Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Quality Assessment of Imputations in Administrative Data Cover

Quality Assessment of Imputations in Administrative Data

Journal of Official Statistics
Volume 31 (2015): Issue 2 (June 2015)
By: Matthias Schnetzer,  Franz Astleithner,  Predrag Cetkovic,  Stefan Humer,  Manuela Lenk and  Mathias Moser  
Open Access
|Jun 2015

References

  1. Andridge, R.R. and R.J.A. Little. 2010. “A Review of Hot Deck Imputation for Survey Non-response.” International Statistical Review 78: 40-64. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-5823.2010.00103.x.10.1111/j.1751-5823.2010.00103.x313033821743766
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. Axelson, M., A. Holmberg, I. Jansson, P. Werner, and S. Westling. 2012. “Doing a Register-Based Census for the First Time: The Swedish Experiences.” In Proceedings of JSM 2012, Survey Statistics Section, July 28-August 2, 2012. 1481-1489. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association.
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. Batini, C. and M. Scannapieco. 2006. Data Quality: Concepts, Methodologies and Techniques. New York: Springer.
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. Berka, C., S. Humer, M. Lenk, M. Moser, H. Rechta, and E. Schwerer. 2010. “A Quality Framework for Statistics based on Administrative Data Sources using the Example of the Austrian Census 2011.” Austrian Journal of Statistics 39: 299-308.
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. Berka, C., S. Humer, M. Lenk, M. Moser, H. Rechta, and E. Schwerer. 2012. “Combination of Evidence from Multiple Administrative Data Sources: Quality Assessment of the Austrian Register-Based Census 2011.” Statistica Neerlandica 66: 18-33. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9574.2011.00506.x.10.1111/j.1467-9574.2011.00506.x
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. Chambers, R. 2001. “Evaluation Criteria for Statistical Editing and Imputation.” National Statistics Methodological Series 28: 1-41.
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. Daas, P., J. Arends-Toth, B. Schouten, and L. Kuijvenhoven. 2008. “Quality Framework for the Evaluation of Administrative Data.” In Proceedings of Q2008 European Conference on Quality in Official Statistics. 8-11 July, 2008. p 1-10. Available at: http://q2008.istat.it/sessions/paper/21Daas.pdf (accessed May 6, 2015).
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. Daas, P. and T. Fonville. 2007. Quality Control of Dutch Administrative Registers: An Inventory of Quality Aspects. Presented at the seminar on Registers in Statistics- Methodology and Quality, 21-23 May, 2007, Helsinki. Available at: http://www.oecd.org/std/38883259.pdf (accessed May 6, 2015).
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. Daas, P., S. Ossen, R. Vis-Visschers, and J. Arends-To´th. 2009. “Checklist for the Quality Evaluation of Administrative Data Sources.” Discussion Paper No. 09042, Statistics Netherlands. Available at: http://www.cbs.nl/nr/rdonlyres/0dbc2574-cdae-4a6d-a68a-88458cf05fb2/0/200942x10pub.pdf (accessed May 6, 2015).
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. Daas, P.J., S.J. Ossen, M. Tennekes, and E.S. Nordholt. 2012. “Evaluation of the Quality of Administrative Data used in the Dutch Virtual Census.” In Proceedings of JSM 2012, Survey Statistics Section, July 28-August 2, 2012. 1462-1472. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association.
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. European Commission. 2010. “Commission Regulation (EU) No 1151/2010.” Official Journal of the European Union 53 L 324: 1-10. Available at: http://eurlex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:32010R1151&from=EN (accessed May 6, 2015).
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. Eurostat. 2003. “Quality Assessment of Administrative Data for Statistical Purposes.” Contribution for the Working Group “Assessment of Quality in Statistics”, October 2-3, 2003. Luxembourg. Available at: http://unstats.un.org/unsd/EconStatKB/Attachment323.aspx (accessed May 6, 2015).
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. Hendriks, C. 2012. “Input Data Quality in Register Based Statistics-the Norwegian Experience.” In Proceedings of JSM 2012, Survey Statistics Section, July 28-August 2, 2012. 1473-1480. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association.
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. Herzog, T.N., F.J. Scheuren, and W.E. Winkler. 2007. Data Quality and Record Linkage Techniques. New York: Springer.
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. Hui, G. and H.I. AlDarmaki. 2012. “Editing and Imputation of the 2011 Abu Dhabi Census”. Paper presented at the UNECE Work Session on Statistical Data Editing, Oslo, September 24-26, 2012. Available at: http://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/stats/documents/ece/ces/ge.44/2012/44_Abu_Dhabi.pdf (accessed May 6, 2015).
