Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Comparison of Four Methods for Corneal Thickness Measurement Cover

Comparison of Four Methods for Corneal Thickness Measurement

Open Access
|Nov 2016

References

  1. 1. Barkana Y, Gerber Y, Elbaz U, Schwartz S, Ken- Dror G, Avni I, et al. Central corneal thickness measurement with the Pentacam Scheimpflug system, optical low-coherence reflectometry pachymeter, and ultrasound pachymetry. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;3 (9): 729-35.10.1016/j.jcrs.2005.03.058
  2. 2. Doughty MJ, Zaman ML. Human corneal thickness and its impact on intraocular pressure measures: a review and meta-analysis approach. Surv Ophthalmol. 2000;44(5):367-408.10.1016/S0039-6257(00)00110-7
  3. 3. Gordon MO, Beiser JA, Brandt JD, Heuer DK, Higginbotham EJ, Johnson CA, et al. The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: baseline factors that predict the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002; 20(6):7 4- 20.10.1001/archopht.120.6.714
  4. 4. Wheeler NC, Morantes CM, Kristensen RM, Pettit TH, Lee DA. Reliability coefficients of three corneal pachymeters. Am J Ophthalmol. 992; 3(6):645-5 .10.1016/S0002-9394(14)74788-9
  5. 5. Al-Mezaine HS, Al-Amro SA, Kangave D, Sadaawy A, Wehaib TA, Al-Obeidan S. Comparison between central corneal thickness measurements by oculus pentacam and ultrasonic pachymetry. Int Ophthalmol. 2008 ;28(5):333-8.10.1007/s10792-007-9143-9
  6. 6. Taylor JR. An Introduction to Error Analysis: The Study of Uncertainties in Physical Measurements. 2nd ed. Sausalito, Calif. USA: University ScienceBooks; 997. p. 5-55.
  7. 7. Muscat S, McKay N, Parks S, Kemp E, Keating D. Repeatability and reproducibility of corneal thickness measurements by optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002 ;43(6): 79 -5.
  8. 8. Izatt JA, Hee MR, Swanson EA, Lin CP, Huang D, Schuman JS, et al. Micrometer-scale resolution imaging of the anterior eye in vivo with optical coherence tomography. Arch Ophthalmol. 994; 2( 2): 584-9.
  9. 9. Piotrowiak I, Soldanska B, Burduk M, Kaluzny B, Kaluzny J. Measuring Corneal Thickness with SOCT, the Scheimpflug System, and Ultrasound Pachymetry. ISRN Ophthalmology Volume 20 2 (20 2), Article ID 8693 9, 5 pages doi: 0.5402/20 2/8693 9.
  10. 10. M. Shaheeda, Lee GKY, Rao SKR, Wong AL, Cheng AC, Li EY, et al. Repeatability and reproducibility of pachymetric mapping with Visante Anterior Segment-Optical Coherence Tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48( 2): 5499-504.10.1167/iovs.07-0591
  11. 11. Doughty MJ, Zaman ML. Human corneal thickness and its impact on intraocular pressure measures: A review and meta-analysis approach. Surv of Ophthalmol. 2000;44(5): 367-408.10.1016/S0039-6257(00)00110-7
  12. 12. Medeiros FA, Sample PA, Weinreb RN. Corneal thickness measurements and visual function abnormalities in ocular hypertensive patients. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003; 35(2): 3 -7.10.1016/S0002-9394(02)01886-X
  13. 13. Miglior S, Albe E, Guareschi M, Mandelli G, Gomarasca S, Orzalesi N. Intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility in the evaluation of ultrasonic pachymetry measurements of central corneal thickness. Br J Ophthalmol. 2004;88(2): 74-7.10.1136/bjo.2003.023416177201414736765
  14. 14. Kitsos G, Gartzios C, Asproudis I, Bagli E. Central corneal thickness in subjects with glaucoma and in normal individuals (with or without pseudoexfoliation syndrome). Clin Ophthalmol. 2009;3( ): 537-42.10.2147/OPTH.S6484
  15. 15. Cairns G, McGhee CNJ. Orbscan computerized topography: attributes, applications, and limitations. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005; 3 ( ):205-20.10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.09.047
  16. 16. Iskander NG, Anderson Penno E, Peters NT, Gimbel HV, Ferensowicz M. Accuracy ofOrbscan pachymetry measurements and DHG ultrasound pachymetry in primary laser in situ keratomileusis and LASIK enhancement procedures. J Cataract Refract Surg. 200 ;27(5):68 -5.10.1016/S0886-3350(01)00820-3
  17. 17. Chakrabarti HS, Craig JP, Brahma A, Malik TY, McGhee CNJ. Comparison of corneal thickness measurements using ultrasound and Orbs can slit¬scanning topography in normal and post-LASIK eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg. 200 ; 27( ): 823- 8.
