Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Legal Aspects of the Implementation of European Union’s Common Commercial Policy: Lithuanian Experience and Practice Cover

Legal Aspects of the Implementation of European Union’s Common Commercial Policy: Lithuanian Experience and Practice

Open Access
|Dec 2016

References

  1. Audet, D. (2007). Smooth as Silk? A First Look at the Post MFA Textiles and Clothing Landscape. Journal of International Economic Law, 10(2), 267-284.10.1093/jiel/jgm003
  2. Barnard, C. (2010). The substantive law of the EU: the four freedoms. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  3. Baronaitė, M. (2010). Naudotų apgadintų transporto priemonių muitinio vertinimo ypatumai [Peculiarities of the customs valuation of used and damaged transport vehicles]. Teisė, 77, 63-80.10.15388/Teise.2010.0.200
  4. Broberg, M. (2011). What Is the Direction for the EU's Development Cooperation after Lisbon? European Foreign Affairs Review 16, 539-557.10.54648/EERR2011035
  5. Case C-291/11 TNT Freight Management (Amsterdam) v Staatssecretaris van Financiën, 2012 EU:C:2012:459.
  6. Case 14/70 Deutche Bakels GmbH v Oberfinanzdirektion Munchen, 1970 E.C.R. 1001.
  7. Case 248/80 Kommanditgesellschaft in Firma Gebrüder Glunz v Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Waltershof, 1982 E.C.R. 00197.
  8. Case 38-75 Douaneagent der NV Nederlandse Spoorwegen v Inspecteur der invoerrechten en accijnzen, 1975 E.C.R. 01439.
  9. Case 77/71 Gervais-Danone AG v Hauptzollamt Munchen-Schwanthalerstrasse [1971] E.C.R. 1127.
  10. Case 827/79 Amministrazione delle Finanze v Enterprise Ciro Acampora, 1980 E.C.R. 03731.
  11. Case 8/73 Hauptzollamt Bremerhaven v Massey-Ferguson GmbH, 1973 E.C.R. 00897.
  12. Case 11/79 J. Cleton en Co. BV v Inspecteur des droits d’entrée et accises a Rotterdam, 1979 E.C.R. 03069.
  13. Case C-134/13 Raytek GmbH and Fluke Europe BV v Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs, 2015 EU:C:2015:82.
  14. Case C-178/14 Vario Tek v Hauptzollamt Düsseldorf, 2015 EU:C:2015:152.
  15. Case C-196/10 Paderborner Brauerei Haus Cramer KG v Hauptzollamt Bielefeld, 2011 E.C.R. I-06201.
  16. Case C-204/07 CAS SpA v Commission, 2009 E.C.R. I-00140.
  17. Case C-206/03 Commissioners of Customs & Excise v SmithKline Beecham plc, 2005 E.C.R. I-00415.
  18. Case C-208 and 209/06 Medion AG v Hauptzollamt Duisburg and Canon Deutschland GmbH v Hauptzollamt Krefeld, 2007 E.C.R. I-07963.
  19. Case C-218/83 Les Rapides Savoyards Sàrl and others v Directeur Général des Douanes et Droits Indirects, 1984 E.C.R. 03105.
  20. Case C-229/06 Sunshine Deutschland Handelsgesellschaft v Hauptzollamt Kiel, 2007 E.C.R. I-03251.
  21. Case C-233/88 Gijs van de Kolk - Douane Expéditeur BV v Inspecteur der Invoerrechten en. Accijnzen, 1990 E.C.R I-265.
  22. Case C-267/13 Nutricia NV v Staatssecretaris van Financiën, 2014 EU:C:2014:277.
  23. Case C-297/13 Data I/O v Hauptzollamt München, 2014 EU:C:2014:331.10.1007/s00220-014-1926-z
  24. Case C-306/13 LVP NV v Belgische Staat, 2014 EU:C:2014:2465.
  25. Case C-312/07 JVC France v Administration des douanes - Direction nationale du renseignement et des enquêtes douanières, 2008 E.C.R. I-04165.
