Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Wagner versus Keynes: the causal nexus between Government Expenditures and Economic Growth: An Empirical study of Burkina Faso Cover

Wagner versus Keynes: the causal nexus between Government Expenditures and Economic Growth: An Empirical study of Burkina Faso

Open Access
|Apr 2018

References

  1. Abdullah, H. and Maamor, S. (2010). Relationship between national product and Malaysian Government development expenditure: Wagner’s law validity application. International Journal of Business and Management, 5(1), pp. 88-97.
  2. Abizadeh, S. and Yousefi, M. (1988). Growth of government expenditure: The case of Canada. Public finance quarterly, 16(1), 78-100.10.1177/109114218801600104
  3. Abu-Bader, S. and Abu-Qarn, A.S. (2003). Government expenditures, military spending and economic growth: causality evidence from Egypt, Israel, and Syria. Journal of Policy Modeling, 25(6), pp. 567-583.10.1016/S0161-8938(03)00057-7
  4. Alesina, A. and Perotti, R. (1999). Budget Deficits and Budget Institutions. In: J. M. Poterba and J. von Hagen, eds. Fiscal Institutions and Fiscal Performance. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, pp. 13-36.
  5. Al-Faris, A. F. (2002). Public expenditure and economic growth in the Gulf Cooperation Council countries. Applied Economics, 34(9), pp. 1187-1193.10.1080/00036840110090206
  6. Ansari, M. I., Gordon, D. V., and Akuamoah, C. (1997). Keynes versus Wagner: public expenditure and national income for three African countries. Applied Economics, 29(4), pp. 543-550.10.1080/000368497327038
  7. Antonis, A., Constantinos, K., and Persefoni, T. (2013). Wagner's law versus Keynesian hypothesis: Evidence from pre-WWII Greece. Panoeconomicus, 60(4), pp. 457-472.10.2298/PAN1304457A
  8. Azgun, S. (2010). Government Expenditure and National Income: Causality Tests for Turkish Economy. Journal of Applied Sciences Research, 6(11), pp. 1674-1679.
  9. Babatunde, M. A. (2011). A bound testing analysis of Wagner's law in Nigeria: 1970-2006. Applied Economics, 43(21), pp.2843-2850.10.1080/00036840903425012
  10. Balamurali, N. and Sivarajasingam, S. (2010). Empirical investigation of the dynamic relationship between government expenditure and Economic growth in Sri Lanka. Journal of Management, 5(1), pp. 49-59.
  11. Barra, C., Bimonte, G., and Spennati, P. (2015). Did fiscal institutions affect Wagner’s law in Italy during 1951-2009 period? An empirical analysis. Applied Economics, 47(59), pp. 6409-6424.10.1080/00036846.2015.1071475
  12. Bird, R. M. (1971). Wagner's o Law' of Expanding State Activity. Public Finance, 26(1), pp. 1-26.
  13. Biswal, B., Dhawan, U., and Lee, H. Y. (1999). Testing Wagner versus Keynes using disaggregated public expenditure data for Canada. Applied Economics, 31(10), pp. 1283-1291.10.1080/000368499323490
  14. Brown, R. L., Durbin, J., and Evans, J. M. (1975). Techniques for testing the constancy of regression relationships over time. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Methodological). 37(2), pp. 149-192.10.1111/j.2517-6161.1975.tb01532.x
  15. Burney, N. A. (2002). Wagner’s hypothesis: evidence from Kuwait using cointegration tests. Applied Economics, 34(1), pp. 49-57.10.1080/00036840010027540
  16. Chletsos, M., and Kollias, C. (1997). Testing Wagner’s law using disaggregated public expenditure data in the case of Greece: 1958-93. Applied Economics, 29(3), pp. 371-377.10.1080/000368497327155
  17. Chow, Y.F., Cotsomitis, J.A., Kwan, A.C.C., 2002. Multivariate cointegration and causality tests of Wagner's hypothesis: evidence from the UK. Applied Economics, 34(13), pp. 1671-1677.10.1080/00036840110115659
  18. Ebaidalla, E.M. (2013). Causality between Government expenditure and national income: Evidence from Sudan. Journal of Economic Cooperation and Development, 34(4), pp. 61-76.
  19. Ghartey, E. E. (2006). Wagner's Law and the Causal Nexus Between Government Expenditures and Tax Receipts: An Empirical Study of Ghana. IEA Monograph No. 13. Accra: Institute of Economic Affairs.
