Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Accessibility concepts and indicators in transportation strategic planning issues: theoretical framework and literature review Cover

Accessibility concepts and indicators in transportation strategic planning issues: theoretical framework and literature review

By: Ana Vulevic  
Open Access
|Oct 2016

References

  1. 1. A. Ribeiro, A.P. Antunes, and A. Páez, “Road accessibility and cohesion in lagging regions: empirical evidence from Portugal based on spatial econometric models”, Journal of Transport Geography, vol. 18, pp. 125–132, 2010.10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2009.03.002
  2. 2. B. Linneker, “Transport Infrastructure and Regional Economic Development in Europe: A Review of Theoretical and Methodological Approaches”, Report to SASI Project. TRP 133. Sheffield, Department of Town and Regional Planning, 1997.
  3. 3. C. Koopmans, P. Rietveld, and A. Huijg, 2012. “An accessibility approach to railways and municipal population growth, 1840-1930”, Journal of Transport Geography, vol. 25, pp. 98-104, 2012.10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.01.031
  4. 4. C. Schürman, K. Spiekermann, and M. Wegener, “Accessibility indicators”. Berichte aus dem Institut für Raumplanung, 39, IRPUD, Dortmund, 1997.
  5. 5. D. Biehl, (Ed.), “The Contribution of Infrastructure to Regional Development”, Final Report of the Infrastructure Studies Group to the Commission of the European Communities, Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 1986.
  6. 6. D. Biehl, “The role of infrastructure in regional development ”, In R.W. Vickerman (Ed.): Infrastructure and Regional Development, European Research in Regional Science, London, Pion, vol. 1, pp. 9-35, 1991.
  7. 7. D. Keeble, J. Offord, and S. Walker, Peripheral Regions in a Community of Twelve Member States, Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 1988.
  8. 8. D. Keeble, P.L. Owens, and C. Thompson, “Regional accessibility and economic potential in the European Community”, Regional Studies, vol. 16, pp. 419-432, 1982.10.1080/09595238200185421
  9. 9. E. López, J. Gutiérrez, and G. Gómez, “Measuring regional cohesion effects of large-scale transport infrastructure investments: an accessibility approach”, European Planning Studies, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 277-301, 2008.10.1080/09654310701814629
  10. 10. ESPON 1.2.1, Transport Services and Networks: Territorial Trends and Basic Supply of Infrastructure for Territorial Cohesion, Final Report, Tours: University of Tours, http://www.espon.eu., 2005.
  11. 11. F. Bruinsma, and P. Rietveld, “Urban agglomerations in European infrastructure networks”, Urban Studies, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 919–934, 1993.10.1080/00420989320080861
  12. 12. F.P. van den Heuvel, L. Rivera, K. H. van Donselaar, A. de Jong, Y. Sheffi, P.W. de Langen, and J. C. Fransoo,“Relationship between freight accessibility and logistics employment in US counties”, Transportation Research Part A, vol. 59, pp. 91–105, 2014.10.1016/j.tra.2013.11.002
  13. 13. G. Chi, “The impacts of highway expansion on population change: an integrated spatial approach”, Rural Sociology, vol. 75, no. 1, pp. 58–89, 2010.10.1111/j.1549-0831.2009.00003.x
  14. 14. G. Chi, “The impacts of transport accessibility on population change across rural, suburban and urban areas: a case study of Wisconsin at sub-county levels”, Urban Studies, vol. 49, pp. 2711–2731, 2012.
  15. 15. G. Törnqvist, “Contact Systems and Regional Development“, Lund Studies in Geography B vol. 35. Lund: C.W.K. Gleerup, 1970.
  16. 16. J. Berechman, “Urban and regional economic impacts of transportation investment: a critical assessment and proposed methodology“, Transportation Research Part A, vol. 28, no.4, pp. 351–362, 1994.10.1016/0965-8564(94)90009-4
  17. 17. J. Berechman, and R. Paaswell, “Accessibility improvements and local employment: an empirical analysis”, Journal of Transportation Statistics, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 49–66, 2001.
  18. 18. J. Berechmen, D. Ozmen, and K. Ozbay, “Empirical analysis of transportation investment and economic development at state, county and municipality levels”, Transportation, vol. 33, pp. 537–551, 2006.10.1007/s11116-006-7472-6
  19. 19. J. Bröcker, and K. Peschel, Trade. In W. Molle, R. Cappelin, (Eds.), Regional Impact of Community Policies in Europe, Aldershot: Avebury,1988.
  20. 20. C. Martín, J. Gutiérrez, and C. Román, “Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) Index to Measure the Accessibility Impacts of New Infrastructure Investments: The Case of the High-speed Train Corridor Madrid-Barcelona-French Border”, Regional Studies, vol. 38, no 6, pp. 697 – 712, 2004.10.1080/003434042000240987
