Have a personal or library account? Click to login

The Elasticity-Based Approach to Enterprise Innovation

International Journal of Management and Economics
Volume 49 (2016): Issue 1 (March 2016)
By:
Open Access
|Apr 2016

References

  1. Acs, Z., Audretsch, D. (1988), Testing the Schumpeterian Hypothesis, Eastern Economic Journal, 2, pp. 129–140.
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. Acs, Z., Audretsch, D. (1990), Innovation and Small Firms, The MIT Press, Cambridge.
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. Acs, Z., Audretsch, D. (1991), R&D firm size, and innovative activity, in: Z. Acs, D. Audretsch, (eds.), Innovation and Technological Change: An International Comparison, Harvester Wheatsheaf, New York.10.3998/mpub.12958
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. Amir, R., Evstigneev, I., Wooders, J. (2000), Noncooperative versus cooperative R&D with endogenous spillover rates, Games and Economic Behavior, 42, pp. 183–207.
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. Arrow, K. (1962), Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Inventions, in: R. Nelson, (ed.), The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors, Princeton University Press, Princeton.10.1515/9781400879762-024
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. Baldwin, W., Scott, J. (1987), Market Structure and Technological Change, Harwood Academic Publishers, Chur.
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. Beath, J., Katsoulacos, Y., Ulph, D. (1997), Sequential product innovation and industry evolution, Economic Journal, 97, pp. 32–43.
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. Becker, W., Dietz, J. (2004), R&D cooperation and innovation activities of firms – evidence for the German manufacturing industry, Research Policy, 33, pp. 209–223.
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. Becker, W., Peters, J. (1998), R&D-competition between vertical corporate networks: structure, efficiency and R&D spillovers, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 6, pp. 51–71.
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. Belderbos, R., Carree, M., Diederen, B., Lokshin, B., Veugelers, R. (2004a), Heterogeneity in R&D cooperation strategies, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 22, pp. 1237–1263.10.1016/j.ijindorg.2004.08.001
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. Belderbos, R., Carree, M., Lokshin, B. (2004b), Cooperative R&D and Firm Performance, Research Policy, 33, pp. 1477–1492.10.1016/j.respol.2004.07.003
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. Belleflamme, P., Peitz, M. (2010), Industrial Organization: Markets and Strategies, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9780511757808
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. Bound, J., Cummins, C., Griliches, Z., Hall, B., Jaffe, A. (1984), Who does R&D and who patents?, in: Z. Griliches, (ed.), R&D, Patents, and Productivity, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. Brander, J., Spencer, B. (1983), Strategic commitment with R&D: the symmetric case, Bell Journal of Economics, 14, pp. 225–235.
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. Brod, A., Shivakumar, R. (1997), Domestic versus international R&D spillovers, Economics Letters, 56, pp. 229–233.
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. Camagni, R. (1993), Inter-firm industrial network: The cost and benefits of cooperative behaviour, Journal of Industry Studies, 1, pp. 1–15.
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. Cohen, W., Klepper, S. (1996), A reprise of size and R&D, Economic Journal, 106, pp. 925–951.
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. Cohen, W., Levin, R. (1989), Empirical Studies of Innovation and Market Structure, in: R. Schmalensee, R. Willig, (eds.), Handbook of Industrial Organization, Elsevier Science Publishers B. V., Amsterdam.10.1016/S1573-448X(89)02006-6
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. Cohen, W., Levinthal, D. (1989), Innovation and learning: the two faces of R&D, Economic Journal, 94, pp. 569–596.
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. Cohen, W., Levinthal, D. (1990), Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation, Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, pp. 128–152.
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. Comanor, W. (1967), Market Structure, Product Differentiation and Industrial Research, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 81, pp. 639–657.
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. d’Aspremont, C., Jacquemin, A. (1988), Cooperative and Noncooperative R&D in Duopoly with Spillovers, American Economic Review, 78, pp. 1133–1137.