  20. Goffman, I.J., 1968. Empirical Testing of Wagner’s Law- Technical Note. Public Finance (Finances Publiques), 23(3), pp. 359-366.10.1111/j.1540-6261.1968.tb00812.x
  21. Goffman, I. J., and Mahar, D. J. (1971). The Growth of Public Expenditures in Selected Developing Nations: Six Caribbean Countries 1940-65. Public Finance, 26(1), pp. 57-74.
  22. Govindaraju, V.G.R.C., Rao, R., Anwar, S.(2011). Economic growth and government spending in Malaysia: a re-examination of Wagner and Keynesian views. Economic Change and Restructuring, 44(3), pp. 203-219.10.1007/s10644-010-9099-z
  23. Granger, C. W. (1969). Investigating causal relations by econometric models and crossspectral methods. Econometrica, 37(3), pp.424-438.10.2307/1912791
  24. Gupta, S. P. (1967). Public Expenditure and Economic Growth a Time-Series Analysis. Public Finance-Finances Publiques, 22(4), pp. 423-454.
  25. Hakkio, C. S., & Rush, M. (1991). Is the budget deficit “too large?”. Economic inquiry, 29(3), pp. 429-445.10.1111/j.1465-7295.1991.tb00837.x
  26. Halicioglu, F. (2003). Testing Wagner's law for Turkey, 1960-2000. Review of Middle East Economics and Finance, 1(2),pp. 129-140.10.2202/1475-3693.1007
  27. Hansen, B. E. (1992). Tests for parameter stability in regressions with I(1) Processes. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics,10(3),pp. 321-335.
  28. Huang, C. (2006). Government Expenditures in China and Taiwan: Do they Follow Wagner's Law? Journal of Economic Development, 31(2), pp. 139-148.
  29. Ilzetzki, E., Mendoza, E. G., and Végh, C. A. (2013): How big(small?) are fiscal multipliers? Journal of Monetary Economics, 60, pp. 239-254.10.1016/j.jmoneco.2012.10.011
  30. Islam, A. M. (2001). Wagner’s law revisited: cointegration and exogeneity tests for the USA. Applied Economics Letters, 8(8), pp. 509-515.10.1080/13504850010018743
  31. Jamshaid, R., Asim, I., and Siddiqi, M. W. (2010). Cointegration Causality Analysis between Public Expenditures and Economic Growth in Pakistan, European Journal of Social Sciences, 13(4), pp. 556-565.
  32. Karimi, M. S., & Yusop, Z. (2009). FDI and economic growth in Malaysia. University Putra Malaysia, Munich Personal Repec Archive. MPRA Paper No. 14999, posted 4. Retrieved: May 2017, https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/14999/1/
  33. Katrakilidis, C., & Tsaliki, P. (2009). Further evidence on the causal relationship between government spending and economic growth: The case of Greece, 1958-2004. Acta Oeconomica, 59(1), pp. 57-78.10.1556/aoecon.59.2009.1.3
  34. Keynes, J.M. (1936), The General Theory of Employment, Interest, a Money. London: Macmillan.
  35. Korkmaz, S. (2013). Evaluating the relationship between public expenditures and economic growth for Turkey.Aktualni problem ekonomiki, 11,pp. 382-391.
  36. Kotosz, B. (2006). Fiscal expenditures and the GDP-interdependences in transition. Statisztikai Szemle, 84(10), pp. 18-40.
  37. Kotosz, B. (2016). Transzformáció, recesszió és költségvetési politika Kelet-Európában. Saarbrücken: GlobeEdit.
  38. Kotosz, B., and Peak, A. (2013). Economic Growth and Fiscal Expenditures in Hungary -Stylized Facts Based on VAR Modelling. Tér-Gazdaság-Ember, 1(3), pp. 55-73.
