Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Competitive Ability of Capsicum annuum L. Relative to the Weed Amaranthus lividus L. Cover

Competitive Ability of Capsicum annuum L. Relative to the Weed Amaranthus lividus L.

Journal of Horticultural Research
Volume 24 (2016): Issue 1 (June 2016)
By:  and    
Open Access
|Jul 2016
References

References

  1. Agarwal A., Gupta S., Ahmed Z. 2007. Influence of plant densities on productivity of bell pepper (L.) under greenhouse in high altitude cold desert of Ladakh. Acta Horticulturae 756: 309-314. DOI: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2007.756.32.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  2. Aldrich R.J. 1987. Predicting crop yield reductions from weeds. Weed Technology 1: 199-206.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  3. Al Othman Z.A., Ahmed Y.B.H., Habila M.A., Ghafar A.A. 2011. Determination of capsaicin and dihydrocapsaicin infruit samples using high performance liquid chromatography. Molecules 16: 8919-8929. DOI: 10.3390/molecules16108919.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  4. Aminpanah H., Sharifi P., Firouzi S. 2012. Interference interactions of two species ofgenus with rice. Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research 72: 364-370. DOI: 10.4067/S0718-58392012000300010.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  5. Aminpanah H. 2013. Influence of nitrogen rate on competition between two rice (L.) cultivars and barnyardgrass ((L.) P. Beauv). International Journal of Biosciences 3: 90-103. DOI: 10.12692/ijb/3.4.90-103.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  6. Asaduzzaman M., Robbani M., Ali M., Hasan M.M., Begum M., Hasan M.M. et al. 2015. Mother bulb weight and plant density influence on seed yield and yield attributes of onion. International Journal of Vegetable Science 21: 98-108. DOI: 10.1080/19315260.2013.825897.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  7. Berry A.D., Stall W.M., Rathinasabapathi B., MacDonald G.E., Charudattan R. 2006. Aggressivity: cucumber vs. amaranth. Weed Technology 20: 986-991. DOI: 10.1614/wt-04-270.1.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  8. Bhatti I.H., Ahmad R., Jabbar A., Nazir M.S., Mahmood T. 2006. Competitive behaviour of component crops in different sesame-legume intercropping systems. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology 8(2): 165-167.
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. Boatright S.R., McKissick J.C. 2004. 2003 Georgia farm gate value report. Area Report No. 04-01. The University of Georgia, College of Agricultural and Environmental Science, Center for Agribusiness and Economic Development, 182 p.
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. Boughalleb N., El Mahjoub M. 2005. The effect of soil solarization onBreda de Haan var.(Dastur) G.M. Waterhouse, responsable for syndrome associating root rots and damping-off of pepper (L.) in Tunisia. Tropicultura 23: 169-176. [in French with English abstract]
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. Carvalho S.J.P., Buissa J.A.R., Nicolai M., López-Ovejero R.F., Christoffoleti P.J. 2006. Differential susceptibility ofgenus weed species to the herbicides trifloxysulfuron-sodium and chlorimuron-ethyl. Planta Daninha 24: 541-548. DOI: 10.1590/S0100-83582006000300017. [in Portuguese with English abstract]
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  12. Dekker J. 2011. Evolutionary ecology of weeds. Weed Biology Laboratory, Department of Agronomy, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA, 305 p.(last accessed 6 April 2016)
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. de Wit C.T., Goudriaan J. 1978. Simulation of ecological processes. Simulation Monographs. Centre for Agricultural Publishing and Documentation (PU-DOC), Wageningen, The Netherlands, 175 p.
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. de Wit C.T. 1960. On competition. Verslagen van landbouwkundige onderzoekingen 66:1-82.
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. Ewel J.J. 1986. Designing agricultural ecosystems for the humid tropics. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 17: 245-271. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.es.17.110186.001333.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  16. FAOSTAT 2013. Pepper.(last accessed 6 April, 2016)
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. Fetene M. 2013. Intra- and inter-specific competition between seedlings ofand a perennial grass (). Journal of Arid Environments 55: 441-451. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-1963(03)00052-1.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  18. Fischer A.J., Ramírez H.V., Gibson K.D., da Silveira Pinheiro B. 2001. Competitiveness of semidwarf upland rice cultivars against palisadegrass () and signalgrass (.). Agronomy Journal 93: 967-973. DOI: 10.2134/agronj2001.935967x.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  19. Fridley J.D. 2001. The influence of species diversity on ecosystem productivity: how, where, and why? Oikos 93: 514-526. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2001.930318.x.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  20. Gonzalez L., Souto X.C., Bolano J.C., Reigosa M.J. 1992. Allelopathic potential of different accessions ofL. application to weed management. In: Proceedings of the 1992 Congress of the Spanish Weed Science Society, pp. 367-372.
