Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Influence of Probiotics on Reproductive Parameters of Sows and Health of Their Sucklings Cover

The Influence of Probiotics on Reproductive Parameters of Sows and Health of Their Sucklings

By: R. Link,  P. Reichel and  P. Kyzeková  
Open Access
|Oct 2016

References

  1. 1. Alexopoulos, C., Georgoulakis, I., Tzivara, A., Kritas, S., Siochu, A., Kyriakis, S., 2004: Field evaluation of the efficacy of a probiotic containing Bacillus licheniformis and Bacillus subtilis spores, on the health status and performance of sows and their litters. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr., 88, 381—392.10.1111/j.1439-0396.2004.00492.x
  2. 2. Gracia, M., Hansen, S., Sanchez, J., Medel, P., Imasde Agropecuaria, S., 2004: Efficacy of addition of B. licheniformis and B. subtilis in pig diets from weaning to slaughter. J. Anim. Sci., 82 (Suppl. 1), 26.
  3. 3. Kenny, M., Smidt, H., Mengheri, E., Miller, B., 2011: Probiotics — do they have a role in the pig industry ? Animal, 5, 462—470.10.1017/S175173111000193X
  4. 4. Konstantinov, S. R., Awati, A. A., Williams, B. A., Miller, B. G., Jones, P., Stokes, C. R. et al., 2006: Post-natal development of the porcine microbiota composition and activities. Environmental Microbiology, 8, 1191—1199.10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01009.x
  5. 5. Kritas, S. K., Morrison, R. B., 2005: Evaluation of probiotics as a substitute for antibiotics in a large pig nursery. Vet. Rec., 156, 447—448.10.1136/vr.156.14.447
  6. 6. Kyriakis, S., Tsiloyiannis, V., Vlemmas, J., Sarris, K., Tsinas, A., Alexopoulos, C., Jansegers, L., 1999: The effect of probiotic LSP 122 on the control of postweaning diarrhoea syndrome of piglets. Res. Vet. Sci., 67, 223—228.10.1053/rvsc.1999.0308
  7. 7. Madsen, K. L., 2001: The use of probiotics in gastrointestinal disease. Can. J. Gastroenterol., 15, 817—822.10.1155/2001/690741
  8. 8. Munoz, V. D., Lanz, A. G. E., Lucero, P. M., Soria, F. A., Renteria, F. J. A., Cuaron, I. J. A. et al., 2007: Strategies for enhancing microbiological gut’s barrier: BMD BioPlus 2B. J. Anim. Sci., 85 (Suppl. 1), 150.
  9. 9. Samanya, M., Yamauchi, K. E., 2002: Histological alterations of intestinal villi in chickens fed dried Bacillus subtilis var. natto. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A Mol. Integr. Physiol., 133, 95—104.10.1016/S1095-6433(02)00121-6
  10. 10. Scharek, L., Guth, J., Filter, M., Schmidt, M. F. G., 2007: Impact of the probiotic bacteria Enterococcus faecium NCIMB 10415 (SF68) and Bacillus cereus var. toyoi NCIMB 40112 on the development of serum IgG and faecal IgA of sows and their pig-lets. Archives of Animal Nutrition, 61, 223—234.10.1080/1745039070143154017760301
  11. 11. Taras, D., Vahjen, W., Macha, M., Simon, O., 2005: Response of performance characteristics and faecal consistency to long-lasting dietary supplementation with the probiotic strain Bacillus cereus var. toyoi to sows and piglets. Archives of Animal Nutrition, 59, 405—417.10.1080/1745039050035316816429826
  12. 12. Yan, L., Kim, I. H., 2011: The apparent total tract digestibility, apparent ileal digestibility and faecal noxious gas content of growing pigs fed probiotics in diets. Wayamba Journal of Animal Science, 3, 121—123.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/fv-2016-0028 | Journal eISSN: 2453-7837 | Journal ISSN: 0015-5748
Language: English
Page range: 43 - 46
Submitted on: Jun 27, 2016
Published on: Oct 17, 2016
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2016 R. Link, P. Reichel, P. Kyzeková, published by The University of Veterinary Medicine and Pharmacy in Košice
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.