Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Influence of 1-Methylcyclopropene and ULO Conditions on Sensory Characteristics of Apple Fruit Grown in Latvia

Journal of Horticultural Research
Volume 24 (2016): Issue 1 (June 2016)
By:
Open Access
|Jul 2016

References

  1. Aaby K., Haffner K, Skrede G. 2002. Aroma quality of Gravenstein apples influenced by regular and controlled atmosphere storage. Lebensmittel-Wissenschaft und -Technologie 35: 254-259. DOI: 10.1006/fstl.2001.0852.10.1006/fstl.2001.0852
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. Ackermann J., Fischer M., Amadò R. 1992. Changes in sugars, acids, and amino acids during ripening and storage of apples (cv. Glockenapfel). Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 40: 1131-1134. DOI: 10.1021/jf00019a008.10.1021/jf00019a008
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. Awad M.A., de Jager A. 2003. Influences of air and controlled atmosphere storage on the concentration of potentially healthful phenolics in apples and other fruits. Postharvest Biology and Technology 27: 53-58. DOI: 10.1016/S0925-5214(02)00189-8.10.1016/S0925-5214(02)00189-8
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. Blankenship S.M., Dole J.M. 2003. 1-Methylcyclopropene: a review. Postharvest Biology and Technology 28: 1-25. DOI: 10.1016/S0925-5214(02)00246-6.10.1016/S0925-5214(02)00246-6
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. Boylston T.D., Kupferman E.M., Foss J.D., Buering C. 1994. Sensory quality of Gala apples as influenced by controlled and regular atmosphere storage. Journal of Food Quality 17: 477-494. DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-4557.1994.tb00168.x.10.1111/j.1745-4557.1994.tb00168.x
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. Brackmann A., Streif J., Bangerth F. 1994. Influence of CA and ULO storage conditions on quality parameters and ripening of preclimactic and climacteric harvested apple fruits. I. Effect on colour, firmness, acidity, and solubles solids. Gartenbauwissenschaft 59(6): 252-257.
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. Calvo G. 2010. Antioxidant use in apple and pear storage. Part 3 – storage scald and 1-methlycyclopropene (1-MCP). Postharvest Information Network, WSU Tree Fruit Research & Extension Center, Washington State University. http://www.tfrec.wsu.edu/pdfs/P1609.pdf
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. Central Statistical Bureau. 2013. 2.4 thousand hectares of apple tree plantations are occupied by more than 1.3 million apple trees. Latvia. http://www.csb.gov.lv/notikumi/24-tukstosos-hektaru-abeldarzu-aug-vairak-neka-13-miljoni-abelu-36541.html
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. Ciesa F., Dalla Via J., Wisthaler A., Zanella A., Guerra W., Mikoviny T. et al. 2013. Discrimination of four different postharvest treatments of ‘Red Delicious’ apples based on their volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions during shelf-life measured by proton transfer reaction mass spectrometry (PTR-MS). Postharvest Biology and Technology 86: 329-336. DOI: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2013.06.036.10.1016/j.postharvbio.2013.06.036
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. Defilippi B.G., Dandekar A.M., Kader A.A. 2004. Impact of suppression of ethylene action or biosynthesis on flavor metabolites in apple (Malus domestica Borkh) fruits. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 52: 5694-5701. DOI: 10.1021/jf049504x.10.1021/jf049504x15373411
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. Drudze I. 2003. Investigations of harvest maturity and suitability for storage of some apple cultivars in Latvia. Acta Horticulturae 599: 631-637. DOI: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2003.599.82.10.17660/ActaHortic.2003.599.82
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. Drudze I. 2005. Harvest maturity and storage life investigations on Latvian apple cultivars. Latvian Journal of Agronomy 8: 306-310.
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. Galmarini M.V., Symoneaux R., Chollet S., Zamora M.C. 2013. Understanding apple consumers’ expectations in terms of likes and dislikes. Use of comment analysis in a cross-cultural study. Appetite 62: 27-36. DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2012.11.006.10.1016/j.appet.2012.11.00623186695
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. Hoang N.T.T., Golding J.B., Wilkes M.A. 2011. The effect of postharvest 1-MCP treatment and storage atmosphere on ‘Cripps Pink’ apple phenolics and antioxidant activity. Food Chemistry 127(3): 1249-1256. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2011.01.052.10.1016/j.foodchem.2011.01.05225214122
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. Köpcke D. 2015. 1-Methylcyclopropene (1-MCP) and dynamic controlled atmosphere (DCA) applications under elevated storage temperatures: effects on fruit quality of ‘Elstar’, ‘Jonagold’ and ‘Gloster’ apple (Malus domestica Borkh.). European Journal of Horticultural Science 80: 25-32. DOI: 10.17660/eJHS.2015/80.1.4.10.17660/eJHS.2015/80.1.4
