Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Kinematic diffusion approach to describe recharge phenomena in unsaturated fractured chalk Cover

Kinematic diffusion approach to describe recharge phenomena in unsaturated fractured chalk

Open Access
|Jul 2017

References

  1. Barhoum, S., Valdfies, D., Gufierin, R., Marlin, C., Vitale, Q., Benmamar, J., Gombert, P., 2014. Spatial heterogeneity of high-resolution Chalk groundwater geochemistry - Underground quarry at Saint Martin-le-Noeud. Journal of Hydrology, 519, Part A, 756–768.10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.08.001
  2. Beven, K., 1982. On subsurface stormflow: predictions with simple kinematic theory for saturated and unsaturated flows. Water Resources Research, 18, 6, 1627–1633.10.1029/WR018i006p01627
  3. Brouyère, S., Dassargues, A., Hallet, V., 2004. Migration of contaminants through the unsaturated zone overlying the Hesbaye chalky aquifer in Belgium: a field investigation. J. Contam. Hydrol., 72, 1–4, 135–64.10.1016/j.jconhyd.2003.10.009
  4. Brutsaert, W., 2005. Hydrology an Introduction. Cambridge University Press, New York.10.1017/CBO9780511808470
  5. Charbeneau, R.J., 1984. Kinematic models for soil moisture and solute transport. Water Resources Research, 20, 6, 699–706.10.1029/WR020i006p00699
  6. Charbeneau, R.J., Weaver, J.W., Smith, V.J., 1989. Kinematic modelling of multiphase solute transport in the vadose zone. EPA Report EPA/600/2-89/035, R.S.K. Environmental Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Ada, OK, 1588 p.
  7. Crampon, N., Roux, J.C., Bracq, P., 1993. Hydrogéologie de la craie en France. Hydrogéologie, 2, 81–123.
  8. Crank, J., 1956. Mathematics of Diffusion. Oxford University Press, New York, London.
  9. Dahan, O., Nativ, R., Adara, E.M., Berkowitz, B., Ronen, Z., 1999. Field observation of flow in a fracture intersecting unsaturated chalk. Water Resour. Res., 35, 11, 3315–3326.10.1029/1999WR900198
  10. Downing, R.A., Pearson, F.J., Smith, D.B., 1979. The flow mechanism in the Chalk based on radio-isotope analyses of groundwater in the London Basin. Journal of Hydrology, 40, 1–2, 67–83.10.1016/0022-1694(79)90088-X
  11. Foster, S.S.D., 1975. The Chalk groundwater tritium anomaly – a possible explanation. Journal of Hydrology, 25, 159–165.10.1016/0022-1694(75)90045-1
  12. Germann, P., Beven, K., 1985. Kinematic wave approximation to infiltration into soils with sorbing macropores. Water Resources Research, 21, 990–996.10.1029/WR021i007p00990
  13. Germann, P., Beven, K., 1986. A distribution function approach to waterflow in soil macropores based on kinematic wave theory. Journal of Hydrology, 83, 173–183.10.1016/0022-1694(86)90191-5
  14. Ireson, A.M., Butler, A.P., 2011. Controls on preferential recharge to Chalk aquifers. J. Hydrol., 398, 109–123.10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.12.015
  15. Larsbo, M., Roulier, S., Stenemo, F., Kasteel, R., Jarvis, N., 2005. An improved dual permeability model of water flow and solute transport in the vadose zone. Vadose Zone Journal, 4, 398–406.10.2136/vzj2004.0137
  16. Lighthill M.J., Whitham, G.B., 1955. On kinematic waves: 1. Flood movement in long rivers. Proceedings Royal Society London, Series A, 229, 281–316.10.1098/rspa.1955.0088
  17. Nicholl, M.J., Glass, R.J., Wheatcraft, S.W., 1994. Gravity-driven infiltration instability in initially dry nonhorizontal fractures. Water Resour. Res., 30, 9, 2533–2546.10.1029/94WR00164
  18. Nimmo, J.R., 2010. Theory for source-responsive and free-surface film modeling of unsaturated flow. Vadose Zone J., 9, 2, 295–306. DOI: 10.2136/vzj2009.0085.10.2136/vzj2009.0085
  19. Nimmo, J.R., Mitchell, L., 2013. Predicting vertically nonsequential wetting patterns with a source-responsive model. Vadose Zone J., 12, 4. DOI: 10.2136/vzj2013.03.0054.10.2136/vzj2013.03.0054
  20. Nimmo, J.R., Malek-Mohammadi, S., 2015. Quantifying water flow and retention in an unsaturated fracture-facial domain. In: Faybishenko, B., Benson, S.M., Gale, J.E. (Eds.): Fluid Dynamics in Complex Fractured-Porous Systems. American Geophysical Union, Washington, pp. 5–17. DOI: 10.1002/9781118877517.ch12.10.1002/9781118877517.ch12
  21. Price, M., Low, R.G., McCann, C., 2000. Mechanisms of water storage and flow in the unsaturated zone of the Chalk aquifer. J. Hydrology, 233, 1–4, 54–71. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-1694(00)00222-5.10.1016/S0022-1694(00)00222-5
  22. Qin, Z., 2014. An Unsaturated Zone Flux Study in a Highly-fractured Bedrock Area: Ground Water Recharge Processes at the Masser Recharge Site, East-central Pennsylvania. Master's Thesis. Paper 4512. San José State University, San José, CA. http://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/etd_theses/4512
