Have a personal or library account? Click to login
An overview of adaptative responses to drought stress in Eucalyptus spp. Cover

An overview of adaptative responses to drought stress in Eucalyptus spp.

Open Access
|Apr 2018

References

  1. Ali, I., Abbas, S.Q., Hameed, M., Naz, N., Zafar, S., Kanwal, S. 2009. Leaf anatomical adaptations in some exotic species of Eucalyptus L’Hér. (Myrtaceae). – Pakistan Journal of Botany, 41, 2717–2727.
  2. Barradas, C., Pinto, G., Correia, B., Castro, B.B., Phillips, A.J.L., Alves, A. 2017. Drought x disease interaction in Eucalyptus globulus under Neofusicoccum eucalyptorum infection. – Plant Pathology, 67, 87–96.
  3. Basu, S., Ramegowda, V., Kumar, A., Pereira, A. 2016. Plant adaptation to drought stress. – F1000 Research, 5, 1554.
  4. Batish, D.R., Singh, H.P, Kohli, R.K., Kaur, Sh. 2008. Eucalyptus essential oil as a natural pesticide. – Forest Ecology and Management, 256(12), 2166–2174.
  5. Beech, E., Rivers, M., Oldfield, S., Smith P.P. 2017. GlobalTreeSearch: The first complete global database of tree species and country distributions. – Journal of Sustainable Forestry, 36(5), 454–489.
  6. Bilal, H., Nisa, S., Ali, S.S. 2014. Effects of Exotic Eucalyptus Plantation on the Ground and Surface Water of District Malakand, Pakistan. – International Journal of Innovation and Scientific Research, 8(2), 299–304.
  7. Caldeira, M.C., Fernandéz, V., Tomé, J., Pereira, J.S. 2002. Eucalyptus longicorn borer response to tree water stress. – Annals of Forest Science, 59, 99–106.
  8. Christina, M., Nouvellon, Y., Laclau, J.P., Stape, J.L., Bouillet, J.P., Lambais, G.R., le Maire, G. 2017. Importance of deep water uptake in tropical eucalypt forest. – Functional Ecology, 31, 509–519.10.1111/1365-2435.12727
  9. Corrêa, T.R., Picoli, E.A.T., de Souza, G.A., Condé, S.A., Silva, N.M., Lopes-Mattos, K.L.B., de Resende, M.D.V, Zauza, E.A.V., Oda, S. 2017. Phenotypic markers in early selection for tolerance to dieback in Eucalyptus. – Industrial Crops and Products, 107, 130–138.
  10. Correia, B., Pintó-Marijuan, M., Neves, L., Brossa, R., Dias, M.C., Costa, A., Castro, B.B., Araújo, C., Santos, C., Chaves, M.M., Pinto, G. 2013. Water stress and recovery in the performance of two Eucalyptus globulus clones: physiological and biochemical profiles. – Physiologia Plantarum, 150(4), 580–592.
  11. Coutinho, T.A., Wingfield, M.J. 2017. Ralstonia solanacearum and R. pseudosolanacearum on Eucalyptus: Opportunists or primary pathogens? – Frontiers in Plant Science, 8, article 761, doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00761.10.3389/fpls.2017.00761542548428553301
  12. De Almeida, M. R., Aumond, M. Jr., Da Costa, C.T., Schwambach, J., Ruedell, C.M., Correa, L.R., Fett- Neto, A.G. 2017. Environmental control of adventitious rooting in Eucalyptus and Populus cuttings. – Trees, 31, 1377–1390.
  13. Doran, J.C., Bell, R.E. 1994. Influence of non-genetic factors on yield of monoterpenes in leaf oils of Eucalyptus camaldulensis. – New Forest, 8(4), 363–379.
  14. du Toit, B., Malherbe, G.F., Kunneke, A., Seifert, T., Wessels, C.B. 2017. Survival and long-term growth of eucalypts on semi-arid sites in a Mediterranean climate, South Africa. – Southern Forests: a Journal of Forest Science, 79(3), 235–249.10.2989/20702620.2016.1254914
  15. Du, H., Zeng, F., Peng, W., Wang, K., Zhang, H., Liu, L., Song, T. 2015. Carbon Storage in a Eucalyptus Plantation Chronosequence in Southern China. – Forests, 6, 1763–1778.
  16. Emara, S, Shalaby, A.E. 2011. Seasonal variation of fixed and volatile oil percentage of four Eucalyptus spp. related to lamina anatomy. – African Journal Plant Science, 5(6), 353–359.