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. Iwig, W., M. Berning, P. Marck, and M. Prell. 2013. Data Quality Assessment Tool for Administrative Data. Technical Report, Office of Survey Methods Research (OSMR). Available at: http://www.bls.gov/osmr/datatool.pdf (accessed April 30, 2015).
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. Kapteyn, A. and J. Ypma. 2007. “Measurement Error and Misclassification: A Comparison of Survey and Administrative Data.” Journal of Labor Economics 255: 513-551.10.1086/513298
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. Karr, A., A. Sanil, and D. Banks. 2006. “Data Quality: A Statistical Perspective.” Statistical Methodology 3: 137-173. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.stamet.2005.08.005.10.1016/j.stamet.2005.08.005
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. Kausl, A. 2012. “The Data Imputation Process of the Austrian Register-Based Census.” Paper presented at the UNECE Work Session on Statistical Data Editing, Oslo, September 24-26, 2012. Available at: http://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/stats/documents/ece/ces/ge.44/2012/41_Austria_Kausl.pdf (accessed May 6, 2015).
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. Laitila, T., A. Wallgren, and B. Wallgren. 2011. Quality Assessment of Administrative Data. Research and Development-Methodology Reports from Statistics Sweden, 2011:2, Statistics Sweden. Available at: http://www.scb.se/statistik/_publikationer/OV9999_2011A01_BR_X103BR1102.pdf (accessed May 6, 2015).
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. Lanzieri, G. 2009. A Quantitative Approach to the European Union Census Quality Reporting. Note by the Statistical Office of the European Communities. Available at: http://www.academia.edu/2565773/A_quantitative_approach_to_the_European_Union_census_quality_reporting (accessed April 30, 2015).
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. Lenk, M. 2008. Methods of Register-based Census in Austria. Technical Report, Statistik Austria, Vienna. Available at: http://www.statistik.at/web_de/static/methods_of_register-based_census_in_austria_055160.pdf (accessed May 6, 2015).
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. Little, R.J.A. and D.B. Rubin. 2002. Statistical analysis with missing data. New York: Wiley.10.1002/9781119013563
    Search in Google Scholar
  24. Pipino, L.L., Y.W. Lee, and R.Y. Wang. 2002. “Data Quality Assessment.” Communications of the ACM 45: 211-218.10.1145/505248.506010
    Search in Google Scholar
  25. Roth, P.L. 1994. “Missing data: A Conceptual Review for Applied Psychologists.” Personnel Psychology 47: 537-560. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1994.tb01736.x.10.1111/j.1744-6570.1994.tb01736.x
    Search in Google Scholar
  26. UNECE. 2007. Register Based Statistics in the Nordic Countries. Review on Best Practices with Focus on Population and Social Statistics. Technical Report, United Nations Economic Commission for Europe. Available at: http://unstats.un.org/unsd/dnss/docViewer.aspx?docID=2764 (accessed May 6, 2015).
    Search in Google Scholar
  27. UNECE. 2014. Measuring Population and Housing-Practices of UNECE Countries in the 2010 Round of Censuses. Technical Report, United Nations Economic Commission for Europe. Available at: http://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/stats/publications/2013/Measuring_population_and_housing_2010.pdf (accessed May 6, 2015).
    Search in Google Scholar
  28. UNECE and EUROSTAT. 2006. Conference of European Statisticians Recommendations for the 2010 Censuses Of Population and Housing. Technical Report, United Nations Economic Commission for Europe. Available at: http://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/stats/publications/CES_2010_Census_Recommendations_English.pdf (accessed May 6, 2015).
    Search in Google Scholar
  29. Wallgren, A. and B. Wallgren. 2007. Register-Based Statistics. New York: Wiley.10.1002/9780470061350
    Search in Google Scholar
  30. Zhang, L.-C. 2011. “A Unit-Error Theory for Register-Based Household Statistics.” Journal of Official Statistics 27: 415-432.
    Search in Google Scholar
  31. Zhang, L.-C. 2012. “Topics of Statistical Theory for Register-Based Statistics and Data Integration.” Statistica Neerlandica 66: 41-63. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9574.2011.00508.x. 10.1111/j.1467-9574.2011.00508.x
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jos-2015-0015 | Journal eISSN: 2001-7367
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 231 - 247
Submitted on: Jul 1, 2013
|
Accepted on: May 1, 2014
|
Published on: Jun 27, 2015
Published by: Sciendo
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Keywords:
Administrative data,
register-based statistics,
quality assessment,
imputations.
Related subjects:
Mathematics,
Probability and statistics

© 2015 Matthias Schnetzer, Franz Astleithner, Predrag Cetkovic, Stefan Humer, Manuela Lenk, Mathias Moser, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 31 (2015): Issue 2 (June 2015)Next article