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. Krasnova I. 2013. Evaluation of quality influencing factors of fresh fruit salads. Doctoral thesis, Latvia University of Agriculture, Jelgava, Latvia, p. 206.
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. Kruczyńska D.E., Rutkowski K.P. 2006. Quality and storage of Czech scab resistant apple cultivars. Phytopathologia Polonica 39: 53-61.
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. Kühn B.F., Bertelsen M., Sørensen L. 2011. Optimising quality-parameters of apple cv. ‘Pigeon’ by adjustment of nitrogen. Scientia Horticulturae 129: 369-375. DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2011.03.033.10.1016/j.scienta.2011.03.033
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. López Camelo A.F. 2004. Manual for the preparation and sale of fruits and vegetables. From field to market. FAO Agricultural Services Bulletin 151: 11-26.
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. Lurie S., Pre-Aymard C., Ravid U., Larkov O., Fallik E. 2002. Effect of 1-methylcyclopropene on volatile emission and aroma in cv. Anna apples. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 50: 4251-4256. DOI: 10.1021/jf0200873.10.1021/jf020087312105954
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. Marin A.B., Colonna A.E., Kudo K., Kupferman E.M., Mattheis J.P. 2009. Measuring consumer response to ‘Gala’ apples treated with 1-methylcyclopropene (1-MCP). Postharvest Biology and Technology 51: 73-79. DOI: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2008.06.008.10.1016/j.postharvbio.2008.06.008
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. Milosevic N., Milosevic T., Glísic I. 2009. Productive and organoleptic traits of recent apple cultivars. Acta Horticulturae 825: 565-570. DOI: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2009.825.90.10.17660/ActaHortic.2009.825.90
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. Næs T., Brockhoff P.B., Tomic O. 2010. Statistics for sensory and consumer science. John Wiley and Sons, Ltd., p. 294.
    Search in Google Scholar
  24. Pre-Aymard C., Fallik E., Weksler A., Lurie S. 2005. Sensory analysis and instrumental measurements of ‘Anna’ apples treated with 1-methylcyclopropene. Postharvest Biology and Technology 36: 135-142. DOI: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2004.12.007.10.1016/j.postharvbio.2004.12.007
    Search in Google Scholar
  25. Raffo A., Kelderer M., Paoletti F., Zanella A. 2009. Impact of innovative controlled atmosphere storage technologies and postharvest treatments on volatile compound production in cv. Pinova apples. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 57: 915-923. DOI: 10.1021/jf802054y.10.1021/jf802054y19154103
    Search in Google Scholar
  26. Riekstiņa-Dolģe R. 2014. Factors influencing apple cider quality. Doctoral thesis, Latvia University of Agri-culture, Jelgava, Latvia, p. 156.
    Search in Google Scholar
  27. Rutkowski K.P., Michalczuk B., Konopacki P. 2008. Nondestructive determination of ‘Golden Delicious’ apple quality and harvest maturity. Journal of Fruit and Ornamental Plant Research 16: 39-52.
    Search in Google Scholar
  28. Sisler E.C., Dupille E., Serek M. 1996. Effect of 1-methylcyclopropene and methylcyclopropene on ethylene binding and ethylene action on cut carnations. Plant Growth Regulation 18: 79-86. DOI: 10.1007/BF00028491.10.1007/BF00028491
    Search in Google Scholar
  29. Sisler E.C., Serek M. 1997. Inhibitors of ethylene responses in plants at the receptor level: recent developments. Physiologia Plantarum 100: 577-582. DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1997.tb03063.x.10.1111/j.1399-3054.1997.tb03063.x
    Search in Google Scholar
  30. Viškelis P., Rubinskienė M., Sasnauskas A., Bobinas Č., Kviklienė N. 2011. Changes in apple fruit quality during a modified atmosphere storage. Journal of Fruit and Ornamental Plant Research 19: 155-165.
    Search in Google Scholar
  31. Wawrzyńczak A., Jóźwiak Z.B., Rutkowski K.P. 2007. The Influence of storage conditions and 1-MCP treatment on ethylene evolution and fruit quality in ‘Gala’ apples. Vegetable Crops Research Bulletin 66: 188-196. DOI: 10.2478/v10032-007-0021-9.10.2478/v10032-007-0021-9
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/johr-2016-0005 | Journal eISSN: 2353-3978 | Journal ISSN: 2300-5009
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 37 - 46
Submitted on: Mar 1, 2016
Accepted on: Jun 1, 2016
Published on: Jul 27, 2016
Published by: National Institute of Horticultural Research
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year
Keywords:
apple fruit,
controlled atmosphere,
1-methylcyclopropene (1-MCP) treatment,
sensory evaluation
Related subjects:
Life sciences,
Biotechnology,
Plant science,
Ecology,
Life sciences, other

© 2016 Karina Juhņeviča-Radenkova, Vitalijs Radenkovs, published by National Institute of Horticultural Research
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 24 (2016): Issue 1 (June 2016)Next article