Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
A Dynamic Capabilities Perspective of High-Growth Firms: Organizational Aspects Cover

A Dynamic Capabilities Perspective of High-Growth Firms: Organizational Aspects

International Journal of Management and Economics
Volume 48 (2015): Issue 1 (December 2015)
By:   
Open Access
|Feb 2016
References

References

  1. Abebe, M., Alvarado, A. D. (2013), Founder-CEO status and firm performance: an exploratory study of alternative perspectives,, Vol. 6, No. 4, pp. 343–357.
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. Ács, Z. J. (2011), High-impact firms: gazelles revisited, in: M. Fritsch (ed.),, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp. 133–174.
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. Ács, Z. J., Szerb, L., Autio, E. (2015),, Springer Briefs in Economics, Springer, Heidelberg.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  4. Agarwal, R., Helfat, C. E. (2009), Strategic renewal of organizations,, Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 281–293.
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. Armbruster, H., Bikfalvi, A., Kinkel, S., Lay, G. (2008), Organizational innovation: The challenge of measuring non-technical innovation in large-scale surveys,, Vol. 28, No. 10, pp. 644–657.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  6. Békés, G., Muraközy, B. (2012), Magyar gazellák: gyorsnövekedésűvállalatokjellemzőiéskialakulásukelemzése Magyarországon, [Hungarian gazelles: what makes a high-growth firm in Hungary?], Közgazdaság Szemle, Vol. 59, No. 3, pp. 233–262.
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. Barbero, J. L., Casillas, J. C., Feldman, H. D. (2011), Managerial capabilities and paths to growth as determinants of high-growth small and medium-sized enterprises,, Vol. 29, No. 6, pp. 671–694.
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. Birch, D. (1979),Cambridge, MA, MIT Program on Neighborhood and Regional Change, Unpublished report U. S. Department of Commerce.
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. Birch, D. L., Medoff, J. (1994), Gazelles, in: L. C. Solmon, A. R. Levenson, (eds.),Westview, Boulder, Co, pp. 159–167.
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. Boeker, W., Karichalil, R. (2002), Entrepreneurial transitions: Factors influencing founder departure,, Vol. 45, No. 4, pp. 818–826.
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. Chan, Y. E., Bhargava, N., Street, C. T. (2006), Having Arrived: The Homogeneity of High–Growth Small Firms,, Vol. 44, No. 3, pp. 426–440.
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. Coad, A., Daunfeldt, S. O., Hölzl, W., Johansson, D., Nightingale, P. (2014), High-growth firms: introduction to the special section,, Vol. 23, No. 1, pp. 91–112.
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. Colombelli, A., Krafft, J., Quatraro, F. (2014), High-growth firms and technological knowledge: do gazelles follow exploration or exploitation strategies?,, Vol. 23, No. 1, pp. 261–291.
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. Csapó, K. (2011), The Characteristics and Development Possibilities of Fast-Growing SMEs in Hungary,, Vol. 6, No. 3, pp. 16–27.
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. Davidsson, P. (1991), Continued entrepreneurship: Ability, need, and opportunity as determinants of small firm growth,, Vol. 6, No. 6, pp. 405–429.
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. Deligianni, I., Voudouris, I., Lioukas, S. (2014), Growth paths of small technology firms: The effects of different knowledge types over time,in Press, doi:10.1016/j.jwb, (accessed: August 6, 2014).
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. Delmar, F., Davidsson, P., Gartner, W. B. (2003), Arriving at the high-growth firm,, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 189–216.
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989), Building theories from case study research,, Vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 532–550.
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. Eisenhardt, K. M., Graebner, M. E. (2007), Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges,, Vol. 50, No. 1, pp. 25–32.
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. Eisenhardt, K. M., Martin, J. A. (2000), Dynamic capabilities: What are they?,, Vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 1105–1121.
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. Foss, N. J., Laursen, K., Pedersen, T. (2011), Linking customer interaction and innovation: The mediating role of new organizational practices,, Vol. 22, No. 4, pp. 980–999.
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. Hambrick, D. C., Crozier, L. M. (1986), Stumblers and stars in the management of rapid growth,, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 31–45.