  17. ENCE. 2009. Sustainable Forest Management and Eucalyptus, Grupo Empresarial ENCE, Spain. 76 pp.
  18. FAO. 1982. Eucalyptus in reforestation. (Les eucalyptus dans les reboisements). Rome, Italy. 783 pp. (In French).
  19. FAO. 2011. Eucalyptus in East Africa, Socio-economic and environmental issues, by Gessesse Dessie, Teklu Erkossa. Planted Forests and Trees Working Paper 46/E, Forest Management Team, Forest Management Division. FAO, Rome. 30 pp.
  20. Fladung, M., Schroeder, H., Wehenkel, C., Kersten, B. 2015. Differentiation of six Eucalyptus trees grown in Mexico by ITS and six chloroplast barcoding markers. – Silvae Genetica, 64(3), 121–13010.1515/sg-2015-0012
  21. Gonçalves, J.L.M., Alvares, C.A., Rocha, J.H.T., Brandani, C.B., Rodrigo, H.R. 2017. Eucalypt plantation management in regions with water stress. – Southern Forests: a Journal of Forest Science, 1, 1–15.
  22. Graciano, C., Guiamet, J.J., Goya, J.F. 2006. Fertilization and water stress interactions in young Eucalyptus grandis plants. – Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 36, 1028–1034.10.1139/x05-301
  23. Granda, V., Cuesta, C., Alvarez, R., Ordas, R., Centeno, M.L., Rodriguez, A., Majada, J.P., Fernandez, B., Feito, I. 2011. Rapid responses of C14 clone of Eucalyptus globulus to root drought stress: timecourse of hormonal and physiological signaling. – Journal of Plant Physiology, 168, 661–670.
  24. Granda, V., Delatorre, C., Cuesta, C., Centeno, M., Fernandez, B., Rodriguez, A., Feito, I. 2014. Physiological and biochemical responses to severe drought stress of nine Eucalyptus globulus clones: a multivariate approach. – Tree Physiology, 34(7), 778–786.10.1093/treephys/tpu05225009154
  25. Hodecker, B.E.R. 2015. Comparison of drought stress responses of tolerant and sensitive Eucalypt genotypes. University of Viçosa, Minas Gerais-Brasil. 148 pp.
  26. Hojjati, M., Barzeg, H. 2017. Chemical composition and biological activities of lemon (Citrus limon) leaf essential oil. – Nutrition and Food Sciences Research, 4(4), 15–24.
  27. Joshi, M. Palanisami, K. 2011. Impact of Eucalyptus plantations on ground water availability in South Karnataka. – ICID 21st International Congress on Irrigation and Drainage, 255–262.
  28. Khouja, M.L., Khaldi, A., Rejeb, M.N. 2001. Results of the Eucalyptus introduction trials in Tunisia. – Proceedings of the international conference. Eucalyptus in the Mediterranean basin: Perspectives and new utilization, 163–168.
  29. Labate, C.A., de Assis, T.F., Oda, S. et al. 2008. Eucalyptus. – Kole, C.H., Hall, T.C. (eds.). Compendium of transgenic crop plants: transgenic forest trees species. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, 35–108.
  30. Laclau, J.P., da Silva, E.A., Lambais, G.R., Bernoux, M., le Maire, G., Stape, J.L., Bouillet, J.P., Gonçalves, J.L.M., Jourdan, CH., Nouvellon, Y. 2013. Dynamics of soil exploration by fine roots down to a depth of 10 m throughout the entire rotation in Eucalyptus grandis plantations. – Frontiers in Plant Science, Functional Plant Ecology, 4(243), 1–12.
  31. Leicach, S.R., Garau, A.M., Guarnaschelli, A.B., Grass, M.A.Y., Sztarker, N.D., Dato, A. 2010. Changes in Eucalyptus camaldulensis essential oil composition as response to drought preconditioning. – Journal of Plant Interactions, 5(3), 205–210.
  32. Leicach, S.R., Yaber G.M.A., Chludil, H.D., Garau, A.M., Guarnaschelli, A.B., Fernandez, P.C. 2012. Chemical defenses in Eucalyptus species: A sustainable strategy based on antique knowledge to diminish agrochemical dependency, new advances and contributions to forestry research. – Oteng-Amoako, A.A. (ed.). New Advances and Contributions to Forestry Research, 225–256.
