Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Conceptions of Landscape-Ecological Relevance Emerged in the Czech Botany during the Second Half of Twentieth Century Cover

Conceptions of Landscape-Ecological Relevance Emerged in the Czech Botany during the Second Half of Twentieth Century

Journal of Landscape Ecology
Volume 8 (2015): Issue 3 (December 2015)
By:   
Open Access
|Jan 2016
References

References

  1. Bohn, U., Neuhäusl, R., Gollub, G., Hettwer, C., Neuhäuslová, Z., Schlüter, H. & Weber, H. (eds.) (2000-2003).. Maßstab 1 : 2 500 000. Teil 1-3. Landwirtschaftsverlag, Münster.
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. Emmer, I.M., Fanta, J., Kobus, A.T. et al., (1998). Reversing borealization as a means to restore biodiversity in Central-European mountain forests - an example from the Krkonose Mountains, Czech Republic. B, 7(2): 229-247.
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. Fanta, J., Siepel, H. (eds)(2010).. - KNNV Publishing, Zeist, The Netherlands.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  4. Forman, R.T.T. (2014).. Science of cities. Cambridge University Press, New York.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  5. Forman, R.T.T., Godron, M. (1986).. - John Wiley & Sons.
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. Hadač, E. et al. (1969).. Vydavateľstvo Slovenskej akadémie vied, Bratislava.
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. Hejný, S. (1957). Ein Beitrag zur ökologischen Gliederung der Makrophyten der tschechoslowakischen Niederung sgewässer., 29: 349-368.
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. Hejný, S. (1960).. Vydavatelstvo SAV, Bratislava.
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. Hejný, S., Slavík, B., (eds.)(1988).. Academia, Praha.
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. Jeník, J., (1961).: teorie anemo-orografických systémů. Nakladatelství ČSAV, Praha.
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. Jeník, J., (1990). Large-scale pattern of biodiversity in Hercynian massifs. In: Krahulec F., Agnew S. et al. (eds.)(1990):(p. 252-259). The Hague.
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. Klika, J., (1948).. - Brázda, Praha.
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. Kopecký, K., (1969a). Zur Syntaxonomie der naturlichen nitrophilen Saumgesellschaften in der Tschechoslowakei und zur Gliederung der Klasse Galio-Urticetea.., 4: 235-259.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  14. Kopecký, K., (1969b). A proposal of classification of vegetation habitats on banks of Czechoslovak water courses from hydrological standpoint., 66(3): 326.
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. Kopecký, K. et Hejný, S., (1978). Use of a so-called deductive method in syn-taxonomic classification of roadside plant communities in NE Bohemia., 36(1): 43-51.
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. Kropáč, Z., (1966), Estimation of weed seeds in arable soils., 6: 105-128.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  17. Kropáč, Z., Hadač, E. et Hejný, S. (1971). Some remarks on the synecological and syntaxonomic problems of weed plant communities., 43: 139-153.
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. Longman, K.A. et Jeník, J., (1992). Forest-savanna boundaries - general considerations. - In: Furley, P.A., Proctor, J. et Ratter, J.A. (eds.)(1992):(p. 3-20). Chapman & Hall, London.
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. Mikyška, R., (1948). Nástin hlavních zásad pro biologické plánování. In: Klika J.,, Brázda, Praha.
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. Mikyška, R., [red.] et al. (1969).. 1. České země. Academia, Praha.
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. Neuhäusl, R., (1975). Kartierung der potentiell naturlichen Vegetation in der Kulturlandschaft., 47: 117-128.
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. Neuhäusl, R., (1991). Vegetation map of Europe - 1st results and current state., 2(1): 131-134.
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. Neuhäuslová, Z., et al. (1998).. - Praha, AV ČR, Botanický ústav.
    Search in Google Scholar
  24. Rychnovská, M., (ed.)(1979).. Progress Report on MAB Project No. 91, Brno.
    Search in Google Scholar
  25. Rychnovská, M., (ed.)(1993).. - Elsevier, Amsterdam.
    Search in Google Scholar
  26. Safford, H.D., Rejmánek, M. et Hadač, E., (2001). Species pools and the “hump-bach” model of plant species diversity: an empirical analysis at a relevant spatial scale., 95: 282-290.
    Search in Google Scholar
  27. Skalický, V., (1975). Die regional-phytogeographische Gliederung des Westböhmischen Bezirkes., 6: 1-39.
    Search in Google Scholar
  28. Skalický, V., (1988). Regionálně fytogeografické členění (Regional phytogeographical division). - In: Hejný S., Slavík B. (eds):(pp. 103–121, Flora of the Czech Republic) 1. Academia, Praha.
    Search in Google Scholar
  29. Slavíková, J. et al. (1968).. Vegetace ČSSR, Ser. A, Academia, Praha.
    Search in Google Scholar
  30. Štěpán, J., (1976). Prognóza krajinoekologických podmínek fytogeografických okresů v ČSR., 48: 163-184.
    Search in Google Scholar
  31. Úlehla, V., (1947).. Život a práce, Praha.
    Search in Google Scholar
  32. Vicherek, J., (1973).. Vegetace ČSSR, Ser. A, Academia, Praha.
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jlecol-2015-0013 | Journal eISSN: 1805-4196 | Journal ISSN: 1803-2427 (formerly 1805-4196)
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 40 - 50
Submitted on: Jun 22, 2015
Accepted on: Jul 30, 2015
Published on: Jan 26, 2016
Published by: Czech Society for Landscape Ecology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
conceptions within Czech botany,
relevance to landscape level,
mapping of potential vegetation,
structure and dynamics in landscapes,
corridors,
deductive classification of vegetation,
soil seed bank,
productivity and ecophysiology of grasslands,
agroecocycles and segetal vegetation,
dynamics of wetlands,
anemo-orographic systems,
disturbance,
diversity of plants,
invasive plants and invasions
Related subjects:
Geosciences,
Geosciences, other

© 2016 Pavel Kovář, published by Czech Society for Landscape Ecology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Volume 8 (2015): Issue 3 (December 2015)
Previous article
Next article