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. Erickson, G., Bayus, B. (2001), R&D Productivity in the Personal Computer Industry, Working Paper.10.2139/ssrn.296228
    Search in Google Scholar
  24. Fisher, F., Temin, P. (1973), Returns to Scale in Research and Development: What Does the Schumpeterian Hypothesis Imply?, Journal of Political Economy, 81, pp. 56–70.
    Search in Google Scholar
  25. Fishman, A., Rob, R. (2000), Product innovation by a durable – good monopoly, RAND Journal of Economics, 31, pp. 237–252.
    Search in Google Scholar
  26. Galbraith, J. (1952), American Capitalism, The Concept of Countervailing Power, Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston.
    Search in Google Scholar
  27. Garbicz, M. (2005), Niedorozwój a korzyści skali, in: W. Pacho, (ed.), Szkice ze współczesnej teorii ekonomii, SGH, Warszawa.
    Search in Google Scholar
  28. Griliches, Z. (1998), R&D and Productivity: The Econometric Evidence, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.10.7208/chicago/9780226308906.001.0001
    Search in Google Scholar
  29. Hausman, J., Hall, B., Griliches, Z. (1984), Econometric models for count data with an application to the patents-R&D relationship, Econometrica, 52, pp. 909–938.
    Search in Google Scholar
  30. Inkmann, J. (2000), Horizontal and vertical R&D cooperation, Center of Finance and Econometrics at the University of Konstanz, Discussion Paper.
    Search in Google Scholar
  31. Janasz, W., Janasz, K., Prozorowicz, M., Świadek, A., Wiśniewska, J. (2002), Determinanty innowacyjności przedsiębiorstw, Rozprawy i Studia, No. 406, Uniwersytet Szczeciński, Szczecin.
    Search in Google Scholar
  32. Janasz, W., Kozioł, K. (2007), Determinanty działalności innowacyjnej przedsiębiorstw, PWE, Warszawa.
    Search in Google Scholar
  33. Kaiser, U., Licht, G. (1998), R&D cooperation and R&D intensity: theory and micro-econometric evidence for German manufacturing industries, ZEW Discussion Paper.
    Search in Google Scholar
  34. Kamien, M., Schwartz, N. (1982), Market Structure and Innovation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
    Search in Google Scholar
  35. Kamien, M., Muller, E., Zang, I. (1992), Research Joint Ventures and R&D Cartels, American Economic Review, 82, pp. 1293–1306.
    Search in Google Scholar
  36. Kamien, M., Zang, I. (2000), Meet me halfway: research joint ventures and absorptive capacity, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 18, pp. 995–1012.
    Search in Google Scholar
  37. Katz, M. (1986), An Analysis of Cooperative Research and Development, RAND Journal of Economics, 17, pp. 527–543.
    Search in Google Scholar
  38. Kesteloot, K., De Bondt, R. (1993), Demand-creating R&D in an symmetric oligopoly, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 2, pp. 171–183.
    Search in Google Scholar
  39. Klepper, S. (1996), Entry, Exit, Growth, and Innovation over the Product Life Cycle, American Economic Review, 86, pp. 562–583.
    Search in Google Scholar
  40. Knudsen, M. (2005), Patterns of technological competence accumulation: a proposition for empirical measurement, Industrial and Corporate Change, 14, pp. 1075–1108.
    Search in Google Scholar
  41. Lee, C., Sung, T. (2005), Schumpeter’s legacy: A new perspective on the relationship between firm size and R&D, Research Policy, 34, pp. 914–931.
    Search in Google Scholar
  42. Levin, R., Klevorick, A., Nelson, R., Winter, S. (1987), Appropriating the returns from industrial research and development, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 3, pp. 783–820.
    Search in Google Scholar
  43. Levin, R. (1988), Appropriability, R&D spending, and technological performance, American Economic Review, 78, pp. 424–428.
    Search in Google Scholar
  44. Levin, R., Reiss, P. (1988), Cost-reducing and demand-creating R&D with spillovers, RAND Journal of Economics, 19, pp. 538–556.
    Search in Google Scholar
  45. Mansfield, E. (1964), Industrial Research and Development Expenditures: Determinants, Prospects, and Relation of Size of Firm and Inventive Output, Journal of Political Economy, 72, pp. 319–340.
    Search in Google Scholar
  46. Morck, R., Yeung, B. (2000), The Economic Determinants of Innovation, Industry Canada Research Publications, Occasional paper.
    Search in Google Scholar
  47. Motta, M. (1992), Cooperative R&D and vertical product differentiation, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 10, pp. 643–661.
    Search in Google Scholar
  48. Mukhopadhyay, A. (1985), Returns to Scale in R&D and the Schumpeterian Hypothesis: A Comment, The Journal of Industrial Economics, 33, pp. 359–361.
    Search in Google Scholar
  49. Nelson, R., Winter, S. (1982), The Schumpeterian Tradeoff Revisited, American Economic Review, 72, pp. 114–132.
