Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Computed Tomography Biomarkers of Vulnerable Coronary Plaques Cover

References

  1. 1. Schaar JA, Muller JE, Falk E, et al. Terminology for high-risk and vulnerable coronary artery plaques. Report of a meeting on the vulnerable plaque, June 17 and 18, 2003, Santorini, Greece. Eur Heart J. 2004;25:1077-1082.10.1016/j.ehj.2004.01.00215191780
  2. 2. Opolski MP, Kępka C, Rużyłło W. Computed tomography for detection of vulnerable coronary plaque – A Cassandra’s dream? Postępy w Kardiologii Interwencyjnej/Advances in Interventional Cardiology. 2014;10:147-152.
  3. 3. Motoyama S, Masayoshi S, Harigaya H, et al. Computed tomographic angiography characteristics of atherosclerotic plaques subsequently resulting in acute coronary syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;54:49-57.10.1016/j.jacc.2009.02.06819555840
  4. 4. Maurovich-Horvat P, Schlett CL, Alkadhi H, et al. The napkin-ring sign indicates advanced atherosclerotic lesions in coronary CT angiography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012;5:1243-1252.10.1016/j.jcmg.2012.03.01923236975
  5. 5. van Velzen JE, de Graaf FR, de Graaf MA, et al. Comprehensive assessment of spotty calcifications on computed tomography angiography: comparison to plaque characteristics on intravascular ultrasound with radiofrequency backscatter analysis. J Nucl Cardiol. 2011;18:893-903.10.1007/s12350-011-9428-2317504521769702
  6. 6. Motoyama S, Kondo T, Sarai M, et al. Multislice computed tomographic characteristics of coronary lesions in acute coronary syndromes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;50:319-326.10.1016/j.jacc.2007.03.04417659199
  7. 7. Cilla M, Pena E, Martinez MA, Kelly DJ. Comparison of the vulnerability risk for positive versus negative atheroma plaque morphology. J Biomech. 2013;46:1248-1254.10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.02.01223523380
  8. 8. Benedek T, Gyöngyösi M, Benedek I. Multislice computed tomographic coronary angiography for quantitative assessment of culprit lesions in acute coronary syndromes. Can J Cardiol. 2013;29:364-371.10.1016/j.cjca.2012.11.00423333164
  9. 9. Batty JA, Subba S, Luke P, Gigi LWC, Sinclair H, Kunadian V. Intracoronary imaging in the detection of vulnerable plaques. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2016;18:28.10.1007/s11886-016-0705-1475433326879196
  10. 10. Huynh K. Imaging: Combining IVUS and NIRS improves accuracy of fibroatheroma detection. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2015;12:130.10.1038/nrcardio.2015.325622847
  11. 11. Sinclair H, Bourantas C, Bagnall A, Mintz GS, Kunadian V. OCT for identification of Vulnerable Plaque in Acute Coronary Syndrome. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;8:198-209.10.1016/j.jcmg.2014.12.00525677892
  12. 12. Rasouli ML, Shavelle DM, French WJ, McKay CR, Budoff MJ. Assessment of coronary plaque morphology by contrast enhanced computed tomographic angiography: CT Imaging of Coronary Artery Plaque 313 comparison with intravascular ultrasound. Coron Artery Dis. 2006;17:359-364.10.1097/00019501-200606000-0000616707959
  13. 13. Nance JW Jr, Schlett CL, Schoepf UJ, et al. Incremental prognostic value of different components of coronary atherosclerotic plaque at cardiac CT angiography beyond coronary calcification in patients with acute chest pain. Radiology. 2012;264:679-690.10.1148/radiol.1211235022820732
  14. 14. Achenbach S, Moselewski F, Ropers D, et al. Detection of calcified and noncalcified coronary atherosclerotic plaque by contrast-enhanced, submillimeter multidetector spiral computed tomography: a segment based comparison with intravascular ultrasound. Circulation. 2004;109:14-17.10.1161/01.CIR.0000111517.69230.0F14691045
  15. 15. Kim SY, Kim KS, Lee SY, et al. Assessment of non-calcified plaques Using 64-Slice Computed Tomography: Comparison with Intravascular Ultrasound. Korean Circ J. 2009;39:95-99.10.4070/kcj.2009.39.3.95277180519949594
  16. 16. Sato A. Coronary plaque imaging by coronary computed tomography angiography. World J Radiol. 2014;6:148-159.10.4329/wjr.v6.i5.148403754124876919
  17. 17. Conte E, Annoni A, Pontone G, et al. Evaluation of coronary plaque characteristics with coronary computed tomography angiography in patients with non-obstructive coronary artery disease: a long-term follow-up study. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;pii:jew200. [Epub ahead of print]10.1093/ehjci/jew20027679600
  18. 18. Benedek T, Jako B, Benedek I. Plaque quantification by coronary CT and intravascular ultrasound identifies a low CT density core as a marker for plaque instability in acute coronary syndromes. Int Heart J. 2014;55:22-28.10.1536/ihj.13-21324463925
  19. 19. Nadjiri J, Hausleiter J, Jähnichen C, et al. Incremental prognostic value of quantitative plaque assessment in coronary CT angiography during 5 years of follow up. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2016;10:97-104.10.1016/j.jcct.2016.01.00726837235
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jim-2016-0068 | Journal eISSN: 2501-8132 | Journal ISSN: 2501-5974
Language: English
Page range: 263 - 266
Submitted on: Nov 6, 2016
Accepted on: Dec 4, 2016
Published on: Dec 29, 2016
Published by: Asociatia Transilvana de Terapie Transvasculara si Transplant KARDIOMED
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2016 Tiberiu Nyulas, Monica Chiţu, András Mester, Laura Jáni, Sebastian Condrea, Diana Opincariu, István Kovács, Imre Benedek, Theodora Benedek, published by Asociatia Transilvana de Terapie Transvasculara si Transplant KARDIOMED
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.