  23. Rasmussen, T.C., 2001. Pressure wave vs. tracer velocities through unsaturated fractured rock. In: Evans, D.D., Nicholson, T.J., Rasmussen, T.C. (Eds.): Flow and Transport through Unsaturated Fractured Rock. 2nd Ed. Geophysical Monograph 42, American Geophysical Union, Washington, DC, pp. 45–52.10.1029/GM042p0045
  24. Rasmussen, T.C., Baldwin Jr, R.H., Dowd, J.F., Williams, A.G., 2000. Tracer vs. pressure wave velocities through unsaturated saprolite. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 64, 1, 75–85.10.2136/sssaj2000.64175x
  25. Reeves, M.J., 1979. Recharge and pollution of the English Chalk: some possible mechanisms. Eng. Geol., 14, 231–240.10.1016/0013-7952(79)90065-6
  26. Roux, J.C., Tirat, M., 1967. Carte de la surface piezometrique de la nappe de la craie en Picardie. Bureau de Recherches Geologiques et Minieres, Service Geologique Regional Picardie Normandie.
  27. Scheurer, O., 2000. Atlas Agriculture environnement de l’Oise Relations spatiales entre sensibilité des sols et activité agricole. Institut Supérieur d’Agriculture de Beauvais, Beauvais, 41 p. http://www.sols-et-territoires.org/bibliographie/applicationsthematiques/?L=0
  28. Šimůnek, J., Jarvis, N.J., van Genuchten, M.T., Gärdenäs, A., 2003. Review and comparison of models for describing nonequilibrium and preferential flow and transport in the vadose zone. Journal of Hydrology, 272, 14–35.10.1016/S0022-1694(02)00252-4
  29. Singh, V.P., 1997. Kinematic Wave Modeling in Water Resources, Environmental Hydrology. John Wiley, New York.
  30. Singh, V.P., 2002. Is hydrology kinematic? Hydrological Processes, 16, 667–716. DOI: 10.1002/hyp.306.10.1002/hyp.306
  31. Sisson, F.B., Ferguson, A.H., van Genuchten, M.T., 1980. Simple method for predicting drainage from field plots. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 44, 1147–1152.10.2136/sssaj1980.03615995004400060004x
  32. Smith, R.E., 1983. Approximate soil water movement by kinematic characteristics. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 47, 3–8.10.2136/sssaj1983.03615995004700010001x
  33. Su, G.W., Geller, J.T., Pruess, K., Wen, F., 1999. Experimental studies of water seepage and intermittent flow in unsaturated, rough-walled fractures. Water Resour. Res., 35, 4, 1019–1037.10.1029/1998WR900127
  34. Tokunaga, T.K., Wan, J., 1997. Water film flow along fracture surfaces of porous rock. Water Resour. Res., 33, 6, 1287–1295.10.1029/97WR00473
  35. Valdes, D., Dupont, J., Laignel, B., Slimani, S., Delbart, C., 2014. Infiltration processes in karstic chalk investigated through a spatial analysis of the geochemical properties of the groundwater: The effect of the superficial layer of claywith-flints. Journal of Hydrology, 519, 23–33.10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.07.002
  36. Van den Daele, G.F.A., Barker, J.A., Connell, L.D., Atkinson, T.C., Darling, W.G., Cooper, J.D., 2007. Unsaturated flow and solute transport through the Chalk: Tracer test and dual permeability modelling. J. Hydrol., 342, 1–2, 157–172. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.05.021.10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.05.021
  37. White, R.E., 1985. The influence of macropores on the transport of dissolved and suspended matter through soil. Adv. Soil Sci., 3, 95–120.10.1007/978-1-4612-5090-6_3
  38. Yamada, T., Kobayashi, M., 1988. Kinematic wave characteristics and new equations of unsaturated infiltration. Journal of Hydrology, 102, 257–266.10.1016/0022-1694(88)90101-1
  39. Yang, T., 2000. Some recent results on compressible flow with vacuum. Taiwanese Journal of Mathematics, 4, 1, 33–44.10.11650/twjm/1500407196
  40. Yang, Y., Endreny, T.A., 2013. Watershed hydrograph model based on surface flow diffusion. Water Resources Research, 49, 507–516.10.1029/2012WR012186
  41. Zghibi, A., Chenini, I., Zouhri, L., Merzougui, A., Tarhouni, J., 2015. Modelling of tracer movement with advectiondispersion scheme at the LaSalle Beauvais experimental site, Beauvais, France. J. Hydrogeol. Hydrol. Eng., 4, 3. http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/2325-9647.100012610.4172/2325-9647.1000126
  42. Zouhri, L., Lutz, P., 2010. A comparison of peak and plate electrodes in electrical resistivity tomography: application to the chalky groundwater of the Beauvais aquifer (northern part of the Paris basin, France). Hydrol. Process., 24, 3040–3052.10.1002/hyp.7719
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/johh-2017-0033 | Journal eISSN: 1338-4333 | Journal ISSN: 0042-790X
Language: English
Page range: 287 - 296
Submitted on: Jul 26, 2016
|
Accepted on: May 24, 2017
|
Published on: Jul 22, 2017
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2017 Nicola Pastore, Claudia Cherubini, Concetta I. Giasi, published by Slovak Academy of Sciences, Institute of Hydrology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.