Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Inconsistent Regression and Nonresponse Bias: Exploring Their Relationship as a Function of Response Imbalance Cover

Inconsistent Regression and Nonresponse Bias: Exploring Their Relationship as a Function of Response Imbalance

Open Access
|Sep 2017

References

  1. Brick, J.M. 2013. “Unit Nonresponse and Weighting Adjustments: A Critical Review.” Journal of Official Statistics 29: 329–353. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2478/jos-2013-0026">https://doi.org/10.2478/jos-2013-0026.10.2478/jos-2013-0026
  2. Deville, J.C. and Y. Tillé. 2004. “Efficient Balanced Sampling. The Cube Method.” Biometrika 91: 893–912. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/91.4.893">https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/91.4.893.10.1093/biomet/91.4.893
  3. Groves, R.M. and S.G. Heeringa. 2006. “Responsive Design for Household Surveys: Tools for Actively Controlling Survey Errors and Costs.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A 169: 439–457. Doi: 10.1111/j.1467-985X.2006.00423.x">http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-985X.2006.00423.x.10.1111/j.1467-985X.2006.00423.x
  4. Haziza, D. and É. Lesage. 2016. “A Discussion of Weighting Procedures for Unit Nonresponse.” Journal of Official Statistics 32: 129–145. Doi: 10.1515/jos-2016-0006">http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/jos-2016-0006.10.1515/jos-2016-0006
  5. Heckman, J.J. 1979. “Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error.” Econometrica 47: 153–161. Doi: 10.2307/1912352">http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1912352.10.2307/1912352
  6. Legg, J.C. and C.L. Yu. 2010. “A Comparison of Sample Set Restriction Procedures.” Survey Methodology 36: 69–79.
  7. Little, R.J.A. and S. Vartivarian. 2005. “Does Weighting for Nonresponse Increase the Variance of Survey Means?” Survey Methodology 31: 161–168.
  8. Lundquist, P. and C.E. Särndal. 2013. “Aspects of Responsive Design – With Applications to the Swedish Living Conditions Survey.” Journal of Official Statistics 29: 557–582. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2478/jos-2013-0040">https://doi.org/10.2478/jos-2013-0040.10.2478/jos-2013-0040
  9. Matei, A. and M.G. Ranalli. 2015. “Dealing with Non-Ignorable Nonresponse in Survey Sampling: A Latent Modeling Approach.” Survey Methodology 41: 145–164.
  10. Särndal, C.E., K. Lumiste, and I. Traat. 2016. “Reducing the Response Imbalance: Is the Accuracy of the Survey Estimates Improved?” Survey Methodology 42: 219–238.
  11. Särndal, C.E. and P. Lundquist. 2014. “Accuracy in Estimation with Nonresponse: A Function of Degree of Imbalance and Degree of Explanation.” Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology 2: 361–387. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smu014">https://doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smu014.10.1093/jssam/smu014
  12. Schouten, B., F. Cobben, P. Lundquist, and J. Wagner. 2016. “Does More Balanced Survey Response Imply Less Non-Response Bias?” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A 179: 727–748. Doi: 10.1111/rssa.12152">http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/rssa.12152.10.1111/rssa.12152
  13. Schouten, B. 2015. “Statistical Inference Based on Randomly Generated Auxiliary Variables.” Discussion Paper. Statistics Netherlands, The Hague.
  14. Schouten, B., M. Calinescu, and A. Luiten. 2013. “Optimizing Quality of Response Through Adaptive Survey Designs.” Survey Methodology 39: 29–58.
  15. Schouten, B., N. Shlomo, and C. Skinner. 2011. “Indicators for Monitoring and Improving Representativeness of Response.” Journal of Official Statistics 27: 231–253.
  16. Schouten, B., F. Cobben, and J. Bethlehem. 2009. “Indicators for the Representativeness of Survey Response.” Survey Methodology 35: 101–113.
  17. Tourangeau, R., J.M. Brick, S. Lohr, and J. Li. 2017. “Adaptive and Responsive Survey Designs: a Review and Assessment.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A 180: 203–223. Doi: 10.1111/rssa.12186">http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/rssa.12186.10.1111/rssa.12186
  18. Vartivarian, S. and R.J.A. Little. 2002. “On the Formation of Weighting Adjustment Cells for Unit Nonresponse.” In proceedings of American Statistical Association, Survey Research Methods Section, 3553–3558.
  19. Vella, F. 1998. “Estimating Models With Sample Selection Bias.” Journal of Human Resources 33: 127–169. Doi: 10.2307/146317">http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/146317.10.2307/146317
Language: English
Page range: 709 - 734
Submitted on: Apr 1, 2016
Accepted on: Apr 1, 2017
Published on: Sep 9, 2017
Published by: Sciendo
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 times per year

© 2017 Carl-Erik Särndal, Peter Lundquist, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.