References
- Berry, C. and E. O’Brien. 2016. “Managing the Fast-Track Transformation of a 35-Year Old Federal Survey.” Presented at the 2016 FedCASIC Workshop, Washington DC, May 4, 2016. Available at: https://www.census.gov/fedcasic/fc2016/ppt/2_2_Speed.pdf (accessed September 2016).
- Biemer, P., P. Kott, and J. Murphy. 2016. “Estimating Mail or Web Survey Eligibility for Undeliverable Addresses: A Latent Class Analysis Approach.” Proceedings of the Survey Research Methods Section: American Statistical Association, Chicago, IL, August 2016, 1166-1172. Available at: https://ww2.amstat.org/sections/srms/Proceedings/y2016/files/389587.pdf.
- Chang, T. and P.S. Kott. 2008. “Using Calibration Weighting to Adjust for Nonresponse under a Plausible Model.” Biometrika 95: 557-571. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/biomet/asn022 (A version for the full appendices can be found here: http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/handle/234362).10.1093/biomet/asn022(Aversionfoundhere:http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/handle/234362)
- Deville, J.C. 2000. “Generalized Calibration and Application to Weighting for Nonresponse.” COMPSTAT: Proceedings in Computational Statistics, 14th Symposium, Utrecht, The Netherlands, edited by J.G. Bethlehem and P.G.M. van der Heijden. New York: Springer-Verlag. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-57678-2.10.1007/978-3-642-57678-2
- Kim, J.K. and M. Riddles. 2012. “Some Theory for Propensity Scoring Adjustment Estimator.” Survey Methodology 38: 157-165.
- Kott, P. 2014. “Calibration Weighting When Model and Calibration Variables Can Differ.” In Contributions to Survey Statistics - ITACOSM 2013 Selected Papers (pp. 1-18). Cham: Springer, Contributions to Statistics. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05320-2_1.10.1007/978-3-319-05320-2_1
- Kott, P. and T. Chang. 2010. “Using Calibration Weighting to Adjust for Nonignorable Unit Nonresponse.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 105: 1265-1275. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1198/jasa.2010.tm09016.10.1198/jasa.2010.tm09016
- Kott, P. and D. Liao. 2017. “Calibration Weighting for Nonresponse that is Not Missing at Random: Allowing for More Calibration than Response-model Variables.” Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology 5(2): 159-174. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smx003.10.1093/jssam/smx003
- Little, R. and S. Vartivarian. 2005. “Does Weighting for Nonresponse Increase the Variance of Survey Means?” Survey Methodology 31: 161-168.
- Molenberghs, G., C. Beunckens, and C. Sotto. 2008. “Every Missingness Not at Random Model has a Missingness at Random Counterpart with Equal Fit.” Journal of Royal Statistical Society B 70: 371-388. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9868.2007.00640.x.10.1111/j.1467-9868.2007.00640.x
- National Research Council. 2010. The Prevention and Treatment of Missing Data in Clinical Trials. Panel on Handling Missing Data in Clinical Trials. Committee on National Statistics, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education.
- Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.17226/12955.10.17226/12955
- Research Triangle Institute. 2012. SUDAAN Language Manual, Volumes 1 and 2, Release 11. Research Triangle Park, NC: Research Triangle Institute.
- Särndal, C-E. and S. Lundstro¨m. 2005. Estimation in Surveys with Nonresponse. John Wiley & Sons: Chichester. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/0470011351.10.1002/0470011351
- Tille, Y. and A. Matei. 2013. Package ‘Sampling.’ A software routine available at” http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/sampling/sampling.pdf (accessed October 2017).