  26. Case C-361/11 Hewlett-Packard Europe BV v Inspecteur van de Belastingdienst/Douane West, kantoor Hoofddorp, 2013 EU:C:2013:18.
  27. Case C-361/11 Rechtbank Haarlem v v Inspecteur van de Belastingdienst/Douane West, kantoor Hoofddorp, 2013 EU:C:2013:18.
  28. Case C-373/08 Hoesch Metals and Alloys GmbH v Hauptzollamt Aachen, 2010 E.C.R. I-00951.
  29. Case C-38/75 Douneagent der NV Nederlandse Sooprwegen v Inspecteur der Invoerrechten en Accijinzen, 1975 E.C.R 1439.
  30. Case C-386/08 Brita v Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Hafen, 2010 E.C.R.I-1289.
  31. Case C-396/02 DFDS BV v Inspecteur der Belastingdienst - Douanedistrict Rotterdam, 2004 E.C.R. I-08439.
  32. Case C-409/10 Afasia Knits Deutschland GmbH v Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Hafen, 2011 E.C.R. I-13331.
  33. Case C-42/99 Fábrica de Queijo Eru Portuguesa Ldª v Tribunal Técnico Aduaneiro de Segunda Instância, 2000 I-07691.
  34. Case C-44/15 Duval v Hauptzollamt Frankfurt am Main, 2015 EU:C:2015:783.
  35. Case C-442/08 Commission v Germany, 2010 E.C.R. I-0000.
  36. Case C-472/12 Panasonic Italia SpA, Panasonic Marketing Europe GmbH, Scerni Logistics Srl v Agenzia delle Dogane di Milano, 2014 EU:C:2014:2082.
  37. Case C-97/95 Pascoal & Filhos Ld. v Fazenda Pública, 1997 E.C.R. I-04209.
  38. Case T-412/13 Chin Haur Indonesia, PT v Council of the European Union, 2015 EU:T:2015:163.
  39. Commission Regulation No. 1101948/200914 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (200915). Official Journal, L 287285.
  40. Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 of 12 October 1992 establishing the Community Customs Code (1992). Official Journal, L302.
  41. Craig, P., de Burca, G. (2011). The Evolution of the EU Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  42. Devuyst, T. (2011). The European Union's Competence in International Trade after the Treaty of Lisbon. The Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law, 39, 640-660.
  43. Eechaut, P. (2011). EU External Relations Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199606634.001.0001
  44. Einhorn, T. (2012). Customs Law, International. The Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Volume II. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 961-962.
  45. Gurevičienė, J., Sarapinienė, S. (2014). Muitinės formalumai tarptautinėje prekyboje [Customs formalities in the international trade]. From Muitinė tarptautinės prekybos logistinėje grandinėje [Customs in the International Trade Logistical Chain] (eds. A. Laurinavičius, J. Gurevičienė, A. Jablonskis). Vilnius: Mykolo Romerio universitetas, 108-210.
  46. Herdegen, M. (2013). Principles of International Economic Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/law/9780199579860.001.0001
  47. Joined cases 21 to 24-72 International Fruit Company NV and others v Produktschap voor Groenten en Fruit, 1972 EU:C:1972:115.
  48. Joined cases 267/81, 268/81 and 269/81 SPI and SAMI v Amministrazione delle Finanze dello Stato, 1983 E.C.R. 00801.
  49. Joined cases C-121/91 and C-122/91 CT Control (Rotterdam) BV and JCT Benelux BV v Commission, 1993 E.C.R. I-03873.
  50. Joined cases C-23/04 to C-25/04 Sfakianakis v Elliniko Dimosio, 2006 E.C.R. I-1265.
  51. Joined Cases C-288/09 British Sky Broadcasting Group plc v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs and C-289/09 Pace plc v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs, 2011 E.C.R. I-02851.
