journal of Psychology. Advance Online Publication.
    Search in Google Scholar
  28. Glaser, R. (1988). Cognitive science and education. In J. Crowley (Ed.), International Social Science Journal, 40(1), 21-44.
    Search in Google Scholar
  29. Greenberg, K. H. (2000). Attending to hidden needs: The cognitive enrichment advantage perspective. Educational and Child Psychology: Psychological Influences upon Educational Intervention, 17(3), 51-69.<a href="https://doi.org/10.53841/bpsecp.2000.17.3.51" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.53841/bpsecp.2000.17.3.51</a>
    Search in Google Scholar
  30. Greenfield, P. M. (1997). You can’t take it with you: Why ability assessments don’t cross cultures. American psychologist, 52(10), 1115-1124.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.52.10.1115" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1037/0003-066X.52.10.1115</a>
    Search in Google Scholar
  31. Guilford, J. P. (1977). Way beyond the IQ. Boston, MA: Creative Education Foundation.
    Search in Google Scholar
  32. Guthke J. (1993). Developments in learning potential assessment. In J. H. M. Hamers & K. Sijtsma (Eds.), Learning potential assessment: Theoretical, methodological and practical issues (pp. 43-67). Amsterdam: Swets & Zeitlinger.
    Search in Google Scholar
  33. Hansen, A. (2009). Basic conceptual systems (BCSs) - tools for analytic coding, thinking and learning: A concept teaching curriculum in Norway. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 4(3), 160-169.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2009.09.001" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/j.tsc.2009.09.001</a>
    Search in Google Scholar
  34. Haywood, H. C. (1977). A cognitive approach to the education of retarded children. Peabody Journal of Education, 54(2), 110-116.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/01619567709538116" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1080/01619567709538116</a>
    Search in Google Scholar
  35. Haywood, H. C. (2004). From the editor: Current concepts in cognitive development and education: A topical issue. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 4(2), 181-182.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1891/194589504787382802" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1891/194589504787382802</a>
    Search in Google Scholar
  36. Haywood, H. C., Brooks, P. H., & Burns, M. S. (1992). Bright Start: Cognitive curriculum for young children. Watertown, MA: Charlesbridge.
    Search in Google Scholar
  37. Haywood, H. C., & Lidz, C. (2007). Dynamic Assessment in Practice. London: Cambridge University Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  38. Haywood, H. C., & Tzuriel, D. (2002). Applications and challenges in dynamic assessment. Peabody Journal of Education, 77(2), 38-61.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327930PJE7702_5" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1207/S15327930PJE7702_5</a>
    Search in Google Scholar
  39. Howard-Jones, P. (2010). The teacher’s handbook of twig: Minds, brains and teaching with immersive gaming. Available at: www.lulu.com:NEnet.
    Search in Google Scholar
  40. Ihnot, C., Kilkelly, C., & Nichols, M. (2000). Read naturally: Master’s edition, reading level 5.8/6.0 (Blackline Masters). Saint Paul, MI: Read Naturally.
    Search in Google Scholar
  41. Jitendra, A. K., & Kameenui, E. J. (1994). A review of concept learning models: Implications for special education practitioners. Intervention in School and Clinic, 30(2), 91-98.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1177/105345129403000205" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1177/105345129403000205</a>
    Search in Google Scholar
  42. Karpov, Y. (2008). Do all dynamic assessment techniques assess learning potential? Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 7(3), 411-418.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1891/194589508787724132" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1891/194589508787724132</a>
    Search in Google Scholar
  43. Kirby, J. R., & Robinson, G. W. (1987). Simultaneous and successive processing in reading disabled children. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 20(4), 243-252.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1177/002221948702000409" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1177/002221948702000409</a>
    Search in Google Scholar
  44. Klauer, K. (1987). Criterion-referenced testing: The inference to the item pool. Zeitschrift für differentielle und diagnostische Psychologie, 8, 141-147.
    Search in Google Scholar
  45. Klauer, K. J., & Phye, G. D. (1995). Fallbuch der klinischen Psychologie: Modelle psychischer Storungen. Einzelfallstudien zum Lehrbuch der klinischen Psychologie. Germany: Hogrefe, Verlag fur Psychologie.
    Search in Google Scholar
  46. Kolb, D. A., Boyatzis, R., & Mainemelis, C. (2000). Experiential learning theory: Previous research and new directions. In R. J. Sternberg, & L. F. Zhang (Eds.), Perspectives on cognitive learning and thinking styles. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    Search in Google Scholar
  47. Kozulin, A. (1999). Profiles of immigrant students` cognitive performance on Raven`s progressive matrices. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 87(3), 1311-1314.
