Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
General Purpose Technologies and their Implications for International Trade Cover

General Purpose Technologies and their Implications for International Trade

International Journal of Management and Economics
Volume 47 (2015): Issue 1 (September 2015)
By:   
Open Access
|Dec 2015
References

References

  1. Aghion, P., Howitt, P. (1998a), Endogenous Growth Theory, MIT Press, Cambridge.
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. Andersen, B., (1999), The hunt for s-shaped growth paths in technological innovation: a patent study, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Vol. 9, pp. 487-526.
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. Arroyo, C., Dinopoulos, E., Donald, S. (1995), Schumpeterian Growth and Capital Accumulation: Theory and Evidence, Manuscript, University of Florida.
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. Barro, R., Sala-I-Martin, X. (1995), Economic Growth, McGraw-Hill, New York.
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. Breshnahan, T., Trajtenberg, M. (1995), General Purpose Technologies: Engines of growth?, Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 65, pp. 83-108.
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. Chung, J., Hwang, J. H. (2009), Dynamics of General Purpose Technologies in an Open Economy, Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics, Vol. 50, pp. 193-204.
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. David, P., (1990), The Dynamo and the computer: a historical perspective on the modern productivity paradox, American Economic Review, Vol. 80, pp. 355-361.
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. Devine, W. (1983), From Shafts to Wires: Historical Perspective on Electrification, The Journal of Economic History, Vol. 43, No. 2, pp. 347-372.
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. Dinopoulos, E., Segerstrom, P. (1999), A Schumpeterian Model of Protection and Relative Wages, American Economic Review, Vol. 89, pp. 450-472.
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. Dinopoulos, E., Syropoulos, C. (2000), Innovation and Rent Protection in the Theory of Schumpeterian Growth, Manuscript, University of Florida.
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. Dinopoulos, E., Syropoulos, C. (2001), Globalization and Scale-Invariant Growth, University of Florida, Department of Economics Working Paper.
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. Dinopoulos, E., Thompson, P. (1996), A Contribution to the Empirics of Endogenous Growth, Eastern Economic Journal, Vol. 22, pp. 389-400.
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. Dinopoulos, E., Thompson, P. (1998), Schumpeterian Growth without Scale Effects, Journal of Economic Growth, Vol. 3, pp. 313-335.
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. Dinopoulos, E., Thompson, P. (1999), Scale Effects in Schumpeterian Models of Economic Growth, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Vol. 9, pp. 157-185.
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. Dornbusch, R., Fischer, S., Samuelson P. A. (1977), Comparative Advantage, Trade, and Payments in a Ricardian Model with a Continuum of Goods, American Economic Review, Vol. 67, pp. 823-839.
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. Grossman, G. M., Helpman, E. (1990), Comparative Advantage and Long-Run Growth, American Economic Review, Vol. 80, pp. 796-815.
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. Grossman, G. M., Helpman, E. (1991a), Endogenous Product Cycles, Economic Journal, Vol. 101, pp. 1214-1244.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  18. Grossman, G. M., Helpman, E. (1991b), Quality Ladders and Product Cycles, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 425, pp. 557-586.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  19. Grossman, G. M., Helpman, E. (1991c), Quality Ladders in the Theory of Growth, Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 59, pp. 43-61.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  20. Griliches, Z. (1957), Hybrid corn: an exploration in the economics of technological change, Econometrica, Vol. 25, pp. 501-522.
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. Helpman, E., Krugman, P. R. (1989), Trade Policy and Market Structure, MIT Press, Cambridge.
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. Jones, C. (1995a), Time-Series Tests of Endogenous Growth Models, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 110, pp. 495-525.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  23. Helpman, El, Trajtenberg, M. (1996), Diffusion of General Purpose Technologies, NBER Working Paper, 5773.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  24. Helpman, E., Trajtenberg, M. (1998a), A Time to sow and a time to reap: growth: based on general purpose technologies, in: E. Helpman (eds.), General purpose technologies and economic growth, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
    Search in Google Scholar
  25. Helpman, E., Trajtenberg, M. (1998b), Diffusion of general purpose technologies, in: E. Helpman (eds.), General purpose technologies and economic growth, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
    Search in Google Scholar
  26. Jones, C. (1995a), Time-series tests on endogenous growth models, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 110, pp. 495-525.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  27. Jones, C. (1995b), R&D-Based Models of Economic Growth, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 103, pp. 759-784.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  28. Jorgenson, D. (2001), Information technology and the U. S. economy, American Economic Review, Vol. 91, pp. 1-32.
    Search in Google Scholar
  29. Jovanovic, B., Rousseau, P. (2001), Vintage organization capital, NBER Working Paper, 8166.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  30. Krugman, P. R. (1987), The Narrow Moving Band, the Dutch Disease and the Competitive Consequences of Mrs. Thatcher, Journal of Development Economics, Vol. 27, pp. 41-55.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  31. Mulligan, CB., Sala-i-Martin, X. (1991), A Note on the Time-Elimination Method for Solving Recursive Economic Models, NBER Working Paper 116.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  32. Mulligan, C. B., Sala-i-Martin, X. (1992), Transition Dynamics in Two-Sector Models of Endogenous Growth, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 107, pp. 739-773.
    Search in Google Scholar
  33. Petsas, I. (2003), The Dynamic Effects of General Purpose Technologies on Schumpeterian Growth, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Vol. 13, pp. 577-605.
    Search in Google Scholar
  34. Petsas, I. (2010), Sustained Comparative Advantage and Semi-Endogenous Growth, Review of Development Economics, Vol. 14, pp. 34-47.
    Search in Google Scholar
  35. Segerstrom, P. (1998), Endogenous Growth without Scale Effects, American Economic Review, Vol. 88, pp. 1290-1310.
    Search in Google Scholar
  36. Segerstrom, P., Zolnierek, J. (1999), The R&D Incentives of Industry Leaders, International Economic Review, Vol. 40, pp. 745-766.
    Search in Google Scholar
  37. Thirtly, C., Ruttan, V. (1987), The role of demand and supply in the generation and diffusion of technical change, Harwood Academic Publishers, Switzerland.
    Search in Google Scholar
  38. Taylor, M. S. (1993), Quality Ladders’ and Ricardian Trade, Journal of International Economics, Vol. 34, pp. 225-243.
    Search in Google Scholar
  39. Young, A. (1998), Growth without Scale Effects, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 106, pp. 41-63.
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ijme-2015-0026 | Journal eISSN: 2543-5361 (formerly 2299-9701) | Journal ISSN: 2299-9701
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 7 - 35
Published on: Dec 4, 2015
Published by: SGH Warsaw School of Economics
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Keywords:
general purpose technologies,
Schumpeterian growth,
comparative advantage,
scale effects,
R&D races
Related subjects:
Business and economics,
Business management,
Management accounting, financial controlling, cost calculation, investment

© 2015 Iordanis Petsas, published by SGH Warsaw School of Economics
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Volume 47 (2015): Issue 1 (September 2015)
Next article