  18. 18. Gherghel D, Hosking SL, Mantry S, Banerjee S, Naroo SA, Shah S. Corneal pachymetry in normal and keratoconic eyes: Orbscan II versus ultrasound. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004; 30(6): 272-7.10.1016/j.jcrs.2003.11.049
  19. 19. Buehl W, Stojanac D, Sacu S, Drexler W, Findl O. Comparison of three methods of measuring corneal thickness and anterior chamber depth. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006; 4 ( ):7- 2.10.1016/j.ajo.2005.08.048
  20. 20. Geggel HS, Talley AR. Delayed onset keratectasia following laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 999;25(4):582-6.10.1016/S0886-3350(99)80060-1
  21. 21. Lattimore MR Jr, Kaupp S, Schallhom S, Lewis R IV. Oibscan pachymetry; implications of a repeated measures and diurnal variation analysis. Ophthalmology. 999; 06(5):977-8 .10.1016/S0161-6420(99)00519-9
  22. 22. Bourne WM, McLaren JW. Clinical responses of the corneal endothelium. Exp Eye Res. 2004; 78(3):56 -72.
  23. 23. Maurice DM, Giardini AA. A simple optical apparatus for measuring the corneal thickness, and the average thickness of the human cornea. Br J Ophthalmol. 20 2; 35(3): 69-77.10.1136/bjo.35.3.169132370814821293
  24. 24. Hashemi H, Mehravaran S. Central corneal thickness measurement with Pentacam, Oibscan II, and ultrasound devices before and after laser refractive surgery for myopia. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007;33( 0): 70 -7.10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.05.04017889763
  25. 25. Bouiges JL, Alfonsi N, Lalibeit JF, Chagnon M, Renard G, Legeais J-M, et al. Average 3- dimensional models for the comparison of Orbscan II and Pentacam pachymetry maps in normal corneas. Ophthalmology. 2009; 6( ):2064-7 .10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.04.03619744719
  26. 26. Jahadi HR, Katbab A, Khalili MR, Abtahi MB. Comparison of comeal thickness measurements using Galilei. Cornea 20 0;29( 0): 09 -5.
  27. 27. Ho T, Cheng ACK, Rao SK, Lau S, Leung CKS, Lam DSC. Central corneal thickness measurements using Orbscan II, Visante, ultrasound, and Pentacam pachymetry after laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia. J Cataract Refract Suig. 2007;33(7): 77-82.10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.03.028
  28. 28. Tam ES and Rootman DS. Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements by specular microscopy, ultrasound pachymetry, and ultrasound bio microscopy. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;29(6): 79-84.10.1016/S0886-3350(02)01921-1
  29. 29. Wong ACM, Wong CC, Yuen NSY, Hui SP. Correlational study of central corneal thickness measurements on Hong Kong Chinese using optical coherence tomography, Orbscan and ultrasound pachymetry. Eye (Lond). 2002; 6(6):7 5-2 .10.1038/sj.eye.670021112439665
  30. 30. Jalbert I, Stapleton F, Papas E, Sweeney DF, CoroneoM. In vivo confocal microscopy of the human cornea. Br J Ophthalmol. 2003;87(2):225- 36.10.1136/bjo.87.2.225177151612543757
  31. 31. Li HF,PetrollWM,Moller-PedersenT,Maurer JK, Cavanagh HD, Jester JV. Epithelial and comeal thickness measurements by in vivo confocal microscopy through focusing (CMTF). Curr Eye Res. 997; 6(3 ):2 4-2 .
  32. 32. Jalbert I, Papas E, Sweeney DF, Stapleton F. Instrument, diurnal, and day to day repeatability of in vivo measurements of the central human cornea using slit scanning confocal microscopy and modified optical pachometiy. Invest Ophthalmol VisSci. 2002;43:E-Abstract 7 3.
  33. 33. Vesaluoma M, Perez-Santonja J, Petroll WM, Linna T, Alio J, Tervo T. Corneal stromal changes induced by myopic LASIK. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci.2000;4 (2):369-76.
  34. 34. Stave J, Slowik C, Somodi S, et al. Keratocyte density in the in vivo cornea. Automatic quantification with a modified confocal microscope MICROPHTHAL. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd. 998;2 3:38-44.
Language: English
Page range: 37 - 42
Submitted on: Nov 21, 2012
|
Accepted on: Jun 26, 2013
|
Published on: Nov 30, 2016
Published by: Sciendo
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2016 Teodora L. Marinova, Vesela Ivancheva, Svilena S. Peeva, Christina N. Grupcheva, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.