Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Rangeland Condition Assessment Based on Economic Criteria Cover

Rangeland Condition Assessment Based on Economic Criteria

Open Access
|Jul 2016

References

  1. Ahmadpour, A., Heshmati, G.A., (2016). Struvture, Functions and Their Relations in Ecosystems, a viewpoint. Unpublished study.
  2. Bodin, P., Wiman, B.L.B., (2007). The usefulness of stability concepts in forest management when coping with increasing climate uncertainties. Forest Ecology and Management 242, 541-552.10.1016/j.foreco.2007.01.066
  3. Bradshaw, A.D., (1984). Ecological principles and land reclamation practice. Landscape Planning, 11, 35-48.10.1016/0304-3924(84)90016-9
  4. Chomitz, K., Kumari, K., (1996). The Domestic Benefits of Tropical Forests: a Critical Review,Working paper 96- 19, CSERGE, University of East Anglia and University College London.
  5. Ciais, P.H., Reichstein, M., Viovy, N., Granier, A., Oge´e, J., Allard, V., Aubinet, M., Buchmann, N., Bernhofer, Chr., Carrara, A., Chevallier, F., De Noblet, N., Friend, A.D., Friedlingstein, P., Gru¨nwald, T., Heinesch, B., Keronen, P., Knohl, A., Krinner, G., Loustau, D., Manca, G., Matteucci, G., Miglietta, F., Ourcival, J.M., Papale, D., Pilegaard, K., Rambal, S., Seufert, G., Soussana, J.F., Sanz, M.J., Schulze, E.D., Vesala, T., Valentini, R., (2005). Europe-wide reduction in primary productivity caused by the heat and drought in 2003. Nature, 437, 529-533.10.1038/nature03972
  6. Clements, F.E., (1916). Plant succession: an analysis of the development of vegetation. Carnegie Inst., Washington Pub., 242, 1-512.10.5962/bhl.title.56234
  7. Cortina, J., Maestre, F.T., Vallejo, R., Baeza, M.J., Valdecantos, A.L., Pe´rez-Devesa, M., (2006). Ecosystem structure, function, and restorationsuccess: Are they related? Journal for Nature Conservation, 14, 152-160.10.1016/j.jnc.2006.04.004
  8. Costanza, R, D'Arge, R., de Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., O'Neill, S., Paruelo, J., Raskin, R., Sutton P., van den Belt, M., (1997). The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital, Nature, 387, 253-260.10.1038/387253a0
  9. Costanza, R., d'Arge, R., de Groot, R.S., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., O'Neill, R.V., Paruelo, J., Raskin, R.G., Sutton, P., van den Belt, M., (1997). The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387, 253-60.10.1038/387253a0
  10. Daily, G.C., Soderquist, T., Aniyar, S., Arrow, K., Dasgupta, P., Ehrlich, P.R., Folke, C., Jannson, A., Jansson, B.O., Kautsky, N., Levin, S., Lubchenco, J., Maler, K.G., David, S., Starrett, D., Tilman, D., Walker, B., (2000). The value of nature and the nature of value. Science, 289, 395-396.10.1126/science.289.5478.395
  11. de Groot, R.S., (1992). Functions of Nature: Evaluation of Nature in Environmental Planning, Management and Decision-Making. Wolters Noordhoff BV, Groningen, The Netherlands.
  12. de Groot, R.S., Wilson, M., Boumans, R., (2002). A typology for the description, classification and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Economics, 41, 393-408.10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00089-7
  13. DSEWPC, Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities, (2011). ACRIS Landscape Function Update 2006-2010: Updated Information to That Provided in Rangelands 2008- Taking the Pulse. Commonwealth of Australia. 37p.
  14. Elsasser, P., (1999). Recreational benefits of forests in Germany, in C.Roper and A.Park (eds), The Living Forest: the Non-market Benefits of Forestry (pp. 175-188), London: The Stationery Office.
  15. Francis, G.R., Magnuson, J.J., Regier, H.A., Talhelm, D.R., (1979). Rehabilitating Great Lakes Ecosystems. Great Lakes Fishery Commision. Technical Report 37, Ann Arbor, MI., pp. 1-107.
  16. Friedel, M. H., (1991). Range condition assessment and the concept of threshold -a viewpoint. J. Range Manage. 44:422-426.
