Have a personal or library account? Click to login

The Implications of Alternative Allocation Criteria in Adaptive Design for Panel Surveys

By:
Open Access
|Sep 2017

References

  1. Al Baghal, T. (ed.). 2014. “Understanding Society Innovation Panel Wave 6: Results from Methodological Experiments.” Understanding Society Working Paper Series 2014-04. Available at: https://www.understandingsociety.ac.uk/research/publications/working-paper/understanding-society/2014-04.pdf (accessed 24 February 2016).
  2. Al Baghal, T. (ed.). 2015. “Wave 7: Results from Methodological Experiments.” Understanding Society Working Paper Series 2015-03. Available at: https://www.understandingsociety.ac.uk/research/publications/working-paper/understanding-society/2015-03.pdf (accessed 24 February 2016).
  3. Bethlehem, J., F. Cobben, and B. Schouten. 2011. Handbook of Nonresponse in Household Surveys. New Jersey: Wiley.10.1002/9780470891056
  4. Burton, J. (ed.). 2013. “Understanding Society Innovation Panel Wave 5: Results from Methodological Experiments.” Understanding Society Working Paper Series 2013-06. Available at: https://www.understandingsociety.ac.uk/research/publications/working-paper/understanding-society/2013-06.pdf (accessed 24 February 2016).
  5. Calinescu, M. and B. Schouten. 2015. “Adaptive Survey Designs to Minimize Survey Mode Effects – a Case Study on the Dutch Labor Force Survey.” Survey Methodology 41(2): 403–425.
  6. Durrant, G., R.M. Groves, L. Staetsky, and F. Steele. 2010. “Effects of Interviewer Attitudes and Behaviors on Refusal in Household Surveys.” Public Opinion Quarterly 74(1) : 1–36. Doi: 10.1093/poq/nfp098">http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfp098.10.1093/poq/nfp098
  7. Durrant, G.B., O. Maslovskaya, and P. Smith. 2015. “Modelling Final Outcome and Length of Call Sequence to Improve Efficiency in Interviewer Call Scheduling.” Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology 3: 397–424. Doi: 10.1093/jssam/smv008">http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smv008.10.1093/jssam/smv008
  8. Groves, R.M. 1989. Survey Errors and Survey Costs. New York: Wiley.10.1002/0471725277
  9. Groves, R.M., J.M. Brick, W. Kalsbeek, B. Harris-Kojetin, F. Kreuter, B.-E. Pennell, T. Raghunathan, B. Schouten, T. Smith, R. Tourangeau, A. Bowers, M. Jans, C. Kennedy, R. Levenstein, K. Olson, E. Peytcheva, S. Ziniel, and J. Wagner. 2008. “Issues Facing the Field: Alternative Practical Measures of Representativeness of Survey Respondent Pools.” Survey Practice 1(3): 1–6.10.29115/SP-2008-0013
  10. Groves, R.M. and M.P. Couper. 1998. Nonresponse in Household Interview Surveys. New York: Wiley.10.1002/9781118490082
  11. Groves, R.M. and S.G. Heeringa. 2006. “Responsive Design for Household Surveys: Tools for Actively Controlling Survey Errors and Costs.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A 169: 439–457.10.1111/j.1467-985X.2006.00423.x
  12. Groves, R.M. and E. Peytcheva. 2008. “The Impact of Nonresponse Rates on Nonresponse Bias: A Meta-Analysis.” Public Opinion Quarterly 72(2): 167–189. Doi: 10.1093/poq/nfn011">http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfn011.10.1093/poq/nfn011
  13. Jäckle, A., P. Lynn, and J. Burton. 2015. “Going Online with a Face-to-Face Household Panel: Effects of a Mixed Mode Design on Item and Unit Nonresponse.” Survey Research Methods 9(1): 57–70. Doi: 10.18148/srm/2015.v9i1.5475">http://dx.doi.org/10.18148/srm/2015.v9i1.5475.
  14. Kanuk, L. and C. Berenson. 1975. “Mail Surveys and Response Rates: A Literature Review.” Journal of Marketing Research 12: 440–453.10.1177/002224377501200408
  15. Kaplowitz, M.D., T.D. Hadlock, and R. Levine. 2004. “A Comparison of Web and Mail Survey Response Rates.” Public Opinion Quarterly 68: 94–101.10.1093/poq/nfh006
  16. Kaplowitz, M.D., F. Lupi, M.P. Couper, and L. Thorp. 2012. “The Effect of Invitation Design on Web Survey Response Rates.” Social Science Computer Review 30(3): 339–349. Doi: 10.1177/0894439311419084">http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0894439311419084.10.1177/0894439311419084
  17. Kish, L. 1965. Survey Sampling. New York: Wiley.
  18. Lundquist, P. and C.-E. Särndal. 2013. “Aspects of Responsive Design with Applications to the Swedish Living Conditions Survey.” Journal of Official Statistics 29(4): 557–582. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2478/jos-2013-0040">https://doi.org/10.2478/jos-2013-0040.10.2478/jos-2013-0040