  52. Joined cases C-522/07 and C-65/08 Dinter GmbH v Hauptzollamt Düsseldorf and Europol Frost-Food v Hauptzollamt Krefeld , 2009 E.C.R. I-10333.
  53. Joined cases T-186/97, T-187/97, T-190/97 to T-192/97, T-210/97, T-211/97, T-216/97, T-217/97, T-218/97, T-279/97, T-280/97, T-293/97 and T-147/99 Kaufring and Others v Commission, 2001 E.C.R. II-01337.
  54. Law of the Republic of Lithuania on the ratification of Agreement founding World Trade Organization and its Annexes (2001). Official Gazette, 46 (1620).
  55. Law of the Republic of Lithuania on the ratification of Harmonized Commodity Description and Coding System Convention (2001). Official Gazette, 61 (2772).
  56. Law on Customs of the Republic of Lithuania (2004). Official Gazette, 73 (2517).
  57. Leal-Arcas, R. (2008). Theory and Practice of EC External Trade Law and Policy. London: Cameron May.
  58. Leal-Arcas, R. (2010). The European Union's Trade and Investment Policy after the Treaty of Lisbon. The Journal of World Investment and Trade. (11), 463-514.10.1163/221190010X00220
  59. Leal-Arcas, R. (2011). International Trade and Investment Law. Multilateral, Regional and Bilateral Governance. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.
  60. Limbach, K. (2015). Uniformity of Customs Administration in the European Union. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
  61. Lux, M. (2002). Guide to Community Customs Legislation. Bruxelles: Bruylant.
  62. Lux, M. (2007). EU Customs Law and International Law. World Customs Journal, 1(1), 19-29.
  63. Lyons, T. (2008). EC Customs law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  64. Moussis, N. (2015). Access to European Union: law, economics, policies. Cambridge: Intersentia Limited.
  65. Radžiukynas, J., Belzus, A. (2008). Importuojamų prekių muitinis įvertinimas ir kontrolė [Customs Valuation of Imported Goods and its Control]. Vilnius: Lietuvos prekybos, pramonės ir amatų rūmų asociacija.
  66. Radžiukynas, J., et al. (2011). Europos Sąjungos Bendroji Prekybos Politika [The Common Commercial Policy of the EU]. Vilnius: Mykolo Romerio universitetas.
  67. Regulation (EU) No 952/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 October 2013 laying down the Union Customs Code (2013). Official Journal, L 269.
  68. Rovetta, D. (2010). Are Tariff Explanatory Notes Subject to Judicial Supremacy? Global Trade and Customs Journal, 5(3), 129-132.10.54648/GTCJ2010013
  69. Rovetta, D. (2010). Are Tariff Explanatory Notes Subject to Judicial Supremacy? Global Trade and Customs Journal, 5(3), 129-132.10.54648/GTCJ2010013
  70. Terra, B. J. M., Wattel, P. J. (2012). European Tax Law. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.
  71. Terra, B. J. M., Wattel, P. J. (2012). European Tax Law. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.
  72. The Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania 1 February 2011 ruling of the panel of judges in the administrative case No. A143-218/2011. Access through the Internet: < http://liteko.teismai.lt/viesasprendimupaieska/tekstas.aspx?id=750ebcbc-c579-49c3-831a-73ea93dec19d>.
  73. The Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania 28 January 2010 ruling of the panel of judges in the administrative case No. A442-176/2010. Access through the Internet: <http://liteko.teismai.lt/ viesasprendimupaieska/tekstas.aspx?id=b47d4096-f6cf-480f-98d2-ba32df285be2>.
  74. The Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania, 13 February 2012 ruling in the administrative case No. A261-218/2012. Access through the Internet: <http://liteko.teismai.lt/viesasprendimupaieska/ tekstas.aspx?id=750ebcbc-c579-49c3-831a-73ea93dec19d>.
  75. The Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania, 2 November 2010 ruling of the panel of judges in the administrative case No. A143-1243/2010. Access through the Internet: <http://liteko.teismai.lt/ viesasprendimupaieska/tekstas.aspx?id=82ab5a89-39e9-4d19-a7ad-e591b109423a>.
