Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Spatial considerations of an area restriction model for identifying harvest blocks at commercial forest plantations Cover

Spatial considerations of an area restriction model for identifying harvest blocks at commercial forest plantations

Open Access
|Dec 2016

References

  1. Baskent, E. Z., Keles, S., 2005: Spatial forest planning: A review. Ecological Modelling, 188:145–173.
  2. Borges, P., Bergseng, E., Eid, T., Gobakken, T., 2015: Impact of maximum opening area constraints on profitability and biomass avalability in forestry – A large, real world case. Silva Fennica 49:1–21.
  3. Bruce, J. C., Han, H. S., Akay, A. E., Chung, W., 2011: ACCEL: Spreadsheet-Based Cost Estimation for Forest Road Construction. Western Journal of Applied Forestry, 26:189–197.
  4. Buongiorno, J., Gilles, J. K., 2003: Decision methods for forest resource management. Academic Press, 439 p.
  5. Crowe, K. A., Nelson, J. D., Boyland, M., 2003: Solving the area-restricted harvest scheduling model using the branch and bound algorithm. Canadian Journal of Forest Resource, 33:1804–1814.
  6. Emmingham, W. L., Oester, P., Bennett, M., Kukulka, F., Conrad, K., Michel, A., 2002: Comparing short-term financial aspects of four management options in Oregon: implications for uneven-aged management. Forestry, 75:489–494.
  7. Falcão, A. O., Borges, J. G., 2003: Heuristics for integrating strategic and operational levels in large scale forest management problems. Scientia Forestalis, 63:94–102.
  8. Hokans, R. H., 1983: Evaluating spatial feasibility of harvest schedules with simulated stand-selection decisions. Journal of Forestry, 81:601–603.
  9. Kašpar, J., Marušák, R., Bettinger P., 2016: Time Efficiency of Selected Types of Adjacency Constraints in Solving Unit Restriction Models. Forests, 7:102.
  10. Konôpka, J., Konôpka, B., 2008: Prognóza náhodných ťažieb v smrečinách v dôsledku mechanicky pôsobiacich abiotických škodlivých činiteľov v oblasti Kysuce a Orava, Tatry, Spiš, Slovenské rudohorie. Lesnícky časopis - Forestry Journal, 54:325–346.
  11. Lockwood, C., Moore, T., 1993: Harvest scheduling with spatial constraints: A simulated annealing approache. Canadian Journal of Forest Resource, 23:468–478.
  12. Lohmander, P., Helles, F., 1987: Windthrow probability as a function of stand characteristics and shelter. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 2:227–238.
  13. Marušák, R., Kašpar, J., 2015: Spatially-constrained harvest scheduling with respect to environmental requirements and silvicultural system. Lesnícky časopis-Forestry Journal, 61:71–77.
  14. Marušák, R., Kašpar, J., Vopěnka, P., 2015: Decision Support System (DSS) Optimal – A case study from the Czech Republic. Forests, 6:163–182.
  15. McDill, M., Rebain, S., Braze, J., 2002: Harvest scheduling with area-based adjacency constraints. Forest Science, 48:631–642.
  16. Murray, A. T., 1999: Spatial Restrictions in Harvest Scheduling. Forest Science, 45:45–52.
  17. Murray, A. T., Weintraub, A., 2002: Scale and unit specification influences in harvest scheduling with maximum area restrictions. Forest Science, 48:779–789.
  18. Öhman, K., Eriksson, L. O., 2010: Aggregating harvest activities in long term forest planning by minimizing harvest area perimeters. Silva Fennica, 44:77–89.
  19. Palma, C. D., Nelson, J. D., 2013: A Robust Model for Protecting Road-Building and Harvest-Scheduling Decisions from Timber Estimate errors. Forest Science, 60:137–148.
  20. Pasalodos-Tato, M., Mäkinen, A., Garcia-Gonzalo, J., Borges, J. G., Lämås, T., Eriksson, L. O., 2013: Review. Assessing uncertainty and risk in forest planning and decision support systems: review of classical methods and introduction of innovative approaches. Forest Systems, 22:282–303.
  21. Richards, E. W., Gunn, E. A., 2000: A Model and Tabu Search Method to Optimize Stand Harvest and Road Construction Schdeules. Forest Science, 46:188–203.
  22. Spinelli, R., Owende, P. M. O., Ward, S. M., Ronero, M., 2004: Comparison of Short-Wood Forwarding Systems Used in Iberia. Silva Fennica, 38:85–94.
  23. Tiernan, D., Nieuwenhuis, M., 2005. Financial optimisation of forest-level harvest scheduling in Ireland – A case study. Journal of Forest Economics, 11:21–43.
  24. Vopěnka, P., Kašpar, J., Marušák, R., 2015: GIS tool for optimization of harvest-scheduling. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 113:254–259.
  25. Zeng, H., Peltola, H., Talkkari, A., Venalainen, A., Strandmanm H., Kellomäki, S. et al., 2004: Influence of clear-cutting on the risk of wind damage at forests edges. Forest and Ecology Management, 203:77–88.
  26. Zeng, H., Peltola, H., Väisänen, H., Kellomäki, S., 2009: The effects of fragmentation on the susceptinility of boreal forest ecosystem to wind damage. Forest Ecology and Management, 257:1165–1173.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/forj-2016-0017 | Journal eISSN: 2454-0358 | Journal ISSN: 2454-034X
Language: English
Page range: 146 - 151
Published on: Dec 8, 2016
Published by: National Forest Centre and Czech University of Life Sciences in Prague, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2016 Jan Kašpar, Gerardo F. E. Perez, Adelaide Cerveira, Róbert Marušák, published by National Forest Centre and Czech University of Life Sciences in Prague, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.