Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Seasonality and host-parasite interrelationship of Hysterothylacium aduncum (Nematoda) in whiting Merlangius merlangus off the southern and northern coasts of the Black Sea

Open Access
|Jul 2016

Figures & Tables

List of Hysterothylacium aduncum infections in the Black Sea whiting Merlangius merlangus on the basis of literature data

Infection prevalence (%)Infection IntensityAbundanceSampling AreaAuthor(s)Remarks
---Georgia–BatumiChulkova (1939)as Contracaecum clavatum
68.71–12 (mean =4.6)3.2Ukraine – SevastopolOsmanov (1940)as Contracaecum clavatum
367–9-Ukraine – Novorossiysk, KaradagPogoreltceva (1952)as Contracaecum aduncum
53.31–3-Ukraine – Odessa GulfChernichenko (1955)as Contracaecum clavatum
---BulgariaMargaritov (1960)as Contracaecum clavatum
411–11-Black SeaNikolaeva and Shramova (1975)as Contracaecum aduncum
16.8–88.2--BulgariaDimitrov, 1989as Contracaecum aduncum
---Ukraine – Alushta, Karadag, SevastopolMange (1993)-
---Turkey – SamsunDoğanay (1994)-
21.8–54.80.5–1.45 (mean intensity)-Turkey - Turkish Black Sea coastsIsmen and Bingel (1999)-
60.37.5 ±0.1-Turkey - SinopÖzer et al. (2000)-
62.5 (adult); 25.0 (larvae)-1 – 6 (adults); 2.0 (larvae)Ukraine – KaradagMiroshnichenko (2004)as Thynnascaris adunca
60.37.48 ±0.96.62 ±0.9Turkey - SinopÖzer étal. (2009)-
91.2 (Sinop)41.79 ± 10.03 (Sinop)-Turkey – Sinop; Ukraine – SevastopolÖzer étal. (2012)-
40.5 (Sevastopol)1.99 ± 0.52 (Sevastopol)-Turkey – Sinop; Ukraine - SevastopolÖzer étal. (2012)-
4–91 (larvae); 2–74 (adult)--Ukraine–Sevastopol, Sudak, Kalamitskiy BayZavyalov (2013)-
2–1001–24-Ukraine – Streletskaya Bay-SevastopolSkuratovskaya et al. (2013)-
88.57.5 ±0.1-Turkey – SinopÖzer and Olguner (2013)-
37.51 – 8 (mean=3.8)-Turkey - Eastern Black Sea coastsPekmezci et al (2013)-
56.09.4 (mean intensity)10.0Turkey – Artvin, Rize, TrabzonTepe and Oğuz (2013)-
80.3(77.1–83.1)11.5(9.6–17.2)9.3(7.7–13.9)Black Sea – SinopThis study-
32.9 (28.5–37.6)3.1 (2.5–4.0)1.0 (0.8–1.4)Black Sea – SevastopolThis study-

Comparative statistical differences in prevalence, mean intensity, median intensity and mean abundance of H_ aduncum between Sinop and Balaklava Bay samples relative to season, fish size and sex

VariablePrevalence(%)Mean IntensityMedian IntensityMean Abundance
Seasons
 Spring0.000
*

level of significance given as p<0.05

0.000
*

level of significance given as p<0.05

0.000
*

level of significance given as p<0.05

0.000
*

level of significance given as p<0.05

 Summer0.000
*

level of significance given as p<0.05

0.0670.0840.051
*

level of significance given as p<0.05

 Autumn0.000
*

level of significance given as p<0.05

0.3130.001
*

level of significance given as p<0.05

0.281
 Winter0.000
*

level of significance given as p<0.05

0.002
*

level of significance given as p<0.05

0.000
*

level of significance given as p<0.05

0.000
*

level of significance given as p<0.05

Length classes
 <15 cm0.000
*

level of significance given as p<0.05

0.2530.0860.206
 15 – 18 cm0.000
*

level of significance given as p<0.05

0.000
*

level of significance given as p<0.05

0.000
*

level of significance given as p<0.05

0.000
*

level of significance given as p<0.05

>18 cm0.000
*

level of significance given as p<0.05

0.011
*

level of significance given as p<0.05

0.013
*

level of significance given as p<0.05

0.000
*

level of significance given as p<0.05

Sex
 Female0.000
*

level of significance given as p<0.05

0.000
*

level of significance given as p<0.05

0.000
*

level of significance given as p<0.05

0.000
*

level of significance given as p<0.05

 Male0.000
*

level of significance given as p<0.05

0.3740.042
*

level of significance given as p<0.05

0.377

Levels of Infection of H_ aduncum according to season, length classes and sex of whiting, M_ merlangus, from Sinop and Balaklava Bay of the Black Sea during 2011 – 2014 N= number offish examined, Cl – 95 % confidence Intervals based on Stern’s exact score limit, Mean I - Mean Intensity and Mean A - Mean Abundance with bootstrap 95 % Cl (Mean I, A), v/m – varlance-to-mean ratio of H_ aduncum, SE – Standard Error