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. Gonzalez L., Souto X.C., Reigosa M.J. 1993. Potential of different pepper cultivars (L.) as weed controllers by allelopathy agents in Galicia (North Spain). In: 8EWRS Symp.: Quantitative approaches in weed and herbicide research and their practical application. Braunschweig, Germany, pp. 143-150.
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. Gough R.E. 2001. Color of plastic mulch affects lateral root development but not root system architecture in pepper. HortScience 36: 66-68.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  23. Hager A.G., Wax L.M., Stoller E.W., Bollero G.A. 2002. Common waterhemp () interference in soybean. Weed Science 50: 607-610. DOI: 10.1614/0043-1745(2002)050[0607:CWARII]2.0.CO;2.
    Search in Google Scholar
  24. Harper J.L. 1977. Population biology of plants. Academic Press, University of California, USA, 892 p.
    Search in Google Scholar
  25. Hachem M.W. 2003. Flore adventices de la culture de piment. Projet de Fin d’Étude. Superior Institute Agronomic (Ex ESHE), Chott-Meriem, Sousse, Tunisia, 36 p.
    Search in Google Scholar
  26. Hoffman M.L., Buhler D.D. 2002. Utilizingas a functional model of crop–weed competition. I. Establishing a competitive hierarchy. Weed Science 50: 466-472. DOI: 10.1614/0043-1745(2002)050[0466:USAAFM]2.0.CO;2.
    Search in Google Scholar
  27. Holm L., Doll J., Holm E., Pancho J., Herberger J. 1997. World weeds: natural histories and distribution. John Wiley & Sons, 1129 p.
    Search in Google Scholar
  28. Jala A., Wongsarasin A. 2012. Effect of allelochemical fromL. on the germination of chili (L.). Thai Journal of Science and Technology 1: 25-31.
    Search in Google Scholar
  29. Kato-Noguchi H., Tanaka Y. 2003. Effects of capsaicin on plant growth. Biologia Plantarum 47: 157-159. DOI: 10.1023/A:1027317906839.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  30. Lahbib K., Bnejdi F., El-Gazzah M. 2012. Genetic diversity evaluation of pepper (L.) in Tunisia based on morphologic characters. African Journal of Agricultural Research 7: 3413-3417. DOI: 10.5897/ajar11.2171.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  31. Laird R.A., Aarssen L.W. 2005. Size inequality and the tragedy of the commons phenomenon in plant competition. Plant Ecology 179: 127-131. DOI: 10.1007/s11258-004-6737-4.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  32. Markham J., Halwas S. 2011. Effect of neighbour presence and soil volume on the growth ofVitman. Plant Ecology & Diversity 4: 265-268. DOI: 10.1080/17550874.2011.618515.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  33. McGilchrist C.A., Trenbath B.R. 1971. A revised analysis of plant competition experiments. Biometrics 27: 659-671. DOI: 10.2307/2528603.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  34. Morales-Payan J.P., Charudattan R., Stall W.M., DeValerio J.T. 2003. Surfactants affect the efficacy of the potential mycoherbicideto suppressin bell pepper. Proceedings, Southern Weed Science Society 56, Section XI, p. 326.
    Search in Google Scholar
  35. Morales-Payan J.P., Charudattan R., Stall W.M., DeValerio J. 2002. Time and number of application of the mycoherbicideaffectinterference with pepper. Phytopathology 92(6) Suppl.: 58.
    Search in Google Scholar
  36. Morales-Payan J.P., Santos B.M., Stall W.M., Bewick T.A. 1999. Influence of nitrogen fertilization on the competitive interactions of cilantro () and purple nutsedge (). Journal of Herbs, Spices & Medicinal Plants 4: 59-66. DOI: 10.1300/J044v06n04_07.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  37. Morales-Payan J.P., Stall W.M. 2002. Time of removal and population density effects of livid amaranth () on bell pepper (). HortScience 37: 747-748.
    Search in Google Scholar
  38. Murphy T.R., Colin D.L., Dickens R., Everest J.W., Hall D., McCarty L.B. 2010. Weeds of Southern turfgrasses. Special Bulletin 31. Cooperative extension service, College of Agricultural and environmental Sciences, The University of Georgia, 208 p.
    Search in Google Scholar
  39. Johnson W.C., Jackson L.E., Ochoa O., van Wijk R., Peleman J., St. Clair D.A., Michelmore R.W. 2000. Lettuce, a shallow-rooted crop, and, its wild progenitor, differ at QTL determining root architecture and deep soil water exploitation. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 101: 1066-1073. DOI: 10.1007/s001220051581.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  40. Jolliffe P.A., Gaye M.M. 1995. Dynamics of growth and yield component responses of bell pepper (L.) to row covers and population density. Scientia Horticulturae 62: 153-164. DOI: 10.1016/0304-4238(95)00766-M.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  41. Price T.D., Qvarnström A., Irwin D.E. 2003. The role of phenotypic plasticity in driving genetic evolution. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 270: 1433-1440. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2003.2372.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  42. Procópio S.O., Santos J.B., Silva A.A., Martinez C.A., Werlang R.C. 2004. Physiological caracteristics of soybean and common bean crops and three weed species. Planta Daninha 22: 211-216. DOI: 10.1590/S0100-83582004000200006. [in Portuguese with English abstract]
