Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Diagnosis and Hemodynamic Monitoring of Circulatory Shock: Current and Future Trends Cover

The Diagnosis and Hemodynamic Monitoring of Circulatory Shock: Current and Future Trends

The Journal of Critical Care Medicine
Volume 2 (2016): Issue 3 (July 2016)
By:  and    
Open Access
|Aug 2016
References

References

  1. 1. Antonelli M, Levy M, Andrews PJ, et al. Hemodynamic monitoring in shock and implications for management. Intensive Care Med. 2007;33:575-90.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  2. 2. Cecconi M, De Backer D, Antonelli M, et al. Consensus on circulatory shock and hemodynamic monitoring. Task force of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med. 2014;40:1795-815.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  3. 3. Vincent JL, Rhodes A, Perel A, et al. Clinical review: Update on hemodynamic monitoring - a consensus of 16. Crit Care. 2011;15:229.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  4. 4. Vincent JL, Pelosi P, Pearse R, et al. Perioperative cardiovascular monitoring of high-risk patients: a consensus of 12. Crit Care. 2015;19:224.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  5. 5. Herget-Rosenthal S, Saner F, Chawla L S. Approach to hemodynamic shock and vasopressors. J Am SocNephrol. 2008;3:546-53.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  6. 6. Bone RC, Balk RA, Cerra FB, et al. American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine Consensus Conference: definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis. Crit Care Med. 1992;20:864-74.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  7. 7. Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, et al. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016;315:801-10.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  8. 8. Shankar-Hari M, Phillips GS, Levy ML, et al. Developing a New Definition and Assessing New Clinical Criteria for Septic Shock: For the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016;315:775-87.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  9. 9. Finfer S, Vincent JL, De Backer D. Circulatory Shock. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:1726-34.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  10. 10. Vincent JL, Sakr Y, Sprung CL, et al. Sepsis Occurrence in Acutely Ill Patients I. Sepsis in European intensive care units: results of the SOAP study. Crit Care Med. 2006;34:344-53.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  11. 11. Sakka SG, Klein M, Reinhart K, Meier-Hellmann A. Prognostic value of extravascular lung water in critically ill patients. Chest. 2002;122:2080-6.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  12. 12. Martin GS, Mannino DM, Eaton S, Moss M. The epidemiology of sepsis in the United States from 1979 through 2000. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:1546-54.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  13. 13. Jawad I, Lukšić I, Rafnsson SB. Assessing available information on the burden of sepsis: global estimates of incidence, prevalence and mortality. J Glob Health. 2012;2:010404.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  14. 14. Goldberg RJ, Spencer FA, Gore JM, Lessard D, Yarzebski J. Thirty- Year Trends (1975 to 2005) in the Magnitude of, Management of, and Hospital Death Rates Associated With Cardiogenic Shock in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction A Population- Based Perspective. Circulation. 2009;119:1211-9.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  15. 15. Awad HH, Anderson FA Jr, Gore JM, Goodman SG, Goldberg RJ. Cardiogenic shock complicating acute coronary syndromes: insights from the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events. Am Heart J. 2012;163:963-71.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  16. 16. Kauvar DS, Wade CE. The epidemiology and modern management of traumatic hemorrhage: US and international perspectives. Crit Care. 2005;9:S1-9.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  17. 17. Zenati MS, Billiar TR, Townsend RN, Peitzman AB, Harbrecht BG. A brief episode of hypotension increases mortality in critically ill trauma patients. J Trauma. 2002;53:232-6.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  18. 18. Rivers EP, Kruse JA, Jacobsen G, et al. The influence of early hemodynamic optimization on biomarker patterns of severe sepsis and septic shock. Critical Care Medicine. 2007;35:2016-24.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  19. 19. Mikkelsen ME, Miltiades AN, Gaieski DF, et al. Serum lactate is associated with mortality in severe sepsis independent of organ failure and shock. Crit Care Med. 2009;37:1670-7.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  20. 20. Wacharasint P, Nakada TA, Boyd JH, Russell JA, Walley KR. Normal-range blood lactate concentration in septic shock is prognostic and predictive. Shock. 2012;38:4-10.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  21. 