References
- Anderson, L. M., & Schroeder, H. W. (1983). Application of wildland scenic assessment methods to the urban landscape. Landscape Planning, 10, 219-237.10.1016/0304-3924(83)90049-7
- Arriaza, M, Canas-Ortega, J. F., Canas-Madueno, J. A., & Ruiz-Aviles, P. (2004). Assessing the visual quality of rural landscapes, Landscape and Urban Planning, 69, 115-125.10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.029
- Bernaldez, F.G., Ruiz, J.P., Benayas, J., and Abello, R.P. (1998). Real landscapes versus photographed landscapes: preference dimensions. Landscape Resources, 13, 10-11.10.1080/01426398808706244
- Beza, B. (2010). The aesthetic value of a mountain landscape: A study of the Mt. Everest Trek. Landscape and Urban Planning, 97, 306-317.10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.07.003
- Bishop, I. D. (1997). Testing perceived landscape colour difference using the Internet. Landscape and Urban Planning, 37, 187-196.10.1016/S0169-2046(97)80003-5
- Brown, T. C., & Daniel, T. C. (1986). Predicting Scenic Beauty of Timber Stands. Forest Science, 32, 417-487.
- Buhyoff, G. J., Gauthier, L. J., and Wellman, J. D. (1984). Predicting scenic quality for urban forests using vegetation measurements. Forest Science, 30(1), 71-82.
- Cañas, I., Ayuga, E., and Ayuga, F. (2009). A contribution to the assessment of scenic quality of landscapes based on preferences expressed by the public. Land Use Policy, 26, 1173-1181.10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.02.007
- Daniel, T. C. (1990). Measuring the quality of the human environment: a psychophysical approach. American Psychologist, 45, 633-637.10.1037/0003-066X.45.5.633
- Daniel, T. C., (2001). Whither scenic beauty? visual landscape quality assessment in the 21st century. Landscape Urban Planning, 25, 267-281.10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00141-4
- Daniel, T. C., & Boster, R. S. (1976). Measuring landscape aesthetics: the scenic beauty estimation method. USDA Forest Service, 167, 66-69.
- Daniel, T. C., & Vining, J. (1983). Methodological issues in the assessment of landscape quality. In Altman, I., & Wohwill, J. F. (Eds.), Behaviour and the Natural Environment (pp. 39-83.). New York: Plenum Press.
- Español, I. (1995). Impacto Ambiental (Environmental Impact). Canales y Puertos, Madrid: E.T.S.I. Caminos.
- García, M. L., Hernańdez, B. J., and Ayuga, F. (2003). Analysis of the exterior colour of agroindustrial buildings: a computer aided approach to landscape integration. Journal of Environmental Management, 69, 93-104.10.1016/S0301-4797(03)00121-X
- Gottemoeller, F. (2004). Bridgescape: The Art of Designing Bridge. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
- Groat, L. (1984). Public opinions of contextual fit. Architecture, 11, 72-75.
- Hagerhall, C. M., Purcell, T. and Taylor, R. (2004). Fractal dimension of landscape silhouette outlines as a predictor of landscape preference, J. Environ. Psychol. 24, 247-255.10.1016/j.jenvp.2003.12.004
- Hammitt, W. E., Patterson, M. E., and Noe, F. P. (1994). Identifying and predicting visual preference of southern Appalachian forest recreation vistas. Landscape and Urban Planning, 29, 171-183.10.1016/0169-2046(94)90026-4
- Herzog, T. R. (1989). A cognitive analysis of preference for urban nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 9, 27-43.10.1016/S0272-4944(89)80024-6
- Hull, R. B., & Revell, G. R. (1988). Cross-cultural comparison of landscape scenic beauty evaluations: a case study in Bali. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 9, 177-191.10.1016/S0272-4944(89)80033-7
- Hull, R.B. & Stewart, W.P. (1992). Validity of photo-based scenic beauty judgments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 12, 101-114.10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80063-5
- Hull, R. B. & Harvey, A. (1989). Explaining the emotion people experience in suburban parks. Environment and behavior, 21(3), 323-345. Kaltenborn, B. P. & Bjerke, T. (2002). Associations between environmental value orientations and landscape preferences. Landscape and Urban Planning, 59, 1-11.
- Kaplan, S. & Kaplan, R. (1982). Cognition and environment: Functioning in an nncertain World. New York: Praeger.
- Kaplan, R., Kaplan, S. and Wendt, J. S. (1972). Rated preference and complexity for natural and urban Material. Perception Psychophysics, 12(4), 354-356.10.3758/BF03207221
- Kaplan, R. & Kaplan, S. (1989). The experience of nature: A psychological perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Kaplan, R. (1977). Preference and everyday nature: method and application. In: Stokols, D. (Ed.), Perspectives on Environmental Behavior -Theory, Research and Applications (pp. 235-250). New York: Plenum Press.
- Kaplan, R. (1983). The role of nature in the urban context. In I. Altman & J. F. Wohwill (Eds.), Behavior and Natural Environment (pp. 127-162). New York: Plenum Press.