  33. Lima, W.P., Jarvis, P., Rhizopoulou, S. 2003. Stomatal responses of Eucalyptus species to elevated CO2 concentration and drought stress. – Scientia Agricola, 60(2), 231–238.10.1590/S0103-90162003000200005
  34. Lin, Y.S. 2012. How will Eucalyptus tree species respond to global climate change? – A comparison of temperature responses of photosynthesis. PhD Thesis, University of Western Sydney. 185 pp.
  35. Lundqvist, S.O., Grahn, T., Olsson, L., Seifert, T. 2017. Comparison of wood, fibre and vessel properties of drought-tolerant eucalypts in South Africa. – Southern Forests: a Journal of Forest Science, 79(3), 215–225.10.2989/20702620.2016.1254910
  36. Manika, N., Mishra, P., Kumar, N., Chanotiya, C.S., Bagchi, G.D. 2012. Effect of season on yield and composition of the essential oil of Eucalyptus citriodora Hook. leaf grown in sub-tropical conditions of North India. – Journal of Medicinal Plants Research, 6(14), 2875–2879.10.5897/JMPR11.1611
  37. Martorell, S., Diaz-Espejo, A., Medrano, H., Ball, M.C., Choat, B. 2013. Rapid hydraulic recovery in Eucalyptus pauciflora after drought: linkages between stem hydraulics and leaf gas exchange. – Plant, Cell and Environment, 37, 617–626.
  38. Maseda, P.H., Fernández, R.J. 2016. Growth potential limits drought morphological plasticity in seedlings from six Eucalyptus provenances. –Tree Physiology, 36, 243–251.
  39. Matos, F.S., Oliveira, P.R.C., Anciotti Gil, J.L.R., de Sousa, P.V., Gonçalves, G.A., Sousa, M.P.B.L., da Silveira, P.S., da Silva, L.M. 2016. Eucalyptus urocan drought tolerance mechanisms. – African Journal of Agricultural Research, 11(18), 1617–1622.
  40. McDonnell, L.M., Coleman, H.D., French, D.G., Meilan, R., Mansfield, S.D. 2010. Engineering Trees with Target Traits. –El-Kassaby, Y.A., Prado, J.A. (eds.). Forests and Genetically Modified Trees, FAO, Rome, 77–122.
  41. McKiernan, A.B., Potts, B.M., Brodribb, T., Hovenden, M.J., Davies, N.W., McAdan, S.A., Ross, J.J., Rodemann, T., O’Reilly-Wapstra, J.M. 2016. Responses to mild water deficit and rewatering differ among secondary metabolites but are similar among provenances within Eucalyptus species. – Tree Physiology, 36, 133–147.
  42. McKiernan, A.B., Potts, B.M., Hovenden, M.J., Brodribb, T.J., Davies, N.W., Rodemann, T., McAdam, S.A.M., O’Reilly-Wapstra, J.M. 2017. A water availability gradient reveals the deficit level required to affect traits in potted juvenile Eucalyptus globulus. – Annals of Botany, 119(6), 1043–1052.
  43. Merchant, A., Callister, A., Arndt, S., Tausz, M., Adams, M.A. 2007. Contrasting physiological responses of six Eucalyptus species to water deficit. – Annals of Botany, 100, 1507–1515.10.1093/aob/mcm234275922117905722
  44. Minhas, P.S., Yadav, R.K., Lal, K., Chaturvedi, R.K. 2015. Effect of long-term irrigation with wastewater on growth, biomass production and water use by Eucalyptus (Eucalyptus tereticornis Sm.) planted at variable stocking density. – Agricultural Water Management, 152, 151–160.10.1016/j.agwat.2015.01.009
  45. Mitchell, P.J., O’Grady, A.P., Tissue, D.T., White, D.A., Ottenschlaeger, M.L., Pinkard, E.A. 2013. Drought response strategies define the relative contributions of hydraulic dysfunction and carbohydrate depletion during tree mortality. – New Phytologist, 197, 862–872.
  46. Morris, J., Zhang, N.N., Yang, Z.J., Collopy, J., Xu, D.P. 2004. Water use by fastgrowing Eucalyptus urophylla plantations in southern China. – Tree Physiology, 24, 1035–1044.10.1093/treephys/24.9.103515234901
  47. Myburg, A., Grattapaglia, D., Tuskan, G., Hellsten, U., Hayes, R., Grimwood, J., et al. 2014. The genome of Eucalyptus grandis. – Nature, 509, 356–362.
