Have a personal or library account? Click to login

CSR and Financial Performance: The Case of Polish Small and Medium Manufacturers

International Journal of Management and Economics
Volume 43 (2014): Issue 1 (September 2014)
By:
Open Access
|Jan 2015

References

  1. Aupperle, K., Carroll, A., Hatfield, J. (1985), An empirical examination of the relationship between corporate social responsibility and profitability, Academy of Management Journal, 28, pp. 446-463.
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. Barnett, M., Salomon, R. (2006), Beyond dichotomy: the curvilinear relationship between social responsibility and financial performance, Strategic Management Journal, 27, pp. 1101-1122.
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. Bello, Z. (2005), Socially responsible investing and portfolio diversification, Journal of Financial Research, 28, pp. 4-57.
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. Bowen, N., Guo, S. (2012), Structural Equation Modeling: Pocket Guides to Social Research Methods, Oxford University Press, New York.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195367621.003.0002
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. Brammer, S. and Pavalin, S. (2006), Corporate reputation and social performance: the importance of fit, Journal of Management Studies, 43, pp. 435-55.
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. Bush, T., Hoffmann, V. (2011), How hot is your bottom line? Linking carbon and financial performance, Business and Society, 50, pp. 233-265.
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. Byrne, B. (2010), Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications and Programming, Second Edition, Routledge, New York.
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. Carmeli, A., Gilat, G., Waldman, D.A. (2007), The role of perceived organizational performance in organizational identification, adjustment and job performance, Journal of Management Studies, 44, pp. 972-92.
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. Carroll, A.B. (1979), A three‑dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance, Academy of Management Review, 4(1), pp. 497-505.
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. Dahlsrud, A. (2008), How corporate social responsibility is defined: an analysis of 37 Definitions, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 15 (1), pp. 1-13.
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. European Commission (2011), Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of Regions: A renewed EU strategy 2011-14 for Corporate Social Responsibility, Brussels, Belgium.
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. European Commission (2003), Responsible entrepreneurship: A collection of good practice cases among small and medium sized enterprises across Europe, Belgium, Bruxelles. retrieved on September 27, 2014 from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2011:0681:FIN:EN:PDF
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. European Commission (2005), Awareness‑raising questionnaire, Belgium, Bruxelles, retrieved on June 3, 2013 from http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/sustainable-business/files/csr/campaign/documentation/download/questionaire_pl.pdf
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. Friedman, M. (1962), Capitalism and Freedom, University of Chicago Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. Gadenne, D., Kennedy, J., McKeiver, C. (2008), An empirical study of environmental awareness and practices in SMEs, Journal of Business Ethics, 10, pp. 1-19.
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. Garson, D. (2012), Structural Equation Modeling: Statistical Association Publishing Blue Book Series, Statistical Association Publishing, Asheboro.
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. Groza, M.D., Pronschinske, M.R., Walker, M. (2011), Perceived organizational motives and consumer responses to proactive and reactive CSR, Journal of Business Ethics, 102, pp. 639-652.
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., Anderson, R. (2010), Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.), Prentice‑Hall, Inc. Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA.
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. Hoyle, R.H. (2011), Structural Equation Modeling: Concepts, Issues, and Applications, SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks.
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. Jenkins, H. (2009), A business opportunity model of corporate social responsibility for small- and medium‑sized enterprises, Business Ethics: A European Review, 18(1), pp. 21-36.