21. Rivers E, Nguyen B, Havstad S, et al. Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:1368-77.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  22. 22. Rödig G, Prasser C, Keyl C, Liebold A, Hobbhahn J. Continuous cardiac output measurement: pulse contour analysis vsthermodilution technique in cardiac surgical patients. Br J Anaesth. 1999;82: 525-30.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  23. 23. Bendjelid K, Marx G, Kiefer N, et al. Performance of a new pulse contour method for continuous cardiac output monitoring: validation in critically ill patients. Br J Anaesth. 2013;aet116.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  24. 24. Chung FT, Lin SM, Lin SY, Lin HC. Impact of extravascular lung water index on outcomes of severe sepsis patients in a medical intensive care unit. Respir Med. 2008;102:956-61.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  25. 25. Michard F, Alaya S, Zarka V, Bahloul M, Richard C, Teboul JL. Global end-diastolic volume as an indicator of cardiac preload in patients with septic shock. Chest. 2003;124:1900-8.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  26. 26. Spöhr F, Hettrich P, Bauer H, Haas U, Martin E, Böttiger BW. Comparison of two methods for enhanced continuous circulatory monitoring in patients with septic shock. Intensive care med. 2007;33:1805-10.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  27. 27. Zhang Z, Xu X, Yao M, Chen H, Ni H, Fan H. Use of the PiCCO system in critically ill patients with septic shock and acute respiratory distress syndrome: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2013;14:1.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  28. 28. Mirea L, Ungureanu R, Pavelescu D, Grintescu I. Global enddiastolic volume: a better indicator of cardiac preload in patients with septic shock. Critical Care. 2015;19:P179.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  29. 29. Madhusudan P, Tirupakuzhi Vijayaraghavan BK, Cove ME. Fluid resuscitation in sepsis: reexamining the Paradigm. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:984082.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  30. 30. KDIGO (2012) Clinical Practice Guideline for Acute Kidney Injury Section 2: AKI Definition. Kidney Int Suppl 2012;2:19-36.
    Search in Google Scholar
  31. 31. Cannesson M. Arterial pressure variation and goal-directed fluid therapy. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2010;24:487-97.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  32. 32. Michard F, Teboul JL. Predicting fluid responsiveness in ICU patients: a critical analysis of the evidence. Chest. 2002;121:2000-8.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  33. 33. Guyton AC, Jones CE, Coleman TG. Circulatory physiology: cardiac output and its regulation. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Company. 1973, pp.135-47.
    Search in Google Scholar
  34. 34. Magder S, De Varennes B. Clinical death and the measurement of stressed vascular volume. Crit Care Med. 1998;26:1061-4.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  35. 35. Kumar A, Anel R, Bunnell E, et al. Pulmonary artery occlusion pressure and central venous pressure fail to predict ventricular filling volume, cardiac performance, or the response to volume infusion in normal subjects. Crit Care Med. 2004;32:691-9.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  36. 36. Osman D, Ridel C, Ray P, et al. Cardiac filling pressures are not appropriate to predict hemodynamic response to volume challenge. Crit Care Med. 2007;35:64-8.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  37. 37. Marik PE, Cavallazzi R. Does the central venous pressure predict fluid responsiveness? An updated meta-analysis and a plea for some common sense. Crit Care Med. 2013;41:1774-81.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  38. 38. Perel A. Assessing fluid responsiveness by the systolic pressure variation in mechanically ventilated patients. Systolic pressure variation as a guide to fluid therapy in patients with sepsisinduced hypotension. Anesthesiology. 1998;89:1309-10.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  39. 39. Berkenstadt H, Margalit N, Hadan M, et al. Stroke Volume Variation as a Predictor of Fluid Responsiveness in Patients Undergoing Brain Surgery. Anesth Analg. 2001;92:984-9.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  40. 40. Preisman S, Kogan S, Berkenstadt H, Perel A. Predicting fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: functional haemodynamic parameters including the Respiratory Systolic Variation Test and static preload indicators. Br J Anaesth. 2005;95:746-55.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  41. 41. Biais M, Ehrmann S, Mari A, et al. Clinical relevance of pulse pressure variations for predicting fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated intensive care unit patients: the grey zone approach. Crit Care. 2014;18:587.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  42. 