Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Census Model Transition: Contributions to its Implementation in Portugal Cover

Census Model Transition: Contributions to its Implementation in Portugal

Journal of Official Statistics
Volume 32 (2016): Issue 1 (March 2016)
By: Carlos A. Dias,  Anders Wallgren,  Britt Wallgren and  Pedro S. Coelho  
Open Access
|Mar 2016

References

  1. Andersen, E. and H. Utne. 2011. “Censuses in a Register-Based Statistical System: Norwegian Experiences.” Paper presented at the 58th World Statistics Congress ISI 2011, IP064.01, 21-26 August, Dublin, Ireland.
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. Ballano, C. 2008. “A Census of Population Based on an Administrative Register.” Paper presented at the 24th International Methodology Symposium, Statistics Canada, 28-31 October, Ottawa, Canada.
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. Berka, C., S. Humer, M. Lenk, M. Moser, H. Rechta, and E. Schwerer. 2010. “A Quality Framework for Statistics Based on Administrative Data Sources Using the Example of the Austrian Census 2011.” Austrian Journal of Statistics 39: 299-308.
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. Borchsenius, L. 2000. “From a Conventional to a Register-Based Census of Population.” Paper presented at the INSEE/Eurostat Seminar on the Censuses after 2001, 20-21 November, Paris, France.
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. Conti, P., D. Marella, and M. Scanu. 2012. “Uncertainty Analysis in Statistical Matching.” Journal of Official Statistics 28: 69-88.
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. Daas, P., S. Ossen, and J. Arends-Tóth. 2009. “Framework of Quality Assurance for Administrative Data Sources.” Paper presented at the 57th World Statistics Congress ISI 2009, 16-22 August, Durban, South Africa.
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. Dolenc, D. 2010. “Quality Assessment in a Register-Based Census - Administrative Versus Statistical Concepts in the Case of Households.” Paper presented at the European Conference on Quality in Official Statistics, 4-6 May, Helsinki, Finland.
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. Dugmore, K., P. Furness, B. Leventhal, and C. Moy. 2011. “Beyond the 2011 Census in the United Kingdom - With an International Perspective.” The Market Research Society 53: 619-650.10.2501/IJMR-53-5-619-650
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. Durr, J. and J. Dumais. 2002. “Redesign of the French Census of Population.” Survey Methodology 28: 43-49.
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. Eppmann, H., S. Krügener, and J. Schäfer. 2006. “First German Register Based Census in 2011.” Allgemeines Statistisches Archiv 90: 465-482. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10182-006-0246-9.10.1007/s10182-006-0246-9
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. Eurostat. 2011. EU legislation on the 2011 Population and Housing Censuses - Explanatory Notes. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. Herman, E. 2008. “The American Community Survey: An Introduction to the Basics.” Government Information Quarterly 25: 504-519. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2007.08.006.10.1016/j.giq.2007.08.006
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. Houbiers, M. 2004. “Towards a Social Statistical Database and Unified Estimates at Statistics Netherlands.” Journal of Official Statistics 20: 55-75.
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. Instituto Nacional de Estatística (INE). 2010. Programa de Acção para os Censos 2011. Lisbon, Portugal.
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. Kish, L. 1986. “Complete Censuses and Sample.” Journal of Official Statistics 2: 381-395.
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. Kish, L. 1990. “Rolling Samples and Censuses.” Survey Methodology 16: 63-93.
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. Linder, F. 2004. “The Dutch Virtual Census 2001: A New Approach by Combining Administrative Registers and Household Sample Surveys.” Austrian Journal of Statistics 33: 69-88.
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. Maldonado, A., D. Scheuregger, and K. Ziprik. 2010. “Setting Up the Central Register of Addresses and Buildings of the German Census 2011.” Paper presented at the European Conference on Quality in Official Statistics, 4-6 May, Helsinki, Finland.
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. Mulry, M., S. Bean, D. Bauder, D. Wagner, T. Mule, and R. Petroni. 2006. “Evaluation of Estimates of Census Duplication Using Administrative Records Information.” Journal of Official Statistics 22: 655-679.
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. Myrskylä, P. 1991. “Census by Questionnaire - Census by Registers and Administrative Records: The Experience of Finland.” Journal of Official Statistics 7: 457-474.
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. Nordholt, E. 2005. “The Dutch Virtual Census 2001: A New Approach by Combining Different Sources.” Statistical Journal of the United Nations Commission for Europe 22: 25-37.10.3233/SJU-2005-22104
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. Nordholt, E. and F. Linder. 2007. “Record Matching for Census Purposes in the Netherlands.” Statistical Journal of the IAOS 24: 163-171.
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. Nordholt, E., S. Ossen, and P. Daas. 2011. “Research on the Quality of Registers to Make Data Decisions in the Dutch Virtual Census.” Paper presented at the 58th World Statistics Congress ISI 2011, STS050.01, 21-26 August, Dublin, Ireland. Available at: http://2011.isiproceedings.org/Abstracts/STS050.html (accessed April 2012).
    Search in Google Scholar
  24. Ralphs, M. and P. Tutton. 2011. “Beyond 2011: International Models for Census Taking: Current Processes and Future Developments.” Working Paper: Beyond 2011 Project - Office for National Statistics. Available at: http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/about-ons/what-we-do/programmes--projects/beyond-2011/news/reports-and-publications/earlyreports-and-research-papers/international-models-for-census-taking.pdf (accessed April 2012).