  48. OECD. 2016. Eucalyptus (Eucalyptus spp.) – Safety Assessment of Transgenic Organisms in the Environment. OECD Consensus Documents, OECD Publishing, Paris, 6, 245–323.
  49. Ouyanga, Y., Xu, D., Leininger, T.D., Zhang, N. 2016. A system dynamic model to estimate hydrological processes and water use in a eucalypt plantation. – Ecological Engineering, 86, 290–299.10.1016/j.ecoleng.2015.11.008
  50. Pfautsch, S., Harbusch, M., Wesolowski, A., Smith, R., Macfarlane, C., Tjoilker, M.G., Reich, P.B., Adams, M.A. 2016. Climate determines vascular traits in the ecologically diverse genus Eucalyptus. – Ecology Letters, 19, 240–248.10.1111/ele.1255926743135
  51. Potts, B.M. 2004. Genetic improvements of eucalypts. – Burley, J., Evans, J., Youngquist, J.A. (eds.) Encyclopedia of Forest Sciences. Elsevier Academic Press, Oxford, 1480–1490.
  52. Queiroz, T.B., Pereira, N.N.J., Silva, J.C.R.L., da Fonseca, F.S.A., Martins E.R. 2017. Influence of water regime on initial growth and essential oil of Eucalyptus globulus. (Influência do regime hídrico sobre o crescimento inicial e óleo essencial de Eucalyptus globulus). – Ciência Rural, Santa Maria, 47(03), e20150530. (In Portuguese).10.1590/0103-8478cr20150530
  53. Ramsfield, T.D., Bentz, B.J., Faccoli, M., Jactel, H., Brockerhoff, E.G. 2016. Forest health in a changing world: effects of globalization and climate change on forest insect and pathogen impacts. – Forestry, 89, 245–252.10.1093/forestry/cpw018
  54. Sadlon, A.E., Lamson, D.W. 2010. Immune-modifying and antimicrobial effects of Eucalyptus oil and simple inhalation devices. – Alternative Medicine Review, 15(1), 33–47.
  55. Schühli, G.S., Penteado, S.Ch., Barbosa, L.R., Filho, W.R., Lede, E.T. 2016. A review of the introduced forest pests in Brazil. (Um artigo de revisão sobre pragas florestais introduzidas no Brasil). – Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, 51(5), 397–406. (In Portuguese).10.1590/S0100-204X2016000500001
  56. Searson, M.J., Thomas, D.S., Montagu, K.D., Conroy, J.P. 2004. Wood density and anatomy of waterlimited eucalypts. – Tree Physiology, 24, 1295–1302.10.1093/treephys/24.11.129515339739
  57. Seaton, S., Matusick, G., Ruthrof, K.X., Hardy, G.E.St.J. 2015. Outbreak of Phoracanthasemipunctata in Response to Severe Drought in a Mediterranean Eucalyptus Forest. – Forests, 6, 3868–3881.
  58. Shvaleva, A., Costa e Silva, F, Breia, E., Jouve, J., Hausman, J.F., Almeida, M.H., Maroco, J.P., Rodrigues, M.L., Pereira, J.S., Chaves, M.M. 2005. Metabolic responses to water deficit in two Eucalyptus globulus clones with contrasting drought sensitivity. – Tree Physiology, 26, 239–248.10.1093/treephys/26.2.23916356921
  59. Silva, I.M.A., de Souza, M.W.R., Rodrigues, A.C.P., Correia, L.P.S., Veloso, R.V.S., dos Santos, J.B., Titon, M., Gonçalves, J.F., de Laia, M.L. 2016a. Determination of parameters for selection of Eucalyptus clones tolerant to drought. – African Journal of Agricultural Research, 11(40), 3940–3949.
  60. Silva, P.H.M., Campoe, O.C., de Paula, R.C., Lee, D.J. 2016b. Seedling growth and physiological responses of sixteen eucalypt taxa under controlled water regime. – Forests, 7(6), 110.
  61. Sousa, A.O., Assis, E.T.C.M., Pirovani, C.P., Alvim, F.C., Costa, M.G.C. 2014. Phosphate-induced-1 gene from Eucalyptus (EgPHI-1) enhances osmotic stress tolerance in transgenic tobacco Genetics and Molecular Research, 13(1), 1579–1588.