  17. GES, Glossary of Environment Statistics, (1997). Studies in Methods, Series F, No. 67, United Nations, New York.
  18. Gram, S., (2001). Economic valuation of special forest products: an assessment of methodological shortcomings, Ecological Economics, 36, 109-117.10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00213-5
  19. Gunawardena, U., Edwards-Jones, G and McGregor, M., (1999). A contingent valuation approach for a tropical rainforest: a case study of Sinharaja rainforest reserve in Sri Lanka, In Roper S and Park, A (eds), The Living Forest: the Non-Market Benefits of Forestry (pp. 275-284),London: The Stationery Office.
  20. Hacket, S., C., (2006). Environmentas and Natural Resources Economics. London: Armonk, New York.
  21. Hanley, N., Shogren, J., White, B., (2007). Environmental Economics in Theory and Practice, Palgrave, London.
  22. Harris, J., (2006). Environmental and Natural Resource Economics: A Contemporary Approach. Houghton Mifflin Company.
  23. Hobbs, R.J., Norton, D.A., (1996). Towards a conceptual framework for restoration ecology. Restor. Ecol., 4(2), 93-110.10.1111/j.1526-100X.1996.tb00112.x
  24. Hooper, D.U., Chapin III, F.S., Hector, A., Inchausti, P., Lavorel, S., Lawton, J.H., Lodge, D.M., Loreau, M., Naeem, S., Schmid, B., Seta¨la¨, H., Symstad, A.J., Vandermeer, J., Wardle, D.A., (2005). Effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning: a consensus of current knowledge. Ecol. Monogr., 75, 3-35.10.1890/04-0922
  25. IFRO, Iranian Forest and Rangelands Organization, (2013). Reports of rangelands and watersheds comprehensive plans in Khorasan Province, Mashhad. In Persian.
  26. Jameson, D. A., (1970). Land management policy and development of ecological concepts. J. Range Manage. 23:316-321.
  27. Joyce, L. A., (1993). The life cycle of the range condition concept. Journal of Range Management, 46:132-138.
  28. Lipton, D.W., K. Wellman, I.C. Sheifer, R.F. Weiher, (1995). Economic valuation of natural resources: a handbook for coastal resource policymakers. U.S. Dept. of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Coastal Ocean Office, Silver Springs, MD.
  29. Lockwood, J.L., Samuels, C.L., (2004). Assembly Models and the Practice of Restoration. In V.M., Temperton, R.J., Hobbs, T., Nuttle, S., Halle, (Eds.), Assembly Rules and Restoration Ecology (pp. 34-54). Washington: Island Press.
  30. Loreau, M., (2000). Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: recent theoretical advances. Oikos, 91, 3-17.10.1034/j.1600-0706.2000.910101.x
  31. Loreau, M., Naeem, S., Inchausti, P., Bengtsson, J., Grime, J.P., Hector, A., Hooper, D.U., Huston, M.A., Raffaelli, D., Schmid, B., Tilman, D.,Wardle, D.A., (2001). Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: current knowledge and future challenges. Science, 294, 804-808.10.1126/science.1064088
  32. Love, R.M., (1961). The range-natural plant communities or modified ecosystems? J. Brit. Grassl. Soc., 16:89-99.
  33. Macleod, N.D. and Johnston, B.G., (1990). An economic framework for the evaluation of rangeland restoration projects. The Australian Rangeland Journal, 12(1) 40 - 53.10.1071/RJ9900040
  34. Mankiw, N.G. (2012). Principles of Microeconomics, South- Western Cengage Learning, 6th Ed.
  35. Mattson, L and Li, C., (1993). The non-timber value of Northern Swedish forests, Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 8, 426-434.10.1080/02827589309382789
  36. Moghaddan, M.R., (2001). Range and Range Management. 2nd ed., University of Tehran. In Persian.
  37. Neumann, R and Hirsch, E., (2000). Commercialisation of Non-Timber Forest Products: Review and Analysis of Research, Bogor, Indonesia: Center for International Forestry Research.
  38. NRC, National Research Council, (1994). Rangeland Health. New Methods to Classify, Inventory, and Monitor Rangelands. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
  39. Pellant, M., P. Shaver, D.A. Pyke, and J.E. Herrick, (2005). Interpreting indicators of rangeland health, version 4. Technical Reference 1734-6. U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, National Science and Technology Center, Denver, CO. BLM/WO/ST-00/001+1734/REV05. 122 p.
  40. Schacht, W. H., (1993). A new approach for range condition assessment is needed. Rangelands, 15, 245-247.
  41. Scarnecchia, D. L., (1995). Viewpoint: the rangeland condition concept and range sciences search for identity: a system viewpoint. Journal of Range Management, 48:181-186.