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. Lu, W., Chau, K., Wang, H., Pan, W. (2014), A decade’s debate on the nexus between corporate social and financial performance: a critical review of empirical studies 2002-2011, Journal of Cleaner Production, 79, pp. 195-206.
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. Luo, X., Bhattacharya, C.B. (2006), Corporate social responsibility, customer satisfaction, and market value, Journal of Marketing, 70, pp. 1-18.
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. Malhotra, N. (2010), Marketing Research: An Applied Orientation, Prentice Hall, 6th edition.
    Search in Google Scholar
  24. Martin, K., Thaghafian, H., Esapour, K., Amin, Alvari, M., Farhoodi, A. (2011), A study of the Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Financial Performance, Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 5(12), pp. 668-674.
    Search in Google Scholar
  25. Matten, D., Moon, J. (2008), Implicit and explicit CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility, Academy of Management Review, 33(2), pp. 404-424.
    Search in Google Scholar
  26. McWilliams, A., Siegel, D., Wright, P. (2006), Guest editors’ introduction. Corporate social responsibility: Strategic implications, Journal of Management Studies, 43, pp. 1-18.
    Search in Google Scholar
  27. Mirońska, D., Zaborek, P. (2014), Polacy wobec marketingu społecznie zaangażowanego, Marketing i Rynek, 1/2014.
    Search in Google Scholar
  28. Mulaik, S. (2009), Linear Causal Modeling with Structural Equations, Chapman & Hall, CRC Press Taylor and Francis Group, Boca Raton.10.1201/9781439800393
    Search in Google Scholar
  29. Peloza, J. (2006), Using corporate social responsibility as insurance for financial performance, California Management Review, 48, pp. 52-72.
    Search in Google Scholar
  30. Peters, R., Mullen, M. (2009), Some Evidence of the Cumulative Effects of Corporate Social Responsibility on Financial Performance, The Journal of Global Business Issues, 3(1), pp. 1-14.
    Search in Google Scholar
  31. Porter, M.E., Kramer, M.R. (2006). ‘Strategy and society’. Harvard Business Review, 84, 78-91.
    Search in Google Scholar
  32. Rettab, B., Ben Brik, A., Mellahi, K. (2009), A study of management perceptions of the impact of corporate social responsibility on organizational performance in emerging economies: the case of Dubai, Journal of Business Ethics, 89, pp. 371-390.
    Search in Google Scholar
  33. Tang, Z., Eirikur, H., Rotenberg, S. (2012), How Corporate Social Responsibility Engagement Strategy Moderates the CSR - Financial Performance Relationship, Journal of Management Studies, 49, pp.1274-1303.
    Search in Google Scholar
  34. The Economist (2014), The glass‑ceiling index: The best and worst places to be a working women, March 6th.
    Search in Google Scholar
  35. Torgusa, N., O’Donohue, W., Hecker, R. (2012), Capabilities, Proactive CSR and Financial Performance in SMEs: Empirical Evidence from an Australian Manufacturing Industry Sector, Journal of Business Ethics, 109, pp. 483-500.
    Search in Google Scholar
  36. Wagner, M. (2009), Innovation and competitive advantages: from the integration of strategic aspects with social and environmental management in European firms, Business, Strategy and the Environment, 18, pp. 291-306.
    Search in Google Scholar
  37. Wagner, M., Van Phu, N., Azomahou, T., Whermeyer, W. (2002), The relationship between the environmental and economic performance of firms: An empirical analysis of the European paper industry, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 9, pp. 133-146.
    Search in Google Scholar
  38. Yu, V., Ting, H., Wu, Y. (2009), Assessing the greenness effort for European firms: A resource efficiency perspective, Management Decisions, 47, pp. 1065-1079.
    Search in Google Scholar
  39. Zaborek, P., Mirońska, D. (2013), Analiza wrażliwości polskich nabywcow dobr indywidualnych na działania z zakresu marketingu społecznego podejmowane przez wytworcow dobr i usług konsumpcyjnych, Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu, 288, pp. 115-125.
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ijme-2015-0003 | Journal eISSN: 2543-5361 | Journal ISSN: 2299-9701
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 53 - 73
Published on: Jan 27, 2015
Published by: Warsaw School of Economics
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Keywords:
CSR,
social responsibility,
financial performance,
SMEs,
manufacturing,
Poland
Related subjects:
Business and economics,
Political economics,
Economic theory, systems and structures,
Business management,
Management accounting, financial controlling, cost calculation, investment

© 2015 Piotr Zaborek, published by Warsaw School of Economics
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 43 (2014): Issue 1 (September 2014)Next article