Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Autonomy Principle and Fraud Exception in Documentary Letters of Credit, a Comparative Study between United States and England Cover

Autonomy Principle and Fraud Exception in Documentary Letters of Credit, a Comparative Study between United States and England

By: Hamed Alavi  
Open Access
|Jan 2018

References

  1. Angelica-Whitewear Ltd v Bank of Nova Scotia 36 D.L.R. (4th) 161, EYB 1987-67726
  2. ARKINS, JR. “Snow White v. Frost White: Th e New Cold War in Banking Law?.” JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL BANKING LAW 15, no. 2 (2000): 30-41
  3. Banco Santander S.A. v. Bayfern Ltd, 1999 WL 250019 (Q.B. June 9, 1999), aff ’d, 2000 WL 191098 (C.A. Feb. 25, 2000)
  4. Buckley, Ross P., and Xiang Gao. “Development of the Fraud Rule in Letter of Credit Law: Th e Journey So Far and the Road Ahead.” U. Pa. J. Int’l Econ. L. 23 (2002): 663.
  5. Code, Uniform Commercial. “Uniform Commercial Code.” Uniform Laws (2001).
  6. Czarnikow-Rionda Sugar Trading Inc v Standard Bank London (1996) 1WRL 1152, 1161
  7. Discount Records Ltd v Barclays Bank Ltd [1975] 1 Llyod’s Law Reports 444-446
  8. Dolan, J,F, Th e Law of Letters of Credit: Commercial and Standby Credits, Fourth Edition, Warren, Gorham & Lamont, Incorporated, USA, (1996).
  9. Eakin v Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Co. (1989) 875 F.2d 114 .116.
  10. Edward Owen Engineering Ltd v Barclays Bank International Ltd. [1978] 1 Lloyd’s Rep. 166
  11. Enonchong N, ‘the Autonomy Principle of Letters of Credit: An Illegality Exception?’ Lloyd’s Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly,(2006), 404
  12. Enonchong.N, ‘Th e Independence Principle of Letters of Credits and Demand Guarantees’. Oxford University Press, (2011). 9
  13. Ellinger .P, Noe. D, the Law and Practice of Documentary Letters of Credit, Hart, (2010), 141
  14. Ellinger, E. P. “Documentary Credits and Fraudulent Documents.” Current Problems Of International Trade Financing. Singapore: Malaya Law Review and Butterworth & Co 185 (1983).
  15. Xiang, Gao, and Ross P. Buckley. “Comparative Analysis of the Standard of Fraud Required under the Fraud Rule in Letter of Credit Law, A.” Duke J. Comp. & Int’l L. 13 (2003): 293.
  16. Gao, Xiang. “Th e Fraud Rule in the Law of Letters of Credit.” (2002).
  17. García, Roberto Luis Frías. “Th e Autonomy Principle of Letters of Credit.”Mexican Law Review 3, no. 1 (2010): 4.10.22201/iij.24485306e.2010.5.7747
  18. Gordley, James. “Comparative Legal Research: Its Function in the Development of Harmonized Law.” Th e American Journal of Comparative Law 43, no. 4 (1995): 555-567.10.2307/840607
  19. Hamzeh Malas & Sons v. British Imex Industries Ltd [1958] 2 QB 127; [1958] 2 WLR 100; [1958] 1 All ER 262, C.A.
  20. Harbottle (RD) (Mercantile) Ltd v National Westminster Bank Ltd [1978] 1 QB 146.
  21. Harfield.H, Bank Credits and Acceptances (5th ed.), New York, (1974),
  22. Kelly-Louw, Michelle. “Documentary Nature of Demand Guarantees and the Doctrine of Strict Compliance (Part 1), Th e.” S. Afr. Mercantile LJ 21 (2009): 306.
  23. Lu, Lu. “Th e Exceptions in Documentary Credits in English Law.” (2011). 75
  24. Malek, Ali, and David Quest. “Jack: Documentary Credits.” (2009).
  25. Official Comment to Article 5 of the Uniform Commercial Code, para. 2
  26. Power Curber International Ltd v. National Bank of Kuwait SAK [1981]2 Lloyd’s Rep 394.
  27. Schmitthoff ’s Export Trade - Th e Law and Practice of International Trade (12th ed.)Sweet & Maxwell, (2012),
  28. Semetex Corporation v UBAF Arab American Bank [1995] 2Bank LR 73
  29. Sztejn v Henry Schroder Banking Corporation 31 NYS 2d 631 (1941)
  30. Themehelp Ltd. v. West, (1995) 4 All E.R. 215
  31. Tóth, Zsuzsanna. “DOCUMENTARY CREDITS IN INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL TRANSACTIONS WITH SPECIAL FOCUS ON THE FRAUD RULE.”,(2006)
  32. Trade Finance Fraud -Understanding the Threats and reducing the Risk, A Special Report prepared by the ICC International Maritime Bureau (Paris) ,(2002), 9
  33. Trans Trust SPRL v Danubian Co Ltd [1952] 2QB 297 at 304
  34. Uniform Customs and Ptactice for Dcoumentary Letters of Credit . ICC ,( 2007).
  35. United City Cooperation v. Allied Arab Bank (1985) 2 Lloyds Rep .554, 561
  36. United City Merchants (Investment) Limited v Royal Bank of Canada [1982] 2 All E.R. 725
  37. United City Merchants (Investment) Limited v Royal Bank of Canada [1979] 1 Lloyd’s Law Reports 267
  38. United City Merchants (Investments) Ltd v Royal Bank Of Canada [1983] 1AC 168,183
  39. United Trading Corporation SA and Murray Clayton Ltd v allied Arab Bank Ltd [1985] 2 Lloyd’s Law Reports 554 (CA)
  40. Ward Petroleum Corp. v Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. (1990) 903 F.2d 1299.
  41. White and Co Inc vs Chamet Handel Training (S) Pte Ltd (1993) 1 SLR 65
  42. Zhang, Yanan. Approaches to Resolving the International Documentary Letters of Credit Fraud Issue. University of Eastern Finland, (2011).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/iclr-2016-0035 | Journal eISSN: 2464-6601 | Journal ISSN: 12138770
Language: English
Page range: 47 - 68
Published on: Jan 24, 2018
Published by: Palacký University Olomouc
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2018 Hamed Alavi, published by Palacký University Olomouc
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.