  42. SCBD, Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, (2001). The Value of Forest Ecosystems. CBD Technical Series no. 4. Montreal, SCBD, 67p.
  43. Schacht, W. H., (1993). A new approach for range condition assessment is needed. Rangelands,15:245-247.
  44. Smith, E.L., (1978). A critical evaluation of the range condition concept. In: D.N. Hyder (Ed). Proc. First Int. Rangeland Congr. Soc. Range Manage (pp 266-267). Denver, Colo.
  45. Smith, E.L., (1979). Evaluation of the range condition concept. Rangelands. 1, 52-54.
  46. Srivastava, D.S., Vellend, M., (2005). Biodiversity-Ecosystem function research: Is it relevant to conservation. Annu. Rev. Evol. Syst., 36, 267-294.10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.36.102003.152636
  47. SRM, Society for Range Management, Task Group in Concepts and Terminology, (1995). New concepts for assessment of rangeland condition. Journal of Range Management 48:271-282.
  48. Stoddart, L.A., Smith, A.D., Box, T.W., (1955). Range Management. 2nd ed., Mc Graw Hill Book Company. New York.
  49. TGUCT, Task Group for Unity in Concepts and Terminology, (1995). New concepts for assessment of rangeland condition. J. Range Manage., 48, 271-282.
  50. Thurow, T.L., (2000). Hydrologic effects on rangeland degradation and restoration processes. In:Rangeland Desertification (eds. Arnalds, O. and Arc her, S.). Kluwer Academic Publishers (pp. 53-66), Dordrecht.
  51. Tietenberg, T., (2006). Environmental and natural resource economics. Boston Pearson/Addison Wesley.
  52. Tilman, D., (1999). The ecological consequences of changes in biodiversity: a search for general principles. Ecology, 80, 1455-1474.10.2307/176540
  53. Tilman, D., Wedin, D., Knops, J. (1996). Productivity and sustainability inuenced by bio-diversity in grassland ecosystems. Nature, 379, 718-720.10.1038/379718a0
  54. Turner, K., R., Pearce, D., Baterman, I., (1999). Environmental economics, Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1999.
  55. Turner, R.K., Paavola, J., Cooper, P., Farber, S., Jessamy, V., Georgiou, S., (2003). Valuing nature: lessons learned and future research directions. Ecological Economics, 46, 493-510.10.1016/S0921-8009(03)00189-7
  56. USDA, Soil Conservation Service, (1977). Grazing guide for potential climax forest sites and condition classes, Montana foothills and mountains area. Bozeman, Mont.
  57. USDA, U.S. Forest Service, (1987). Ecosystem classification handbook. Chapter four-Ecodata sampling method. FSH 12/87 R-1. Missoula, Mont.
  58. Valentine, J.F., (1971). Range development and improvements. 2nd ed., UT: Brigham Young University Press; 545 p. Provo, Utah.
  59. Walker, B.H., (1992). Biodiversity and ecological redundancy. Conserv. Biol., 6, 18-23.10.1046/j.1523-1739.1992.610018.x
  60. Weitzman, M.L., (2000). Economic profitability versus ecological entropy. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115(1): 237-263.
  61. Westoby, M., Walker, B., Noy-Meir, I., (1989). Opportunistic management for rangelands not at equilibrium. Journal of Range Management, 42(4), 266-274.10.2307/3899492
  62. Workman, John P., (1984). Criteria for investment feasibility and selection. In: Developing Strategies for Rangeland Management (p. 1475-1507), National Research Council/National Academy of Science. Westview Press, Boulder, Colo.
  63. Workman, John P. and John A. Tanaka, (1991). Economic feasibility and management considerations in range revegetation. Journal of Range Management, 44(6):566-573.
  64. Zedler, J.B., Callaway, J.C., (1999). Tracking wetland restoration: Do mitigation sites follow desired trajectories? Restoration Ecology, 7, 69-73. 10.1046/j.1526-100X.1999.07108.x
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jlecol-2016-0009 | Journal eISSN: 1805-4196 | Journal ISSN: 1803-2427
Language: English
Page range: 83 - 96
Submitted on: Feb 28, 2016
|
Accepted on: May 14, 2016
|
Published on: Jul 26, 2016
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2016 Amir Ahmadpour, Gholam Ali Heshmati, Ramtin Joulaie, published by Czech Society for Landscape Ecology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.