Calibration of numerical models based on advanced optimization and penalization techniques

Pavel Karban; David Pánek; František Mach; Ivo Doležel

doi:10.1515/jee-2017-0073

.blurhash-client-img { display: none !important; }

Calibration of numerical models based on advanced optimization and penalization techniques

Journal of Electrical Engineering

Volume 68 (2017): Issue 5 (September 2017)

By: Pavel Karban, David Pánek, František Mach and Ivo Doležel

Open Access

|Nov 2017

Abstract

A new approach to estimation of unknown material parameters and boundary conditions of physical models was developed. The approach is based on processing measured data by advanced optimization techniques connected with penalization. The data are supposed to be in the form of random variables with normal probability distributions. Several examples were calculated proving the strength of the proposed algorithm.

References

[1] A. Bondeson, Y. Yang and P. Weinerfelt, “Optimization of Radar Cross Section by a Gradient Method”, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 1260–1263, 2004.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[2] M. Agarwal, R. Gupta, “Penalty Function Approach in Heuristic Algorithms for Constrained Redundancy Reliability Optimization”, IEEE Transactions on Reliability, vol. 54, no 3, pp. 549–558, 2005.10.1109/TR.2005.853285
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[3] K. Matous and G. J. Dvorak, “Optimization of Electromagnetic Absorption in Laminated Composite Plates”, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 1827–1835, 2003.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[4] P. Karban, F. Mach, P. Kůs, D. Pánek and I. Doležel, “Numerical Solution of Coupled Problems using Code Agros2D”, Computing, vol. 95, no. 1 Supplement, pp. 381–408, 2013.10.1007/s00607-013-0294-4
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[5] M. Pelikan, D.E. Goldberg, and E. Cant-Paz, “BOA: the Bayesian Optimization Algorithm”, Proceedings of the 1st Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation, vol. 1, pp. 525–532, 1999.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[6] R. Martinez-Cantin, “Bayes Opt: A Bayesian Optimization Library for Nonlinear Optimization, Experimental Design and Bandits”, Journal of Machine Learning Research, vol. 15, pp. 3735–3739, 2014.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[7] A. Cully, K. Chatzilygeroudis, F. Allocati and J. B. Mouret, “Limbo: A Fast and Flexible Library for Bayesian Optimization”, Preprint arXiv:1611.07343, 2016.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[8] K. Deb and H. Jain, “An Evolutionary Many-Objective Optimization Algorithm Using Reference-Point-Based Nondominated Sorting Approach, Part I: Solving Problems with Box Constraints”, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 577–601, 2014.10.1109/TEVC.2013.2281535
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[9] K. Deb and H. Jain, “A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 182–197, ISBN:047187339X, 2002.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[10] K. Deb, Multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms, 1st ed. Chichester, John Wiley & Sons (New York), 2001.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[11] A. Saravanan, C. Balamurugan, K. Sivakumar and S. Ramabalan, “Optimal geometric tolerance design framework for rigid parts with assembly function requirements using evolutionary algorithms”, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, vol. 73, no. 9, pp. 1219–1236, 2000.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[12] Z. Ren, M. Pham and C. Koh, “Robust Global Optimization of Electromagnetic Devices With Uncertain Design Parameters: Comparison of the Worst Case Optimization Methods and Multiobjective Optimization Approach Using Gradient Index”, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 851–859, 2013.10.1109/TMAG.2012.2212713
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[13] Z. Ren, M. Pham and C. Koh, “Numerically Efficient Algorithm for Reliability Based Robust Optimal Design of TEAM Problem 22”, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 661–664, 2014.10.1109/TMAG.2013.2285929
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[14] P. Di Barba, F. Dughiero, M. Forzan and E. Sieni, “Migration-corrected NSGA-II for Improving Multiobjective Design Optimization in Electromagnetics”, International Journal of Applied Electromagnetics and Mechanics, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 161–172, 2016.10.3233/JAE-150171
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[15] P. Di Barba, F. Dughiero, M. Forzan and E. Sieni, “A Paretian Approach to Optimal Design With Uncertainties: Application in Induction Heating”, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 917–920, 2014.10.1109/TMAG.2013.2280377
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[16] P. Di Barba, F. Dughiero, M. Forzan and E. Sieni, “Handling Sensitivity in Multiobjective Design Optimization of MFH Inductors”, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 53, no. 6, pp. 1–4, 2017.10.1109/TMAG.2017.2658728
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[17] P. Di Barba, F. Dughiero, M. Forzan and E. Sieni, “Magnetic Design Optimization Approach Using Design of Experiments With Evolutionary Computing”, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 1–4, 2016.10.1109/TMAG.2015.2476378
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[18] P. Di Barba and M. Mognaschi, “Sorting Pareto solutions: a principle of optimal design for electrical machines”, COMPEL – The international journal for computation and mathematics in electrical and electronic engineering, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 1227-1235, 2009.10.1108/03321640910969476
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[19] M. J. D. Powell, “The BOBYQA Algorithm for Bound Constrained Optimization without Derivatives, Cambridge NA Report NA2009/06, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, 2009.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[20] T. P. Runarsson and Xin Yao, “Stochastic Ranking for Constrained Evolutionary Optimization”, IEEE Trans. Evolutionary Computation, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 284–294, 2000.10.1109/4235.873238
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[21] M. Kennedy and A. O’Hagan, “Bayesian Calibration of Computer Models”, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 425–464, 2001.10.1111/1467-9868.00294
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[22] F. Dughiero, M. Forzan, S. Lupi, F. Nicoletti and M. Zerbetto, “A new high efficiency technology for the induction heating of non magnetic billets, COMPEL – The international journal for computation and mathematics in electrical and electronic engineering, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 1528-1538, 2011.10.1108/03321641111152685
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[23] F. Mach, V. Starman, P. Karban, I. Dolezel and P. Kus, “Finite-Element 2D Model of Induction Heating of Rotating Billets in System of Permanent Magnets and its Experimental Verication”, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 61, no. 5, pp. 2584-2519, 2014.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article

Articles in this issue

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jee-2017-0073 | Journal eISSN: 1339-309X | Journal ISSN: 1335-3632

Journal RSS Feed

Language: English

Page range: 396 - 400

Submitted on: Apr 23, 2017

Published on: Nov 28, 2017

Published by: Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava

In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

Publication frequency: 6 issues per year

Keywords:

optimization,

penalization,

estimation of parameters,

finite element method

Related subjects:

Engineering,

Introductions and overviews,

Engineering, other

© 2017 Pavel Karban, David Pánek, František Mach, Ivo Doležel, published by Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Volume 68 (2017): Issue 5 (September 2017)