Insight into the Disciplinary Structure of Nanoscience & Nanotechnology
By:
References
- Anick, D.J. (2007). The octave potencies convention: A mathematical model of dilution and succussion. Homeopathy, 96(3), 202–208.
- Arora, S.K., Porter, A.L., Youtie, J., & Shapira, P. (2013). Capturing new developments in an emerging technology: An updated search strategy for identifying nanotechnology research outputs. Scientometrics, 95(1), 351–370.
- Bartol, T., & Stopar, K. (2015). Nano language and distribution of article title terms according to power laws. Scientometrics, 103(2), 435–451.
- Binnig, G., Quate, C.F., & Gerber, C. (1986). Atomic force microscope. Physical Review Letters, 56(9), 930–933.
- Borgatti, S.P., & Everett, M.G. (1999). Models of core/periphery structures. Social Networks, 21(4), 375–395.
- Bottero, J.Y., Auffan, M., Borschnek, D., Chaurand, P., Labille, J., Levard, C., Masion, A., Tella, M., Rose, J., & Wiesner, M.R. (2015). Nanotechnology, global development in the frame of environmental risk forecasting. A necessity of interdisciplinary researches. Comptes Rendus Geoscience, 347(1), 35–42.
- Freeman, L. (1977). A set of measures of centrality based upon betweenness. Sociometry, 40(1), 35–41.
- Freeman, L.C., Borgatti, S.P., & White, D.R. (1991). Centrality in valued graphs—A measure of betweenness based on network flow. Social Networks, 13(2), 141–154.
- Fu, H.Z., & Ho, Y.S. (2015). Top cited articles in thermodynamic research. Journal of Engineering Thermophysics, 24(1), 68–85.
- Garner, J., Porter, A.L., & Newman, N.C. (2014). Distance and velocity measures: Using citations to determine breadth and speed of research impact. Scientometrics, 100(3), 687–703.
- Gorjiara, T., & Baldock, C. (2014). Nanoscience and nanotechnology research publications: A comparison between Australia and the rest of the world. Scientometrics, 100(1), 121–148.
- Guan, J.C., & Wei, H. (2015). A bilateral comparison of research performance at an institutional level. Scientometrics, 104(1), 147–173.
- Heimeriks, G. (2013). Interdisciplinarity in biotechnology, genomics and nanotechnology. Science and Public Policy, 40(1), 97–112.
- Herranz, N., & Ruiz-Castillo, J. (2012). Sub-field normalization in the multiplicative case: Average-based citation indicators. Journal of Informetrics, 6(4), 543–556.
- Johnson, J.C., Luczkovich, J.J., Borgatti, S.P., & Snijders, T.A.B. (2009). Using social network analysis tools in ecology: Markov process transition models applied to the seasonal trophic network dynamics of the Chesapeake Bay. Ecological Modelling, 220(22), 3133–3140.
- Jung, H.J., & Lee, J. (2014). The impacts of science and technology policy interventions on university research: Evidence from the US National Nanotechnology Initiative. Research Policy, 43(1), 74–91.
- Kostoff, R.N., Barth, R.B., & Lau, C.G.Y. (2008). Relation of seminal nanotechnology document production to total nanotechnology document production—South Korea. Scientometrics, 76(1), 43–67.
- Kostoff, R.N., Koytcheff, R.G., & Lau, C.G.Y. (2007). Global nanotechnology research metrics. Scientometrics, 70(3), 565–601.
- Krug, H.F., & Wick, P. (2011). Nanotoxicology: An interdisciplinary challenge. Angewandte Chemie-International Edition, 50(6), 1260–1278.
- Leydesdorff, L. (2008). On the normalization and visualization of author co-citation data: Salton’s cosine versus the Jaccard index. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(1), 77–85.
- Leydesdorff, L. (2013). An evaluation of impacts in “nanoscience & nanotechnology”: Steps towards standards for citation analysis. Scientometrics, 94(1), 35–55.
- Leydesdorff, L., Carley, S., & Rafols, I. (2013). Global maps of science based on the new Web-of-Science categories. Scientometrics, 94(2), 589–593.
