Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Acoustical Properties of Contemporary Mosques Cover

Acoustical Properties of Contemporary Mosques

Open Access
|Jun 2017

References

  1. [1] KLEINER, M., KLEPPER, D., & TORRES, R., Worship Space Acoustics. J. Ross Publishing Inc., 2010.10.3397/1.3517099
  2. [2] UZUN, Ç., The Examination of Today’s Mosque Architecture in the Context of Form, Function and Technology. Izmir:Dokuz Eylul University - The Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, (2010).
  3. [3] KHAN, H.-U., Contemporary Mosque Architecture. ISIM Review, 21, (Spring 2008), 52-53. Retrieved from https://openaccess.leidenuniv.nl/bitstream/handle/1887/13326/review_21.pdf?sequence=1
  4. [4] DINÇ KALAYCI, P., & ŞAHIN ÇELIK, E., Public’s Judgment on Contemporary Mosque Design Approaches. GaziUniversity Journal of Science, 27(4), (2014), 1185-1194.
  5. [5] Photographs by ÖZGÜL YILMAZ KARAMAN, (2010, 2016)
  6. [6] KARABIBER, Z., Acoustical problems in mosques: A case study on the three mosques in Istanbul. The Journal of theAcoustical Society of America, 105(2), (1999), 1044.10.1121/1.424975
  7. [7] SMITH, S. C., General view, facade, Islamic Center of Washington. Aga Khan Documentation Center at MIT. 2014,Retrieved September 2016, from http://archnet.org/sites/358/media_contents/95255
  8. [8] GEWERTZ, A., View to northwest across entrance plaza to minaret. Hassan II Mosque, Casablanca, Morocco. 2011,Retrieved September 2016, from http://archnet.org/sites/1051/media_contents/90767
  9. [9] GÜRSOY, E., “Unprıncıpled Approach” in the Contemporary Mosque Architecture . SDU Faculty of Arts and Sciences- Journal of Social Sciences, (2013), 239-253 .
  10. [10] BEGEÇ, H., & UZUN, Ç., Mosque Architecture, Current Approaches. Yapı, (2011), 68-73.
  11. [11] Photograph by NESLIHAN ONAT GÜZEL, (2016)
  12. [12] KOCAGÖZ, Ş., Bir Bireşim Süreci: Bedirye Mencik Camisi (A Synthesis Process: Bedirye Mencik Mosque).Arredamento (264), (2013, Ocak), 62-67.
  13. [13] KARABIBER, Z., A new approach to an ancient subject: Cahrisma Project. Germany: 7th International Congress onSound and Vibration, (2000).
  14. [14] ABDOU, A., Measurement of Acoustical Characteristics of Mosques in Saudi Arabia. The Journal of The AcousticalSociety of America, 113(3), (2003, March), 505-1517. Doi:10.1121/1.1531982.10.1121/1.153198212656385
  15. [15] ORFALI, W. A., Sound parameters in mosques. Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics (153rd Meeting of AcousticalSociety of America). Acoustical Society of America, (2007).10.1121/1.2829306
  16. [16] HOSSAM ELDIEN, H., & AL QAHTANI, H., The acoustical performance of mosques’ main prayer hall geometryin the eastern province, Saudi arabia. Société Française d’Acoustique, Acoustics (2012), pp. 949-955. Nantes, France.Retrieved from https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00810652
  17. [17] SÜ GÜL, Z., ÇALIŞKAN, M., & TAVUKÇUOĞLU, A., Geçmişten Günümüze Süleymanyiye Camii Akustiği.Megaron, 9(3), (2014), 201-216.10.5505/megaron.2014.96168
  18. [18] ELKHATEEB, A., ADAS, A., ATTIA, M., & BALILA , Y., The Acoustics of Masjids, why they differ fromthe Classical Speech Rooms. Proceedings of the 22nd International Congress on Sound and Vibration (ICSV22). 7/8,Florence, Italy: The International Institute of Acoustics & Vibration, (2015), 5773-5780
  19. [19] KAYILI, M., Mimar Sinan’ın Camilerindeki Akustik Verilerin Değerlendirilmesi. In Mimarbaşı Koca Sinan: YaşadığıÇağ ve Eserleri, İstanbul: T.C. Başbakanlık Vakıflar Genel Müdürlüğü, 1988, pp. 545-555.
  20. [20] SÜ, Z., & YILMAZER, S., The Acoustical Characteristics of the Kocatepe Mosque in Ankara, Turkey, ArchitecturalScience Review, 51(1), (2008), 21-30. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.3763/asre.2008.510410.3763/asre.2008.5104
