Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Noninvasive Assessment of Coronary Artery Disease: Fractional Flow Reserved Derived from Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography (FFRCT) Cover

Noninvasive Assessment of Coronary Artery Disease: Fractional Flow Reserved Derived from Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography (FFRCT)

Open Access
|Oct 2016

References

  1. 1. Nichols M, Townsend N, Scarborough P, et al. Cardiovascular disease in Europe 2014: epidemiological update. Eur Heart J. 2014;35:2920-2929.10.1093/eurheartj/ehu299
  2. 2. Norgaard BL, Leipsic J, Koo BK, et al. Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Derived Fractional Flow Reserve and Plaque Stress. Curr Cardiovasc Rep. 2016;9:2.10.1007/s12410-015-9366-5
  3. 3. Lucas FL, Siewers AE, Malenka DJ, et al. Diagnostic-therapeutic cascade revisited: coronary angiography, coronary artery bypass graft surgery, and percutaneous coronary intervention in the modern era. Circulation. 2008;118:2797-2802.10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.789446
  4. 4. Grunau GL, Min JK, Leipsic J. Modeling of Fractional Flow Reserve Based on Coronary CT Angiography. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2013;15:336.10.1007/s11886-012-0336-0
  5. 5. Tonino PA, Faeron WF, DeBruyne B, et al. Angiographic versus functional severity of coronary artery stenosis in the FAME study fractional flow reserve versus angiography in multivessel evaluation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55(25):2816-2821.10.1016/j.jacc.2009.11.096
  6. 6. Metz LD, Beattie M, Hom R, et al. The prognostic value of normal exercise myocardial perfusion imaging and exercise echocardiography: a meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49:227-237.10.1016/j.jacc.2006.08.048
  7. 7. Gould KL, Lipscomb K, Hamilton GW. Physiologic basis for assessing critical coronary stenosis. Instantaneous flow response and regional distribution during xoronary hyperemia as measures of coronary flow reserve. Am J Cardiol. 1974;33:87-94.10.1016/0002-9149(74)90743-7
  8. 8. Uren NG, Melin JA, De Bruyne B, et al. Relation between myocardial blood flow and the severity of coronary-artery stenosis. N Engl J Med. 1994;330(25):1782-1788.10.1056/NEJM1994062333025038190154
  9. 9. Abd TT, George RT. Association of coronary plaque burden with fractional flow reserve: should we keep attempting to drive physiology from anatomy? Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2015;5(1):67-70.
  10. 10. Fihn SD, Gardin JM, Abrams J, et al. 2012 ACCF/AHA/ACP/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS Guideline for the diagnosis and management of patients with stable ischemic heart disease: a report of the ACCF, AHA, ACP, AATS, PCNA, SCAI, STS. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60(24):44-164.10.1016/j.jacc.2012.07.01323182125
  11. 11. Pijls NH, Sels JW. Functional Measurment of Coronary Stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;59(12):1045-1057.10.1016/j.jacc.2011.09.07722421298
  12. 12. Pang CL, Alcock R, Pilkington N, et al. Determining the haemodynamic significance of arterial stenosis: the relationship between CT angiography, computational fluid dynamics, and noninvasive fractional flow reserve. Clin Radiol. 2016;71(8):750-757.10.1016/j.crad.2016.03.00127061041
  13. 13. Pijls NH, van Son JA, Kirkeeide RL, et al. Experimental basis of determining maximum coronary, myocardial and collateral blood flow by pressure measurements for assessing functional stenosis severity before and after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Circulation. 1993;87(4):1354-1367.10.1161/01.CIR.87.4.13548462157
  14. 14. Pijls NH, van Schaardenburgh, Manoharan G, et al. Percunateous coronary intervention of functionally nonsignificant stenosis: 5-year follow-up of the DEFER study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49(21):2105-2111.10.1016/j.jacc.2007.01.08717531660
  15. 15. Boden WE, O’Rouuke RA, Teo KK, et al. Optimal medical therapy with or without PCI for stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(15):1503-1516.10.1056/NEJMoa07082917387127
  16. 16. Pijls NH, De Bruyene B, Peels K, et al. Measurement of fractional flow reserve to assess the functional severity of coronary-artery stenoses. N Engl J Med. 1996;334(26):1703-1708.10.1056/NEJM1996062733426048637515
  17. 17. Fearon WF, Bornschein B, Tonino PA, et al. Economic evaluation of fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel disease. Circulation. 2010;122(24):2545-2550.10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.92539621126973