  62. Spokevicius, A.V., Tibbits, J., Rigault, P., Nolin, M.A., Müller, C., Merchant, A. 2017. Medium term water deficit elicits distinct transcriptome responses in Eucalyptus species of contrasting environmental origin. – BMC Genomics, 18(1), 284.10.1186/s12864-017-3664-z538398528388878
  63. Stape, J.L., Binkley, D., Ryan, M.G., Gomes, A.N. 2004. Water use, water limitation, and water use efficiency in a Eucalyptus plantation Water use, water limitation, and water use efficiency in a Eucalyptus plantation. – Bosque, 25(2), 35–41.
  64. Susiluoto, S., Berninger, F. 2007. Interactions between morphological and physiological drought responses in Eucalyptus microtheca. – Silva Fennica, 41(2), 221–233.
  65. Szota, Ch., Farrell, C., Koch, J.M., Lambers, H., Veneklaas, E.J. 2011. Contrasting physiological responses of two co-occurring eucalypts to seasonal drought at restored bauxite mine sites. – Tree Physiology, 31(10), 1052–1066.
  66. Valadares, J., de Paula, N.F., de Paula, R.C. 2014. Physiological changes in eucalyptus hybrids under different irrigation regimes. – Revista Ciência Agronômica, 45(4), 805–814.
  67. Valdés, A.E., Irar, S., Majada, J.P., Rodriguez, A., Fernandez, B., Pagès, M. 2013. Drought tolerance acquisition in Eucalyptus globulus (Labill.): A research on plant morphology, physiology and proteomics. – Journal of Proteomics, 79, 263–276.10.1016/j.jprot.2012.12.01923313219
  68. Vecchio, M.G., Loganes, C., Minto, C. 2016. Beneficial and healthy properties of Eucalyptus plants: A great potential use. – The Open Agriculture Journal, 10(suppl. 1, M3), 52–57.
  69. Warrier, R.R., Jayaraj, R.S.C., Balu, A. 2013. Variation in gas exchange characteristics in clones of Eucalyptus camaldulensis under varying conditions of CO2. – Journal of Stress Physiology & Biochemistry, 9(3), 333–344.
  70. Wessels, C.B., Crafford, P.L., du Toit, B., Grahn, T., Johansson, M., Lundqvist, S.O., Säll, H., Seifer, T. 2016. Variation in physical and mechanical properties from three drought tolerant Eucalyptus species grown on the dry west coast of Southern Africa. – European Journal of Wood and Wood Products, 4, 563–575.
  71. Whitehead, D., Beadle, C.L. 2004. Physiological regulation of productivity and water use in Eucalyptus: a review. – Forest Ecology and Management, 193, 113–140.
  72. Williams, R.A. 2015. Mitigating biodiversity concerns in Eucalyptus plantations located in South China. – Journal of Biosciences and Medicines, 3, 1–8.
  73. Wills A., Far, J.D. 2016. Gum leaf skeletoniser Urab alugens (Lepidoptera: Nolidae) larval outbreaks occur in high rainfall Western Australian jarrah. – Australian Entomology, doi:10.1111/aen.12255.10.1111/aen.12255
  74. Zahid, D. M., Shah, F. R., Majeed A. 2010. Planting Eucalyptus camaldulensis in arid environment – Is it useful species under water deficit system. – Pakistan Journal of Botany, 42(3), 1733–1744.
  75. Zhang, W.J. 2012. Did Eucalyptus contribute to environment degradation? Implications from a dispute on causes of severe drought in Yunnan and Guizhou, China. – Environmental Skeptics and Critics, 1(2), 34–38.
  76. Zhou, Sh.X., Medlyn, B.E., Prentice, I.C. 2016. Longterm water stress leads to acclimation of drought sensitivity of photosynthetic capacity in xeric but not riparian Eucalyptus species. – Annals of Botany, 117, 133–144.
  77. Zweifel, R., Drew, D.M., Schweingruber, F., Downes, G.M. 2014. Xylem as the main origin of stem radius changes in Eucalyptus. – Functional Plant Biology, 41, 520–534.10.1071/FP1324032481010
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/fsmu-2017-0014 | Journal eISSN: 1736-8723 | Journal ISSN: 1406-9954
Language: English
Page range: 86 - 96
Submitted on: Sep 18, 2017
Accepted on: Jan 5, 2018
Published on: Apr 25, 2018
Published by: Estonian University of Life Sciences
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2018 Ezzeddine Saadaoui, Kaouther Ben Yahia, Samir Dhahri, Mohamed Lahbib Ben Jamaa, Mohamed Larbi Khouja, published by Estonian University of Life Sciences
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.