  21. 21. J. Gutiérrez, “Location, economic potential and daily accessibility: an analysis border”. Journal of Transport Geography, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 229–242, 2001.10.1016/S0966-6923(01)00017-5
  22. 22. J. Gutiérrez, A. Condeço-Melhorado, and J. C. Martín, “Using accessibility indicators and GIS to assess spatial spillovers of transport infrastructure investment”, Journal of Transport Geography, vol. 18, pp. 141-152, 2010.10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2008.12.003
  23. 23. J. Gutiérrez, R. González, and G.Gómez, “The European high-speed train network: predicted effects on accessibility patterns”, Journal of Transport Geography, vol. 4, pp. 227–238, 1996.10.1016/S0966-6923(96)00033-6
  24. 24. J. M. Morris, P.L. Dumble, and M.R. Wigan, “Accessibility indicators for transportation planning”, Transportation Research A, vol. 13, pp. 91–109, 1979.10.1016/0191-2607(79)90012-8
  25. 25. K. Ozbay, D. Ozmen, and J. Berechman, “Modeling and analysis of the link between accessibility and employment growth”, Journal of Transportation Engineering, vol. 132, no. 5, pp. 385–393, 2006.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2006)132:5(385)
  26. 26. K. Spiekermann, and M. Wegener, “Trans-European Networks and unequal accessibility in Europe”, European Journal of Regional Development, vol. 4, pp. 35-42, 1996.
  27. 27. K.T. Geurs, and B. van Wee, “Accessibility of land-use and transport strategies: review and research directions”, Journal of Transport Geography, vol. 12, pp. 127–140, 2004.10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2003.10.005
  28. 28. K.T. Geurs, and J.R. Ritsema van Eck, “Accessibility measures: review and applications”, RIVM Report 408505 006, National Institute of Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, 2001.
  29. 29. M. Wegener, H. Eskelinnen, F. Fürst, C. Schürmann, and K. Spiekermann, “Criteria for the Spatial Differentiation of the EU Territory: Geographical Position”, Forschungen 102.2, Bonn: Bundesamt für Bauwesen und Raumordnung, 2002.
  30. 30. P. Gould, “Spatial Diffusion”, Resource Paper No. 17, Washington, DC: Association of American Geographers, 1969.
  31. 31. P. Jiwattanakulpaisarn, R.P. Noland, and D.J. Graham, “Causal linkages between highways and sector-level employment”, Transportation Research Part A, vol. 44, pp. 265–280, 2010.10.1016/j.tra.2010.01.008
  32. 32. R.J. Johnston, D. Gregory, G. Pratt, and M. Watts, The Dictionary of Human Geography, Oxford, Blackwell Publishing, 2000.
  33. 33. R. Thompson, and E. Taniguchi, “City logistics and freight transport”, In: A.M. Brewer, K.J. Button, D.A. Hensher, (Eds.), The Handbook of Logistics and Supply-Chain Management, Handbooks in Transport, no 2. Pergamon, Elsevier, London, pp. 393–404, 2001.10.1108/9780080435930-025
  34. 34. R. W. Vickerman, “Accessibility, attraction, and potential: a review of some concepts and their use in determining mobility”, Environment and Planning A vol. 6, pp. 675–691, 1974.10.1068/a060675
  35. 35. R.W. Vickerman, Introduction. In R.W. Vickerman (ed.), Infrastructure and Regional Development, London: Pion, pp. 1-8, 1991a.
  36. 36. S.L. Handy, and D.A. Niemeier, “Measuring Accessibility: An Exploration of Issues and Alternatives”, Environment and Planning A, vol. 29, pp. 1175–94, 1997.
  37. 37. S. Karou, and A. Hull, “Accessibility modelling: predicting the impact of planned transport infrastructure on accessibility patterns in Edinburgh, UK”, Journal of Transport Geography, vol. 35, pp. 1–11, 2014.10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2014.01.002
  38. 38. Study Programme on European Spatial Planning Working Group, 1.1 GEOGRAPHICAL POSITION Final Report Part 1, Prepared by the National Focal Points of Finland, France and Germany Draft 12, January 2000.
  39. 39. T. Kramberger, V. Potočan, & V. M. Ipavec, Sustainable Logistics and Strategic Transportation Planning, University of Maribor, Slovenia, pp. 248-272, ISBN13: 9781522500018; EISBN13: 9781522500025, DOI: 10.4018/978-1-5225-0001-8.ch012, 2016.10.4018/978-1-5225-0001-8.ch012
  40. 40. U. Blum, “Effects of transportation investments on regional growth: a theoretical and empirical investigation”, Regional Science Association vol. 49, pp. 169-184, 1982.10.1007/BF01939882
  41. 41. J. Hong, “Transport and the location of foreign logistics firms: the Chinese experience”, Transportation Research Part A, vol. 41, pp. 597–609, 2007.10.1016/j.tra.2006.11.004
Language: English
Page range: 58 - 67
Published on: Oct 18, 2016
Published by: University of Maribor
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2016 Ana Vulevic, published by University of Maribor
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.