  19. Lynn, P. 2014. “Targeted Response Inducement Strategies on Longitudinal Surveys.” In Improving Survey Methods: Lessons from Recent Research, edited by U. Engel, B. Jann, P. Lynn, A. Scherpenzeel, and P. Sturgis, pp. 322–338. Abingdon UK: Psychology Press.
  20. Lynn, P. 2017. “From Standardised to Targeted Survey Procedures for Tackling Non-Response and Attrition.” Survey Research Methods 11(1): 93–103. Doi: 10.18148/srm/2017.v11i1.6734">http://dx.doi.org/10.18148/srm/2017.v11i1.6734.
  21. Lynn, P. and A. Jäckle. in press. “Mounting Multiple Experiments on Longitudinal Social Surveys: Design and Implementation Considerations.” In Experimental Methods in Survey Research: Techniques that Combine Random Sampling with Random Assignment, edited by P.J. Lavrakas, M.W. Traugott, C. Kennedy, A.L. Holbrook, E.D. De Leeuw, and B.T. West. Hoboken NJ: Wiley.
  22. Särndal, C.-E. 2011. “The 2010 Morris Hansen Lecture: Dealing with Survey Nonresponse in Data Collection, in Estimation.” Journal of Official Statistics 27(1): 1–21.
  23. Schouten, B., J. Bethlehem, K. Beullens, O. Kleven, G. Loosveldt, A. Luiten, K. Rutar, N. Shlomo, and C. Skinner. 2012. “Evaluating, Comparing, Monitoring, and Improving Representativeness of Survey Response Through R-Indicators and Partial RIndicators.” International Statistical Review 80(3): 382–399.10.1111/j.1751-5823.2012.00189.x
  24. Schouten, B., M. Calinescu, and A. Luiten. 2013. “Optimizing Quality of Response Through Adaptive Survey Designs.” Survey Methodology 39(1): 29–58.
  25. Schouten, B., F. Cobben, and J. Bethlehem. 2009. “Indicators for the Representativeness of Survey Response.” Survey Methodology 35(1): 101–113.
  26. Schouten, B. and N. Shlomo. 2015. “Selecting Adaptive Survey Design Strata with Partial R-indicators.” International Statistical Review 85(1): 143–163. Doi: 10.1111/insr.12159">http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/insr.12159.10.1111/insr.12159
  27. Schouten, B., N. Shlomo, and C. Skinner. 2011. “Indicators for Monitoring and Improving Representativeness of Response.” Journal of Official Statistics 27(2): 231–253.
  28. Sheehan, K.B. 2001. “Email Survey Response Rates: A Review.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 6(2): 1–16.10.1111/j.1083-6101.2001.tb00117.x
  29. Shlomo, N., B. Schouten, and V. de Heij. 2013. Designing Adaptive Survey Designs with R-Indicators. Available at: http://www.risq-project.eu/papers/shlomo-schouten-heij-2013.pdf (accessed February 24 2016).
  30. Singer, E. and C. Ye. 2013. “The Use and Effects of Incentives in Surveys.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 645: 112.10.1177/0002716212458082
  31. Uhrig, S.C. 2008. The Nature and Causes of Attrition in the British Household Panel Study. ISER Working Paper Series, 2008(05). Colchester: Institute for Social and Economic Research, University of Essex.
  32. Wagner, J.R. 2008. Adaptive Survey Design to Reduce Nonresponse Bias, PhD Dissertation. University of Michigan.
  33. Wagner, J.R. 2012. “Research Synthesis: a Comparison of Alternative Indicators for the Risk of Nonresponse Bias.” Public Opinion Quarterly 76(3): 555–575. Doi: 10.1093/poq/nfs032">http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfs032.10.1093/poq/nfs032627697530538342
  34. Watson, N. and M. Wooden. 2009. “Identifying Factors Affecting Longitudinal Survey Response.” In Methodology of Longitudinal Surveys, edited by P. Lynn, pp. 157–181. Chichester: Wiley. Doi: 10.1002/9780470743874">http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470743874.10.1002/9780470743874
  35. White, N., T. Bourne, and A. Patterson. 2011. Understanding Society Innovation Panel 2: Technical Report. Available at: https://www.understandingsociety.ac.uk/documentation/innovation-panel/technical-reports (accessed January 24 2017).
  36. Yu, J. and H. Cooper. 1983. “A Quantitative Review of Research Design Effects on Response Rates to Questionnaires.” Journal of Marketing Research 20(1): 36–44.10.1177/002224378302000105
Language: English
Page range: 781 - 799
Submitted on: Mar 1, 2016
Accepted on: Jun 1, 2017
Published on: Sep 9, 2017
Published by: Sciendo
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 times per year

© 2017 Olena Kaminska, Peter Lynn, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.