- Leydesdorff, L., & Wagner, C. (2009). Is the United States losing ground in science? A global perspective on the world science system. Scientometrics, 78(1), 23–36.
- Lin, C.S.L., & Ho, Y.S. (2015). A bibliometric analysis of publications on pluripotent stem cell research. Cell Journal, 17(1), 59–70.
- Lindquist, N.C. (2014). Interdisciplinary chemistry and physics research and advanced nanotechnology labs. Abstracts of Papers of the American Chemical Society, 247.
- Martin, Y., Williams, C.C., & Wickramasinghe, H.K.(1987). Atomic force microscope foce mapping and profiling on a sub 100-A scale. Journal of Applied Physics, 61(10), 4723–4729.
- Milanez, D.H., do Amaral, R.M., Faria, L.I.L. de, & Gregolin, J.A.R. (2013). Assessing nanocellulose developments using science and technology indicators. Materials Research-Ibero-American Journal of Materials, 16(3), 635–641.
- Mody, C.C.M., & Choi, H. (2013). From materials science to nanotechnology: Interdisciplinary center programs at Cornell University, 1960–2000. Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences, 43(2), 121–161.
- Mohammadi, E. (2012). Knowledge mapping of the Iranian nanoscience and technology: A text mining approach. Scientometrics, 92(3), 593–608.
- National Academies Committee on Facilitating Interdisciplinary Research, Committee on Science, Engineering, Public Policy (COSEPUP). (2005). Facilitating interdisciplinary research. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.
- Patenaude, J., Legault, G.A., Beauvais, J., Bernier, L., Beland, J.P., Boissy, P., Chenel, V., Daniel, C.E., Genest, J., Poirier, M.S., & Tapin, D. (2015). Framework for the analysis of nanotechnologies’ impacts and ethical acceptability: Basis of an interdisciplinary approach to assessing novel technologies. Science and Engineering Ethics, 21(2), 293–315.
- Persson, O., & Dastidar, P.G. (2013). Citation analysis to reconstruct the dynamics of Antarctic ozone hole research and formulation of the Montreal Protocol. Current Science, 104(7), 835–840.
- Porter, A.L., & Youtie, J. (2009). How interdisciplinary is nanotechnology? Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 11(5), 1023–1041.
- Porter, A.L., Youtie, J., Shapira, P., & Schoeneck, D.J. (2008). Refining search terms for nanotechnology. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 10(5), 715–728.
- Roco, M.C. (2001). From vision to the implementation of the US National Nanotechnology Initiative. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 3(1), 5–11.
- Schummer, J. (2004). Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity, and patterns of research collaboration in nanoscience and nanotechnology. Scientometrics, 59(3), 425–465.
- Souminen, A., Li, Y., & Youtie, J. (2016). A bibliometric analysis of the development of next generation active nanotechnologies. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 18(9), 270.
- Sweileh, W.M., Al-Jabi, S.W., Sawalha, A.F., & Zyoud, S.H. (2014). Bibliometric analysis of nutrition and dietetics research activity in Arab countries using ISI Web of Science database. Springerplus, 3(1), 718.
- Tersoff, J., & Hamann, D.R. (1983). Theory and application for the scanning tunneling microscope. Physical Review Letters, 50(25), 1998–2001.
- Tersoff, J., & Hamann, D.R. (1985). Theory of the scanning tunneling microscope. Physical Review B, 31(2), 805–813.
- Wang, J., & Shapira, P. (2011). Funding acknowledgement analysis: An enhanced tool to investigate research sponsorship impacts: The case of nanotechnology. Scientometrics, 87(3), 563–586.
- Wong, P.K., Ho, Y.P., & Chan, C.K. (2007). Internationalization and evolution of application areas of an emerging technology: The case of nanotechnology. Scientometrics, 70(3), 715–737.
Language: English
Page range: 70 - 88
Submitted on: Jun 30, 2016
Accepted on: Oct 14, 2016
Published on: Feb 18, 2017
Published by: Chinese Academy of Sciences, National Science Library
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 times per year
Keywords:
Related subjects:
© 2017 Chunjuan Luan, Alan L. Porter, published by Chinese Academy of Sciences, National Science Library
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.