  18. 18. Budoff MJ, Shinbane JS. Cardiac CT Imaging: Diagnosis of Cardiovascular Disease – Third Edition. London. Springer-Verlag. 2016.10.1007/978-3-319-28219-0
  19. 19. Benedek I, Benedek T. Multislice Angio Computed Tomography in the Diagnosis of Cardiovascular Diseases. Oradea. Editura Universitatii din Oradea. 2014
  20. 20. Benedek I, Chitu M, Kovacs I, et al. Incremental value of preporcedural Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography to classical Coronary Angiography for prediction of PCI complexity in left main stenosis. World J Cardiovasc Dis. 2013;3(9):537-580.10.4236/wjcd.2013.39090
  21. 21. Stahli BE, Bonassin F, Goetti R, et al. Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Indicates Complexity of Percutaneous Coronary Interventions. J Invasive Cardiol. 2012;24(5):196-201.
  22. 22. Heydari B, Leipsic J, Mancini GB, et al. Diagnostic performance of high-definition coronary computed tomography angiography performed with multiple radiation dose reduction strategies. Can J Cardiol. 2011;27:606-612.10.1016/j.cjca.2010.12.02621963057
  23. 23. Nakazato R, Otake H, Konishi A, et al. Atherosclerotic plaque characterization by CT angiography for identification of high-risk coronary artery lesions: a comparison to optical coherence tomography. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;16(4):373-379.10.1093/ehjci/jeu18825246503
  24. 24. Cheruvu C, Naoum C, Blanke P, et al. Beyond Stenosis With Fractional Flow Reserve Via Computed Tomography and Advanced Plaque Analyses for the Diagnosis of Lesion-Specific Ischemia. Can J Cardiol. 2016;28(16):63-65.10.1016/j.cjca.2016.01.02327032888
  25. 25. Hamon M, Biondi-Zoccai GG, Malagutti P, et al. Diagnostic performance of multislice spiral computed tomography of coronary arteries as compared with conventional invasive coronary angiography: a meta-anatylis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48:1896-1910.10.1016/j.jacc.2006.08.02817084268
  26. 26. Kochar M, Min JK. Physiologic assessment of coronary artery disease by cardiac computed tomography. Korean Circ J. 2013;43(7):435-442.10.4070/kcj.2013.43.7.435374473023964289
  27. 27. Zarins CK, Taylor CA, Min JK. Computed fractional flow reserve (FFRCT) derivated from coronary CT angiography. J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2013;6(5):708-714.10.1007/s12265-013-9498-4379091623934536
  28. 28. Taylor CA, Fonte TA, Min JK. Computational Fluid Dynamics Applied to Cardiac Computed Tomography for Noninvasive Quantification of Fractional Flow Reserve. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61(22):2233-2241.10.1016/j.jacc.2012.11.08323562923
  29. 29. Koo BK, Erglis A, Doh JH, et al. Diagnosis of Ischemia-Causing Coronary Stenoses by Noninvasive Fractional Flow Reserve Computed From Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiograms. Results from the Prospective Multicenter DISCOVER-FLOW Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58(19):1989-1997.10.1016/j.jacc.2011.06.06622032711
  30. 30. Nakazato R, Park HB, Berman DS, et al. Noninvasive fractional flow reserve derived from computed tomography angiography for coronary lesions of intermediate stenosis severity: results from the DeFACTO study. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013;6(6):881-889.10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.113.00029724081777
  31. 31. Gaur S, Achenbach S, Leipsic J, et al. Rationale and design of the HeartFlowNXT study. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2013;7(5):279-288.10.1016/j.jcct.2013.09.00324268114
  32. 32. Norgraard BL, Gaur S, Leipsic J, et al. Influence of Coronary Calcification on the Diagnostic Performance of CT Angiography Derived FFR in Coronary Artery Disease: A Substudy of the NXT Trial. Jacc Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;8(9):1045-1055.10.1016/j.jcmg.2015.06.00326298072
  33. 33. Hlatky MA, De Bruyne B, Pontone G, et al. Quality-of-Life and Economic Outcomes of Assessing Fractional Flow Reserve With Computed Tomography Angiography: PLATFORM. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;66(21):2315-2323.10.1016/j.jacc.2015.09.05126475205
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jim-2016-0030 | Journal eISSN: 2501-8132 | Journal ISSN: 2501-5974
Language: English
Page range: 137 - 141
Submitted on: Sep 6, 2016
|
Accepted on: Sep 14, 2016
|
Published on: Oct 23, 2016
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2016 Mihaela Rațiu, Nora Rat, Sebastian Condrea, Alexandra Stănescu, Diana Opincariu, András Mester, Laura Jani, Imre Benedek, Theodora Benedek, published by Asociatia Transilvana de Terapie Transvasculara si Transplant KARDIOMED
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.