References
- 1. Vasileva P. Problems of corneal transplantation in our country. Yearbook Euro Atlantic Transplant Alliance. 2006. p. 67-71. [In Bulgarian]
- 2. Whitcher JP, Srinivasan M, Upadhyay MP. Corneal blindness: a global perspective. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 2001 ;79:214-21.
- 3. Sinha R, Sharma N, Vajpayee RB. Corneal blindness - present status. Cataract & Refractive Surgery Today. Oct 2005;59-61.
- 4. Mannis MJ, Krachmer JH. Keratoplasty: a historical perspective. Surv Ophthalmol. 1981;25(5):333-8.
- 5. Patel NP, Kim T, Rapuano CJ, Cohen EJ, Laibson PR. Indications for and outcomes of repeat penetrating keratoplasty, 1989-1995. Ophthalmology. 2000; 107(4):719-24.
- 6. Edwards M, Clover GM, Brookes N, Pendergrast D, Chaulk J, McGhee CN. Indications for corneal transplantation in New Zealand: 1991-1999. Cornea. 2002;21(2): 152-5.
- 7. Yahalom C, Mechoulam H, Solomon A, Raiskup FD, Peer J, Frucht-Pery J. Forty years of changing indications in penetrating keratoplasty in Israel. Cornea, 2005;24(3):256-8.
- 8. Chen WL, Hu FR, Wang IJ. Changing Indications for penetrating keratoplasty inTaiwan from 1987 to 1999. Cornea. 2001 ;20(2): 141-4.
- 9. Dorrepaal SJ, Cao KY, Slomovic AR. Indications for penetrating keratoplasty in a tertiary referral centre in Canada, 1996-2004. Can J Ophthalmol. 2007;42(2):244-50.
- 10. Kirkness CM, Ezra E, Rice NS, Steele AD. The success and survival of repeat comeal grafts. Eye (Lond). 1990;4(Pt l):58-64.