Table 1
Recovered helminths in the studied markets from Udon Thani, Thailand. Z: zoonotic helminth; R.e.: Rattus exulans; R.n: Rattus norvegicus; P%: general prevalence, CI: clopper-Pearson confidence interval; MI: general mean intensity; Z: zoonotic helminth. Comparison with previous studies of zoomotic helminths in wet markets: 1: Claveria et al., 2005; 2: Paramasavaran et al., 2009; 3: Tung et al., 2013.
| Host | General prevalence | Cl (Clopper Pearson) | Ml | Zoonotic | 1 | 2 | 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gongylonema neoplasticum(Fibiger & Ditlevson, 1914) Ransom & Hall, 1916 | R.e/R.n | 38.8 | 29.1 – 49.2 | 4.68 | Z | - | * | - |
| Raillietinasp. | R.n | 34.7 | 25.4 – 45.0 | 6.18 | Z | - | * | * |
| Hymenolepis nana(Siebold, 1852) | R.n | (8) 8.2 | 3.6 – 15.5 | 1.38 | Z | - | * | * |
| Hymenolepis diminuta(Rudolphi, 1819) Weinland, 1858 | R.n | (5) 5.1 | 1.7 – 11.5 | 1.60 | Z | * | * | * |
| Trichostrongylidae | R.n | (35) 35.7 | 26.3 – 46.0 | 36.86 | - | |||
| Syphacia muris(Yamaguti, 1935) | R.e/R.n | (2) 2.0 | 0.2 – 7.2 | 25.0 | - | |||
| Capillariinae | R.n | (6) 6.1 | 2.3 – 12.9 | 11.17 | - | |||
| Pterygodormatites tani(Hoeppli, 1929) | R.n | (3) 3.1 | 0.6 – 8.7 | 3.67 | - | |||
| Physaloptera gnociLe-Van-hoa, 1961 | R.n | 1 (1) | 0.0 – 5.6 | 2.0 | - | |||
| Hydatigera taeniaeformisI. (Batsch, 1786) Lamarck, 1816 | R.n | (28) 28.6 | 19.9 – 38.6 | 1.89 | - | |||
| Moniliformis moniliformis(Bremser, 1811) | R.e | (1) 1.0 | 0.0 – 5.6 | 3.00 | Z | * | * | - |
| Angiostrongylus cantonensis(Chen, 1935) Dougerthy, 1946 | R.n | (3) 3.1 | 0.6 – 8.7 | 10.00 | Z | - | - | * |
| Capillaria hepatica(Bancroft, 1893) | R.e/R.n | (63) 64.3 | - | - | Z | * | * | * |