Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Forest management decision making based on a real options approach: An application to a case in northeastern Argentina Cover

Forest management decision making based on a real options approach: An application to a case in northeastern Argentina

Open Access
|Apr 2018

References

  1. Bayram, K., Ganikhodjaev, N. 2013. On pricing futures options on random binomial tree. – Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 435(1), 1–10.
  2. Bettinger, P., Boston, K., Siry, J., Grebner, D. 2009. Forest management and planning. Academic Press, California. 331 pp.
  3. Black, F., Scholes, M. 1973. The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities. – Journal of Political Economy, 8(3), 637–659.10.1086/260062
  4. Brandão, L.E., Dyer, J.S., Hahn, W.J. 2005. Using binomial decision trees to solve real options valuations problems. – Journal of Decision Analysis, 2(2), 69–88.
  5. Broz, D., Rossit, D.A., Rossit, D.G., Cavallin, A. 2018. The Argentinian forest sector: opportunities and challenges in supply chain management. Uncertain Supply Chain Management. (In press).10.5267/j.uscm.2018.1.001
  6. Broz, D.R., Woitschach, G.B., Milanesi, G. 2014. Real Options in determining the optimal forest harvesting. (Opções reais na determinação da idade ótima de colheita para dois manejos florestais). – Cerne, 20(1), 89–96. (In Portuguese).10.1590/S0104-77602014000100012
  7. Caprio, G. 2012. The evidence and impact of financial globalization. Academic Press, New York. 781 pp.
  8. Chidiak, M., Moreyra, A., Greco, C. 2003. Carbon capture and sustainable forest development in Patagonia Argentina: synergies and challenges. (Captura de carbono y desarrollo forestal sustentable en la Patagonia Argentina: Sinergias y Desafíos). CEPAL, Buenos Aires. 118 pp. (In Spanish).
  9. COIFORM. Colegio de Ingenieros Forestales de Misiones, Argentina. 2017. [WWW document]. – URL http://www.coiform.com.ar [Accessed 19 November 2017]. (In Spanish).
  10. Colcombet, L., Crechi, E., Keller, A., Pachas, N., Fassola, H., Lacorte, S., Esquivel, J. 2010. Preliminary comparison of financial and economic results of forestry, livestock and silvopastoral projects in Misiones. (Comparación preliminar de resultados financieros y económicos de proyectos forestales, ganaderos y silvopastoriles en Misiones). Acta 14, Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. [WWW document]. – URL http://inta.gob.ar/sites/default/files/script-tmp-inta-resultadosfinancieros-economicos.pdf [Accessed 19 March 2016]. (In Spanish).
  11. Cox, J., Ross, S., Rubinstein, M. 1979. Option pricing: A simplified approach. – Journal of Financial Economics, 7(3), 229–263.10.1016/0304-405X(79)90015-1
  12. Duku-Kaakyire, A., Nanang, D.M. 2004. Application of real options theory to forestry investment analysis. – Forest Policy and Economics, 6(6), 539–552.10.1016/S1389-9341(03)00003-0
  13. Fama, E., French, K. 2004. The capital asset pricing model: Theory and evidence. – Journal of Economic Perspectives, 18(3), 25–46.10.1257/0895330042162430
  14. Feenstra, R.C., Taylor, A.M. 2007. International Macroeconomics. Worth Publishers. 548 pp.
  15. Manley, B. 2013. How does real option value compare with Faustmann value in the context of the New Zealand Emissions Trading Scheme? – Forest Policy and Economics, 30, 14–22.10.1016/j.forpol.2013.02.001
  16. Markowitz, H. 1991. Portfolio selection: Efficient diversification of investments. John Wiley & Sons, Massachusetts. 400 pp.
  17. Merton, R. 1973. The theory of rational options princing. – The Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 4(1), 141–183.10.2307/3003143
  18. Milanesi, G., Woitschach, G., Broz, D. 2012. Application of the theory of real options to the determination of the optimal time of forest harvest. (Aplicación de la teoría de opciones reales a la determinación del momento óptimo de cosecha forestal). – Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias de la Universidad Nacional de Cuyo, 44, 65–78. (In Portuguese).