    Search in Google Scholar
  25. Redfern, P. 1986. “Which Countries Will Follow the Scandinavian Lead in Taking a Register-Based Census of Population?” Journal of Official Statistics 2: 415-424.
    Search in Google Scholar
  26. Redfern, P. 1989. “Population Registers: Some Administrative and Statistical Pros and Cons.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A 152: 1-41. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2982819.10.2307/2982819
    Search in Google Scholar
  27. Scheuren, F. 1999. “Administrative Records and Census Taking.” Survey Methodology 25: 151-160.
    Search in Google Scholar
  28. Statistics Denmark. 1995. Statistics on Persons in Denmark - A Register-Based Statistical System. Luxembourg: Eurostat and Denmark Statistics.
    Search in Google Scholar
  29. Statistics Finland. 2004. Use of Registers and Administrative Data Sources for Statistical Purposes - Best Practices of Statistics Finland. Handbook 45, Helsinki, Finland.
    Search in Google Scholar
  30. Statistics Portugal. 2010. “Implementing a Register-Based Census in Portugal: Changing the Paradigm.” Paper presented at Joint UNECE/Eurostat Expert Group Meeting on Register-Based Censuses, 10-11 May, The Hague, The Netherlands.
    Search in Google Scholar
  31. Szenzenstein, J. 2005. “The New Method of the Next German Population Census.” Statistical Journal of the United Nations Commission for Europe 22: 59-71.10.3233/SJU-2005-22106
    Search in Google Scholar
  32. Tönder, J.-K. 2008. “The Register-Based Statistical System: Preconditions and Processes.” Paper presented at the International Association for Official Statistics Conference, 14-18 October, Shanghai, China.
    Search in Google Scholar
  33. United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE). 2006. Conference of European Statisticians Recommendations for the 2010 Censuses of Population and Housing, Prepared in cooperation with the Statistical Office of the European Communities (Eurostat). New York and Geneva: United Nations Publications.
    Search in Google Scholar
  34. United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE). 2007. Register-Based Statistics in the Nordic Countries: Review of Best Practices with Focus on Population and Social Statistics. Geneva, Switzerland: United Nations Publications.
    Search in Google Scholar
  35. United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE). 2013. “Census Methodology: Key Results of the UNECE Survey on National Census Practices, and First Proposals about the CES Recommendations for the 2020 Census Round.” Paper presented at the Conference of European Statisticians - Group of Experts on Population and Housing Censuses, 30 September - 3 October, Geneva, Switzerland. Available at: http://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/stats/documents/ece/ces/ge.41/2013/census_meeting/3_E_x_15_Aug_WEB_revised_map.pdf (accessed September 2014).
    Search in Google Scholar
  36. United Nations Statistic Division (UNSD). 2010. Report on the Results of a Survey on Census Methods Used by Countries in the 2010 Census Round. Working Paper: UNSD/DSSB/1. Available at: http://unstats.un.org/unsd/demographic/sources/census/2010_phc/docs/ReportOnSurveyFor2010Census.pdf (accessed April 2012).
    Search in Google Scholar
  37. Valente, P. 2010a. “Main Results of the UNECE/UNSD Survey on the 2010/2011 Round of Census in the UNECE Region”. Paper presented at the Working Group on Demography and Census - Eurostat, 19-20 April, Luxembourg.
    Search in Google Scholar
  38. Valente, P. 2010b. “Census Taking in Europe: How Are Populations Counted in 2010?” Population & Societies 467: 1-4.
    Search in Google Scholar
  39. Valente, P. 2011. “Innovative Approaches to Census-Taking: Overview of the 2011 Census Round in Europe.” Paper presented at the conference “Statistics in the 150 years from Italian Unification”, June 8-10, Bologna, Italy.
    Search in Google Scholar
  40. Wallgren, A. and B. Wallgren. 2007. Register-Based Statistics - Administrative Data for Statistical Purposes. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9780470061350
    Search in Google Scholar
  41. Winkler, W. 2011. “Machine Learning and Record Linkage.” Paper presented at the 58th World Statistics Congress ISI 2011, IPS057.01, 21-26 August, Dublin, Ireland. Available at: http://2011.isiproceedings.org/papers/450070.pdf (accessed January 2016).
    Search in Google Scholar
  42. Woods, S. 2009. “Evaluating Population Estimates in the United States: Counting the Population Between the Censuses.” Government Information Quarterly 26: 144-147.10.1016/j.giq.2007.02.006
    Search in Google Scholar
  43. Zanutto, E. and A. Zaslavsky. 2002. “Using Administrative Records to Improve Small Area Estimation: An Example from the U.S. Decennial Census.” Journal of Official Statistics 18: 559-576.
    Search in Google Scholar
  44. Zhang, L. 2011. “A United-Error Theory for Register-Based Household Statistics.” Journal of Official Statistics 27: 415-432.
    Search in Google Scholar
  45. Zhang, L. 2012. “Topics of Statistical Theory for Register-Based Statistics and Data Integration.” Statistica Neerlandica 66: 41-63. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9574.2011.00508.x. 10.1111/j.1467-9574.2011.00508.x
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jos-2016-0004 | Journal eISSN: 2001-7367
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 93 - 112
Submitted on: Apr 1, 2012
|
Accepted on: Sep 1, 2015
|
Published on: Mar 10, 2016
Published by: Sciendo
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Keywords:
Administrative registers,
register-based census,
traditional census
Related subjects:
Mathematics,
Probability and statistics

© 2016 Carlos A. Dias, Anders Wallgren, Britt Wallgren, Pedro S. Coelho, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 32 (2016): Issue 1 (March 2016)Next article