42. Monnet X, Teboul JL. Passive leg rising. Intensive Care Med. 2008;34:659-63.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  43. 43. Teboul JL, Monnet X. Prediction of volume responsiveness in critically ill patients with spontaneous breathing activity. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2008;14:334-9.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  44. 44. Magder S, Georgiadis G, Cheong T. Respiratory variations in right atrial pressure predict the response to fluid challenge. J Crit Care. 1992;7:76-85.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  45. 45. Reeves ST, Finley AC, Skubas NJ, et al. Basic perioperative transesophageal echocardiography examination: a consensus statement of the American Society of Echocardiography and the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2013;26:443-56.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  46. 46. Perrino AC JR, Harris SN, Luther MA. Intraoperative determination of cardiac output using multiplanetransesophageal echocardiography: a comparison to thermodilution. Anesthesiology. 1998;89:350-7.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  47. 47. Vieillard-Baron A, Chergui K, Rabiller A, et al. Superior vena caval collapsibility as a gauge of volume status in ventilated septic patients. Intensive Care Med. 2004;30:1734-9.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  48. 48. Charron C, Caille V, Jardin F, Vieillard-Baron A. Echocardiographic measurement of fluid responsiveness. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2006;12:249-54.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  49. 49. Cioccari L, Baur HR, Berger D, Wiegand J, Takala J, Merz TM. Hemodynamic assessment of critically ill patients using a miniaturized transesophageal echocardiography probe. Crit Care. 2013;17:R121.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  50. 50. Vieillard-Baron A, Slama M, Mayo P, et al. A pilot study on safety and clinical utility of a single-use 72-hour indwelling transesophageal echocardiography probe. Intensive Care Med. 2013;39:629-35.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  51. 51. Cavarocchi NC, Pitcher HT, Yang Q, et al. Weaning of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation using continuous hemodynamic transesophageal echocardiography. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013;146:1474-9.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  52. 52. Maltais S, Costello WT, Billings FT, et al. Episodic monoplane transesophageal echocardiography impacts postoperative management of the cardiac surgery patient. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2013;27:665-9.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  53. 53. Krishnan S, Ngai J, Schlame M, Rabinowitz L. 276: Comparison of Htee and Swan-Ganz Catheter for the Evaluation of Volume Status in Patients Status Post AVR. Crit Care Med. 2012;40:1-328.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  54. 54. Puskarich MA, Trzeciak S, Shapiro NI, et al. Whole blood lactate kinetics in patients undergoing quantitative resuscitation for severe sepsis and septic shock. Chest. 2013;143:1548-53.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  55. 55. Pölönen P, Ruokonen E, Hippeläinen M, Pöyhönen M, Takala J. A prospective, randomized study of goal-oriented hemodynamic therapy in cardiac surgical patients. Anesth Analg. 2000;90:1052-9.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  56. 56. Jones AE, Shapiro NI, Trzeciak S, Arnold RC, Claremont HA, Kline JA. Lactate clearance vs central venous oxygen saturation as goals of early sepsis therapy: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2010;303:739-46.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  57. 57. Sánchez M, García-de-Lorenzo A, Herrero E, et al. A protocol for resuscitation of severe burn patients guided by transpulmonarythermodilution and lactate levels: a 3-year prospective cohort study. Crit Care. 2013;17:R176.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jccm-2016-0018 | Journal eISSN: 2393-1817 | Journal ISSN: 2393-1809
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 115 - 123
Submitted on: Jun 3, 2016
Accepted on: Jul 15, 2016
Published online: Aug 10, 2016
Published in print: Jul 1, 2016
Published by: University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science and Technology of Targu Mures
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Keywords:
circulatory shock,
hemodynamic shock,
transesophageal echocardiography,
new statements,
future trends
Related subjects:
Medicine,
Clinical medicine,
Internal medicine,
Internal medicine, other,
Surgery,
Surgery, other,
Anaesthesiology,
Emergency medicine and intensive-care medicine

© 2016 Adham Hendy, Şerban-Ion Bubenek-Turconi, published by University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science and Technology of Targu Mures
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Volume 2 (2016): Issue 3 (July 2016)
Previous article
Next article