Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Sensitivity of Mixed-Source Statistics to Classification Errors Cover

Sensitivity of Mixed-Source Statistics to Classification Errors

Journal of Official Statistics
Volume 31 (2015): Issue 3 (September 2015)
By:
Open Access
|Sep 2015

References

  1. Bakker, B.F.M. and P.J.H. Daas. 2012. “Methodological Challenges of Register-Based Research.” Statistica Neerlandica 66: 2-7. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9574.2011.00505.x.10.1111/j.1467-9574.2011.00505.x
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. Bethlehem, J. 2009. Applied Survey Methods: A Statistical Perspective. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.10.1002/9780470494998
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. Bryant, J. and P. Graham. 2013. “A Bayesian Method for Deriving Population Statistics from Multiple Imperfect Data Sources.” Paper presented at the World Statistics Congress, August 25-30, Hong Kong. Available at: http://www.statistics.gov.hk/wsc/IPS027-P4-S.pdf (accessed December 2013).
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. Burger, J., J. Davies, D. Lewis, A. Van Delden, P. Daas, and J.-M. Frost. 2013. Guidance on the Accuracy of Mixed-Source Statistics. Deliverable 6.3/2011 of ESSnet Admin Data. Available at: http://essnet.admindata.eu/WorkPackage/ShowAllDocuments?objectId=4257 (accessed December 2013).
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. Chamberlain, J. and E. Schulte Nordholt. 2004. “The Results of the 2001 Census in the Netherlands, the United Kingdom and Some Other European Countries.” In The Dutch Virtual Census of 2001, Analysis and Methodology, edited by E. Schulte Nordholt, M. Hartgers and R. Gircour, 225-241. Statistics Netherlands: Voorburg/Heerlen.
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. Delden, A. van and P.P. de Wolf. 2013. “A Production System for Quarterly Turnover Levels and Growth Rates Based on VAT Data.” In Proceedings of the Conferences on New Techniques and Technologies for Statistics, March 5-7 2013. Brussels. Available at: http://www.cros-portal.eu/sites/default/files//NTTS2013%20Proceedings_0.pdf (accessed December 2013).
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. Demnati, A. and J.N.K. Rao. 2009. “Linearization Variance Estimation and Allocation for Two-Phase Sampling under Mass Imputation.” Paper for the Federal Committee on Statistical Methodology Research Conference, November 2-4, Washington, DC. Available at: http://www.fcsm.gov/09papers/Demnati_VI-C.pdf (accessedDecember 2013).
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. De Munnik, D., M. Illing, and D. Dupuis. 2013. “Assessing the Accuracy of Non-Random Business Conditions Surveys: a Novel Approach.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 176: 371-388. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-985X.2012.01035.x.10.1111/j.1467-985X.2012.01035.x
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. DiCiccio, T.J. and B. Efron. 1996. “Bootstrap Confidence Intervals.” Statistical Science 11: 189-228. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1214/ss/1032280214.10.1214/ss/1032280214
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. Efron, B. and R.J. Tibshirani. 1993. An Introduction to the Bootstrap. London: Chapman & Hall/CRC.10.1007/978-1-4899-4541-9
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. Kuijvenhoven, L., and S. Scholtus. 2011. Bootstrapping Combined Estimator Based on Register and Sample Survey Data. Discussion paper 201123. The Hague/Heerlen: Statistics Netherlands. Available at: http://www.cbs.nl/NR/rdonlyres/06202B2AB6C1-40CC-B25B-4022B7712E59/0/2011x1023.pdf (accessed December 2013).
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. Särndal, C.-E., B. Swensson, and J.H. Wretman. 1992. Model Assisted Survey Sampling. New York: Springer-Verlag.10.1007/978-1-4612-4378-6
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. Shao, J. and R.R. Sitter. 1996. “Bootstrap for Imputed Survey Data.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 91: 1278-1288. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1996.10476997.10.1080/01621459.1996.10476997
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. UNECE. 2007. Register-Based Statistics in the Nordic Countries, Review of Best Practices with Focus on Population and Social Statistics. New York: United Nations. Available at: http://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/stats/publications/Register_based_statistics_in_Nordic_countries.pdf (accessed August 2015).
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. Zhang, L.-C. 2011. “A Unit-Error Theory for Register-Based Household Statistics.” Journal of Official Statistics 27: 415-432.
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. Zhang, L.-C. 2012a. “Topics of Statistical Theory for Register-Based Statistics and Data Integration.” Statistica Neerlandica 66: 41-63. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9574.2011.00508.x.10.1111/j.1467-9574.2011.00508.x
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. Zhang, L.-C. 2012b. “On the Accuracy of Register-Based Census Employment Statistics.” Paper presented at the European Conference on Quality in Official Statistics (Q2012), May 30-June 1, Athens. Available at: http://www.q2012.gr/articlefiles/sessions/23.4_Zhang_AaccuracyRegisterStatistics.pdf (accessed December 2013).
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jos-2015-0029 | Journal eISSN: 2001-7367
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 489 - 506
Published on: Sep 1, 2015
Published by: Sciendo
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 times per year
Keywords:
Accuracy,
coverage error,
administrative data,
short-term business statistics,
bootstrap,
resampling
Related subjects:
Mathematics,
Probability and statistics

© 2015 Joep Burger, Arnout van Delden, Sander Scholtus, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 31 (2015): Issue 3 (September 2015)Next article