Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Online streaming public participation in forest management planning Cover

Online streaming public participation in forest management planning

Open Access
|Oct 2017

References

  1. Black, J. 2008. Constructing and contesting legitimacy and accountability in polycentric regulatory regimes. – Regulation & Governance, 2(2), 137–164.
  2. Buijs, A., Lawrence, A. 2013. Emotional conflicts in rational forestry: Towards a research agenda for understanding emotions in environmental conflicts. – Forest Policy and Economics, 33, 104–111.10.1016/j.forpol.2012.09.002
  3. Eastaugh, C.S., Kangur, A., Korjus, H., Kiviste, A., Zlatanov, T., Velichkov, I., Srdjevic, B., Srdjevic, Z., Hasenauer, H. 2013. Scaling issues and constraints in modelling of forest ecosystems: a review with special focus on user needs. – Baltic Forestry, 19(2), 316–330.
  4. Edwards, P., Kleinschmit, D. 2013. Towards a European forest policy – conflicting courses. – Forest Policy and Economics, 33, 87–93.10.1016/j.forpol.2012.06.002
  5. Gadow, K. v. 2000. Evaluating risk in forest planning models. – Silva Fennica, 34(2), 181–191.
  6. Hellström, E. 2001. Conflict cultures – qualitative comparative analysis of environmental conflicts in forestry. – Silva Fennica Monographs, 2, 109 pp.10.14214/sf.sfm2
  7. Holmgren, P., Thuresson, T. 1997. Applying objectively estimated and spatially continuous forest parameters in tactical planning to obtain dynamic treatment units. – Forest Science, 43(3), 317−326.
  8. Hynynen, J., Ojansuu, R., Hökkä, H., Siipilehto, J., Salminen, H., Haapala, P. 2002. Models for predicting stand development in MELA system. – Metsäntut-kimuslaitoksen tiedonantoja, 835, 116 pp.
  9. Karppinen, H. 1998. Values and objectives of non-industrial private forest owners in Finland. – Silva Fennica, 32, 43–59.
  10. Khadka, C., Hujala, T., Wolfslehner, B., Vacik, H. 2013. Problem structuring in participatory forest planning. – Forest Policy and Economics, 26, 1−11.10.1016/j.forpol.2012.09.008
  11. Kimmins, J.P. 1987. Forest ecology: models and the role in ecology and resource management. Macmillan Publishing Company, New York, 460-474.
  12. Kiviste, A., Hordo, M., Kangur, A., Kardakov, A., Laarmann, D., Lilleleht, A., Metslaid, S., Sims, A., Korjus, H. 2015. Monitoring and modeling of forest ecosystems: the Estonian Network of Forest Research Plots. – Forestry studies / Metsanduslikud uurimused, 62, 26−38.
  13. Krott, M. 2005. Forest policy analysis. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag. 323 pp.
  14. Lindkvist, A., Mineur, E., Nordlund, A., Nordlund, C., Olsson, O., Sandström, C., Westin, K., Keskitalo, E.C.H. 2012. Attitudes on intensive forestry. An investigation into perceptions of increased production requirements in Swedish forestry. – Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 27(5), 438–448.10.1080/02827581.2011.645867
  15. Nordström, E.-M., Eriksson, L.O., Öhman, K. 2010. Integrating multiple criteria decision analysis in participatory forest planning: Experience from a case study in northern Sweden. – Forest Policy and Economics, 12(8), 562–574.
  16. Põllumäe, P., Korjus, H., Paluots, T. 2014. Management motives of Estonian private forest owners. – Forest Policy and Economics, 42, 8−14.10.1016/j.forpol.2014.02.007
  17. Raitio, K. 2012. New institutional approach to collaborative forest planning on public land: Methods for analysis and lessons for policy. – Land Use Policy, 29(2), 309–316.10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.07.001
  18. Raitio, K. 2013. Discursive institutionalist approach to conflict management analysis – The case of oldgrowth forest conflicts on state-owned land in Finland. – Forest Policy and Economics, 33, 97–103.10.1016/j.forpol.2012.06.004
  19. Schröter, M., Rusch, G.M., Barton, D.N., Blumentrath, S., Nordén, B. 2014. Ecosystem services and opportunity costs shift spatial priorities for conserving forest biodiversity. – PLOS ONE, 9(11), e112557.
  20. Sims, A., Hordo, M., Kangur, A., Kiviste, K., Jõgiste, K., von Gadow, K. 2009. Tracking disturbances induced changes in stand development on irregular measurement intervals in the Järvselja forest experiments. – Baltic Forestry, 15(2), 151−160
  21. Sténs, A., Sandström, C. 2013. Divergent interests and ideas around property rights: The case of berry harvesting in Sweden. – Forest Policy and Economics, 33, 56–62.
  22. Transparency International 2017. Open governance. [WWW document]. – URL http://www.transparency.org.uk/our-work/uk-corruption/open-governance/ [Accessed 28 April 2017].
  23. United Nations. 1992. Internationally agreed glossary of basic terms related to disaster management. United Nations Department of Humanitarian Affairs, Geneva.
  24. Wolfslehner, B., Seidl, R. 2010. Harnessing ecosystem models and multi-criteria decision analysis for the support of forest management. – Environmental Management, 46(6), 850–861.10.1007/s00267-009-9414-520024654
  25. Zachrisson, A., Beland Lindahl, K. 2013. Conflict resolution through collaboration: Preconditions and limitations in forest and nature conservation controversies. – Forest Policy and Economics, 33, 39–46.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/fsmu-2017-0001 | Journal eISSN: 1736-8723 | Journal ISSN: 1406-9954
Language: English
Page range: 5 - 13
Submitted on: Feb 16, 2017
Accepted on: May 4, 2017
Published on: Oct 23, 2017
Published by: Estonian University of Life Sciences
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2017 Henn Korjus, Priit Põllumäe, Andres Kiviste, Ahto Kangur, Diana Laarmann, Risto Sirgmets, Mait Lang, published by Estonian University of Life Sciences
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.