    Search in Google Scholar
  48. Kulistak, P. (2003). Neuropsychologie. Praha: Portál.
    Search in Google Scholar
  49. Lebeer, J., Candeias, A., & Gracio, M. L. (2011). With a different glance. Dynamic assessment and functioning of children oriented at development & inclusive learning. Belgium: Garant Publishers.
    Search in Google Scholar
  50. Lidz, C. S. (1992). Dynamic assessment: Some thoughts on the model, the medium, and the message. Learning and individual differences, 4(2), 125--36.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/1041-6080(92)90009-4" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/1041-6080(92)90009-4</a>
    Search in Google Scholar
  51. Lovett, M. W., Lacerenza, L., & Borden, S. B. (2000). Putting struggling readers on the PHAST track: A program to integrate phonological and strategy-based remedial reading instruction and maximize outcomes. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33(5), 458-476.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1177/002221940003300507" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1177/002221940003300507</a>
    Search in Google Scholar
  52. Luther, M., & Wyatt, F. (1996). A comparison of Feuerstein’s method of (LPAD) assessment with conventional IQ testing on disadvantaged North York high school students. In M. Luther, E. Cole, & P. Gamlin (Eds.), Dynamic assessment for instruction: From theory to application (pp. 168-181). Ontario: Captus Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  53. Malda, M., Van de Vijver, F. R., Srinivasan, K., Transler, C., Sukumar, P., & Rao, K. (2008). Adapting a cognitive test for a different culture: An illustration of qualitative procedures. Psychology Science Quarterly, 50(4), 451-468.
    Search in Google Scholar
  54. Marzano, R. J. (1998). A theory-based meta-analysis of research on instruction. Aurora, CO: Mid-continent Regional Educational Laboratory.
    Search in Google Scholar
  55. Meeker, M. (1965). A procedure for relating Stanford Binet behavior samplings to Guilford’s structure of the intellect. Journal of School Psychology, 3(3), 26-36.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-4405(65)90037-3" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/0022-4405(65)90037-3</a>
    Search in Google Scholar
  56. Miles, D., & Forcht, J. P. (1995). Mathematics strategies for secondary students with learning disabilities or mathematics deficiencies: A cognitive approach. Intervention in School and Clinic, 31, 91-96.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1177/105345129503100205" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1177/105345129503100205</a>
    Search in Google Scholar
  57. Minnaert, A. (2002). Alternative assessment of students’ domain-specific learning competencies in the transition of secondary to higher education. In G. M. Van der Aalsvoort, W. C. M. Resing, & A. J. J. M. Ruijssenaars (Eds.), Learning potential assessment and cognitive training: Actual research and perspectives in theory building and methodology (Volume 7, pp. 335-351). Amsterdam: JAI.
    Search in Google Scholar
  58. Murphy, R. (2007). Exploring a meta-theoretical framework for dynamic assessment and intelligence. Dissertation thesis. University of Pretoria.
    Search in Google Scholar
  59. Nyborg, M. (1993). Pedagogy: The study of how to provide optimum conditions of learning for persons who may differ widely in pre-requisites for learning. Norway: Nordisk undervisningsforlag.
    Search in Google Scholar
  60. OECD. (2007). OECD Factbook 2007 - Economic, Environmental and Social Statistics. OECD.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1787/journal_dev-v8-2-en" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1787/journal_dev-v8-2-en</a>
    Search in Google Scholar
  61. Paour, J. L., & Soavi, G. (1992). A case study in the induction of logic structures. In H. C. Haywood, & D. Tzuriel (Eds.), Interactive Assessment (pp. 419-442). New York: Springer.
    Search in Google Scholar
  62. Primi, R., Ferrão, M. E., & Almeida, L. S. (2010). Fluid intelligence as a predictor of learning: A longitudinal multilevel approach applied to math. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(5), 446-451. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2010.05.001" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/j.lindif.2010.05.001</a>
    Search in Google Scholar
  63. Rand, Y., & Kaniel, S. (1987). Group administration of the LPAD. In C. S. Lidz (Ed.), Dynamic assessment: an interactional approach to evaluating learning potential (pp. 196-214). NewYork: The Guilford Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  64. Resing, W. C. M. (2013). Dynamic testing and individualized instruction: Helpful in cognitive education? Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 12(1), 81-95.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1891/1945-8959.12.1.81" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1891/1945-8959.12.1.81</a>
    Search in Google Scholar
  65. Resing, W. C. M., Roth, J. M., & Van der Werf, T. J. M. (2002). Learning potential assessment and cognitive training in inductive reasoning: emergent relationship? In G. M. Van der Aalsvoort, W. C. M. Resing, & A. J. J. M. Ruijssenaars (Eds.), Learning potential assessment and cognitive training: actual research and perspectives in theory building and methodology (Volume 7, pp. 175-208). Amsterdam: JAI.