  19. Monicault, L.A., Delvalle, P. 2009. Economic-financial evaluation of a silvopastoral system (SSP). National Institute of Agricultural Technology. (Evaluación Económico–Financiero de un Sistema Silvopastoril (SSP). Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria). [WWW document]. – URL http://inta.gob.ar/sites/default/files/script-tmp-inta_evaluacin_econmicofinanciero_de_un_sist.pdf [Accessed 19 March 2016]. (In Spanish).
  20. Mun, J. 2002. Real options analysis: Tools and techniques for valuing strategic investment and decisions. John Wiley & Sons, Massachusetts. 386 pp.
  21. Olivera, E.B. 2011. Softwares for management and economic analysis of forest plantations. (Softwares para manejo e análise econômica de plantações florestais). Documento 216, Empresa Brasi leira de Pesquisa Agropecuária. [WWW document]. – URL http://www.infoteca.cnptia.embrapa.br/bitstream/doc/898050/1/Doc216.pdf [Accessed 19 March 2016]. (In Portuguese).
  22. Peltola, J., Knapp, K.C. 2001. Recursive preferences in forest management. – Forest Science, 47(4), 455–465.
  23. Petrasek, S., Perez-Garcia, J.M. 2010. Valuation of timber harvest contracts as American call options with modified least-squares Monte Carlo algorithm. – Forest Science, 56(5), 494–504.
  24. Plantinga, A.J. 1998. The optimal timber rotation: An option value approach. – Forest Science, 44(2), 192–202.
  25. Rubinstein, M. 1994. Implied Binomial Trees. – Journal of Finance, 49(3), 771–818.10.1111/j.1540-6261.1994.tb00079.x
  26. Sant’Anna, A.C., Nogueira, J.M. 2010. Economic valuation of environmental services of national forests. (Valoração econômica dos serviços ambientais de florestas nacionais). – Revista de Administração e Negócios da Amazônia, 2(2), 82–108. (In Portuguese).
  27. Smith, J. 2005. Alternative approach for solving real options problems. – Decision Analysis, 2(2), 89–102.
  28. Sun, C., Zhang, D. 2001. Assessing the financial perfor mance of forestry-related investment vehicles: Capital asset pricing model vs. arbitrage pricing theory. – American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 83(3), 617–628.10.1111/0002-9092.00182
  29. Thomson, T.A. 1992. Optimal forest rotation when stumpage prices follow a diffusion process. – Land Economics, 68(3), 329–342.10.2307/3146380
  30. Trifonov, Y., Yashin, S., Koshelev, E. 2013. Upgrading corporate equipment as an Asian real option with constant business volatility. – International Journal of Business and Social Science, 4(4), 76–89.
  31. Trigeorgis, L. 1995. Real options in capital investment: Models, strategies and applications. Praeger Publishers, California. 386 pp.
  32. Yao, W, Mei, B. 2015. Assessing forestry-related assets with the intertemporal capital asset pricing model. – Forest Policy and Economics, 50, 192–199.
  33. Yemshanov, D., McCarney, G.R., Hauer, G., Luckert (Marty), M.K., Unterschultz, J., McKenney, D.W. 2015. A real options-net present value approach to assessing land use change: A case study of afforestation in Canada. – Forest Policy and Economics, 50, 327–336.
  34. Yin, R. 2001. Combining forest-level analysis with options valuation approach – A new framework for assessing forestry investment. – Forest Science, 47(4), 475–483.
  35. Yin, R., Newman, D. 1997. When to cut a stand of trees? – Natural Resource Modeling, 10(3), 251–261.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/fsmu-2017-0015 | Journal eISSN: 1736-8723 | Journal ISSN: 1406-9954
Language: English
Page range: 97 - 108
Submitted on: Aug 16, 2017
Accepted on: Feb 19, 2018
Published on: Apr 25, 2018
Published by: Estonian University of Life Sciences
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2018 Diego Broz, Gastón Milanesi, Daniel Alejandro Rossit, Diego Gabriel Rossit, Fernando Tohmé, published by Estonian University of Life Sciences
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.