- Kaplan, R., & Herbert, E. J. (1987). Cultural and sub-cultural comparisons in preferences for natural settings. Landscape and Urban Planning, 14, 281-293.10.1016/0169-2046(87)90040-5
- Kenwick, R.A., Shammin, Md. R. and Sullivan, W.C. (2009). Preferences for riparian buffers. Landscape and Urban Planning, 91, 88-96.10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.12.005
- Krejcie, R.V., & Morgan, D.W. (1970). Determining Sample Size for Research Activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30, 607-610.10.1177/001316447003000308
- Law, C. S., & Zube, E. H. (1983). Effects of photographic composition on landscape perception. Landscape Resources, 8, 22-23.10.1080/01426398308706052
- Lekagul, A. (2002). A preference study of the traditional Thai Market Place: A management and preservation tool for vernacular environments. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg.
- Leonhardt, F. (1984). Bridges: Aesthetics and Design. Cambridge: The M.I.T. Press.
- Leonhardt, F. (2001). Bridge Engineering Handbook. In Wai-Fah Chen, & Lian Duan (Eds), Bridge Aesthetics Basics (chapter 2). Boca Raton: CRC Press.
- Listavich, S. T. (1995). The development of aesthetic guidelines for short and medium span Texas bridge systems. Unpublished Master’s thesis, The University of Texas at Austin.
- Magill, A. W., & Litton, R. B. J. (1986). A color measuring system for landscape assessment. Landscape Journal, 5(1), 45-54.10.3368/lj.5.1.45
- Menn, C. (1986). Prestressed Concrete Bridges. Wien: Springer-Verlag.
- Miller, P. A. (1984). Visual Preference and Implications for Coastal Management: A Perceptual Study of the British Colombia Shoreline. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
- Minnesota Department of Transportation. Office of Technical Support, Site Development Unit (1995). Architectural and Visual Quality Design Recommendations, for the T.H. 610 Transportation Corridors.
- Nasar, J. L. (1997). The Evaluative Image of the City. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Pitt, D., G., & Zube, E. H. (1987). Management of Natural Environments. In Stokols, D., Altman, D. (Eds.), Handbook of Environmental Psychology (pp.1009-1042). New York: Wiley.
- Reese, R. C. (1976). Aesthetic is a do it yourself project. Methods of Structural Analysis, (ASCE), 1, 33-38. Sarmad, Z., Bazargan, A. and Hejazi, E. (2000). Research methods in behavioral science. Tehran. Iran: Agah Press.
- Sayadi, S., González-Roa, M. C., and Calatrava-Requena, J. (2009). Public preferences for landscape features: the case of agricultural landscape in mountainous Mediterranean areas. Land Use Policy, 26(2), 334-344.10.1016/j.landusepol.2008.04.003
- Schroeder, H. W. (1986). Estimating park trees densities to maximize landscape aesthetics. Journal of Environmental Management, 23(4), 325-333.
- Shafer, E. L. (1969). Perception of natural environment. Environment and Behavior, 1, 71-82.10.1177/001391656900100105
- Shafer, E. L., & Brush, R. O. (1977). How to measure preferences for photographs of natural landscapes. Landscape Planning, 4, 237-256.10.1016/0304-3924(77)90027-2
- Sheets, V. L., & Manzer, C. D. (1991). Affect, cognition, and urban vegetation some effects of adding trees along city streets. Environment and Behavior, 23(3), 285-304.10.1177/0013916591233002
- Shuttleworth, S., (1980). The use of photographs as an environmental presentation medium in landscape studies. Journal of Environmental Management, 11, 61-76.
- Stamps, A. E. (1999). Demographic effects in environmental aesthetics: A meta-analysis. Journal of Planning Literature, 14, 155-175.10.1177/08854129922092630
- Stamps, A. E. & Miller, S. D. (1993). Advocacy membership, design guidelines, and predicting preferences for residential infill designs. Environment and Behavior, 25(3), 367-409.10.1177/0013916593255004
- Stewart, T. R., Middleton, P., Downton, M., Ely, D. (1984). Judgments of photographs vs. field observations in studies of perception and judgment of the visual environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 4, 283-302.10.1016/S0272-4944(84)80001-8
- Svobodova, K., Sklenicka, P., Molnarova, K. and Salek, M. (2012). Visual preferences for physical attributes of mining and post-mining landscapes with respect to the socio-demographic characteristics of respondents. Ecological Engineering, 43, 34-44.10.1016/j.ecoleng.2011.08.007
- Wherrett, J. R. (2000). Creating landscape preference models using the internet as a medium for surveys. Landscape Resources, 25, 79-96.10.1080/014263900113181
- Woods, J. D. (1995). Environmental factors that influence preference and price perceptions of commercial landscapes and storefronts. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg.
- Yu, K. (1995). Cultural variations in landscape preference: comparisons among Chinese sub-groups and Western design experts. Landscape and Urban Planning, 32, 107-126.10.1016/0169-2046(94)00188-9
- Zube, E. H., Sell, J. L. & Taylor, J. G. (1982). Landscape perception: Research, application and theory. Landscape Planning, 9, 1-33.10.1016/0304-3924(82)90009-0
- Zuk, W. (1973). Public response to bridge colors. Department of Highways and the University of Virginia, Virginia Highway Research Council: Charlottesville, VA.