  39. Kumar, S., Webber, D.J., and Fargher, S. (2009). Wagner's Law revisited: cointegration and causality tests for New Zealand. Applied Economics, 44(5), pp. 607-61610.1080/00036846.2010.511994
  40. Lengyel, I., Vas, Z., Szakálné Kanó, I., and Lengyel, B. (2017): Spatial differences of reindustrialization in a post-socialist economy: manufacturing in the Hungarian counties. European Planning Studies, 25(8), pp. 1416-1434.10.1080/09654313.2017.1319467
  41. Loizides, J., and Vamvoukas, G. (2005). Government expenditure and economic growth: evidence from trivariate causality testing. Journal of Applied Economics, 8(1), 125.10.1080/15140326.2005.12040621
  42. Mann, A. J. (1980). Wagner's law: An econometric test for Mexico, 1925-1976. National Tax Journal, 33(2), pp. 189-201.10.1086/NTJ41862301
  43. Masan, S. S., (2015). Testing Keynesian versus Wagner Hypothesis on the linkage between Government Spending and Economic Growth in Oman. In Proceedings of the Fourth Asia-Pacific Conference on Global Business, Economics, Finance and Social Sciences (AP15Malaysia Conference) ISBN 978-1-63415-762-9, Paper ID: KL553.
  44. Mohammadi, H., Cak, M., and Cak, D. (2008). Wagner's hypothesis: New evidence from Turkey using the bounds testing approach. Journal of Economic Studies, 35(1), pp. 94-106.10.1108/01443580810844442
  45. Muhlis, B. and Hakan, C. (2003) ‘Causality between public expenditure and economic growth: the Turkish case’, Journal of Economic and Social Research, 6(1), pp. 53-72.
  46. Musgrave, R. A. (1969). Theories of fiscal federalism. Public Finance / Finances publiques, 24(4), pp. 521-536.
  47. Narayan, P. K., Narayan, S., Chand Prasad, B., and Prasad, A. (2007). Export-led growth hypothesis: evidence from Papua New Guinea and Fiji. Journal of Economic Studies, 34(4), 341-351.10.1108/01443580710826380
  48. Pahlavani, M., Abed, D., and Pourshabi, F. (2011). Investigating the Keynesian View and Wagner's Law on The Size Of Government And Economic Growth In Iran. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(13), pp. 170-175.
  49. Peacock, A. T. and Wiseman, J. (1961), The Growth of Public Expenditure in the United Kingdom, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  50. Pesaran, M. H., and Pesaran, B. (1997). Working with micro fit 4.0: Interactive econometric analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  51. Pesaran, M. H., and Shin, Y. (1999). An autoregressive distributed lag-modeling approach to cointegration analysis. In S. Strom, ed., Econometrics and economic theory in the 20th century (Chapter 11). The Ragnar Frisch Centennial Symposium, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 371-413.
  52. Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., and Smith, R. J. (2001). Bounds testing approach to the analysis of level relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16(3), pp.289-326.10.1002/jae.616
  53. Pryor, F. L. (1968). Public expenditure in communist and capitalist nations. London: George Allen and Unwin.
  54. Singh, B., and Sahni, B. S. (1984). Causality between Public Expenditure and National Income. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 66(4), pp. 630-644.10.2307/1935987
  55. Sinha, D. (1998). Government expenditure and economic growth in Malaysia. Journal of Economic Development, 23(2), pp. 71-80.
  56. Tang, C. F. (2008). Wagner’s law versus Keynesian hypothesis: New evidence from recursive regression-based causality approaches. The IUP Journal of Public Finance, 6(4), pp. 29-38.
  57. Thabane, K., and Lebina, S. (2016). Economic growth and government spending nexus: Empirical evidence from Lesotho. African Journal of Economic Review, 4(1), pp. 86-100.
  58. Toda, H. Y., & Yamamoto, T. (1995). Statistical inference in vector autoregressions with possibly integrated processes. Journal of econometrics, 66(1), pp. 225-250.10.1016/0304-4076(94)01616-8
  59. Verma, S. Arora, R. (2010). Does the Indian Economy Support Wagner’s Law? An Econometric Analysis. Eurasian Journal of Business and Economics, 3(5), pp. 77-91.
  60. Wagner, A. (1893). Grundlegund de politischen oekonomie. Leipzig: C.F. Winter.
  61. Wang, L., Dumitrescu Peculea, A., Xu, H. (2016). The relationship between public expenditure and economic growth in Romania: Does it obey Wagner’s or Keynes’s Law? Theoretical and Applied Economics, 23(3), pp. 41-52.
  62. Ziramba, E. (2008). Wagner's Law: An econometric test for South Africa, 1960‐2006. South African Journal of Economics, 76(4), pp. 596-606.10.1111/j.1813-6982.2008.00218.x
Language: English
Page range: 74 - 101
Published on: Apr 28, 2018
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2018 Isaac Kwesi Ampah, Balázs Kotosz, published by West University of Timisoara
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.