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. Henrekson, M., Johansson, D. (2010), Gazelles as job creators: a survey and interpretation of the evidence,, Vol. 35, No. 2, pp. 227–244.
    Search in Google Scholar
  24. Hsu, L. C., Wang, C. H. (2012), Clarifying the effect of intellectual capital on performance: the mediating role of dynamic capability,, Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 179–205.
    Search in Google Scholar
  25. Lumpkin, G. T., Dess, G. G. (1996), Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance,, Vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 135–172.
    Search in Google Scholar
  26. Major, I. (2003), What Makes Hungarian SMEs Perform Poorly?,, Vol. 53, No. 2, pp. 109–143.
    Search in Google Scholar
  27. Major, I. (2008), Technical efficiency, allocative efficiency and profitability in Hungarian small and medium-sized enterprises: a model with frontier functions,, Vol. 60, No. 8, pp. 1371–1396.
    Search in Google Scholar
  28. McGrath, R. G., MacMillan, I. (2000),, Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
    Search in Google Scholar
  29. Mueller, S., Volery, T., Von Siemens, B. (2012), What Do Entrepreneurs Actually Do? An Observational Study of Entrepreneurs’ Everyday Behavior in the Start-Up and Growth Stages,, Vol. 36, No. 5, pp. 995–1017.
    Search in Google Scholar
  30. Papanek, G. (2010), A gyorsannövekvőmagyarkis- ésközépvállallatok a gazdaságmotorjai, [High-growth Hungarian SMEs are the engines of the economy],, Vol. 57, No. 4, pp. 357–370.
    Search in Google Scholar
  31. Parker, S. C., Storey, D. J., Van Witteloostuijn, A. (2010), What happens to gazelles? The importance of dynamic management strategy,, Vol. 35, No. 2, pp. 203–226.
    Search in Google Scholar
  32. Sadler – Smith, E., Hampson, Y., Chaston, I., Badger, B. (2003), Managerial behavior, entrepreneurial style, and small firm performance,, Vol. 41, No. 1, pp. 47–67.
    Search in Google Scholar
  33. Smallbone, D., Leig, R., North, D. (1995), The characteristics and strategies of high growth SMEs,, Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 44–62.
    Search in Google Scholar
  34. St-Jean, E., Julien, P. A., Audet, J. (2008), Factors associated with growth changes in “gazelles”,, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 161–188.
    Search in Google Scholar
  35. Storey, D. J. (1994),Routledge, London.
    Search in Google Scholar
  36. Szerb, L., Aidis, R., Ács, Z. J. (2012), Entrepreneurship in Hungary in the 2006–2010 time period.,, available at:
    Search in Google Scholar
  37. Teece, D. J. (2007), Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance,, Vol. 28, No. 13, pp. 1319–1350.
    Search in Google Scholar
  38. Teece, D. J. (1986), Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy,, Vol. 15, No. 6, pp. 285–305.
    Search in Google Scholar
  39. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., Shuen, A. (1997), Dynamic capabilities and strategic management,, Vol. 18, No. 7, pp. 509–533.
    Search in Google Scholar
  40. Terjesen, S., Hessels, J., Li, D. (2013), Comparative International Entrepreneurship, A Review and Research Agenda,, DOI: 10.1177/0149206313486259
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  41. Wasserman, N. (2008), The founder’s dilemma,, Vol. 86, No. 2, pp. 102–109.
    Search in Google Scholar
  42. Wennberg, K. (2013), Managing High-Growth Firms: A literature review, available at:
    Search in Google Scholar
  43. Winter, S. G. (2003), Understanding dynamic capabilities,, 24, No. 10, pp. 991–995.
    Search in Google Scholar
  44. Yin, R. K. (2003),Sage publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
    Search in Google Scholar
  45. Zahra, S. A., Sapienza, H. J., Davidsson, P. (2006), Entrepreneurship and dynamic capabilities: a review, model and research agenda,, Vol. 43, No. 4, pp. 917–955.
    Search in Google Scholar
  46. Zollo, M., Winter, S. G. (2002), Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities,, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 339–351.
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ijme-2015-0034 | Journal eISSN: 2543-5361 (formerly 2299-9701) | Journal ISSN: 2299-9701
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 45 - 62
Published on: Feb 29, 2016
Published by: SGH Warsaw School of Economics
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Keywords:
high-growth firms,
dynamic capabilities,
organizational innovations,
organizational learning,
Hungary
JEL:
L22,
L25,
L26
Related subjects:
Business and economics,
Business management,
Management accounting, financial controlling, cost calculation, investment

© 2016 Andrea Szalavetz, published by SGH Warsaw School of Economics
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Volume 48 (2015): Issue 1 (December 2015)
Previous article
Next article