1. Benz DC, Mikulici F, Grani C, et al. Long-term outcome prediction by functional parameters derived from coronary computed tomography angiography. Int J Cardiol. 2017 May 24. pii: S0167-5273(17)30601-0. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.05.083. [Epub ahead of print]10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.05.083
2. Fengfeng Y, Jie D, Wei W, et al. Evaluation of stenosis severity of coronary calcified lesions using transluminal attenuationgradient: clinical application of 320-row volume CT. Minerva Med. 2017 Mar 1. doi: 10.23736/S0026-4806.17.04862-5. [Epub ahead of print]10.23736/S0026-4806.17.04862-5
5. Nakanishi R, Matsumoto S, Alani A, et al. Diagnostic performance of transluminal attenuation gradient and fractional flow reserve by coronary computed tomographic angiography (FFR(CT)) compared to invasive FFR: a subgroup analysis from the DISCOVER-FLOW and DeFACTO studies. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;31:1251-9. doi: 10.1007/s10554-015-0666-2.10.1007/s10554-015-0666-2
7. Orzan M, Dobra M, Chitu M. A comparative preliminary study on CT contrast attenuation gradient versus invasive FFR in patients with unstable angina. J Cardiovasc Emerg. 2017;2:…10.1515/jce-2017-0012