Season/fish length/sexNFish Length±SEPrevalence (%) ClMean I ClMean A Clv/mk*
Sinop Samples
Seasons
 Summer (June – August) (20.4 – 26.1 °C)2615.5 ±0.280.8 (61.7–92.1)5.3 (3.2–9.1)4.3 (2.5–7.5)9.50.711
 Autumn (September – November) (15.2 – 21.4 °C)22215.5 ±0.288.3 (83.4–91.9)14.4 (9.0–33.1)11.8(8.0–29.5)227.70.548*
 Winter (December – February) (8.3 – 13.1 °C)22215.2 ±0.179.7 (73.9–84.6)11.9 (9.3–17.1)9.5(7.5–13.4)48.30.481
 Spring (March – May) (9.5 – 17.2 °C)22015.0 ±0.172.7 (66.4–78.2)9.7(7.8–12.4)7.0 (5.6–9.0)24.40.454
Fish Length Classes
 <15cm32370.9 (65.6 – 75.7)11.7 (7.8–29.1)8.3(5.4–18.5)238.70.330*
 15–18cm32688.7 (84.7–91.8)10.3 (8.9–12.8)9.1 (7.9–11.3)24.10.774
 >18cm4187.8 (74.6–95.1)20.6(14.0–31.5)18.1 (12.0–29.1)37.00.682
Fish Sex
 Male22914.5 ±0.274.7 (68.6 – 79.9)10.6 (5.9–32.6)7.9(4.4–21.9)321.30.374*
 Female46115.6 ±0.183.1 (79.3–86.3)11.9(10.4–14.4)9.9(8.5–12.0)34.40.568*
Overall69015.2 ±0.180.3 (77.1–83.1)11.5 (9.6–17.2)9.3(7.7–13.9)115.70.487*
Balaklava Bay Samples
Seasons
 Summer (June–August) (21.7 – 25.2 °C)4015.1 ±0.217.5(8.4–32.3)1.7(11–2.1)0.3 (0.1–0.6)1.70.254
 Autumn (September – November) (13.9 – 21.6 °C)9718.6 ±0.311.3 (6.1–19.5)1.5(1.1–16)0.2 (0.1–0.3)1.50.216
 Winter (December – February) (8.2 – 11.0 °C)8017.0 ±0.232.5 (23.0 – 43.7)2.2(15–3.8)0.7 (0.4–13)4.50.328
 Spring (March – May) (8.4 – 16.4 °C)20615.7 ±0.246.1 (39.3–53.2)3.7 (2.9–4.8)17(13–2.4)8.00.331
Fish Length Classes
 <15cm11743.6 (34.6 – 53.0)5.0 (3.7–7.2)2.2(15–3.3)9.90.249
 15–18cm18131.5 (25.1 – 38.7)18(15–2.3)0.6 (0.4–0.8)2.20.490
 >18cm12524.8(17.9–33.2)2.3(19–3.7)0.6 (0.4–10)4.10.211
Fish Sex
 Male6914.8 ±0.233.3 (23.1 – 45.6)3.4 (2.2–5.6)1.2 (0.7–2.0)6.90.214
 Female35416.9 ±0.232.8 (27.9 – 37.8)3.1 (2.5–4.1)1.0 (0.8–14)7.70.232
Overall42316.5 ±0.232.9 (28.5–37.6)3.1 (2.5–4.0)1.0 (0.8–14)7.60.228

Comparative statistical differences in prevalence, mean intensity, median intensity and mean abundance of H_ aduncum in Sinop and Balaklava Bay samples relative to season, fish size and sex

Fish samplesVariablePrevalence(%)Mean IntensityMedian IntensityMean Abundance
SinopSeasons0.001
*

level of significance with p<0.05

-0.012
*

level of significance with p<0.05

-
Length classes0.000
*

level of significance with p<0.05

-0.000
*

level of significance with p<0.05

-
Sex0.009
*

level of significance with p<0.05

0.7120.010
*

level of significance with p<0.05

0.574
Balaklava BaySeasons0.000
*

level of significance with p<0.05

-0.011
*

level of significance with p<0.05

-
Length classes0.007
*

level of significance with p<0.05

-0.000
*

level of significance with p<0.05

-
Sex1.0000.6681.0000.700
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/helmin-2016-0025 | Journal eISSN: 1336-9083 | Journal ISSN: 0440-6605
Language: English
Page range: 248 - 256
Submitted on: Mar 11, 2016
Accepted on: Jun 7, 2016
Published on: Jul 22, 2016
Published by: Slovak Academy of Sciences, Mathematical Institute
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 times per year

© 2016 A. Özer, Y. M. Kornyychuk, V. Yurakhno, T. Öztürk, published by Slovak Academy of Sciences, Mathematical Institute
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.