Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Pruning effect on Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) growth and quality Cover

Pruning effect on Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) growth and quality

Open Access
|Oct 2017

References

  1. Amateis, R.L., Burkhart, H.E. 2011. Growth of young loblolly pine trees following pruning. – Forest Ecology and Management, 262(12), 2338–2343.
  2. Bergström, B., Gref, R., Ericsson, A. 2004. Effects of pruning on heartwood formation in Scots pine trees. – Journal of Forest Science, 50(1), 11–16.
  3. Bergström, R., Vikberg, M. 1992. Winter browsing on pine and birch in relation to moose population density. – Alces, 1, 127–131.
  4. Blomqvist, A.G. 1879. On growing of trees. (Om uppqvistning af träd). – Finska Forstföreningens Meddelanden, 1, 1–18. (In Swedish).
  5. Čermák, P., Strejček, M. 2007. Stem decay by Stereum sanguinolentum after red deer damage in the Českomoravská vrchovina highlands. – Journal of Forest Science, 53, 567–572.
  6. Christiansen, E., Krokene, P., Berryman, A.A., Franceschi, V.R., Krekling, T., Lieutier, F., Lönnborg, A., Solheim, H. 1999. Mechanical injury and fungal infection induce acquired resistance in Norway spruce. – Tree Physiology, 19, 399–403.10.1093/treephys/19.6.39912651562
  7. Coder, K.D. 1998. Pruning effects on tree growth: Growth regulation consequences (Tree growth control systems series). Athens, University of Georgia Service of Forest Resources. 3 pp.
  8. Deal, R.L., Barbour, R.J., Mcclellan, M.H., Parry, D.L. 2003. Development of epicormic sprouts in Sitka spruce following thinning and pruning in southeast Alaska. – Forestry, 76(4), 401–412.10.1093/forestry/76.4.401
  9. Edenius, L., Bergman, M., Ericsson, G., Danell, K. 2002. The role of moose as a disturbance factor in managed boreal forests. – Silva Fennica, 36, 57–67.
  10. Fight, R.D., Bolon, N.A., Cahill, J.M. 1993. Financial analysis of pruning Douglas-fir and ponderosa pine in the Pacific Northwest. – Western Journal of Applied Forestry, 8(2), 58–61.
  11. Gill, R.M.A. 1992. A review of damage by mammals in north temperate forests: 1. Deer. – Forestry, 65(2), 145–169.10.1093/forestry/65.2.145
  12. Gill, R.M.A. 2003. The economic implications of deer damage in woodlands and forests. – The future for deer: The Deer Initiative Conference, 28–29 March 2003. Peterborough, English Nature Research Reports, 548, 26–31.
  13. Gill, R.M.A., Webber, J., Peace, A. 2000. The economic implications of deer damage: a review of current evidence. Final report for The Deer Commission for Scotland. Surrey, Alice Holt Lodge. 49 p.
  14. Grönvall, A. 1908. A little about pruning of Norway spruce. (Vähän näreitten karsimisesta). – Tapio, 1(9), 378–379. (In Finnish).
  15. Heikinheimo, O. 1953 Artificial pruning of trees. (Puiden keinollisesta karsimisesta). – Metsätaloud Aikak, 76(12), 399–402. (In Finnish with English summary).
  16. Hein, S., Weiskittel, A.R., Kohnle, U. 2008. Branch characteristics of widely spaced Douglas-fir in south-western Germany: Comparisons of modelling approaches and geographic regions. – Forest Ecology and Management, 256(5), 1064–1079.
  17. Heiskanen, V. 1959. Studies on pruning of birch. Helsinki. 68 pp.
  18. Heräjärvi, H. 2002. Internal knottiness with respect to sawing patterns in Betula pendula and B. pubescens. – Baltic Forestry, 8(1), 42–50.
  19. Hörnberg, S. 2001. Changes in population density of moose (Alces alces) and damage to forests in Sweden. – Forest Ecology and Management, 149, 141–151.
  20. Houllier, F., Leban, J.M., Colin, F. 1995. Linking growth modelling to timber quality assessment for Norway spruce. – Forest Ecology and Management, 74, 91–102.
  21. Hyvän metsänhoidon suositukset. 2006. (Finnish Guidelines for Good Silviculture). Helsinki, Metsätalouden kehittämiskeskus Tapio. 59 pp. (In Finnish).