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  43. Quintero I., Barraza F. 2009. Population density and phenotype plasticity of chilli pepper (L.) c.v.. Intropica 4: 55-66. [in Portuguese with English abstract]
    Search in Google Scholar
  44. Radhouane L., Rhim T. 2014. Allelopathic interaction of pepper () and pearl millet () intercropped. International Journal of Environment 3: 32-40. DOI: 10.3126/ije.v3i1.9940.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  45. Ronchi C.P., Silva A.A. 2006. Effects of weed species competition on the growth of young coffee plants. Planta Daninha 24: 415-423. DOI: 10.1590/S0100-83582006000300001.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  46. Sarkar R.K., Chakraborty A. 2000. Biological feasibility and economic viability of intercropping pulse and oilseed crops with sesame () under different planting patterns in rice-fallow gangetic alluvial land. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 70: 211-214.
    Search in Google Scholar
  47. Sarkar R.K., Kundu C. 2001. Sustainable intercropping system of sesame () with pulse and oilseed crops on rice fallow land. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 71: 90-93.
    Search in Google Scholar
  48. Sarkar R.K., Sanyal S.R. 2000. Production potential and economic feasibility of sesame (L.) based intercropping system with pulse and oilseed crops on rice fallow land. Indian Journal of Agronomy 45: 545-550.
    Search in Google Scholar
  49. Silva A.F., Concenço G., Aspiazú I., Ferreira E.A., Galon L., Coelho A.T.C.P., Silva A.A., Ferreira F.A. 2009. Interference of different weed densities in soybean growth. Planta Daninha 27: 75-84. DOI: 10.1590/S0100-83582009000100011. [in Portuguese with English abstract]
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  50. Spehia R.S., Sharma V., Raina J.N., Bhardwaj R.K. 2014. Growth, yield and economics of greenhouse grown coloured capsicum as influenced by trellis system and plant spacing. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 84:742-745.
    Search in Google Scholar
  51. Tétard-Jones C., Kertesz M.A., Preziosi R.F. 2011. Quantitative trait loci mapping of phenotypic plasticity and genotype–environment interactions in plant and insect performance. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 366: 1368-1379. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0356.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  52. Tsuchiya K., Lee J.W., Hoshina T. 1994. Allelopathic potential of red pepper (L.). Japan Agricultural Research Quarterly 28: 1-11.
    Search in Google Scholar
  53. Wahla I.H., Ahmad R., Ehsanullah, Ahmad A., Jabbar A. 2009. Competitive functions of components crops in some barley based intercropping systems. Int. J. Agric. Biol. 11: 69-72.
    Search in Google Scholar
  54. Wiersema J.H., León B. 2013. World economic plants. A standard reference, 2 ed., CRC Press, 1336 p.
    Search in Google Scholar
  55. Williams A.C., McCarthy B.C. 2001. A new index of interspecific competition for replacement and additive designs. Ecological Research 16: 29-40. DOI: 10.1046/j.1440-1703.2001.00368.x.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  56. Yachi S., Loreau M. 2007. Does complementary resource use enhance ecosystem functioning? A model of light competition in plant communities. Ecology Letters 10: 54-62. DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00994.x.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  57. Zarochentseva O. 2012. Adaptation of methodology calculation relative crowding coefficient for evaluation competition of three species in polyculture. In: 18th International Scientific Conference: “Economics for Ecology”. Sumy, Ukraine, p. 196-197.
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/johr-2016-0010 | Journal eISSN: 2353-3978 (formerly 2300-5009) | Journal ISSN: 2300-5009
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 79 - 91
Submitted on: Sep 1, 2015
Accepted on: Apr 1, 2016
Published on: Jul 27, 2016
Published by: National Institute of Horticultural Research
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
aggressivity,
allelopathy,
competition,
relative crowding coefficient,
relative yield,
weeds
Related subjects:
Life sciences,
Biotechnology,
Plant science,
Ecology,
Life sciences, other

© 2016 Abdessatar Omezine, Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva, published by National Institute of Horticultural Research
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Volume 24 (2016): Issue 1 (June 2016)
Previous article
Next article