Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Unnatural Selection: Seeing Human Intelligence in Artificial Creations Cover

Unnatural Selection: Seeing Human Intelligence in Artificial Creations

By:   
Open Access
|Dec 2015

References

  1. Barnden, J. 2008. Metaphor and artificial intelligence: Why they matter to each other. In Gibbs, R. W., ed.,. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 311–338.
  2. Brants, T., and Franz, A. 2006.. The Linguistic Data Consortium.
  3. Burroughs, W. S. 1963. The Cut-Up Method. In Jones, L., ed.,. New York, NY: Corinth Books.
  4. Carbonell, J. G. 1981. Metaphor: An inescapable phenomenon in natural language comprehension. Technical Report 2404, Carnegie Mellon Computer Science Department, Pittsburgh, PA.
  5. Chamberlain, W., and Etter, T. 1983.. London, UK: Warner Books.
  6. Dewey, C. 2014. What happens when @everyword ends?May 23.
  7. Duchamp, M. 1917. The Richard Mutt Case.2:4–5.
  8. Falkenhainer, B.; Forbus, K. D.; and Gentner, D. 1989. Structure-Mapping Engine: Algorithm and Examples.41:1–63.
  9. Fass, D. 1991. Met*: a method for discriminating metonymy and metaphor by computer.17(1):49–90.
  10. Fellbaum, C., ed. 1998.. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  11. Freud, S. 1919. Das Unheimliche. In, volume XII. G.W. 229–268.
  12. Gentner, D.; Falkenhainer, B.; and Skorstad, J. 1989. Metaphor: The Good, The Bad and the Ugly. In Wilks, Y., ed.,. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  13. Gibson, W. 2005. God’s Little Toys.13.07.
  14. Giora, R.; Fein, O.; Kronrod, A.; Elnatan, I.; Shuval, N.; and Zur, A. 2004. Weapons of Mass Distraction: Optimal Innovation and Pleasure Ratings.19(2):115–141.
  15. Glucksberg, S. 1998. Understanding metaphors.7:39–43.
  16. Hughes, R. 1991.. London, UK: Thames and Hudson.
  17. Hutton, J. 1982.. New York, NY: Norton.
  18. Kazemi, D. 2015. TinySubversions.com. Web-site.
  19. Kuenzli, R. E., and Naumann, F. M. 1989.. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  20. Lakoff, G., and Johnson, M. 1980.. Chicago, Illinois: University of Chicago Press.
  21. Lydenberg, R. 1987.. Chicago, Illinois: University of Illinois Press.
  22. Magritte, R. 1929. Les Mots et les Images.(12):32–33.
  23. Martin, J. H. 1990.. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  24. McKeganey, N. P. 1983. Cocktail party syndrome.5(1):95–103.
  25. Milic, L. T. 1971. The possible usefulness of computer poetry. In Wisbey, R., ed.,, Publications of the Literary and Linguistic Computing Centre. Cambridge, UK: University of Cambridge.
  26. Reddy, M. J. 1979. The conduit metaphor: A case of frame conflict in our language about language. In Ortony, A., ed.,. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 284–310.
  27. Schwartz, E. R. 1974. Characteristics of Speech and Language Developments in the child with Myelomeningocele and Hydrocephalus.39(4).
  28. Searle, J. R. 1980. Mind, Brains and Programs.3:417–457.
  29. Sontag, S. 1966.. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
  30. Taylor, M. R. 2009.. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press.
  31. Veale, T., and Alnajjar, K. 2015. Unweaving the Lexical Rainbow: Grounding Linguistic Creativity in Perceptual Semantics. In Ventura, D., ed.,. Park City, UT: Association for Computational Creativity.
  32. Veale, T., and Keane, M. T. 1997. The Competence of Sub-Optimal Structure Mapping on ‘Hard’ Analogies. In. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
  33. Veale, T., and Li, G. 2011. Creative Introspection and Knowledge Acquisition. In Burgard, W., and Roth, D., eds.,. San Francisco, CA: AAAI Press.
  34. Veale, T., and Li, G. 2015. Distributed Divergent Creativity: Computational Creative Agents at Web Scale.(May):1–12.
  35. Veale, T. 2012.. London, UK: Bloomsbury.
  36. Veale, T. 2014. Running With Scissors: Cut-Ups, Boundary Friction and Creative Reuse. In Lamontagne, L., and Plaza, E., eds.,.
  37. Veale, T. 2015. Game of Tropes: Exploring the Placebo Effect in Computational Creativity. In Ventura, D., ed.,. Park City, UT: Association for Computational Creativity.
  38. Way, E. C. 1991.. Studies in Cognitive systems. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
  39. Wilks, Y. 1975. A preferential, pattern-seeking, semantics for natural language inference.6(1):53–74.
  40. Wilks, Y. 1978. Making Preferences More Active.11(3):197–223.
Language: English
Page range: 5 - 20
Submitted on: May 17, 2015
Accepted on: Nov 19, 2015
Published on: Dec 30, 2015
Published by: Artificial General Intelligence Society
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2015 Tony Veale, published by Artificial General Intelligence Society
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.