    Search in Google Scholar
  66. Ropovik, I. (2014). Do executive functions predict the ability to learn problem-solving principles? Intelligence, 44, 64-74.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2014.03.002" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/j.intell.2014.03.002</a>
    Search in Google Scholar
  67. Sawyer, R. K. (2006). Educating for innovation. In A. Craft, & R. Wegerif (Eds.), The International Journal of Thinking Skills and Creativity, 1(1), 41-48.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2005.08.001" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/j.tsc.2005.08.001</a>
    Search in Google Scholar
  68. Sousa, D. (2001). How the brain learns. Thousand Oaks, California: Corwin Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  69. Stanovich, K. E., Cunningham, A. E., & Freeman, D. (1984). Intelligence, cognitive skills and early reading progress. Reading Research Quarterly, 14, 278-303.<a href="https://doi.org/10.2307/747822" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.2307/747822</a>
    Search in Google Scholar
  70. Sternberg, R. J. (2013). Introduction to the special issue. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 12, (1), 4-5.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1891/1945-8959.12.1.4" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1891/1945-8959.12.1.4</a>
    Search in Google Scholar
  71. Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2002). Dynamic Testing: The nature and measurement of learning potential. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  72. Stevenson C. E. (2012). Puzzling with potential. Dynamic testing of analogical reasoning in children (Doctoral dissertation, Leiden University). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Ipskamp Drukkerij.
    Search in Google Scholar
  73. Swanson, H. L., & Lussier, C. M. (2001). A selective synthesis of the experimental literature on dynamic assessment. Review of Educational Research, 71(2), 321-363.<a href="https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543071002321" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.3102/00346543071002321</a>
    Search in Google Scholar
  74. Taub, G., Floyd, R. G., Keith, T. Z., & McGrew, K. S. (2008). Effects of general and broad cognitive abilities on mathematics. School Psychology Quarterly, 23(2), 187-198.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1037/1045-3830.23.2.187" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1037/1045-3830.23.2.187</a>
    Search in Google Scholar
  75. Tokuhama-Espinosa, T. (2010). Mind, brain and education science. New York: W.W. Norton Company.
    Search in Google Scholar
  76. Tzuriel, D. (2001). Dynamic assessment of young children. New York, NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Press.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1255-4" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1007/978-1-4615-1255-4</a>
    Search in Google Scholar
  77. Tzuriel, D. (2002). Cognitive education: The menace and the hope. In G. M. Van der Aalsvoort, W. C. M. Resing, & A. J. J. M. Ruijssenaars (Eds ), Learning potential assessment and cognitive training: actual research and perspectives in theory building and methodology (Volume 7, pp. 355-363). Amsterdam: JAI.
    Search in Google Scholar
  78. Tzuriel, D., & Klein, P. S. (1987). Assessing the young child: Children’s analogical thinking modifiability. In C. S. Lidz (Ed.). Dynamic assessment: an interactional approach to evaluating learning potential (pp. 268-287). New York: Guilford Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  79. Tzuriel, D., & Shamir, A. (2007). The effects of peer mediation with young children (PMYC) on children’s cognitive modifiability. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 143-165.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1348/000709905X84279" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1348/000709905X84279</a>
    Search in Google Scholar
  80. Ukrainetz, T. W., Harpell, S., Walsh, C., & Coyle, C. (2000). A preliminary investigation of dynamic assessment with Native American kindergartners. Language, speech and hearing services in schools, 31(2), 142-154.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461.3102.142" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1044/0161-1461.3102.142</a>
    Search in Google Scholar
  81. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
    Search in Google Scholar
  82. Walsh. K. (1978). Neuropsychology: A clinical approach. New York: Churchill Livingston.
    Search in Google Scholar
  83. Wolf, O. T., Schommer, N. C., Hellhammer, D. H., Reischies, F. M., & Kirschbaum, C. (2002). Moderate psychosocial stress appears not to impair recall of words learned four weeks prior to stress exposure. Stress: The International Journal on the Biology of Stress, 5(1), 59-6410.1080/102538902900012332
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jped-2015-0001 | Journal eISSN: 1338-2144 | Journal ISSN: 1338-1563
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 5 - 21
Published on: Jul 24, 2015
Published by: Sciendo
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 times per year
Related subjects:
Social sciences,
Education,
Education, other

© 2015 Iveta Kovalčíková, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Volume 6 (2015): Issue 1 (June 2015)Next article