  22. Ikonen, V.P., Kellomäki, S., Peltola, H. 2009. Sawn timber properties of Scots pine as affected by initial stand density, thinning and pruning: a simulation based approach. – Silva Fennica, 43(3), 411–431.10.14214/sf.197
  23. Jactel, H., Branco, M., Gonzalez-Olabarria, J.R., Grodzki, W., Langstom, B., Moreira, F., Netherer, S., Orazio, C., Piou, D., Santos, H., Schelhaas, M.J., Tojic, K., Vodde, F. 2011. Forest stands management and vulnerability to biotic and abiotic hazards. Technical Report 64. European Forest Institute, Finland. 88 pp.
  24. Jäppinen, A. 2000. Automatic sorting of sawlogs by grade. Summary. PhD Thesis, Uppsala, Acta Universitatis Agriculturae Sueciae. 41 pp.
  25. Kraft, G. 1884. Contributions to the science of thinnings, coupe designs and interventions for light management. (Beiträge zur Lehre von den Durchforstungen, Schlagstellungen und Lichtungshieben). Hannover, Klindworth’s Verlag. 147 pp. (In German).
  26. Krigul T. 1961. Pine and spruce stands pruning. (Männi-ja kuusepuistute laasimine). Tartu, Loodusuurijate Selts. 194 pp. (In Estonian).
  27. Lakari, O.J. 1920. Studies on pruning of Norway spruce. (Tutkimuksia kuusen karsimisesta). – Communicationes Instituti Forestalis Fenniae, 2, 1–43. (In Finnish with German summary).
  28. Liepa, I. 1996. Theory of increment. (Pieauguma mācība). Jelgava, LLU. 124 pp. (In Latvian).
  29. Liepa, I., Zalkalns, O. 2014. The Diversity of the environmental impact in Kurzeme. – Journal of Life Science, 8(7), 570–581.
  30. Lyly, O., Saksa, T. 1992. The effect of stand density on moose damage in young Pinus sylvestris stands. – Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 7, 393–403.10.1080/02827589209382732
  31. Macdonald, E., Hubert, J. 2001. A review of the effects of silviculture on timber quality of Sitka spruce. – Forestry, 75(2), 107–138.
  32. Mäkinen, H. 1999. Growth, suppression, death, and self-pruning of branches of scots pine in southern and central Finland. – Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 29, 585–594.10.1139/x99-026
  33. Mäkinen, H., Ojansuu, R., Sairanen, P., Yli-Kojola, H. 2003. Predicting branch characteristics of Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) from simple stand and tree measurements. – Forestry, 76(5), 525–546.10.1093/forestry/76.5.525
  34. Mattheck, C., Kubler, H. 1995. Wood: The internal optimization of trees. Berlin, Springer Verlag. 129 pp.
  35. McLaughlin, W., Šica, L. 1996. Bark striping caused by moose and an its related fungal infection. (Aļņu radītie mizas plēsumi parastai eglei un ar tiem saistītās trupes izraisitaju infekcijas). – Mežzinātne, 39(6), 26–37. (In Latvian).
  36. Metzler, B. 1996. Fungal infection rate and healing process after green pruning in Norway spruce. Forest Planning and Management Tools (EEC-Project AIR1-CT92-0715). Final Report. Germany, 200–208.
  37. Metzler, B. 1997. Quantitative assessment of fungal colonization in Norway spruce after green pruning. – European Journal of Forest Pathology, 27, 1–11.10.1111/j.1439-0329.1997.tb00848.x
  38. Metzler, B., Hecht, U., Nill, M., Brüchert, F., Fink, S., Kohnle, U. 2012. Comparing Norway spruce and silver fir regarding impact of bark wounds. – Forest Ecology and Management, 274, 99–107.
  39. Meyers, S.P. 1995. Profit potential from pruning: a look from down under. – The economics of commercial pruning and certification in New Zealand. School of Forestry. Auburn, Auburn University. p 15.
  40. O’Hara, K.L. 1991. A biological justification for pruning in coastal Douglas-fir stands. – Western Journal of Applied Forestry, 6(3), 59–63.
  41. O’Hara, K.L. 2007. Pruning wounds and occlusion: A long-standing conundrum in forestry. – Journal of Forestry, 105(3), 131–138.
  42. Paterson, A. 1938. The occlusion of pruning wounds in Norway spruce (Picea excelsa). – Annals Botany, 2(3), 681–698.10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a084026
  43. Petruncio, M., Briggs, D., Barbour, R.J. 1997. Predicting pruned branch stub occlusion in young, coastal Douglas-fir. – Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 27(7), 1074–1082.10.1139/x97-037
  44. Philips, H. 2004. Pruning adds value to plantations. [WWW document]. URL http://www.coford.ie/media/coford/content/publications/projectreports/cofordconnects/Pruning.pdf [Accessed 1 March 2017].