    Search in Google Scholar
  50. Pavitt, K., Robson, M., Townsend, J. (1987), The size distribution of innovating firms in the UK: 1945–1983, The Journal of Industrial Economics, 35, pp. 291–316.
    Search in Google Scholar
  51. Peneder, M. (2008), The problem of private under-investment in innovation: a policy mind map, WIFO Working Paper.10.1016/j.technovation.2008.02.006
    Search in Google Scholar
  52. Prokop, J., Karbowski, A. (2013), Współpraca badawczo-rozwojowa przedsiębiorstw a kartelizacja gałęzi, Przegląd Zachodniopomorski, XXVIII (LVII), pp. 259–272.
    Search in Google Scholar
  53. Qiu, L. (1997), On the dynamic efficiency of Bertrand and Cournot equilibria, Journal of Economic Theory, 75, pp. 213–229.
    Search in Google Scholar
  54. Robertson, P., Langlois, R. (1995), Innovation, networks, and vertical integration, Research Policy, 24, pp. 543–562.
    Search in Google Scholar
  55. Romer, P. (1986), Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth, Journal of Political Economy, 94, pp. 1002–1037.
    Search in Google Scholar
  56. Saha, S. (2007), Consumer preferences and product and process R&D, RAND Journal of Economics, 38, pp. 250–268.
    Search in Google Scholar
  57. Salant, S., Shaffer, G. (1998), Optimal asymmetric strategies in research joint ventures, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 16, pp. 195–208.
    Search in Google Scholar
  58. Salant, S., Shaffer, G. (1999), Unequal treatment of identical agents in Cournot equilibrium, American Economic Review, 89, pp. 585–604.
    Search in Google Scholar
  59. Scherer, F. (1965), Firm Size, Market Structure, Opportunity, and the Output of Patented Inventions, American Economic Review, 55, pp. 1097–1125.
    Search in Google Scholar
  60. Scherer, F. (1980), Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance, Rand McNally College Publishing Company, Chicago.
    Search in Google Scholar
  61. Schmookler, J. (1959), Bigness, Fewness, and Research, Journal of Political Economy, 67, pp. 628–635.
    Search in Google Scholar
  62. Schumpeter, J. (1934), The Theory of Economic Development, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
    Search in Google Scholar
  63. Schumpeter, J. (1942), Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, Harper and Row, New York.
    Search in Google Scholar
  64. Spence, M. (1984), Cost Reduction, Competition, and Industry Performance, Econometrica, 52, pp. 101–121.
    Search in Google Scholar
  65. Sutton, J. (1996), Technology and Market Structure, European Economic Review, 40, pp. 511–530.
    Search in Google Scholar
  66. Sutton, J. (1998), Technology and Market Structure: Theory and History, MIT Press, Cambridge.
    Search in Google Scholar
  67. Symeonidis, G. (1996), Innovation, Firm Size and Market Structure: Schumpeterian Hypotheses and Some New Themes, Working Paper 161, OECD.
    Search in Google Scholar
  68. Tirole, J. (1988), The Theory of Industrial Organization, MIT Press, Cambridge.
    Search in Google Scholar
  69. Tsai, K., Wang, J. (2005), Does R&D Performance Decline with Firm Size? A Reexamination in Terms of Elasticity, Research Policy, 34, pp. 966–976.
    Search in Google Scholar
  70. Tsai, K. (2009), Collaborative networks and product innovation performance: Toward a contingency perspective, Research Policy, 38, pp. 765–778.
    Search in Google Scholar
  71. Villard, H. (1958), Competition, Oligopoly and Research, Journal of Political Economy, 66, pp. 483–497.
    Search in Google Scholar
  72. Wölfl, A. (1998), Spillover Effects – an Incentive to Cooperate in R&D?, Halle Institute for Economic Research, Discussion Paper.10.2139/ssrn.1690556
    Search in Google Scholar
  73. Worley, J. (1961), Industrial Research and the New Competition, Journal of Political Economy, 69, pp. 183–186.
    Search in Google Scholar
  74. Ziss, S. (1994), Strategic R&D with spillovers, collusion and welfare, The Journal of Industrial Economics, 17, pp. 375–393.
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ijme-2016-0004 | Journal eISSN: 2543-5361 | Journal ISSN: 2299-9701
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 58 - 78
Published on: Apr 18, 2016
Published by: Warsaw School of Economics
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 times per year
Keywords:
research and development,
firm innovation,
inter-firm cooperation
Related subjects:
Business and economics,
Political economics,
Economic theory, systems and structures,
Business management,
Management accounting, financial controlling, cost calculation, investment

© 2016 Adam Karbowski, published by Warsaw School of Economics
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 49 (2016): Issue 1 (March 2016)Next article