  76. The Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania, 21 February 2013 ruling of the panel of judges in the administrative case No. A442-165/2013. Access through the Internet: < http://liteko.teismai.lt/viesasprendimupaieska/tekstas.aspx?id=87381193-fe65-4901-b600-bfc582165fe4>.
  77. The Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania, 23 May 2013 ruling of the panel of judges in the administrative case No. A261-718/2013. Access through the Internet: <http://liteko.teismai.lt/ viesasprendimupaieska/tekstas.aspx?id=05af17e3-37cc-4d31-a022-be9ee7adb2a2>.
  78. The Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania, 3 February 2012 ruling of the panel of judges in the administrative case No. A575-1388/2012. Access through the Internet: <http://liteko.teismai.lt/viesasprendimupaieska/tekstas.aspx?id=29e31627-d054-4718-86ef-487d908e6622>.
  79. The Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania, 30 April 2014 ruling of the panel of judges in the administrative case A261-146/2014. Access through the Internet: <http://liteko.teismai.lt/ viesasprendimupaieska/tekstas.aspx?id=7fed64e2-d0fd-4a7b-aa04-4eb9217e9394>.
  80. The Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania, 30 April 2014 ruling of the panel of judges in the administrative case No. A261-144/2014. Access through the Internet: <http://liteko.teismai.lt/ viesasprendimupaieska /tekstas.aspx?id=bd0247d2-356e-4884-af9b-4e13af675f67>.
  81. The Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania, 31 January 2013 ruling of the panel of judges in the administrative case No. A143-71/2013. Access through the Internet: <http://liteko.teismai.lt/ viesasprendimupaieska/tekstas.aspx?id=d6a613ef-ca3b-4d54-b33f-5f99fce90b90>.
  82. The Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania, 4 October 2010 ruling of the panel of judges in the administrative case No. A261-1408/2010. Access through the Internet: < http://liteko.teismai.lt/viesasprendimupaieska/tekstas.aspx?id=18145025-3b18-4a83-9c9a-db2bdffc974d>.
  83. The Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania, 5 May 2010 ruling of the panel of judges in the administrative case No. A442-715/2010. Access through the Internet: <http://liteko.teismai.lt/viesasprendimupaieska/ tekstas.aspx?id=cf2380b1-bfba-42de-b979-3ab206141800>.
  84. The Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania, 7 October 2013 ruling in the administrative case No. A442-1156/2013. Access through the Internet: <http://liteko.teismai.lt/ viesasprendimupaieska/tekstas. aspx?id=451f440f-9eb4-4c04-be4e-f6dacea4c856>.
  85. The Supreme Administrative Court of Lithuania, 9 December 2010 ruling in the administrative case No. A261 -1706/2010. Access through the Internet: <http://liteko.teismai.lt/viesasprendimupaieska/tekstas.aspx?id =e1c5a1fe-9883-49e1-b313-04b92b9d8f11>.
  86. Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (2012). Official Journal, C 326.
  87. Weerth, C. (2008). HS 2007: Notes of the Tariff Nomenclature and the Additional Notes of the EC. World Customs Journal. 2(1), 111-115.
  88. Wolffgang H. M., Ovie, T. (2008). Emerging Issues in European Customs Law - Part 3. World Customs Journal, 2(1), 3-17.
  89. Wolffgang, H. M., Kafeero, E. (2014). Legal thoughts on how to merge trade facilitation and safety & security. World Customs Journal, 8(1), 3-16.
  90. Woolcook, S. (2008). The potential impact of the Lisbon Treaty on European Union External Trade Policy. Stockholm: Swedish Institute for European Policy Studies.
Language: English
Page range: 61 - 76
Published on: Dec 30, 2016
Published by: University College of Economics and Culture
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2016 Gediminas Valantiejus, published by University College of Economics and Culture
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.