  45. Pinkard, E.A., Beadle, C.L. 2000. A physiological approach to pruning. – International Forestry Review, 2(4), 295–305.
  46. Pruning Your Forest Trees. 2006. [WWW document]. URL http://www.shelterwoodmaine.com/pdf/pruning%20trees.pdf [Accessed 1 March 2017].
  47. R Development Core Team. 2011. R: A language and environment for statistical computing, Vienna, R Foundation for Statistical Computing ISBN 3-900051-07-0. [WWW document]. – URL http://www.R-project.org/. [Accessed 21 February 2017].
  48. Rinn, F. 1996. TSAP Reference Manual: computer program for tree ring analysis and presentation. Version 3.0. Heidelberg. 262 pp.
  49. Romell, L.G. 1937. Results of natural and artificial pruning in Scots pine. (Kvistrensning och över-vallning hos okvistad och torrkvistad tall). – Journal of Swedish Forest Society, 35, 299–328, (In Swedish with English summary).
  50. Rytter, L., Jansson, G. 2009. Influence of pruning on wood characters in hybrid aspen. – Silva Fennica, 43, 689–698.
  51. Schatz, U., Herajarvi, H., Kannisto, K., Rantatalo, M. 2008. Influence of saw and secateur pruning on stem discolouration, wound cicatrisation and diameter growth of Betula pendula. – Silva Fennica, 42, 295–305.
  52. Schwerdtfeger, F. 1955. Pathogenese der Borkenkiifer-Epidemie 1946–1950 in Nordwestdeutschland. (Pathogenesis of bark beetle epidemic 1946–1950 in north-wetern Germany). G. Göttingen, Schriftenreihe der Forstlichen Fakultt der Universität Göttingen. 135 pp. (In German).
  53. Šmits, A., Striķe, Z., Liepa, I. 2008. Effect of defoliation caused by European pine sawfly Neodiprion sertifer Geoffr. on Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.). (Priežu rūsganās zāģlapsenes (Neodiprion sertifer Geoffr.) izraisītās defoliācijas ietekme uz priežu (Pinus sylvestris L.) pieaugumu). – Mežzinātne, 18(51), 53–73. (In Latvian).
  54. State Forest Service. 2015. State Forest Service, Annual Report 2015. (Valsts Meža Dienests. 2015. Gada pārskats). [WWW document]. – URL https://www.zm.gov.lv/public/files/CMS_Static_Page_Doc/00/00/00/84/06/Publiskaisparskats2015.pdf [Accessed 18 July 2017]. (In Latvian).
  55. Tomppo, E. 1996. Multi-source national forest inventory of Finland. – Proceedings of the Subject Group S4.02-00 “Forest Resource Inventory and Monitoring” and Subject Group S4.12-00 Remote Sensing Technology, Joensuu, Finland, 1996. – European Forestry Institute Proceedings, 7, 27–41.
  56. Tong, Q., Duchesne, I., Belley D., Beaudoin, M., Swift, E. 2013. Characterization of knots in plantation white spruce. – Wood and Fiber Science, 45(1), 1–14.
  57. Vasiliauskas, R. 2001. Damage to trees due to forestry operations and its pathological significance in temperate forests: a literature review. – Forestry, 74(4), 319–336.10.1093/forestry/74.4.319
  58. Venho, B. 1915. Observations on decay defects caused by pruning in Norway spruce. (Havaintoja karsimisen aiheuttamista lahovioista kuusessa). – Metsätaloud Aikak, 2(11), 332–339. (In Finnish).
  59. Víquez, E., Pérez, D. 2005. Effect of pruning on tree growth, yield, and wood properties of Tectona grandis plantations in Costa Rica. – Silva Fennica, 39(3), 381–390.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/fsmu-2017-0005 | Journal eISSN: 1736-8723 | Journal ISSN: 1406-9954
Language: English
Page range: 33 - 48
Submitted on: Mar 2, 2017
Accepted on: May 15, 2017
Published on: Oct 23, 2017
Published by: Estonian University of Life Sciences
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2017 Endijs Baders, Janis Donis, Guntars Snepsts, Andis Adamovics, Aris Jansons, published by Estonian University of Life Sciences
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.