  21. [21] EL-KHATEEB, A., & ISMAIL, M., Sounds From the Past The Acoustics of Sultan Hassan Mosque and Madrasa,Building Acoustics, 14(2), (2007), 109-132.10.1260/135101007781448037
  22. [22] KAVRAZ, M., The acoustic characteristics of the Carsi Mosque in Trabzon, Turkey. Indoor and Built Environment,25(1), (2016), 128-136. doi:DOI: 10.1177/1420326X14541138
  23. [23] KARABIBER, Z., & ERDOĞAN, S., Comparison of the acoustical properties of an ancient and a recent mosque. ForumAcusticum. Seville, Spain: Spanish Acoustical Society (SEA), (2002).
  24. [24] TOPAKTAŞ, L., Acoustical Properties of Classical Ottoman Mosques Simulation and Measurements, Ankara:The Graduate School of Applied and Natural Science of Middle East Technical University, (2003), 61.
  25. [25] ISMAIL, M. R., A parametric investigation of the acoustical performance of contemporary mosques. Frontiers of Architectural Research, (2013-2).10.1016/j.foar.2012.11.002
  26. [26] ZOHRA, B. H., The Numerical Simulation Support Tool for the Assesment of the Acoustic Quality of Worship Spaces.International Journal of Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology, 6(1), (2016, February), 1-20.doi:10.5121/ijcseit.2016.6101
  27. [27] CARVALHO, A., & AMADO, J., The acoustics of the Mekor Haim Synagogue, Portugal. Osaka: inter-noise. 2011.
  28. [28] HAMMAD, R., Rasti measurements in mosques in Amman, Jordan. Applied Acoustics, 30(4), (1990), 335-345.10.1016/0003-682X(90)90082-6
  29. [29] SÜ GÜL, Z., & ÇALIŞKAN, M., Impact of design decisions on acoustical comfort parameters: Case study of Dogramacızade Ali Pasa Mosque. Applied Acoustics, 74, (2013), 234-244.10.1016/j.apacoust.2012.12.006
  30. [30] GADE, A. C., Acoustics in Halls for Speech and Music (Part C/9). In T. D. Rossing (Ed.), Springer Handbook ofAcoustics, LLC New York : Springer Science+Business Media, 2007, 301-350.10.1007/978-0-387-30425-0_9
  31. [31] ELKHATEEB, A., ADAS, A., ATTIA, M., & BALILA, Y., The Acoustics of Masjids, Looking for Future DesignCriteria. 23rd International Congress on Sound & Vibration, ICSV23, 10-14, Athens, Greece. (2016 July).
  32. [32] MEHTA, M., JOHNSON, J., & ROCAFORT, J., Architectural Acoustics Principles and Design. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc, 1999.
  33. [33] KUTTRUFF, H., Room acoustics (5 ed.). New York: Spon Press, 2009.10.3397/1.3455049
  34. [34] CARVALHO, Relations between rapid speech transmission-index (RASTI) and other acoustical and architectural measures in churches. applied acoustics(58), (1999) 33-49.10.1016/S0003-682X(98)00071-1
  35. [35] BS EN ISO 3382-2:2008, BS, Acoustics - Measurement of room acoustic parameters, Part 2: Reverberation time in ordinary rooms, 2008.
  36. [36] SÜ GÜL, Z., Assessment of non-Exponential Sound Energy Decays within Multi-Domed Monuments by Numerical and Experimental Methods. The Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences . Ankara: METU (Middle East Technical University), (2015).
  37. [37] SU GÜL, Z., & ÇALIŞKAN, M., Acoustical design of Turkish Religious Affairs Mosque. Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics (ICA 2013, Montreal), Montreal: Acoustical Society of America, Vol. 19, 015083, (2013),doi:10.1121/1.4800903
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jbe-2017-0002 | Journal eISSN: 2064-2520 | Journal ISSN: 2063-997X
Language: English
Page range: 14 - 30
Published on: Jun 13, 2017
Published by: Sciendo
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2017 Özgül Yılmaz Karaman, Neslihan Onat Güzel, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.