Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Unnatural Selection: Seeing Human Intelligence in Artificial Creations Cover

Unnatural Selection: Seeing Human Intelligence in Artificial Creations

By:
Open Access
|Dec 2015

References

  1. Barnden, J. 2008. Metaphor and artificial intelligence: Why they matter to each other. In Gibbs, R. W., ed., The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 311–338.
  2. Brants, T., and Franz, A. 2006. Web IT 5-gram database, Version 1. The Linguistic Data Consortium.
  3. Burroughs, W. S. 1963. The Cut-Up Method. In Jones, L., ed., The Moderns: An Anthology of New Writing in America. New York, NY: Corinth Books.
  4. Carbonell, J. G. 1981. Metaphor: An inescapable phenomenon in natural language comprehension. Technical Report 2404, Carnegie Mellon Computer Science Department, Pittsburgh, PA.
  5. Chamberlain, W., and Etter, T. 1983. The Policeman’s Beard is Half-Constructed: Computer Prose and Poetry. London, UK: Warner Books.
  6. Dewey, C. 2014. What happens when @everyword ends? The Wall Street Journal (Intersect column) May 23.
  7. Duchamp, M. 1917. The Richard Mutt Case. Blind Man 2:4–5.
  8. Falkenhainer, B.; Forbus, K. D.; and Gentner, D. 1989. Structure-Mapping Engine: Algorithm and Examples. Artificial Intelligence 41:1–63.10.1016/0004-3702(89)90077-5
  9. Fass, D. 1991. Met*: a method for discriminating metonymy and metaphor by computer. Computational Linguistics 17(1):49–90.
  10. Fellbaum, C., ed. 1998. WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/7287.001.0001
  11. Freud, S. 1919. Das Unheimliche. In Collected Papers, volume XII. G.W. 229–268.
  12. Gentner, D.; Falkenhainer, B.; and Skorstad, J. 1989. Metaphor: The Good, The Bad and the Ugly. In Wilks, Y., ed., Theoretical Issues in Natural Language Processing. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  13. Gibson, W. 2005. God’s Little Toys. Wired Magazine 13.07.
  14. Giora, R.; Fein, O.; Kronrod, A.; Elnatan, I.; Shuval, N.; and Zur, A. 2004. Weapons of Mass Distraction: Optimal Innovation and Pleasure Ratings. Metaphor and Symbol 19(2):115–141.10.1207/s15327868ms1902_2
  15. Glucksberg, S. 1998. Understanding metaphors. Current Directions in Psychological Science 7:39–43.10.1111/1467-8721.ep13175582
  16. Hughes, R. 1991. The Shock of the New: Art and the century of change. London, UK: Thames and Hudson.
  17. Hutton, J. 1982. Aristotle’s Poetics. New York, NY: Norton.
  18. Kazemi, D. 2015. TinySubversions.com. Web-site.
  19. Kuenzli, R. E., and Naumann, F. M. 1989. Marcel Duchamp: artist of the century. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  20. Lakoff, G., and Johnson, M. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago, Illinois: University of Chicago Press.
  21. Lydenberg, R. 1987. Word Cultures: Radical theory and practice in William S. Burroughs’ fictio. Chicago, Illinois: University of Illinois Press.10.2307/2926980
  22. Magritte, R. 1929. Les Mots et les Images. La Révolution surréaliste (12):32–33.
  23. Martin, J. H. 1990. A Computational Model of Metaphor Interpretation. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  24. McKeganey, N. P. 1983. Cocktail party syndrome. Sociology of Health and Illness 5(1):95–103.10.1111/1467-9566.ep11340072
  25. Milic, L. T. 1971. The possible usefulness of computer poetry. In Wisbey, R., ed., The Computer in Literary and Linguistic Research, Publications of the Literary and Linguistic Computing Centre. Cambridge, UK: University of Cambridge.
  26. Reddy, M. J. 1979. The conduit metaphor: A case of frame conflict in our language about language. In Ortony, A., ed., Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 284–310.
  27. Schwartz, E. R. 1974. Characteristics of Speech and Language Developments in the child with Myelomeningocele and Hydrocephalus. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 39(4).10.1044/jshd.3904.465
  28. Searle, J. R. 1980. Mind, Brains and Programs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3:417–457.10.1017/S0140525X00005756
  29. Sontag, S. 1966. Against Interpretation and Other Essays. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
  30. Taylor, M. R. 2009. Marcel Duchamp: Étant donnés (Philadelphia Museum of Art). New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press.
  31. Veale, T., and Alnajjar, K. 2015. Unweaving the Lexical Rainbow: Grounding Linguistic Creativity in Perceptual Semantics. In Ventura, D., ed., Proceedings of ICCC-2015, the 6th International Conference on Computational Creativity. Park City, UT: Association for Computational Creativity.
  32. Veale, T., and Keane, M. T. 1997. The Competence of Sub-Optimal Structure Mapping on ‘Hard’ Analogies. In Proceedings of IJCAI’97, the 15th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Nagoya, Japan. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
  33. Veale, T., and Li, G. 2011. Creative Introspection and Knowledge Acquisition. In Burgard, W., and Roth, D., eds., Proceedings of the 25th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. San Francisco, CA: AAAI Press.10.1609/aaai.v25i1.8073
  34. Veale, T., and Li, G. 2015. Distributed Divergent Creativity: Computational Creative Agents at Web Scale. Cognitive Computation (May):1–12.10.1007/s12559-015-9337-9
  35. Veale, T. 2012. Exploding the Creativity Myth: The Computational Foundations of Linguistic Creativity. London, UK: Bloomsbury.
  36. Veale, T. 2014. Running With Scissors: Cut-Ups, Boundary Friction and Creative Reuse. In Lamontagne, L., and Plaza, E., eds., Proceedings of ICCBR-2014, the 22nd International Conference on Case-Based Reasoning.10.1007/978-3-319-11209-1_2
  37. Veale, T. 2015. Game of Tropes: Exploring the Placebo Effect in Computational Creativity. In Ventura, D., ed., Proceedings of ICCC-2015, the 6th International Conference on Computational Creativity. Park City, UT: Association for Computational Creativity.
  38. Way, E. C. 1991. Knowledge Representation and Metaphor. Studies in Cognitive systems. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.10.1007/978-94-015-7941-4
  39. Wilks, Y. 1975. A preferential, pattern-seeking, semantics for natural language inference. Artificial Intelligence 6(1):53–74.10.1016/0004-3702(75)90016-8
  40. Wilks, Y. 1978. Making Preferences More Active. Artificial Intelligence 11(3):197–223.10.1016/0004-3702(78)90001-2
Language: English
Page range: 5 - 20
Submitted on: May 17, 2015
Accepted on: Nov 19, 2015
Published on: Dec 30, 2015
Published by: Artificial General Intelligence Society
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 times per year

© 2015 Tony Veale, published by Artificial General Intelligence Society
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.